EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her


A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.


Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3


What iconic films has Angelina starred in? All of her films suck. She’s never starred in a movie that’s been nominated for a Best Picture Oscar. She was a talentless “B” movie actress who only kept her name in the news by publicizing her personal life. Now that she’s old and ugly, the roles have dried up. She tried directing, but she sucks at it too. She tried creating a fashion house, but it’s a flop because she has no sense of style. She’s a talentless, old washed up hag who doesn’t want to work. She only wants to b***h about her ex-husband and live off his money. She needed her ex-husband to loan her money to buy a house, since she’s a lazy, washed up wastrel who doesn’t work (just like her talentless nepo kids). Those kids are defective because of her bad parenting. Brad has made it clear he will have more kids with a normal, sane, good mom.


OMG, you’re an INCEL.


That part. They can pretend this has anything to do with the kids and they don't have animosity toward them.


You do understand that one post is a truly unhinged troll, right?


Oh I do lol. I don't really see stans like this irl or even here like this anymore so I like to engage sometimes. I am not even a big Angelina fan but it ticks me off how his fans act like the care about the kids while tearing them down in the same breath. They aren't fooling anyone but other boomers
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her


A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

And that is a sign of abuse. If she is the broke parent as you insist, why is he continuingly dragging her back into the court keeping that winery sale alive. What is his end objective, for he cannot get that portion of the winery back. That ship has sailed. Is it to bankrupt her. Great, you win because that is a sign of abuse to try and leave the mother of your children bankrupt.


Angelina broke the contract she and Brad had. She sold her shares to the winery behind his back. He woke up one morning to a press release that he had a new business partner that he had already turned down. The lawsuit is against Jolie, her former company Nouvel, and Stoli and its ownership. He is seeking to keep control of his winery and either undo the illegal sale or recoup monetary damages for the harm he has suffered as a result of the sale. The judge has already said Angelina failed to prove that they did not have an implied in fact contract. Brad can recoup damages from her for her illegal actions. She sought an unearned profit by selling her shares and gained money based on the money and work that he put into the winery. Angelina did nothing for the winery and harmed Brad and his partner Marc Perrin by selling her shares to a partner they don’t want involved in their business. It’s not abuse to sue someone who has harmed you. But you seem to believe Angelina can do whatever she wants and Brad just has to accept her malicious actions without fighting back.

Now you’re making things up, basically using kellyanne Conway alternative facts. No judge has ruled there was an implied contract. In fact, implied contracts are hard to prove due to ambiguity and what was intended along with consideration and more. If the judge had made that ruling, they still would not be litigating the merits of the case.


The judge refused to throw out the claims against Angelina for breach of implied-in-fact contract and breach of quasi-contract. She said Brad had proven the elements of the contract. We will see at trial what a jury says, because Angelina should be ordered to pay damages to Brad for her illegal sale.


No she didn't. At all. She said there could be a contract. They get to argue the merits of the case at the summary judgement.




Proof. "Regarding Defendant's factual arguments as to whether the parties' conduct actually resulted in a contract, the Court is not inclined to resolve this issue on demurrer." It's only that one could exist not that one actually did and a contract was actually formed.

And proof of shiloh. She helps with her dance studio but has worked for the past year or so. You only see kids as a tool to help Brad's image. If not you wouldn't be disparaging them all them time. You see relationships as transactional which is why you went straight to "when they need money/connections they will run back to him" not to reconnect based on a genuine relationship.





I'm not the person to whom you are responding and I agree that people should not be talking about the kids in any disparaging way whatsoever.

But it's absolutely ridiculous to say that the kid's are a tool to help Brad's image. Angelina has used those children as props for her PR for years and years. She seemingly cannot go anywhere without being pictured with at least one of them or clinging onto them at red carpets, award ceremonies, involving them in all her endeavors (fashion house, movies, theater, etc.). It's as if she knows no one will pay attention to her if she isn't pictured with one of her kids.



You only see kids as a tool to help Brad's image YOU.

Which is 100% true. You were salivating at the thought it would be a situation where it was the bio vs adopted ones. That Shiloh and the twins would run to Brad once they turn 18. Now that's clearly not and was never the case, you're disparaging the bio ones too. It's all transactional for you. That's why you keep repeating he will have kids as if that changes anything.


Clearly you are confused about who you are responding to. Lol

I understand that you are likely an unhinged troll. But for the record there have been no repetitious posts from me. I personally never believed shiloh was moving in with brad. And your rant about bio kids vs adopted kids is insulting.

And now I’m done with you

Signed- mom of an adopted child
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her


A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.


Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3


Lol, no. She's a legend in your mind. She's a washed up former actress to everyone else.


LOL no she's not?


Can you list some of her accomplishments? Why is she so admirable?


In her industry, here is a list of her accomplishments. Looks like the industry has nominated her for several awards and recognitions into 2024. You may or may not consider her accomplishments admirable, but others would differ. A lot of people in her industry would jump at the chance to have her resume.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Angelina_Jolie#:~:text=The%20following%20is%20a%20list%20of%20awards%20and,%281997%29%2C%20Gia%20%281998%29%2C%20and%20Girl%2C%20Interrupted%20%281999%29%2C%20respectively.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her


A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.


Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3


What iconic films has Angelina starred in? All of her films suck. She’s never starred in a movie that’s been nominated for a Best Picture Oscar. She was a talentless “B” movie actress who only kept her name in the news by publicizing her personal life. Now that she’s old and ugly, the roles have dried up. She tried directing, but she sucks at it too. She tried creating a fashion house, but it’s a flop because she has no sense of style. She’s a talentless, old washed up hag who doesn’t want to work. She only wants to b***h about her ex-husband and live off his money. She needed her ex-husband to loan her money to buy a house, since she’s a lazy, washed up wastrel who doesn’t work (just like her talentless nepo kids). Those kids are defective because of her bad parenting. Brad has made it clear he will have more kids with a normal, sane, good mom.


OMG, you’re an INCEL.


That part. They can pretend this has anything to do with the kids and they don't have animosity toward them.


You do understand that one post is a truly unhinged troll, right?


Oh I do lol. I don't really see stans like this irl or even here like this anymore so I like to engage sometimes. I am not even a big Angelina fan but it ticks me off how his fans act like the care about the kids while tearing them down in the same breath. They aren't fooling anyone but other boomers

No need to spray us all with that nasty brush. You have to know that we do not think that a man who emotionally and physically abandons his children is a good thing. All his children could not be wrong. Sometimes I think many people give Brad a pass for being a deadbeat, alcoholic father because they hated how Brad mistreated Anniston in the breakup and aftermath. Not realizing that his behavior in that relationship was a precursor to how he treated his next marriage, and children was two-times worse.
Anonymous
Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her


A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.

And that is a sign of abuse. If she is the broke parent as you insist, why is he continuingly dragging her back into the court keeping that winery sale alive. What is his end objective, for he cannot get that portion of the winery back. That ship has sailed. Is it to bankrupt her. Great, you win because that is a sign of abuse to try and leave the mother of your children bankrupt.


Angelina broke the contract she and Brad had. She sold her shares to the winery behind his back. He woke up one morning to a press release that he had a new business partner that he had already turned down. The lawsuit is against Jolie, her former company Nouvel, and Stoli and its ownership. He is seeking to keep control of his winery and either undo the illegal sale or recoup monetary damages for the harm he has suffered as a result of the sale. The judge has already said Angelina failed to prove that they did not have an implied in fact contract. Brad can recoup damages from her for her illegal actions. She sought an unearned profit by selling her shares and gained money based on the money and work that he put into the winery. Angelina did nothing for the winery and harmed Brad and his partner Marc Perrin by selling her shares to a partner they don’t want involved in their business. It’s not abuse to sue someone who has harmed you. But you seem to believe Angelina can do whatever she wants and Brad just has to accept her malicious actions without fighting back.

Now you’re making things up, basically using kellyanne Conway alternative facts. No judge has ruled there was an implied contract. In fact, implied contracts are hard to prove due to ambiguity and what was intended along with consideration and more. If the judge had made that ruling, they still would not be litigating the merits of the case.


The judge refused to throw out the claims against Angelina for breach of implied-in-fact contract and breach of quasi-contract. She said Brad had proven the elements of the contract. We will see at trial what a jury says, because Angelina should be ordered to pay damages to Brad for her illegal sale.


No she didn't. At all. She said there could be a contract. They get to argue the merits of the case at the summary judgement.




Proof. "Regarding Defendant's factual arguments as to whether the parties' conduct actually resulted in a contract, the Court is not inclined to resolve this issue on demurrer." It's only that one could exist not that one actually did and a contract was actually formed.

And proof of shiloh. She helps with her dance studio but has worked for the past year or so. You only see kids as a tool to help Brad's image. If not you wouldn't be disparaging them all them time. You see relationships as transactional which is why you went straight to "when they need money/connections they will run back to him" not to reconnect based on a genuine relationship.





I'm not the person to whom you are responding and I agree that people should not be talking about the kids in any disparaging way whatsoever.

But it's absolutely ridiculous to say that the kid's are a tool to help Brad's image. Angelina has used those children as props for her PR for years and years. She seemingly cannot go anywhere without being pictured with at least one of them or clinging onto them at red carpets, award ceremonies, involving them in all her endeavors (fashion house, movies, theater, etc.). It's as if she knows no one will pay attention to her if she isn't pictured with one of her kids.



You only see kids as a tool to help Brad's image YOU.

Which is 100% true. You were salivating at the thought it would be a situation where it was the bio vs adopted ones. That Shiloh and the twins would run to Brad once they turn 18. Now that's clearly not and was never the case, you're disparaging the bio ones too. It's all transactional for you. That's why you keep repeating he will have kids as if that changes anything.


Clearly you are confused about who you are responding to. Lol

I understand that you are likely an unhinged troll. But for the record there have been no repetitious posts from me. I personally never believed shiloh was moving in with brad. And your rant about bio kids vs adopted kids is insulting.

And now I’m done with you

Signed- mom of an adopted child


😴😴
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?



Never. She has branded herself a victim and martyr. In her mind, she’s perfect, and Brad is solely responsible for their failed marriage.

She uses the kids as a weapon against him. After he won his recent motion in their court case, she struck back by having the kids publicly drop his last name. Then she pretended she had nothing to do with it, and the kids made the decision on their own. She is so transparent.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?



Never. She has branded herself a victim and martyr. In her mind, she’s perfect, and Brad is solely responsible for their failed marriage.

She uses the kids as a weapon against him. After he won his recent motion in their court case, she struck back by having the kids publicly drop his last name. Then she pretended she had nothing to do with it, and the kids made the decision on their own. She is so transparent.


That doesn't make any sense. The kids had already dropped his name before that. I can find articles that Shiloh hasn't been using it for years. She turned 18 and then legally dropped it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her


A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.


Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3


Lol, no. She's a legend in your mind. She's a washed up former actress to everyone else.


LOL no she's not?


Can you list some of her accomplishments? Why is she so admirable?


In her industry, here is a list of her accomplishments. Looks like the industry has nominated her for several awards and recognitions into 2024. You may or may not consider her accomplishments admirable, but others would differ. A lot of people in her industry would jump at the chance to have her resume.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Angelina_Jolie#:~:text=The%20following%20is%20a%20list%20of%20awards%20and,%281997%29%2C%20Gia%20%281998%29%2C%20and%20Girl%2C%20Interrupted%20%281999%29%2C%20respectively.


You don’t know why you like her and included a wikipedia link? What? Im aware of her trash movies and questionable lifestyle choices. I don’t get the adoration at all. I guess there’s nothing there.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because Brad is a loser and an abuser and she's not gonna let him wriggle out of it. HE keeps dragging her back in court and she fights back every time. Good for her


A loser? Angelina is the barely employed almost broke parent with too many kids still complaining about her ex. Nobody admires that woman or thinks she's a winner.


Angelina is a legend and huge with young women. She's an icon and extremely looked up to. And her kids all love her and hate their deadbeat, loser, abuser father. Angie wins <3


Lol, no. She's a legend in your mind. She's a washed up former actress to everyone else.


LOL no she's not?


Can you list some of her accomplishments? Why is she so admirable?


In her industry, here is a list of her accomplishments. Looks like the industry has nominated her for several awards and recognitions into 2024. You may or may not consider her accomplishments admirable, but others would differ. A lot of people in her industry would jump at the chance to have her resume.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Angelina_Jolie#:~:text=The%20following%20is%20a%20list%20of%20awards%20and,%281997%29%2C%20Gia%20%281998%29%2C%20and%20Girl%2C%20Interrupted%20%281999%29%2C%20respectively.


You don’t know why you like her and included a wikipedia link? What? Im aware of her trash movies and questionable lifestyle choices. I don’t get the adoration at all. I guess there’s nothing there.



.........
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?




All of this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


I disagree. It has everything to do with Angelina. She is still upset about the divorce and presents a negative narrative about Brad to the children and presents herself as a victim of his actions. If she was able to move on, the kids would be as well. However, she has engaged in parental alienation and tried to deny Brad a relationship with his children.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


I disagree. It has everything to do with Angelina. She is still upset about the divorce and presents a negative narrative about Brad to the children and presents herself as a victim of his actions. If she was able to move on, the kids would be as well. However, she has engaged in parental alienation and tried to deny Brad a relationship with his children.


Brad created and continues to present a negative narrative about himself. They are victims of his actions and they don't have to accept his apology or have a relationship with him right now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Neither Brad nor Angelina should get a pass on their abhorrent behavior toward Aniston.

Some of us however believe that separating a father from his children so she could “win” whatever marital issues they are/were having is horrid behavior and would be toxic for any family.

By Angelina’s own accounting for 10-plus years, he was an excellent father and supportive of her through health issues etc

He owned up to his failings. When will she take responsibility for hers?


Just because he has owned up to his failings doesn’t mean the kids have to or will forgive him though. The world is full of alcoholics who get clean and their kids are still uninterested in having a relationship with them. You don’t always get a mulligan in life and that has nothing to do with Angelina.


But you're willing to look the other way for a heroin addict. Hm.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: