NP: Goes to show yet again that women shouldn't fall for the cocky, arrogant "bad boy" types because they tend to implode. |
+1 For all his faults, he does seem to pick women who are loving, devoted moms. |
Your "thoughtful, well-balanced posts" suggest you thought otherwise. |
Wait how do you know which Anonymous poster this is? You're communicating with more than just be person ya know. |
And thankfully for them he compensated them well in the divorce so they could spend their time caring for their children. If only more women could find men men like this. |
the one who posts with words in caps ![]() |
True. |
As I recall, Ms Trump #1 had to go through a long court battle to be "compensated well". Ms Trump #2 was unceremoniously dumped right before the deadline that would have given her more money in the prenup. As reported, hers and Tiffany's lives weren't at all luxurious. Ms Trump #3 has a diamond-clad prenup. But who knows? Maybe you are right. Maybe men ARE just ATMs - not husbands, fathers, caring partners. Who needs that. Just give them the money. |
I really don't think anyone on this thread is saying what you wrote. Of course, men should be far more than ATMs. Given that he hasn't been there for his kids as much as he should, we're saying that he picked wives who turned out to be devoted moms. Plenty of women and men have a ton of money but aren't really there for their kids. |
Did Trump force any ex into the job market? No. They were financially able to care for and nurture their children. |
Exactly. Plenty of them are right here, outsourcing their children at every opportunity. Sad. |
Sad x 1000. Why can't more husbands be harder workers like Trump so their wives can stay home? |
It's true that young children require stability, competence and love. Usually it's the biological family who is best able to deliver all three of the critical components, but not always. |
Sadam's wives weren't in the workforce either. I guess he is another fine example of parenting that all men should aspire to. If only all women could be so lucky as to marry men with family money who cast them aside, but are forced to give them enough money so that they don't have to work. Keep the dream alive!
|
After all these pages, did I have to wander over from Off Topic to explain The Manhattan Trophy Wife: Scarmucci married young to a nice woman who put up with his BS to help propel him to fortune. When he reached that point, the candy box of smart, attractive NY women opened to him. Said women are looking for ways to propel their careers or withdraw from the rat race, bear a few children and be given a life time income, whether divorced or not. When wife #2 had the first baby and liked motherhood more than her arm candy life, the Mooch returned to an even larger group of women. He cheated while pregnant and forced her hand to divorce him. She will live nicely off child support and alimony for 18 years and be able to convince a NY court that she is no longer employable and get alimony for the rest of her life. This is all classic New York wealth behavior. The second and subsequent marriages of the wealthy, particularly men, are more mergers than love matches BTDT |