Melania is in no mood to go to Davos with TanTrump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently Monday was the 13th anniversary for the trumps: https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/melania-trump-donald-trump-anniversary/index.html

Who would have know without CNN's announcement? And some crazy trumpkin started a thread that women hate her because she is so "BEATUTIFUL"!

The twit in chief couldn’t be bothered to send out a tweet to his wife on their anniversary? I guess he was too busy with executive time

It’s a stormy relationship.

There's still hope.

Sure enough, look who showed up at Davos with a pair of $800 boots to boot! The White House refused to say whether she was going, like there was any doubt.

Is ANYONE surprised by this??????

Why does everyone assume she's dressed like this to impress Trump? She's a very attractive young woman, presumably single, in an environment where she will be interacting with hundreds of extremely rich men. Maybe she's taking advantage of the situation in hopes of meeting a wealthy man who might be husband material? If I were 20 years younger and single going to an event where I would be surrounded by billionaire men, I'd be dressed to the nines too.

Seriously??? Please tell me this is sarcasm. She is ostensibly the White House Communications Director. She should not be concerned with landing a sugar daddy.

Yes seriously. I know nothing about her, but I'm assuming she's single since there's been an extensive conversation about a possible affair with Trump and no one has mentioned a husband. If she is single there's a good chance she is interested in getting involved in a relationship, which many single people are at any given time. All else being equal most women would prefer a man with money (this does not in and of itself make them a gold digger). If she has the opportunity to be in an environment where she will be surrounded by billionaires, why shouldn't she make the most of it? This doesn't mean she is willing to become involved with any man with money, but maybe she is hoping to meet someone interesting, relatively young, and extremely wealthy to boot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For a party that claim to be “tolerant” and “open,” you folks sure are spending a lot of time and energy judging people for their appearance.
Very trite, petty, and superficial.

When one of our American delegates shows up on the world stage at Davos looking like she’s ready to party rather than being a representative of our national interests, taxpayers have the right to express concern.

I expect our delegates - men and women - to dress professionally at a bare minimum. Hicks isn’t dressed professionally or appropriately given the setting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently Monday was the 13th anniversary for the trumps: https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/melania-trump-donald-trump-anniversary/index.html

Who would have know without CNN's announcement? And some crazy trumpkin started a thread that women hate her because she is so "BEATUTIFUL"!

The twit in chief couldn’t be bothered to send out a tweet to his wife on their anniversary? I guess he was too busy with executive time

Oh come on. How do you know he didn't call her?

Their anniversary was Monday, Jan. 22. He was at the WH at that time. They probably had a nice dinner together.
Twitter is not an appropriate method of wishing one’s wife a happy anniversary. You people are insane.

And they probably had a lovely conversation about Stormy Daniels.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For a party that claim to be “tolerant” and “open,” you folks sure are spending a lot of time and energy judging people for their appearance.
Very trite, petty, and superficial.

When one of our American delegates shows up on the world stage at Davos looking like she’s ready to party rather than being a representative of our national interests, taxpayers have the right to express concern.

I expect our delegates - men and women - to dress professionally at a bare minimum. Hicks isn’t dressed professionally or appropriately given the setting.

Your opinion.
And, once again.......... obsession with appearance. Sad!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For a party that claim to be “tolerant” and “open,” you folks sure are spending a lot of time and energy judging people for their appearance.
Very trite, petty, and superficial.

When one of our American delegates shows up on the world stage at Davos looking like she’s ready to party rather than being a representative of our national interests, taxpayers have the right to express concern.

I expect our delegates - men and women - to dress professionally at a bare minimum. Hicks isn’t dressed professionally or appropriately given the setting.

Your opinion.
And, once again.......... obsession with appearance. Sad!

Demanding our employees dress professionally while representing our nation abroad is not “obsession with appearance.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For a party that claim to be “tolerant” and “open,” you folks sure are spending a lot of time and energy judging people for their appearance.
Very trite, petty, and superficial.

When one of our American delegates shows up on the world stage at Davos looking like she’s ready to party rather than being a representative of our national interests, taxpayers have the right to express concern.

I expect our delegates - men and women - to dress professionally at a bare minimum. Hicks isn’t dressed professionally or appropriately given the setting.

Your opinion.
And, once again.......... obsession with appearance. Sad!

Demanding our employees dress professionally while representing our nation abroad is not “obsession with appearance.”

I agree. And taxpayer money is actually paying her to be there looking like a hooker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't like that coat together with those boots. It's the battle of the clashing tans!

I would like to know how she is affording to buy all of the designer clothes and purses etc. she is being photographed in on a salary that can be no more than the highest paid staff in the white house which is around $180K per year, take home pay translating to about $100K. What's up with that? I think she's not allowed to accept gifts worth over a certain amount, either, so how the heck is she affording all that crap? I guess drain the swamp is more of a rallying cry for the plebes than an actual administration goal, though we really didn't need Hope Hicks to prove that to us anyway.

Daddy is rich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently Monday was the 13th anniversary for the trumps: https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/melania-trump-donald-trump-anniversary/index.html

Who would have know without CNN's announcement? And some crazy trumpkin started a thread that women hate her because she is so "BEATUTIFUL"!

The twit in chief couldn’t be bothered to send out a tweet to his wife on their anniversary? I guess he was too busy with executive time

Oh come on. How do you know he didn't call her?

Their anniversary was Monday, Jan. 22. He was at the WH at that time. They probably had a nice dinner together.
Twitter is not an appropriate method of wishing one’s wife a happy anniversary. You people are insane.

If he was at the WH, where was she. Don’t recall a lovely tweet from Dotard about the occasion of their anniversary. He’s an attention shore. They would have been on prominent display at his tacky hotel eating overcooked steak with ketchup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For a party that claim to be “tolerant” and “open,” you folks sure are spending a lot of time and energy judging people for their appearance.
Very trite, petty, and superficial.

When one of our American delegates shows up on the world stage at Davos looking like she’s ready to party rather than being a representative of our national interests, taxpayers have the right to express concern.

I expect our delegates - men and women - to dress professionally at a bare minimum. Hicks isn’t dressed professionally or appropriately given the setting.

Your opinion.
And, once again.......... obsession with appearance. Sad!

What's sad is your absurd tribalism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For a party that claim to be “tolerant” and “open,” you folks sure are spending a lot of time and energy judging people for their appearance.
Very trite, petty, and superficial.

When one of our American delegates shows up on the world stage at Davos looking like she’s ready to party rather than being a representative of our national interests, taxpayers have the right to express concern.

I expect our delegates - men and women - to dress professionally at a bare minimum. Hicks isn’t dressed professionally or appropriately given the setting.

Your opinion.
And, once again.......... obsession with appearance. Sad!

Trumpkins got all bent out of shape when Michelle Obama wore a sleeveless dress - the nerve of her! How uncouth! But Hope Hicks in hooker boots at an international forum is fine with the Trumpkins because she's one of them. That's what is sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently Monday was the 13th anniversary for the trumps: https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/melania-trump-donald-trump-anniversary/index.html

Who would have know without CNN's announcement? And some crazy trumpkin started a thread that women hate her because she is so "BEATUTIFUL"!

The twit in chief couldn’t be bothered to send out a tweet to his wife on their anniversary? I guess he was too busy with executive time

It’s a stormy relationship.

There's still hope.

Sure enough, look who showed up at Davos with a pair of $800 boots to boot! The White House refused to say whether she was going, like there was any doubt.

Is ANYONE surprised by this??????

Why does everyone assume she's dressed like this to impress Trump? She's a very attractive young woman, presumably single, in an environment where she will be interacting with hundreds of extremely rich men. Maybe she's taking advantage of the situation in hopes of meeting a wealthy man who might be husband material? If I were 20 years younger and single going to an event where I would be surrounded by billionaire men, I'd be dressed to the nines too.

Seriously??? Please tell me this is sarcasm. She is ostensibly the White House Communications Director. She should not be concerned with landing a sugar daddy.

Yes seriously. I know nothing about her, but I'm assuming she's single since there's been an extensive conversation about a possible affair with Trump and no one has mentioned a husband. If she is single there's a good chance she is interested in getting involved in a relationship, which many single people are at any given time. All else being equal most women would prefer a man with money (this does not in and of itself make them a gold digger). If she has the opportunity to be in an environment where she will be surrounded by billionaires, why shouldn't she make the most of it? This doesn't mean she is willing to become involved with any man with money, but maybe she is hoping to meet someone interesting, relatively young, and extremely wealthy to boot.

It is funny to see liberals outraged with the sexy outfits of Page and frumpy outfits of Huckabee. No matter what women are wearing, liberals will tear them down as long as they are not sharing the same values with them.

[Anonymous]

There’s no way Trump is having an affair with anyone. He obviously can’t get it up. That much is obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s no way Trump is having an affair with anyone. He obviously can’t get it up. That much is obvious.

There are ways.

https://www.coloplastmenshealth.com/treatments/erectile-dysfunction-treatment/penile-implants/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For a party that claim to be “tolerant” and “open,” you folks sure are spending a lot of time and energy judging people for their appearance.
Very trite, petty, and superficial.

When one of our American delegates shows up on the world stage at Davos looking like she’s ready to party rather than being a representative of our national interests, taxpayers have the right to express concern.

I expect our delegates - men and women - to dress professionally at a bare minimum. Hicks isn’t dressed professionally or appropriately given the setting.

Your opinion.
And, once again.......... obsession with appearance. Sad!

Trumpkins got all bent out of shape when Michelle Obama wore a sleeveless dress - the nerve of her! How uncouth! But Hope Hicks in hooker boots at an international forum is fine with the Trumpkins because she's one of them. That's what is sad.

Was there really a public outcry over Michelle Obama wearing a sleeveless dress? I've only heard it mentioned on DCUM. I'm beginning to think it's an urban legend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For a party that claim to be “tolerant” and “open,” you folks sure are spending a lot of time and energy judging people for their appearance.
Very trite, petty, and superficial.

When one of our American delegates shows up on the world stage at Davos looking like she’s ready to party rather than being a representative of our national interests, taxpayers have the right to express concern.

I expect our delegates - men and women - to dress professionally at a bare minimum. Hicks isn’t dressed professionally or appropriately given the setting.

Your opinion.
And, once again.......... obsession with appearance. Sad!

Trumpkins got all bent out of shape when Michelle Obama wore a sleeveless dress - the nerve of her! How uncouth! But Hope Hicks in hooker boots at an international forum is fine with the Trumpkins because she's one of them. That's what is sad.

Was there really a public outcry over Michelle Obama wearing a sleeveless dress? I've only heard it mentioned on DCUM. I'm beginning to think it's an urban legend.

Other than DCUM you must only frequent reliable new sources. It was all over the nutosphere.