Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
It's not a whataboutism. It was Brad's addiction that hurt the family. |
You don't actually know any of that. Sounds like child rearing decisions, volatile tempers, mental health issues, and lots of other things hurt the family. |
NP. Brad literally said himself it was because of his alcoholism |
And? A relationship, a marriage, a divorce - there's not just one word to describe these things. Alcohol is only one part, and it was partly the result of the other reasons, not the cause of them. |
And according to the words of your idol, youre wrong. Get over it. |
+1 Brad has been very frustrated that she refuses to her own her side of the street. Then again, when has she ever. |
She will never admit she has any flaws. In her mind, she has become a victim, saint and martyr all in one. Brad didn’t roll over and give her 100% of what she wanted in the divorce, so she was determined to hurt him and ruin his relationship with his children. |
DP. I think you are getting your timing confused. She was addicted to heroin in the 90's before she became a parent. Brad was addicted in the 90's, 2000's and forward while parenting. If you don't understand the difference, well you're being intentionally hypocritical and obtuse. |
DP. They are saying that based upon recent images of her and recent behavior, that they think she has recently taken illicit substances. |
There used to be regular blinds about her popping benzos. Given her history and high-strung temperament, seems likely. At any rate, I'm quite sure Brad has plenty of dirt on her as far as her mental health is concerned. The ED is obvious. And didn't she talk about him finding her curled up in a ball crying on the shower floor at one point? |
Blinds? Lol. Brad would have bought this up during their custody. You're just saying this to put blame off Brad and his addiction. |
How do you know he didn’t? The proceeding were sealed. No one knows what was discussed during the hearing. He could have brought up drug use, her eating disorder and mental health issues. He won 50/50 custody from the judge, so he obviously presented information that he was a good parent or that she had issues. |
The judge indicated parental alienation was a factor, and clearly felt Brad was a committed parent and sober, therefore merited 50-50 custody. Who knows what Brad did or did not say about Jolie's problems. It was probably more about demonstrating his fitness as a parent. |
You're being obtuse. If she was an active addict then he would have became the primary parent and she wouldn't have been alone with the kids just as he couldn't have been. He obtained joint custody under a judge that was later disqualified. If he presented information that showed she shouldn't be around the kids as much then he would have another trial to obtain joint custody. It's Brad's addiction. Not her. |
The judge did warn her about parental alienation. This is not something Brad and his fans invented. It’s Jolie’s documented behavior. She was obstructing his visits with the children and monitoring his phone calls and texts with the children. She did everything to interfere in his relationship with his children and prevent them from reconciling. |