Scaramucci's wife files for divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's not her type, 10:10. Try again.

They why have they been dating for the last 6 months?

No source.

Page 6

Not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sadam's wives weren't in the workforce either. I guess he is another fine example of parenting that all men should aspire to. If only all women could be so lucky as to marry men with family money who cast them aside, but are forced to give them enough money so that they don't have to work. Keep the dream alive!

You are purposely distorting what was said so that you can make your point, and you're writing while wearing blinders to what was written by previous posters.

We heard you. You think Trump did a good job by marrying women who would take care of their kids, and that he did right by his wives by making sure they wouldn't have to work. PP is pointing out that other dictators and would-be dictators have also set a similar example.

DP. Raising your children is actual work, my friend.

Right - thanks for making this about mommy wars. Wouldn't have to do *paid* work - happy now?

Yes. Thank you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sadam's wives weren't in the workforce either. I guess he is another fine example of parenting that all men should aspire to. If only all women could be so lucky as to marry men with family money who cast them aside, but are forced to give them enough money so that they don't have to work. Keep the dream alive!

You are purposely distorting what was said so that you can make your point, and you're writing while wearing blinders to what was written by previous posters.

We heard you. You think Trump did a good job by marrying women who would take care of their kids, and that he did right by his wives by making sure they wouldn't have to work. PP is pointing out that other dictators and would-be dictators have also set a similar example.

DP. Raising your children is actual work, my friend.

Right - thanks for making this about mommy wars. Wouldn't have to do *paid* work - happy now?

I believe you're the one with that intent and the first one to use the words mommy wars and paid work. Clearly, a nerve was hit when that first poster wrote that Trump's wives were devoted moms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sadam's wives weren't in the workforce either. I guess he is another fine example of parenting that all men should aspire to. If only all women could be so lucky as to marry men with family money who cast them aside, but are forced to give them enough money so that they don't have to work. Keep the dream alive!

You are purposely distorting what was said so that you can make your point, and you're writing while wearing blinders to what was written by previous posters.

We heard you. You think Trump did a good job by marrying women who would take care of their kids, and that he did right by his wives by making sure they wouldn't have to work. PP is pointing out that other dictators and would-be dictators have also set a similar example.

DP. Raising your children is actual work, my friend.

Right - thanks for making this about mommy wars. Wouldn't have to do *paid* work - happy now?

I believe you're the one with that intent and the first one to use the words mommy wars and paid work. Clearly, a nerve was hit when that first poster wrote that Trump's wives were devoted moms.

No - they seem like fine moms. Outside of procreating with a cretin. No nerves hit, just tired of language police.

[Anonymous]

Rumor has it Kim Guilfoyle is his mistress.

1. Mooch's marriage was in shambles - they were in counseling.

2. Reinse leaks the "Fox News White House dinner." Bad, I guess, but what REALLY set off Mooch was.

3. Reinse leaked to D.C. gossip reporter Olivia Nuzzi that Kim was invited to Mooch's Fox News White House dinner - THIS is what set Mooch off.

4. Mooch flies off the handle to New Yorker not because of "the leaking" but because his wife knew he was there with his mistress. In other words, he took it as Reinse f-ing with his family.

5. Mooch's wife immediately files for divorce because he's confirmed to be screwing KG while she's 9 months pregnant.

https://twitter.com/Olivianuzzi/status/890434885332197376

[Anonymous]

I just don't think he's her type. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

^ This also explains the hoax emails where Mooch thought he was emailing Reinse and he says "I know what you did" blah blah and "Don't worry, my marriage is fine."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just don't think he's her type. Sorry.

Eh, she's known to date and marry attention whoring sleazebags.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rumor has it Kim Guilfoyle is his mistress.

1. Mooch's marriage was in shambles - they were in counseling.

2. Reinse leaks the "Fox News White House dinner." Bad, I guess, but what REALLY set off Mooch was.

3. Reinse leaked to D.C. gossip reporter Olivia Nuzzi that Kim was invited to Mooch's Fox News White House dinner - THIS is what set Mooch off.

4. Mooch flies off the handle to New Yorker not because of "the leaking" but because his wife knew he was there with his mistress. In other words, he took it as Reinse f-ing with his family.

5. Mooch's wife immediately files for divorce because he's confirmed to be screwing KG while she's 9 months pregnant.

https://twitter.com/Olivianuzzi/status/890434885332197376

Nice theory except she filed in early July before the dinner "leaks" and the crazy followup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just don't think he's her type. Sorry.

Eh, she's known to date and marry attention whoring sleazebags.

Like whom? The dude in SF?

[Anonymous]

I thought that Mooches real interest in doing the interview was to provide an alibi for why he wasn't at the hospital during the birth -- birth was early, couldn't get a plane there because of Presidential no-fly, etc.

On a different note -- who do you think leaked the details about the dinner? Particularly the part about Guilefoyle being the one to say that Reince was the leaker and should be fired. Was Mooch the leaker and just throwing her under the bus? Who else was at the table with an interest to leak this.

And, in a further twist, Bill Shine is now up for the Comms Director job? Nice way to knife Reince at the dinner table and then take his job. I hope Kelly is smart enough to see through this play and block it. That kind of behavior shouldn't be rewarded if you want a functioning WH staff. (Never mind about the too close/conflictual relationship with Fox).

[Anonymous]

Funny how you didn't make a peep about the Clinton News Network.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought that Mooches real interest in doing the interview was to provide an alibi for why he wasn't at the hospital during the birth -- birth was early, couldn't get a plane there because of Presidential no-fly, etc.

On a different note -- who do you think leaked the details about the dinner? Particularly the part about Guilefoyle being the one to say that Reince was the leaker and should be fired. Was Mooch the leaker and just throwing her under the bus? Who else was at the table with an interest to leak this.

And, in a further twist, Bill Shine is now up for the Comms Director job? Nice way to knife Reince at the dinner table and then take his job. I hope Kelly is smart enough to see through this play and block it. That kind of behavior shouldn't be rewarded if you want a functioning WH staff. (Never mind about the too close/conflictual relationship with Fox).

Everyone knew Mooch was sleeping with Kim. Everyone knew Mooch and his wife were having major issues. Reinse was pissed he wasn't invited to the dinner and figured the dinner's discussion revolved around him being canned, so he wanted to stick it to Mooch. No better way to stick it to a guy than to leak to mainstream press he's hanging out with his mistress at a private White House dinner. Obviously that made his pregnant wife go bonkers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought that Mooches real interest in doing the interview was to provide an alibi for why he wasn't at the hospital during the birth -- birth was early, couldn't get a plane there because of Presidential no-fly, etc.

On a different note -- who do you think leaked the details about the dinner? Particularly the part about Guilefoyle being the one to say that Reince was the leaker and should be fired. Was Mooch the leaker and just throwing her under the bus? Who else was at the table with an interest to leak this.

And, in a further twist, Bill Shine is now up for the Comms Director job? Nice way to knife Reince at the dinner table and then take his job. I hope Kelly is smart enough to see through this play and block it. That kind of behavior shouldn't be rewarded if you want a functioning WH staff. (Never mind about the too close/conflictual relationship with Fox).

Everyone knew Mooch was sleeping with Kim. Everyone knew Mooch and his wife were having major issues. Reinse was pissed he wasn't invited to the dinner and figured the dinner's discussion revolved around him being canned, so he wanted to stick it to Mooch. No better way to stick it to a guy than to leak to mainstream press he's hanging out with his mistress at a private White House dinner. Obviously that made his pregnant wife go bonkers.

Ok, but Reince wouldn't have leaked the bit about it being Guilefoyle who denounced Reince. That leak came out subsequently. In whose interest was it to finger Guilefoyle as weildjmg the axe that chopped off Reince's head?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Funny how you didn't make a peep about the Clinton News Network.

Did major clinton network figures have dinner with the President privately and apart from any other networks? Did makor CNN anchors ever attend a private WH dinner with the President and use the occassion to advise him to fire one of his staffers?