Tufts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harvard’ recruited its current President from Tufts.

This is from his official Harvard biography:.

As President of Tufts from 2001 to 2011, Bacow advanced the university’s commitment to excellence in teaching, research, and public service and fostered collaboration across the university’s eight schools. Under his leadership, Tufts pursued initiatives to enhance the undergraduate experience, deepen graduate and professional education and research in critical fields, broaden international engagement, and promote active citizenship among members of the university community.

Not sure what this is meant to prove. One of Harvard's former presidents, Nathan Pusey, was recruited from Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin. Does that somehow make Lawrence a prestigious university by association?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard’ recruited its current President from Tufts.

This is from his official Harvard biography:.

As President of Tufts from 2001 to 2011, Bacow advanced the university’s commitment to excellence in teaching, research, and public service and fostered collaboration across the university’s eight schools. Under his leadership, Tufts pursued initiatives to enhance the undergraduate experience, deepen graduate and professional education and research in critical fields, broaden international engagement, and promote active citizenship among members of the university community.

Not sure what this is meant to prove. One of Harvard's former presidents, Nathan Pusey, was recruited from Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin. Does that somehow make Lawrence a prestigious university by association?

Pusey was President 1953. Please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard’ recruited its current President from Tufts.

This is from his official Harvard biography:.

As President of Tufts from 2001 to 2011, Bacow advanced the university’s commitment to excellence in teaching, research, and public service and fostered collaboration across the university’s eight schools. Under his leadership, Tufts pursued initiatives to enhance the undergraduate experience, deepen graduate and professional education and research in critical fields, broaden international engagement, and promote active citizenship among members of the university community.

Not sure what this is meant to prove. One of Harvard's former presidents, Nathan Pusey, was recruited from Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin. Does that somehow make Lawrence a prestigious university by association?

Pusey was President 1953. Please.

...So? He was president of Harvard until 1971. What's the point you're trying to make about Tufts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard’ recruited its current President from Tufts.

This is from his official Harvard biography:.

As President of Tufts from 2001 to 2011, Bacow advanced the university’s commitment to excellence in teaching, research, and public service and fostered collaboration across the university’s eight schools. Under his leadership, Tufts pursued initiatives to enhance the undergraduate experience, deepen graduate and professional education and research in critical fields, broaden international engagement, and promote active citizenship among members of the university community.

Not sure what this is meant to prove. One of Harvard's former presidents, Nathan Pusey, was recruited from Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin. Does that somehow make Lawrence a prestigious university by association?

Pusey was President 1953. Please.

...So? He was president of Harvard until 1971. What's the point you're trying to make about Tufts?

29TH PRESIDENT OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY

Lawrence S. Bacow
Bacow was the Hauser Leader-in-Residence at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government’s Center for Public Leadership and served as a member of the Harvard Corporation, the university’s principal governing board. One of the most widely experienced leaders in American higher education, known for his commitment to expanding student opportunity, catalyzing academic innovation, and encouraging universities’ civic engagement and service to society, Bacow is the former President of Tufts University and past Chancellor and Chair of the Faculty at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

As President of Tufts from 2001 to 2011, Bacow advanced the university’s commitment to excellence in teaching, research, and public service and fostered collaboration across the university’s eight schools. Under his leadership, Tufts pursued initiatives to enhance the undergraduate experience, deepen graduate and professional education and research in critical fields, broaden international engagement, and promote active citizenship among members of the university community.

While at Tufts, Bacow emerged as a nationally recognized champion of expanding access to higher education through need-based student aid, while also advocating vigorously for federal support of university-based research. He worked to engender novel connections across academic disciplines and among Tufts’ wide array of schools and helped craft a new partnership between the university and its principal teaching hospital, Tufts Medical Center. Bacow convened an international conference of higher education leaders in 2005 to initiate the Talloires Network, a global association of colleges and universities committed to strengthening the civic roles and social responsibilities of higher education. He launched Tufts’ Office of Institutional Diversity and highlighted inclusion as a cornerstone of the university’s excellence. He also strengthened relations between Tufts and its host communities and expanded outreach to alumni, parents, and friends. While guiding Tufts through the global financial crisis of 2008-09 and its aftermath, he brought to fruition the most ambitious fundraising campaign in the university’s history."

[Anonymous]

^This is embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I attended, I think Tufts was ranked 24. I've seen it fall over the decades to now be 30. I think it is placed correctly and I think it might fall further. It's a tweener university - it's in between - not a small elite liberal arts college (Tufts is enrollment is 2.0- 2.5x the size of Williams and Amherst) and doesn't have endowments and research capabilities that NYU and Emory have, nor does it have the man-on-the street brand recognition that BC does. I worked in MA for several years after graduation and I worked with people who knew Bridgewater State but had never heard of Tufts. It only has cache in NY, NJ, DC areas.

Bad take. It was only ranked that high very briefly and only because of the common app came out opening the flood gates of apps to a bunch of schools screwing with the numbers and causing other schools around that range to take a hit for a hot minute. Sounds like you must have gone around then in the late 90s. That 24th ranking was a mirage...

It’s probably a very solid school that isn’t going to close doors or hamstring the prospects of motivated students. It’s not an IVY or top 20 school. Figuring out whether it is better than Tulane or Wake Forest or Emory is splitting hairs and should come down to fit for DC.

If two kids for those schools app for Med school or Law school with the exact same stats would “Rochester” vs “Tufts” be a deciding factor for admissions? Doubt it

...But Emory is a top 20 school, and Tulane does not come close to what Emory is. Neither does Tufts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I attended, I think Tufts was ranked 24. I've seen it fall over the decades to now be 30. I think it is placed correctly and I think it might fall further. It's a tweener university - it's in between - not a small elite liberal arts college (Tufts is enrollment is 2.0- 2.5x the size of Williams and Amherst) and doesn't have endowments and research capabilities that NYU and Emory have, nor does it have the man-on-the street brand recognition that BC does. I worked in MA for several years after graduation and I worked with people who knew Bridgewater State but had never heard of Tufts. It only has cache in NY, NJ, DC areas.

Bad take. It was only ranked that high very briefly and only because of the common app came out opening the flood gates of apps to a bunch of schools screwing with the numbers and causing other schools around that range to take a hit for a hot minute. Sounds like you must have gone around then in the late 90s. That 24th ranking was a mirage...

It’s probably a very solid school that isn’t going to close doors or hamstring the prospects of motivated students. It’s not an IVY or top 20 school. Figuring out whether it is better than Tulane or Wake Forest or Emory is splitting hairs and should come down to fit for DC.

If two kids for those schools app for Med school or Law school with the exact same stats would “Rochester” vs “Tufts” be a deciding factor for admissions? Doubt it

...But Emory is a top 20 school, and Tulane does not come close to what Emory is. Neither does Tufts.

+1 people try to increase the prestige of the school they are affiliated with. No one puts Tulane is the same sentence with Emory. One is 20 the other is 40ish I believe. Similar thing with Wake.

[Anonymous]

You get you just did, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You get you just did, right?

No, I didn't try to associate Emory with any other schools, like the PPs are trying to associate the other schools with Emory.

[Anonymous]

But you used it in the same sentence as Tulane.

[Anonymous]

I went to Tufts in the late 90s and loved it. I chose it over other highly regarded schools and do not regret my choice. What OP says about it being near Boston and not in the city was a big selling factor for me- campus feel but not in the middle of nowhere. Not too big, not too small. The atmosphere was not too extreme in any way, and it attracted all types.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I attended, I think Tufts was ranked 24. I've seen it fall over the decades to now be 30. I think it is placed correctly and I think it might fall further. It's a tweener university - it's in between - not a small elite liberal arts college (Tufts is enrollment is 2.0- 2.5x the size of Williams and Amherst) and doesn't have endowments and research capabilities that NYU and Emory have, nor does it have the man-on-the street brand recognition that BC does. I worked in MA for several years after graduation and I worked with people who knew Bridgewater State but had never heard of Tufts. It only has cache in NY, NJ, DC areas.

Bad take. It was only ranked that high very briefly and only because of the common app came out opening the flood gates of apps to a bunch of schools screwing with the numbers and causing other schools around that range to take a hit for a hot minute. Sounds like you must have gone around then in the late 90s. That 24th ranking was a mirage...

It’s probably a very solid school that isn’t going to close doors or hamstring the prospects of motivated students. It’s not an IVY or top 20 school. Figuring out whether it is better than Tulane or Wake Forest or Emory is splitting hairs and should come down to fit for DC.

If two kids for those schools app for Med school or Law school with the exact same stats would “Rochester” vs “Tufts” be a deciding factor for admissions? Doubt it

...But Emory is a top 20 school, and Tulane does not come close to what Emory is. Neither does Tufts.

I mean technically it’s not. At least it’s not in the top 20 for US News. Maybe top 20 in another set of rankings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I attended, I think Tufts was ranked 24. I've seen it fall over the decades to now be 30. I think it is placed correctly and I think it might fall further. It's a tweener university - it's in between - not a small elite liberal arts college (Tufts is enrollment is 2.0- 2.5x the size of Williams and Amherst) and doesn't have endowments and research capabilities that NYU and Emory have, nor does it have the man-on-the street brand recognition that BC does. I worked in MA for several years after graduation and I worked with people who knew Bridgewater State but had never heard of Tufts. It only has cache in NY, NJ, DC areas.

Bad take. It was only ranked that high very briefly and only because of the common app came out opening the flood gates of apps to a bunch of schools screwing with the numbers and causing other schools around that range to take a hit for a hot minute. Sounds like you must have gone around then in the late 90s. That 24th ranking was a mirage...

It’s probably a very solid school that isn’t going to close doors or hamstring the prospects of motivated students. It’s not an IVY or top 20 school. Figuring out whether it is better than Tulane or Wake Forest or Emory is splitting hairs and should come down to fit for DC.

If two kids for those schools app for Med school or Law school with the exact same stats would “Rochester” vs “Tufts” be a deciding factor for admissions? Doubt it

21! It’s not like this is for Olympic medals and Emory is left off the medal podium in 4th place. Sheesh.
...But Emory is a top 20 school, and Tulane does not come close to what Emory is. Neither does Tufts.

I mean technically it’s not. At least it’s not in the top 20 for US News. Maybe top 20 in another set of rankings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I attended, I think Tufts was ranked 24. I've seen it fall over the decades to now be 30. I think it is placed correctly and I think it might fall further. It's a tweener university - it's in between - not a small elite liberal arts college (Tufts is enrollment is 2.0- 2.5x the size of Williams and Amherst) and doesn't have endowments and research capabilities that NYU and Emory have, nor does it have the man-on-the street brand recognition that BC does. I worked in MA for several years after graduation and I worked with people who knew Bridgewater State but had never heard of Tufts. It only has cache in NY, NJ, DC areas.

Bad take. It was only ranked that high very briefly and only because of the common app came out opening the flood gates of apps to a bunch of schools screwing with the numbers and causing other schools around that range to take a hit for a hot minute. Sounds like you must have gone around then in the late 90s. That 24th ranking was a mirage...

It’s probably a very solid school that isn’t going to close doors or hamstring the prospects of motivated students. It’s not an IVY or top 20 school. Figuring out whether it is better than Tulane or Wake Forest or Emory is splitting hairs and should come down to fit for DC.

If two kids for those schools app for Med school or Law school with the exact same stats would “Rochester” vs “Tufts” be a deciding factor for admissions? Doubt it

21! It’s not like this is for Olympic medals and Emory is left off the medal podium in 4th place. Sheesh.
...But Emory is a top 20 school, and Tulane does not come close to what Emory is. Neither does Tufts.

Emory 2020 acceptance rate: 22%
Tulane 2020 acceptance rate: 24%
Tufts 2020 acceptance rate: 14%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I attended, I think Tufts was ranked 24. I've seen it fall over the decades to now be 30. I think it is placed correctly and I think it might fall further. It's a tweener university - it's in between - not a small elite liberal arts college (Tufts is enrollment is 2.0- 2.5x the size of Williams and Amherst) and doesn't have endowments and research capabilities that NYU and Emory have, nor does it have the man-on-the street brand recognition that BC does. I worked in MA for several years after graduation and I worked with people who knew Bridgewater State but had never heard of Tufts. It only has cache in NY, NJ, DC areas.

Bad take. It was only ranked that high very briefly and only because of the common app came out opening the flood gates of apps to a bunch of schools screwing with the numbers and causing other schools around that range to take a hit for a hot minute. Sounds like you must have gone around then in the late 90s. That 24th ranking was a mirage...

It’s probably a very solid school that isn’t going to close doors or hamstring the prospects of motivated students. It’s not an IVY or top 20 school. Figuring out whether it is better than Tulane or Wake Forest or Emory is splitting hairs and should come down to fit for DC.

If two kids for those schools app for Med school or Law school with the exact same stats would “Rochester” vs “Tufts” be a deciding factor for admissions? Doubt it

21! It’s not like this is for Olympic medals and Emory is left off the medal podium in 4th place. Sheesh.
...But Emory is a top 20 school, and Tulane does not come close to what Emory is. Neither does Tufts.

Emory 2020 acceptance rate: 22%
Tulane 2020 acceptance rate: 24%
Tufts 2020 acceptance rate: 14%

Google says 15.6% acceptance rate for Emory. Also not PP but 21 is very close to 20 soo...
https://www.google.com/search?q=emory+acceptance+rate&oq=emory+acceptance&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0i433j0l3.5616j1j7&client=ms-android-xiaomi-rvo3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8