You know I'm just going to be honest. I was enjoying the interesting content brought up while going back and forth with you guys but it can be so hard to have an honest conversation with you people because you're just sooooo sensitive! Finally we were having a frank discussion about where certain demographics went wrong and how you guys became so misguided. But it's like if you try to speak your mind and say what everyone is you guys shout "RACISM" all over the place and shut the discussion down. We could get some really great conversations going if you people weren't so sensitive all the time. |
I'm a 51 yo white woman who didn't vote for either candidate. I switched from D to I this election b/c I'm basically done with politics. I have a family and I work FT. My husband doesn't control me, nor do I control him. Our children are well-adjusted and happy - and somewhere "in the middle" by DCUM standards. I have a job that allows me to be with my kids as much as possible. I can say the same for my husband, as we both are putting family first. Btw the two of us, we have 6 degrees.
Furthermore, my "sisters" are mostly those who work FT. I don't hear them defining themselves by their careers. Are you blaming me for Trump? Or will you simply be scouring around for another Guardian article to prove another ridiculous point?
|
Right. Which issue(s) pursuaded your vote? We can learn a lot about you from those. |
I'm the (white) PP above who pointed out that the correct vote is not always aligned with what is best for one individually, and that the correct vote should ideally be for what is best for the country. (Granted, most people are selfish and don't vote like that.) But the black woman PP, however, is so hateful toward whites that she ignores what I said, and again made a bigoted remark about white woman voting to protect the interests of rich white men - and then with snark repeated that she will vote for what is best foR her, and Inshould vote for what is best for me. |
I've already told you when you used these same attacking approach two days ago. Apparently, you are so convinced of your moral superiorty that you can't process it. |
PP is making a good argument for why the PC and victimhood culture propagated by liberals is so harmful. It chills constructive dialogue. Thanks, PP! |
Oh, sweetie, you forgot number 11 through 23. You didn't do well in school. So sorry for what your mom did to you |
Uh, the Republican Party freed blacks from slavery. |
And many countries have women who are heads of state, including the longest reigning Queen in history. But Madam Hillary couldn't even shatter the glass ceiling. Sometimes blackmailing the Democratic Party just doesn't work. |
"Chilling" is an understatement. We are told to STFU anytime we bring up something that doesn't fit their liberal mindset. I, for example, have brought out that the problems that blacks, as a group, suffer are not all the fault of white people (or racism) and that the 75% illegitimate birthrate among blacks is contributing to many of the societal ills they experience - higher crime rates, higher poverty rates, etc., - and I am met with a torrent of hate. Just watch.... |
Oh my goodness -- a SAHM has wandered over from "Beauty and Fashion" forum to use analogies related to her daily life. Poor dear--knows nothing more than tantrums, pacifiers, time out, inside voice and whining. Must be difficult to be so marginalized. But keep trying to play with the adults in the sandbox. That is if your husband allows you to do so. Your girl, Hillary, knows that women follow their husband's lead. |
And the irony is that we did all of this to blacks because of our misguided social programs intended to help them. Before the Great Society, marriage and family was highly valued because these were rights that slaves did not have. Now marriage has no meaning for blacks and black women are being encouraged to marry outside their race so that they can have the traditional families that their grandparents and those who went before them cherished. I am a huge supporter of marriage and lobbied hard for gay marriage. Perhaps the next social good we can effect is black marriage. Intact families help societies. |
TRUE that INTACT families HELP society. This should be plastered on every Metro bus and train. |
Absolutely. The social programs have replaced the "husband" in terms of family financial support, thereby enabling the low marriage rate. How's the following for a shocking proposal: REWARD poor, uneducated parents who get married (when a child is involved) with welfare but REDUCE it if the father shirks his responsibility. As long as we're manipulating behavior via social programs, let's manipulate to the good. |
I know, right? And the line about "close-minded Republicans"? For months we've been hearing from liberals that if you didn't fall in line and vote for the liberal agenda, you're a racist and a Nazi. Unreal! |