Such as? |
Given that most of the drugs caught are from legal border entries, a wall won't stop the drugs from MX. To move that much drugs, you need transportation that can carry a heavy load. Human drug smugglers can't carry that much across a desert. https://www.politifact.com/new-york/statements/2019/jan/14/nita-lowey/majority-opioids-come-us-through-points-entry-lowe/ https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/elviadiaz/2019/01/31/fentanyl-bust-undermine-trumps-border-wall/2737648002/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/02/01/fact-that-largest-ever-fentanyl-bust-came-legal-entry-point-should-come-no-surprise/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.8b7f1c1f7b64 |
Looks like the government can't track children's families when they are separated but can track journalists and lawyers helping migrants.
https://www.voanews.com/a/us-tracked-journalists-activists-during-migrant-caravan/4818575.html Pretty disgusting! It government is becoming very scary. |
Our government... I clearly need more coffee this morning |
Exactly. I have no problem sending aid to countries who will actually put it to good use. |
+1 |
This is quite possibly one of the dumbest posts yet. Is China geographically co-located next to our county? Nope. Next! ![]() |
Its weird that people think we should only try to solve one problem at a time. drugs from china can be addressed at the same time as drugs coming across the border. |
Maybe the us should learn from Mexico on how to just make illegals keep moving north... |
canada won't take them. they have a safe third country agreement with us which means you have to accept "asylum seekers" if they land on your soil first. That is why we need one of those agreements with Mexico. SO they can remain in Mexico and we can deport them back immediately when they come to the border. |
Yep. Same is happening to moco and areas of md. Just a few weeks ago i was in md and a lady behind me was talking to her relatives from the caravan who just arrived into the US and when another relative was coming. We might as well just call it the United States of central America |
OMG.. this must be sarcasm. So I take it you are very fluent in spanish, or this person's English was pretty good. BTW, anyone can use google translate so don't bother pretending that you do. -signed a moco resident |
Not the PP you are responding to but you missed the point, dumbass. PP was being sarcastic and demonstrating how stupid and pointless the wall argument is in context of Fentanyl. Totally flew over your head. |
It is fine to call it a national emergency. However, one should use emergency power on emergency actions, not on actions that will be effective in the long run. For example, if a town does not have a hospital and an accident occurs with many wounded. The emergency action is to either send the wounded to a nearby hospital, and/or to bring in first aid emergency workers to help. Getting money to build a hospital to avoid such a situation in the future, cannot be considered an "emergency action". |
You need to define the situation at hand, and you need to address it with actual data and information behind your proposed solutions.
"A WALL" does none of these things. That "solution" is a rhetorical device, not an actual fact-based proposal with any anticipated results, long-term or short-term. This prez f&c#ed up wrt policy, but he sure does know his base, doesn't he. |