The Menendez Brothers

[Anonymous]

Have either of them ever taken a lie detector test about the abuse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

+1 Par for the course for a California liberal.

Even California is rethinking it’s ways, no thanks to loons like the PP who care more about criminals than law abiding good citizens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

This is a very emotional response lacking clarity, compassion, and sound reasoning.

I am not paid to be a good person and thinking member of society.

Keeping the M brothers locked up is not rational, wise or justified.

Whatever. You know they would never touch you and yours but you’re not thinking about society at large and people other than yourself. Because you’re not just talking about the M brothers. You don’t want long sentences for anyone.

How would you know what I think?

If the M brothers represented a threat to society I would want them locked up. But they don’t.

You seem to be fine with throwing away tax payers money away to make yourself feel like you tough on crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

This is a very emotional response lacking clarity, compassion, and sound reasoning.

I am not paid to be a good person and thinking member of society.

Keeping the M brothers locked up is not rational, wise or justified.

Whatever. You know they would never touch you and yours but you’re not thinking about society at large and people other than yourself. Because you’re not just talking about the M brothers. You don’t want long sentences for anyone.

How would you know what I think?

If the M brothers represented a threat to society I would want them locked up. But they don’t.

You seem to be fine with throwing away tax payers money away to make yourself feel like you tough on crime.

Let’s see your guarantee that they don’t pose a threat. Pull that right out of your ass and show us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

This is a very emotional response lacking clarity, compassion, and sound reasoning.

I am not paid to be a good person and thinking member of society.

Keeping the M brothers locked up is not rational, wise or justified.

Whatever. You know they would never touch you and yours but you’re not thinking about society at large and people other than yourself. Because you’re not just talking about the M brothers. You don’t want long sentences for anyone.

How would you know what I think?

If the M brothers represented a threat to society I would want them locked up. But they don’t.

You seem to be fine with throwing away tax payers money away to make yourself feel like you tough on crime.

Let’s see your guarantee that they don’t pose a threat. Pull that right out of your ass and show us.

The warden of their current jail is in the record that they are not a threat to society and that he would trust him to be a neighbor.

Hence we don’t need to rely on opinions pulled out of anyone’s posterior .

[Anonymous]

How much money is their cut from the Netflix min-series?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

This is a very emotional response lacking clarity, compassion, and sound reasoning.

I am not paid to be a good person and thinking member of society.

Keeping the M brothers locked up is not rational, wise or justified.

Whatever. You know they would never touch you and yours but you’re not thinking about society at large and people other than yourself. Because you’re not just talking about the M brothers. You don’t want long sentences for anyone.

How would you know what I think?

If the M brothers represented a threat to society I would want them locked up. But they don’t.

You seem to be fine with throwing away tax payers money away to make yourself feel like you tough on crime.

Let’s see your guarantee that they don’t pose a threat. Pull that right out of your ass and show us.

The warden of their current jail is in the record that they are not a threat to society and that he would trust him to be a neighbor.

Hence we don’t need to rely on opinions pulled out of anyone’s posterior .

They will get out when the judge says they can, not because people watched a Netflix movie and now feel sorry for them. Until then, I lose no sleep thinking about them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:See WapO article today

Nothing new but lawyers feel the Social time is Right to ask for another trial or sentencing

Correct, nothing new except that possible trauma and abuse at home, in today’s America, might get less time.

Plus this lawyer, wants a glory case. Half the practice doesn’t think they had legs beyond mass/social media.

Strike while the iron is hot!! Then on to the next one!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

This is a very emotional response lacking clarity, compassion, and sound reasoning.

I am not paid to be a good person and thinking member of society.

Keeping the M brothers locked up is not rational, wise or justified.

Whatever. You know they would never touch you and yours but you’re not thinking about society at large and people other than yourself. Because you’re not just talking about the M brothers. You don’t want long sentences for anyone.

How would you know what I think?

If the M brothers represented a threat to society I would want them locked up. But they don’t.

You seem to be fine with throwing away tax payers money away to make yourself feel like you tough on crime.

Let’s see your guarantee that they don’t pose a threat. Pull that right out of your ass and show us.

The warden of their current jail is in the record that they are not a threat to society and that he would trust him to be a neighbor.

Hence we don’t need to rely on opinions pulled out of anyone’s posterior .

They will get out when the judge says they can, not because people watched a Netflix movie and now feel sorry for them. Until then, I lose no sleep thinking about them.

There have been many people advocating for them for many years - most notably criminal profiling inventor Dr Anne Burgess.

The psychiatric nurse and forensic expert who testified in the Menendez brothers' first trial said that the LA County district attorney's decision to move forward with a resentencing recommendation for the duo was the right thing to do and something that she's been calling for for a very long time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

+1 Par for the course for a California liberal.

If that person is indeed a California liberal, how does that impact you, as a DMV Maga?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

DP. You sound like someone who severly abuse your children or other's children and you want to make sure that nobody take you out later like the Menendez brothers took out their abusers. A lot of you people are projecting your own failures and want to normalize child sexual abuse/trafficking as no big deal and the abused should just walk away. You people are truly sick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How much money is their cut from the Netflix min-series?

Nothing. It's against California law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have either of them ever taken a lie detector test about the abuse?

Why? Polygraph tests are inadmissible for a reason. They are unreliable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

+1 Par for the course for a California liberal.

If that person is indeed a California liberal, how does that impact you, as a DMV Maga?

PP here. I'm not a MAGA, but I don't think murderers' sentences should be based on childhood abuse. A huge number of prisoners were abused as children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a person who was horribly abused, in a big fancy house, by parents who were extremely well respected and appeared very normal to everyone outside of the family—I don’t doubt abuse for one second with murder of parents.

Occum’s razor — they were pushed to the edge by abuse? Or so spoiled they shot their parents multiple times at close range with a shotgun? I’m not saying they aren’t sociopaths; I’m saying even if they are it is highly unlikely they’d kill because they are spoiled.

They didn’t seem particularly remorseful. Spending money and having a good old time on their ill gotten gains.

What does that have to do with anything? They should feel remorse for having killed the people who made their life hell?

And they spent a bunch of money? So what, everyone in Beverly Hills spends a bunch of money.

It’s not ok to kill people and spend their money. Even Gypsy Rose Blanchard got 10 years and she didn’t even murder her mom herself. Not sure what kind of lenience people think the Menendez brothers would get for their crime. You can’t just kill people who did you wrong.

They’ve already served 30 years. Don’t act like a punishment has not already been handed out.

They killed their parents. They are not judge and jury.

30 years is not enough.

What an ignorant viewpoint - thank god most of society has moved on from such contextless compassionless blanket judgements ..,

Maybe fast easy Deaths are not enough for fathers who sexually, psychologically and emotionally abuse their sons and mothers who hide/ enable the abuse. Life time sentences in maximum security jails would have been better for them.

So abusers, rapists, and murderers should be sentenced leniently if they were abused as children?

If you call 30 years lenient - it obviously should be taken into account yes. And relevant therapies required while
In jail.
.

But no they should not get off Scott free. The M brothers have already served 30 years.

I don't believe in capital punishment but have no words for someone who thinks like you that 30 years is enough for murder. Can't imagine what you think is suitable for child molesters, rapists, and serial killers.

Americans have become numb to these incredibly long prison sentences and act like it is not enough. Try to imagine losing even ONE year of your own life sitting in prison. It is an enormous life changing punishment. 35 years is pretty much impossible to comprehend.

Plus one.

Especially when the perps were sexually and psychologically abused by their father their entire childhood and afraid that he was going to kill them after threats that they were going to expose his abuse. These are mitigating circumstances.

Since PP brought up the death penalty -
I don’t believe in the death penalty because not only is it immoral and extremely expensive to keep inmates on death row for decades until they exhaust appeal options, it does not deter violent crime.

I don't believe in capital punishment either. I DO believe in life sentences for violent, heinous crines like rape, murder, sexual abuse/torture, serial killings, etc. Many perpetrators of crimes were victims of abuse. That does not mean they are allowed to kill and/or torture others without a life changing punishment. Those who are murdered are gone forever and many of them at very young ages. Those who are molested, tortured, and/or raped are never the same afterwards. They are the innocents who have society's sympathy.

In most of the United States, a life sentence usually means a person in prison for 15 years with the chance for parole. Very rarely are life sentences imposed with no end.

The brothers have already served double the average length.

While I am glad you do not support the death penalty, I don’t think your mentality of lock them up forever and throw away the key is going to prevent cycles of abuse. Yes they did wrong and have served more than two average life sentences. It is time for mercy.

They killed two people so maybe they should get double the time. 15 years doesn’t seem like enough when a murderer snuffs out a life if someone who didn’t deserve it and had many years in front of them. How is that justice for a victim or their family? Your bleeding heart can’t spare a thought for the victims? Only the perpetrators?

Doesn’t the family support Lyle and Erik? To them, justice would be setting the brothers free.

Exactly. The vast majority of their family want them free.

Hope to God that the PP who keeps reiterating “they are murderers” (with no accounting for the horrific abuse by their father, long sentences already served and consistent good behavior) is NOT working in the judicial system or law enforcement.

This mentality perpetuates cycles of abuse and violence. Norway which has a very humane criminal judicial and incarceration system has low recidivism rates . (Recidivism is the tendency of a person to repeat a criminal offense after experiencing jail time and being trained to understand and stop criminal behaviors). Norway has a recidivism rate of 20% while the US has a rate of 76.6%.

There is So much evidence that humane justice and jail systems contribute to lower rates of societal violence and reoffending.

The brothers have served more than double average life sentences, exhibited good behavior in jail for 35 years, provided evidence to back up their allegations of long term sexual and psychological abuse at hands of father and shown remorse for their actions.

The punitive minded “lock em up forever and throw away the keys” Approach serves no one well.

Average life sentence for what crimes? Killing one person? Or two?

No End In Sight: America’s Enduring Reliance on Life Sentences
By Ashley Nellis, Ph.D.
February 17, 2021

https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/no-end-in-sight-americas-enduring-reliance-on-life-sentences/

In the United States, more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison.

Before America’s era of mass incarceration took hold in the early 1970s, the number of individuals in prison was less than 200,000. Today, it’s 1.4 million; and more than 200,000 people are serving life sentences – one out of every seven in prison. More people are sentenced to life in prison in America than there were people in prison serving any sentence in 1970.

Nearly five times the number of people are now serving life sentences in the United States as were in 1984, a rate of growth that has outpaced even the sharp expansion of the overall prison population during this period.

The now commonplace use of life imprisonment contradicts research on effective public safety strategies, exacerbates already extreme racial injustices in the criminal justice system, and exemplifies the egregious consequences of mass incarceration

That hardly answer the question. I don’t care how many are serving life sentences I’d like to know what their crimes were. Can guarantee these aren’t good people. I’ll spare my sympathy for the victims.

You are making an emotional decision. Would you rather enjoy your desire for punishment, or would you rather have a system that actually reduces crime? There are a few classes of criminals that cannot be rehabilitated, serial killers for example, but they comprise a small number of offenders.

Being soft on crime doesn’t seem to be working out in many places. Spare us your bleeding heart for criminals. Talk about emotional!

It’s not emotional. It’s based on a multitude of research which clearly demonstrates that rehabilitative correctional systems result in dramatic reductions in overall crime rates and recidivism.

Oh. Is this why we have so many career criminals and repeat offenders?

DP

Complicated but US has mass incarceration system that is not focused on rehabilitation where possible and that is not working well. Obviously there are some people who are criminally insane or sociopaths and need to stay locked up.

In this case, keeping the M brothers locked up serves no one well. Even the warden at their current Donovan Center said he would trust them as his neighbors and to care for his children. They are not threats to society.

And how will we decide who is able to be rehabilitated or not?

35 years of consistently good behavior is a pretty good indication

Oh but I thought double the amount of time? So what is the right amount of time? Seems like you just want slaps on the wrists for heinous crimes.

You are being ridiculous - in what punitive parallel universe does 35 years of confinement (mostly in maximum security separated from each other)/ no chance to ever have families of their own/ no conjugal visits with their wives - represent a slap on the wrist?

No, you’re waffling. 15 years is average but 35 is too long. So, what is the right amount of time? And really with the cycle of abuse in the Menendez family line no kids of their own is a benefit to society and to the Menendez family.

Someone articulating a rational viewpoint to your draconian views is hardly waffling.

1. Yes 15 years is average for life sentences and they have served 35 years. They have served enough time .

2. Evidence about severely abusive childhoods were not allowed in the Second trial and should be considered for resentencing hearing.

3. They have shown themselves to have remorse and to exhibit excellent behavior for a very long time. They are not a threat to society.

4. It is expensive for taxpayers to keep them locked up.

Releasing them is the humane and rationale Course of action.

How much are you getting paid to advocate for them? You should also be their first stop if they get released. They can live with you, watch your kids, and readjust to life on the outside under your roof.

+1 Par for the course for a California liberal.

If that person is indeed a California liberal, how does that impact you, as a DMV Maga?

PP here. I'm not a MAGA, but I don't think murderers' sentences should be based on childhood abuse. A huge number of prisoners were abused as children.

DP, the abuse is relevant in this case is because their victims were their abusers. It’s partially why there is very little concern that the Menendez brothers are a current danger to society. The people they killed were the people that abused them. I’m a former prosecutor and take a pretty hard line approach to the criminal justice system, but the reality is society’s thinking on abuse, especially sexual abuse of boys, has evolved over the last 35 years and informs the way we look at this case now. If the Menendez case happened present day, they would take a plea to manslaughter or second degree murder and would have received a sentence of less than the 35 years they have already served.