Chevy Chase MD - What's so great about it?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I really don't care what happened in Chevy Chase 100 years ago. Do you know what happened 100 years ago too? WWI and millions of white people killing each other. Do I care about that too? Nope.

Nothing stops black buyers from moving to Chevy Chase. Nothing. It's not Chevy Chase's fault if there aren't enough minorities to satisfy your quotas. Good luck trying to make a moral dilemma out of some people wanting to live in Chevy Chase. They are living their life the way they want to while you are sitting in a front of a screen ranting.



Ah, yes, if only I could be as rich and as clueless! I'll stay in touch with reality, thanks.


Leaving aside the obvious falsehood of "100 years ago," you would have to be a pretty stupid person to not care about WWI and WWII though, right? And would you look around and say, well, WWI and WWII don't affect us today? That would be an absurd position.


I think the point is that a lot of bad stuff happened in the past but we shouldn’t let it dictate what we do today. There’s a real danger in being so hung up on history that you can’t enjoy the present and focus on the future. It’s fine if you have personal reasons for not wanting to live in Chevy Chase out of acknowledgement of its discriminatory past. But don’t extent that belief to others who don’t view history the way you do. Judging people for wanting to live in Chevy Chase circa 2019 because of what happened 100 years ago when they, and even their parents and grandparents, weren’t even alive, is a childish thing to do.


Okay, snowflake. I have some bad news about our parents and grandparents and the history of Chevy Chase and America, but I’m sorry if your feelings are hurt by the obvious and dominant truth about “what’s so great” about CheChe. I hope you can find a way to go on. Maybe reach out to the black family on your block. Oh there isn’t one? Weird.


I don’t live in Chevy Chase but you are just being ridiculous here. Let others live where they want to live and you live where you want to live.



Wow, too bad you weren’t around “100 years ago.”


Neither were you. So what are you trying to say?



I assume that's not a serious question but I meant if only people "100 years ago" (I would point out for example that formal racially restricted covenants weren't banned until 1968 and certainly informal practices persisted long after) had your philosophy of "let others live where they want to live and you live where you want to live," this wouldn't be an issue. But in fact we live in the brick and mortar legacy of a very different philosophy. I'm happy for people to live in Chevy Chase. But if they say what they like about it is the "nice houses and good schools" and pretend the racial history is no longer relevant, I'm obligated but also happy to point out that that's absurd. And that absurdity IS relevant and important to everyone, because the falsehood that America has overcome racism is used politically to advance policies that ignore or compound structural racism. Chevy Chase is full of powerful people and potentially powerful children. The stories we tell about ourselves as a community matter, and the truth is important.


You are the one arguing that the racial history is still relevant where I suspect for most residents of CC they would disagree. Are people buying in Chevy Chase because of the ugly racial history (which, let me point out, also affected just about all upscale and even not so upscale pre-war areas of DC including areas that now have sizeable African American populations) or are they buying in Chevy Chase because they like the historic charm, older housing, close proximity to DC, good upkeep and services? And, yes, good schools, which do have plenty of AA and other populations of students of color? Perhaps not as diverse as other high schools but they're not lily-white either. And as voting goes, it's a staunchly Democratic area that also has the bonus of having many international households. Is it possible that Chevy Chase has simply been turned into a symbol and convenient scapegoat for people to vent against? I suspect the latter has a role.

Let's just stick to the premise of letting people live where they want to and not being judgmental about it in 2019. By the way I believe the Supreme Court struck down the racially based clauses in 1948 (I knew the daughter of one of the attorneys involved).


Immediate PP, I'm a long-time white resident of the area and I'm very firmly with the poster before you in thinking that we are not done with our complicated legacy. While de jure limitations were dealt with a while ago, de facto limitations absolutely remain. Inter alia, the dynamics of wealth, past, present, and future, limit the pool of non-white, especially AA residents, in an area that was conceived as a uniquely white and wealthy enclave. Furthermore, the vast majority of local community organizations and governmental resources reify the past as opposed to producing a more inclusive future. Even the recent financial crisis, which devastated black wealth and saw a response that preserved the fortunes of white financiers instead of helping those black HHs, plays a role. And I'm absolutely cynical enough to think those white financiers threw money at Obama and Holder to get them to be the black faces that looked the other way while that happened. It's still a very, very mean world, especially for some people.

And voting Democratic is not the same as "doing the right thing". Yes, it could probably be worse, but never lose site of the fact that it also could be wildly better.

Signed, a guy who knew the son of the Chief Justice that wrote that 1948 opinion.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:People in chevy chase pay to be surrounded by rich white people. They even say so in this thread before their comments get deleted


PP directly above you, and, yeah, exactly. I mean, isn't that what they think is so great about it? That's what all the other stuff is code for, when you get down to it. FWIW, I'm a white woman who grew up in Bethesda, so I know this area well.


Chevy Chase was built for exactly this. It’s not like it just happened that way. The black and poor people who were here were removed and the housing and amenities were uniformly expensive and exclusively for white people. That’s not ancient history.


Do you know of specific black residents in Ch Ch in the past, especially in what’s now the Village? I’m familiar with a past of black residents in currently Chi-Chi areas of DC+MD closer to the River.


DP, but you asked. Not ancient history.

https://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/news/article/21014041/upper-northwest-activists-and-the-descendant-of-a-remarkable-black-family-want-to-put-back-missing-pieces-of-dc-history

Also, a little about the racist founder of Chevy Chase:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2018/09/29/racist-history-chevy-chase-home-power-players-like-brett-kavanaugh/?utm_term=.95bfa4acfb55


I'll post what I posted a minute before, because you haven't answered what I asked. I know what you've posted. THIS IS WHAT I'M interested in:
I'm interested in the possibility or specific sources on black residents in what's now 20815, especially in the Village, before Newlands hit the scene. I know of a bunch of similar communities in places like Kent/Palisades, Westbard, near Seven Locks Rd with it's very unfortunate old creek name, etc.

Not near the Village, but Hawkins Lane off Jones Bridge Road was a small historically black community just like Scotland and Tobytown.


Thanks! This is interesting information. I've known a Hawkins family from nearby. I wonder if they were descendants of the community? In case, I appreciate your contribution here!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I really don't care what happened in Chevy Chase 100 years ago. Do you know what happened 100 years ago too? WWI and millions of white people killing each other. Do I care about that too? Nope.

Nothing stops black buyers from moving to Chevy Chase. Nothing. It's not Chevy Chase's fault if there aren't enough minorities to satisfy your quotas. Good luck trying to make a moral dilemma out of some people wanting to live in Chevy Chase. They are living their life the way they want to while you are sitting in a front of a screen ranting.



Ah, yes, if only I could be as rich and as clueless! I'll stay in touch with reality, thanks.


Leaving aside the obvious falsehood of "100 years ago," you would have to be a pretty stupid person to not care about WWI and WWII though, right? And would you look around and say, well, WWI and WWII don't affect us today? That would be an absurd position.


I think the point is that a lot of bad stuff happened in the past but we shouldn’t let it dictate what we do today. There’s a real danger in being so hung up on history that you can’t enjoy the present and focus on the future. It’s fine if you have personal reasons for not wanting to live in Chevy Chase out of acknowledgement of its discriminatory past. But don’t extent that belief to others who don’t view history the way you do. Judging people for wanting to live in Chevy Chase circa 2019 because of what happened 100 years ago when they, and even their parents and grandparents, weren’t even alive, is a childish thing to do.


Okay, snowflake. I have some bad news about our parents and grandparents and the history of Chevy Chase and America, but I’m sorry if your feelings are hurt by the obvious and dominant truth about “what’s so great” about CheChe. I hope you can find a way to go on. Maybe reach out to the black family on your block. Oh there isn’t one? Weird.


I don’t live in Chevy Chase but you are just being ridiculous here. Let others live where they want to live and you live where you want to live.



Wow, too bad you weren’t around “100 years ago.”


Neither were you. So what are you trying to say?



I assume that's not a serious question but I meant if only people "100 years ago" (I would point out for example that formal racially restricted covenants weren't banned until 1968 and certainly informal practices persisted long after) had your philosophy of "let others live where they want to live and you live where you want to live," this wouldn't be an issue. But in fact we live in the brick and mortar legacy of a very different philosophy. I'm happy for people to live in Chevy Chase. But if they say what they like about it is the "nice houses and good schools" and pretend the racial history is no longer relevant, I'm obligated but also happy to point out that that's absurd. And that absurdity IS relevant and important to everyone, because the falsehood that America has overcome racism is used politically to advance policies that ignore or compound structural racism. Chevy Chase is full of powerful people and potentially powerful children. The stories we tell about ourselves as a community matter, and the truth is important.


You are the one arguing that the racial history is still relevant where I suspect for most residents of CC they would disagree. Are people buying in Chevy Chase because of the ugly racial history (which, let me point out, also affected just about all upscale and even not so upscale pre-war areas of DC including areas that now have sizeable African American populations) or are they buying in Chevy Chase because they like the historic charm, older housing, close proximity to DC, good upkeep and services? And, yes, good schools, which do have plenty of AA and other populations of students of color? Perhaps not as diverse as other high schools but they're not lily-white either. And as voting goes, it's a staunchly Democratic area that also has the bonus of having many international households. Is it possible that Chevy Chase has simply been turned into a symbol and convenient scapegoat for people to vent against? I suspect the latter has a role.

Let's just stick to the premise of letting people live where they want to and not being judgmental about it in 2019. By the way I believe the Supreme Court struck down the racially based clauses in 1948 (I knew the daughter of one of the attorneys involved).


DP: Because they are wealthy and white and it doesn't affect them! How are you this naive? There are MANY conservatives who live in CC; calling it "staunchly Democratic" is a stretch.


And being "staunchly Democratic" is NOT necessarily the same thing as being a good person. Like in all of life, better things are always possible and congratulating oneself for our imagined 'virtues' is problematic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I really don't care what happened in Chevy Chase 100 years ago. Do you know what happened 100 years ago too? WWI and millions of white people killing each other. Do I care about that too? Nope.

Nothing stops black buyers from moving to Chevy Chase. Nothing. It's not Chevy Chase's fault if there aren't enough minorities to satisfy your quotas. Good luck trying to make a moral dilemma out of some people wanting to live in Chevy Chase. They are living their life the way they want to while you are sitting in a front of a screen ranting.



Ah, yes, if only I could be as rich and as clueless! I'll stay in touch with reality, thanks.


Leaving aside the obvious falsehood of "100 years ago," you would have to be a pretty stupid person to not care about WWI and WWII though, right? And would you look around and say, well, WWI and WWII don't affect us today? That would be an absurd position.


I think the point is that a lot of bad stuff happened in the past but we shouldn’t let it dictate what we do today. There’s a real danger in being so hung up on history that you can’t enjoy the present and focus on the future. It’s fine if you have personal reasons for not wanting to live in Chevy Chase out of acknowledgement of its discriminatory past. But don’t extent that belief to others who don’t view history the way you do. Judging people for wanting to live in Chevy Chase circa 2019 because of what happened 100 years ago when they, and even their parents and grandparents, weren’t even alive, is a childish thing to do.


Okay, snowflake. I have some bad news about our parents and grandparents and the history of Chevy Chase and America, but I’m sorry if your feelings are hurt by the obvious and dominant truth about “what’s so great” about CheChe. I hope you can find a way to go on. Maybe reach out to the black family on your block. Oh there isn’t one? Weird.


I don’t live in Chevy Chase but you are just being ridiculous here. Let others live where they want to live and you live where you want to live.



Wow, too bad you weren’t around “100 years ago.”


Neither were you. So what are you trying to say?



I assume that's not a serious question but I meant if only people "100 years ago" (I would point out for example that formal racially restricted covenants weren't banned until 1968 and certainly informal practices persisted long after) had your philosophy of "let others live where they want to live and you live where you want to live," this wouldn't be an issue. But in fact we live in the brick and mortar legacy of a very different philosophy. I'm happy for people to live in Chevy Chase. But if they say what they like about it is the "nice houses and good schools" and pretend the racial history is no longer relevant, I'm obligated but also happy to point out that that's absurd. And that absurdity IS relevant and important to everyone, because the falsehood that America has overcome racism is used politically to advance policies that ignore or compound structural racism. Chevy Chase is full of powerful people and potentially powerful children. The stories we tell about ourselves as a community matter, and the truth is important.


You are the one arguing that the racial history is still relevant where I suspect for most residents of CC they would disagree. Are people buying in Chevy Chase because of the ugly racial history (which, let me point out, also affected just about all upscale and even not so upscale pre-war areas of DC including areas that now have sizeable African American populations) or are they buying in Chevy Chase because they like the historic charm, older housing, close proximity to DC, good upkeep and services? And, yes, good schools, which do have plenty of AA and other populations of students of color? Perhaps not as diverse as other high schools but they're not lily-white either. And as voting goes, it's a staunchly Democratic area that also has the bonus of having many international households. Is it possible that Chevy Chase has simply been turned into a symbol and convenient scapegoat for people to vent against? I suspect the latter has a role.

Let's just stick to the premise of letting people live where they want to and not being judgmental about it in 2019. By the way I believe the Supreme Court struck down the racially based clauses in 1948 (I knew the daughter of one of the attorneys involved).


Immediate PP, I'm a long-time white resident of the area and I'm very firmly with the poster before you in thinking that we are not done with our complicated legacy. While de jure limitations were dealt with a while ago, de facto limitations absolutely remain. Inter alia, the dynamics of wealth, past, present, and future, limit the pool of non-white, especially AA residents, in an area that was conceived as a uniquely white and wealthy enclave. Furthermore, the vast majority of local community organizations and governmental resources reify the past as opposed to producing a more inclusive future. Even the recent financial crisis, which devastated black wealth and saw a response that preserved the fortunes of white financiers instead of helping those black HHs, plays a role. And I'm absolutely cynical enough to think those white financiers threw money at Obama and Holder to get them to be the black faces that looked the other way while that happened. It's still a very, very mean world, especially for some people.

And voting Democratic is not the same as "doing the right thing". Yes, it could probably be worse, but never lose site of the fact that it also could be wildly better.

Signed, a guy who knew the son of the Chief Justice that wrote that 1948 opinion.


So what exactly do you want people in Chevy Chase to do? That's the missing element here. Acknowledge the past? How? In what context and what capacity? Training and education for prospective buyers? Frankly, you're sounding too much like a virtue signaling "woke" person because you offer no solutions. There is no restriction on AA buyers who want to live in Chevy Chase today. None whatsoever. What may stop prospective AA buyers from wanting to live in Chevy Chase is solely within the minds of the AA buyers, not Chevy Chase residents or their actions or behaviors, which is no different from any affluent suburb in and around DC or large parts of NW DC itself.

I grew up in an area similar to Chevy Chase in another city with a similar kind of racial covenants and segregation history. The neighborhood was initially developed by a development company that also developed an adjoining, equally affluent, neighborhood. Both neighborhoods had the same segregation covenants and racially restrictive language on deeds (not just AAs but Jews were excluded too). For some reason the latter neighborhood now as a decent AA population while the former doesn't. Whenever the topic of racist history comes up, it's always neighborhood A that gets mentioned and never neighborhood B. Just like in DC it's Chevy Chase being singled out and not the entire slew of NW DC and all the other neighborhoods in the district that were racially segregated, including areas that are now diverse and have large AA populations. So that's why I'm casting a jaded eye at this discussion and people's attempts at trying to take a moral road where there isn't one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I really don't care what happened in Chevy Chase 100 years ago. Do you know what happened 100 years ago too? WWI and millions of white people killing each other. Do I care about that too? Nope.

Nothing stops black buyers from moving to Chevy Chase. Nothing. It's not Chevy Chase's fault if there aren't enough minorities to satisfy your quotas. Good luck trying to make a moral dilemma out of some people wanting to live in Chevy Chase. They are living their life the way they want to while you are sitting in a front of a screen ranting.



Ah, yes, if only I could be as rich and as clueless! I'll stay in touch with reality, thanks.


Leaving aside the obvious falsehood of "100 years ago," you would have to be a pretty stupid person to not care about WWI and WWII though, right? And would you look around and say, well, WWI and WWII don't affect us today? That would be an absurd position.


I think the point is that a lot of bad stuff happened in the past but we shouldn’t let it dictate what we do today. There’s a real danger in being so hung up on history that you can’t enjoy the present and focus on the future. It’s fine if you have personal reasons for not wanting to live in Chevy Chase out of acknowledgement of its discriminatory past. But don’t extent that belief to others who don’t view history the way you do. Judging people for wanting to live in Chevy Chase circa 2019 because of what happened 100 years ago when they, and even their parents and grandparents, weren’t even alive, is a childish thing to do.


Okay, snowflake. I have some bad news about our parents and grandparents and the history of Chevy Chase and America, but I’m sorry if your feelings are hurt by the obvious and dominant truth about “what’s so great” about CheChe. I hope you can find a way to go on. Maybe reach out to the black family on your block. Oh there isn’t one? Weird.


I don’t live in Chevy Chase but you are just being ridiculous here. Let others live where they want to live and you live where you want to live.



Wow, too bad you weren’t around “100 years ago.”


Neither were you. So what are you trying to say?



I assume that's not a serious question but I meant if only people "100 years ago" (I would point out for example that formal racially restricted covenants weren't banned until 1968 and certainly informal practices persisted long after) had your philosophy of "let others live where they want to live and you live where you want to live," this wouldn't be an issue. But in fact we live in the brick and mortar legacy of a very different philosophy. I'm happy for people to live in Chevy Chase. But if they say what they like about it is the "nice houses and good schools" and pretend the racial history is no longer relevant, I'm obligated but also happy to point out that that's absurd. And that absurdity IS relevant and important to everyone, because the falsehood that America has overcome racism is used politically to advance policies that ignore or compound structural racism. Chevy Chase is full of powerful people and potentially powerful children. The stories we tell about ourselves as a community matter, and the truth is important.


You are the one arguing that the racial history is still relevant where I suspect for most residents of CC they would disagree. Are people buying in Chevy Chase because of the ugly racial history (which, let me point out, also affected just about all upscale and even not so upscale pre-war areas of DC including areas that now have sizeable African American populations) or are they buying in Chevy Chase because they like the historic charm, older housing, close proximity to DC, good upkeep and services? And, yes, good schools, which do have plenty of AA and other populations of students of color? Perhaps not as diverse as other high schools but they're not lily-white either. And as voting goes, it's a staunchly Democratic area that also has the bonus of having many international households. Is it possible that Chevy Chase has simply been turned into a symbol and convenient scapegoat for people to vent against? I suspect the latter has a role.

Let's just stick to the premise of letting people live where they want to and not being judgmental about it in 2019. By the way I believe the Supreme Court struck down the racially based clauses in 1948 (I knew the daughter of one of the attorneys involved).


Immediate PP, I'm a long-time white resident of the area and I'm very firmly with the poster before you in thinking that we are not done with our complicated legacy. While de jure limitations were dealt with a while ago, de facto limitations absolutely remain. Inter alia, the dynamics of wealth, past, present, and future, limit the pool of non-white, especially AA residents, in an area that was conceived as a uniquely white and wealthy enclave. Furthermore, the vast majority of local community organizations and governmental resources reify the past as opposed to producing a more inclusive future. Even the recent financial crisis, which devastated black wealth and saw a response that preserved the fortunes of white financiers instead of helping those black HHs, plays a role. And I'm absolutely cynical enough to think those white financiers threw money at Obama and Holder to get them to be the black faces that looked the other way while that happened. It's still a very, very mean world, especially for some people.

And voting Democratic is not the same as "doing the right thing". Yes, it could probably be worse, but never lose site of the fact that it also could be wildly better.

Signed, a guy who knew the son of the Chief Justice that wrote that 1948 opinion.


So what exactly do you want people in Chevy Chase to do? That's the missing element here. Acknowledge the past? How? In what context and what capacity? Training and education for prospective buyers? Frankly, you're sounding too much like a virtue signaling "woke" person because you offer no solutions. There is no restriction on AA buyers who want to live in Chevy Chase today. None whatsoever. What may stop prospective AA buyers from wanting to live in Chevy Chase is solely within the minds of the AA buyers, not Chevy Chase residents or their actions or behaviors, which is no different from any affluent suburb in and around DC or large parts of NW DC itself.

I grew up in an area similar to Chevy Chase in another city with a similar kind of racial covenants and segregation history. The neighborhood was initially developed by a development company that also developed an adjoining, equally affluent, neighborhood. Both neighborhoods had the same segregation covenants and racially restrictive language on deeds (not just AAs but Jews were excluded too). For some reason the latter neighborhood now as a decent AA population while the former doesn't. Whenever the topic of racist history comes up, it's always neighborhood A that gets mentioned and never neighborhood B. Just like in DC it's Chevy Chase being singled out and not the entire slew of NW DC and all the other neighborhoods in the district that were racially segregated, including areas that are now diverse and have large AA populations. So that's why I'm casting a jaded eye at this discussion and people's attempts at trying to take a moral road where there isn't one.


Okay, friend, yes! Look at this progress! Yes, the next step after we all do the hard work of remembering the truth about our community is to figure out what to do about it. There are lots of ways that communities might recognize and consider the past together. The fountain debate was one important early step. Communities across the country and locally, to say nothing of historic institutions and schools, are engaged to varying degrees in the same kind of work. It’s hard work! There’s no easy answer and you can get into contentious argument alleys about things like the names for buildings. But that’s important work for any community as it considers how to shape its future. You can throw any number of paper tigers about how I’m advocating for this or that silly or objectionable thing, but what I’m actually arguing for is a truthful and difficult community conversation and effort and I don’t know precisely where it leads.

I gotta day though, PP, you’re saying a lot of things that suggest you have a lot of personal anger and resentment about any criticism of rich white communities. Even as you acknowledge that history is history, you’re saying the area has “historic charm” and “plenty of AA students” and that any objection to the neighborhood by wealthy AA families is “all in their heads.” I suspect those are things you wouldn’t say to the faces of the people you know and work with and with whom you use terms like “students of color.” But it’s 2019 America now, and we all know what you think. Just know that. You don’t hide it that well.
Anonymous
Got it, areas like SP which used to be white but have been black now for a few decades need to be protected but white areas need to be broken up because they are evil.

What happens if African Americans ever get any real wealth or political power other than at the individual level? Promises of retaliation isn’t a good look esp when ones only actual mechanisms for change currently is Twitter. It simply won’t advance the conversation.

Truth is there simply arent lots of AA buyers at CC price points even in the DC metro area which has more black wealth than anywhere else. The few that are in the market typically pick other places to live like SP or PG. This leaves people who can’t even afford CC with opinions on who should and should live there about what they think is fair (like you) and nobody cares about your opinion. If you want more black people in CC convince your rich black friends to move there...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Got it, areas like SP which used to be white but have been black now for a few decades need to be protected but white areas need to be broken up because they are evil.

What happens if African Americans ever get any real wealth or political power other than at the individual level? Promises of retaliation isn’t a good look esp when ones only actual mechanisms for change currently is Twitter. It simply won’t advance the conversation.

Truth is there simply arent lots of AA buyers at CC price points even in the DC metro area which has more black wealth than anywhere else. The few that are in the market typically pick other places to live like SP or PG. This leaves people who can’t even afford CC with opinions on who should and should live there about what they think is fair (like you) and nobody cares about your opinion. If you want more black people in CC convince your rich black friends to move there...


The challenge is that due to many reasons (Jim Crow, etc), black folks could not acquire the same level of wealth, could not work at the same law firms and did not have generational wealth, there are not as many black families who can afford to live in CC. I'm black and lived in CC MD. After people asked me if I was the nanny a few times, I moved back into the city to Colonial Village. No thanks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Got it, areas like SP which used to be white but have been black now for a few decades need to be protected but white areas need to be broken up because they are evil.

What happens if African Americans ever get any real wealth or political power other than at the individual level? Promises of retaliation isn’t a good look esp when ones only actual mechanisms for change currently is Twitter. It simply won’t advance the conversation.

Truth is there simply arent lots of AA buyers at CC price points even in the DC metro area which has more black wealth than anywhere else. The few that are in the market typically pick other places to live like SP or PG. This leaves people who can’t even afford CC with opinions on who should and should live there about what they think is fair (like you) and nobody cares about your opinion. If you want more black people in CC convince your rich black friends to move there...


I actually know several very wealthy Black families in CC MD. They do exist!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Got it, areas like SP which used to be white but have been black now for a few decades need to be protected but white areas need to be broken up because they are evil.

What happens if African Americans ever get any real wealth or political power other than at the individual level? Promises of retaliation isn’t a good look esp when ones only actual mechanisms for change currently is Twitter. It simply won’t advance the conversation.

Truth is there simply arent lots of AA buyers at CC price points even in the DC metro area which has more black wealth than anywhere else. The few that are in the market typically pick other places to live like SP or PG. This leaves people who can’t even afford CC with opinions on who should and should live there about what they think is fair (like you) and nobody cares about your opinion. If you want more black people in CC convince your rich black friends to move there...


The challenge is that due to many reasons (Jim Crow, etc), black folks could not acquire the same level of wealth, could not work at the same law firms and did not have generational wealth, there are not as many black families who can afford to live in CC. I'm black and lived in CC MD. After people asked me if I was the nanny a few times, I moved back into the city to Colonial Village. No thanks.


BS troll unless you have white kids no one is going to ask you if you’re the nanny, cook or maid maybe.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Got it, areas like SP which used to be white but have been black now for a few decades need to be protected but white areas need to be broken up because they are evil.

What happens if African Americans ever get any real wealth or political power other than at the individual level? Promises of retaliation isn’t a good look esp when ones only actual mechanisms for change currently is Twitter. It simply won’t advance the conversation.

Truth is there simply arent lots of AA buyers at CC price points even in the DC metro area which has more black wealth than anywhere else. The few that are in the market typically pick other places to live like SP or PG. This leaves people who can’t even afford CC with opinions on who should and should live there about what they think is fair (like you) and nobody cares about your opinion. If you want more black people in CC convince your rich black friends to move there...


I actually know several very wealthy Black families in CC MD. They do exist!


WTF do you mean by this?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Got it, areas like SP which used to be white but have been black now for a few decades need to be protected but white areas need to be broken up because they are evil.

What happens if African Americans ever get any real wealth or political power other than at the individual level? Promises of retaliation isn’t a good look esp when ones only actual mechanisms for change currently is Twitter. It simply won’t advance the conversation.

Truth is there simply arent lots of AA buyers at CC price points even in the DC metro area which has more black wealth than anywhere else. The few that are in the market typically pick other places to live like SP or PG. This leaves people who can’t even afford CC with opinions on who should and should live there about what they think is fair (like you) and nobody cares about your opinion. If you want more black people in CC convince your rich black friends to move there...


I actually know several very wealthy Black families in CC MD. They do exist!


Of course they do but let’s not act like there is a large buying block of them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Got it, areas like SP which used to be white but have been black now for a few decades need to be protected but white areas need to be broken up because they are evil.

What happens if African Americans ever get any real wealth or political power other than at the individual level? Promises of retaliation isn’t a good look esp when ones only actual mechanisms for change currently is Twitter. It simply won’t advance the conversation.

Truth is there simply arent lots of AA buyers at CC price points even in the DC metro area which has more black wealth than anywhere else. The few that are in the market typically pick other places to live like SP or PG. This leaves people who can’t even afford CC with opinions on who should and should live there about what they think is fair (like you) and nobody cares about your opinion. If you want more black people in CC convince your rich black friends to move there...


I actually know several very wealthy Black families in CC MD. They do exist!


Of course they do but let’s not act like there is a large buying block of them.


Nor in most affluent DC area suburbs and neighborhoods. You can make the same complaint about Bethesda and most of NW and McLean and Arlington and Great Falls and Potomac and so on. Why is Chevy Chase being singled out?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Got it, areas like SP which used to be white but have been black now for a few decades need to be protected but white areas need to be broken up because they are evil.

What happens if African Americans ever get any real wealth or political power other than at the individual level? Promises of retaliation isn’t a good look esp when ones only actual mechanisms for change currently is Twitter. It simply won’t advance the conversation.

Truth is there simply arent lots of AA buyers at CC price points even in the DC metro area which has more black wealth than anywhere else. The few that are in the market typically pick other places to live like SP or PG. This leaves people who can’t even afford CC with opinions on who should and should live there about what they think is fair (like you) and nobody cares about your opinion. If you want more black people in CC convince your rich black friends to move there...


I actually know several very wealthy Black families in CC MD. They do exist!


Of course they do but let’s not act like there is a large buying block of them.


Nor in most affluent DC area suburbs and neighborhoods. You can make the same complaint about Bethesda and most of NW and McLean and Arlington and Great Falls and Potomac and so on. Why is Chevy Chase being singled out?


DP, but Bethesda and Potomac are much larger than CC. CC is known in part for being small and exclusive. It's much more homogenous than either Bethesda or Potomac. Those are plenty wealthy themselves, but many CC residents would turn their noses up at the nouveau riche who inhabit those areas. Can't speak to VA since I know it much less, but I imagine the same applies.

But the bigger question is: why are you so ardently defending Chevy Chase? You sound like any other mediocre white person stomping their feet about the how whites are truly the oppressed ones in this country.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Got it, areas like SP which used to be white but have been black now for a few decades need to be protected but white areas need to be broken up because they are evil.

What happens if African Americans ever get any real wealth or political power other than at the individual level? Promises of retaliation isn’t a good look esp when ones only actual mechanisms for change currently is Twitter. It simply won’t advance the conversation.

Truth is there simply arent lots of AA buyers at CC price points even in the DC metro area which has more black wealth than anywhere else. The few that are in the market typically pick other places to live like SP or PG. This leaves people who can’t even afford CC with opinions on who should and should live there about what they think is fair (like you) and nobody cares about your opinion. If you want more black people in CC convince your rich black friends to move there...


I actually know several very wealthy Black families in CC MD. They do exist!


Of course they do but let’s not act like there is a large buying block of them.


Nor in most affluent DC area suburbs and neighborhoods. You can make the same complaint about Bethesda and most of NW and McLean and Arlington and Great Falls and Potomac and so on. Why is Chevy Chase being singled out?


DP, but Bethesda and Potomac are much larger than CC. CC is known in part for being small and exclusive. It's much more homogenous than either Bethesda or Potomac. Those are plenty wealthy themselves, but many CC residents would turn their noses up at the nouveau riche who inhabit those areas. Can't speak to VA since I know it much less, but I imagine the same applies.

But the bigger question is: why are you so ardently defending Chevy Chase? You sound like any other mediocre white person stomping their feet about the how whites are truly the oppressed ones in this country.


Your last sentence is charming. Calling people mediocre? You pretty much destroyed whatever credibility you may have had.

As a FYI I am not affiliated with Chevy Chase in any form. Just another poster, and there have clearly been more than just a handful, puzzled why people are making a big deal about Chevy Chase.

But I do suspect I know the real reason why affluent African American homeowners are not into Chevy Chase. They don't see the allure of spending so much money for small and cramped and dated houses. Which is what most of Chevy Chase is. It's the same reason why you also don't find many Asian or South Asian buyers in Chevy Chase. Chevy Chase, contrary to what some of you want to think, is not a ku klux klan hangout or populated by people who haven't left the 1950s country club environment, but a highly educated, strongly Democratic leaning area dominated by the professionals who'd be happy to have more AA residents. But AA buyers aren't interested in Chevy Chase when they can get bigger and newer houses for their money elsewhere. And that's all there is to it.
Anonymous
I live in the county part of Chevy Chase (not one of the fancier incorporated neighborhoods) and our neighborhood is actually quite diverse, racially/ethnically/socioeconomic status. I can't speak for the Town or the Village but please don't paint all of CCMD with the same broad brush of super wealthy white people.
post reply Forum Index » Real Estate
Message Quick Reply
Go to: