Melania is in no mood to go to Davos with TanTrump

[Anonymous]

Someone should really tell Hicks that the color of your foundation is not supposed to be full three steps darker than your throat. Haven't anyone heard of blending? Not a good look you know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For a party that claim to be “tolerant” and “open,” you folks sure are spending a lot of time and energy judging people for their appearance.
Very trite, petty, and superficial.

When one of our American delegates shows up on the world stage at Davos looking like she’s ready to party rather than being a representative of our national interests, taxpayers have the right to express concern.

I expect our delegates - men and women - to dress professionally at a bare minimum. Hicks isn’t dressed professionally or appropriately given the setting.

Your opinion.
And, once again.......... obsession with appearance. Sad!

Trumpkins got all bent out of shape when Michelle Obama wore a sleeveless dress - the nerve of her! How uncouth! But Hope Hicks in hooker boots at an international forum is fine with the Trumpkins because she's one of them. That's what is sad.

Was there really a public outcry over Michelle Obama wearing a sleeveless dress? I've only heard it mentioned on DCUM. I'm beginning to think it's an urban legend.

Other than DCUM you must only frequent reliable new sources. It was all over the nutosphere.

Oh geez, please keep up. This was well covered at the time. Just one of many stories from reliable sources:
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=6986019&page=1

[Anonymous]

Yes, the Michelle Obama sleeveless scandal went on for years:
https://www.salon.com/2009/03/06/michelle_arms/

The conservatives were "outraged" when she wore a "commie" red dress. Now the commies are their friends.
https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2011/01/20/right-wing-fashion-police-attack-michelle-obama/182894

Republicans were "outraged" (yet again) when Obama wore a tan suit. I remember it well
http://www.chicagotribune.com/81220218-157.html

So, when the communications director, who is rumored to possibly be having an affair with Trump, shows up at a business conference in what used to be known as "f me boots" don't be surprised if we all comment. Especially after 8 years of attacks on relatively innocuous fashion choices.

Really can't believe conservatives are ok with someone dressing similar to a Kardashian at Davos. But I guess the conservative party has changed since they were so outraged at Obama wearing a tan suit.

[Anonymous]

Those boots are f-ugly. Disgusting color. Don't go with that dress. Embarrassing, yes, for her to be rep'ing the US wearing that outfit.

[Anonymous]

Seriously?!? Her face is unrecognizable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not surprising Melania stayed back. It would have been crowded with two FLOTUSes on the same trip.

Like meeting the Pope?

[Anonymous]

Face it, the fat man is trading Melania in for a younger model. The only question is whether you’re the type of person who challenges that sort of unfidelity, or the type of person who cheers it. Which one are you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
The jealous DCUM women are out, furious about a beautiful young woman doing a powerful, exciting and professional job.

Hope Hicks we support you! #MAGA

Not jealous, just noticing the complete lack of class. I guess that makes sense when you basically marry a stripper. I have those boots. I love them. I would be wearing Ferragamos or Manolos at Davos though. There is a time and place for everything.

[jsteele]

Apparently some folks got lost on their way to the fashion forum.