Hannah Graham - what's the latest?

Anonymous
LOL!!! The homeowners association for the rural, semi mountainous wooded lot. Hilarity.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.


If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.

I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.

So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.


Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.




There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.

Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.

Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN


I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.


The homeowner's association? My god, the privilege on DCUM never stops. Do you have any idea of what a true rural location is like? There is no homeowner's association. You all really have no clue.


I said that is what I would do. She could have just as easily called the police. They only had billboards up all over the place and stories on the news 24/7. Is it that hard to make a call from your armchair and say "I own a wooded lot with abandoned buildings on it and I can't check it myself but could you send a few officers out?". Done.


And, how exactly do you KNOW that the homeowner did not take some action? How do you know she did not walk the property or have someone else walk it? How do you know she did not call police? And, do you expect this relatively small police force to go out to every property in rural Charlottesville at the request of a property owner?
You really are out of touch.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.


If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.

I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.

So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.


Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.




There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.

Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.

Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN


I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.


The homeowner's association? My god, the privilege on DCUM never stops. Do you have any idea of what a true rural location is like? There is no homeowner's association. You all really have no clue.


I said that is what I would do. She could have just as easily called the police. They only had billboards up all over the place and stories on the news 24/7. Is it that hard to make a call from your armchair and say "I own a wooded lot with abandoned buildings on it and I can't check it myself but could you send a few officers out?". Done.


Are you assuming that no one, including the landowner, checked her property because the body wasn't discovered earlier?

As for the police doing the footwork, they were getting 200-300 tips a day. They were following up on all of them. And even then the police themselves say they were about to leave after finding nothing but then checked some more.

There was no guarantee anyone would have found that body. Done.
Anonymous
Different poster here. There is a reasonable presumption of a certain mentality, much like that of PP, which tells me that NO, no attempt to search the property was made. Some might call it the Hillbilly Mentality. Go ahead, be proud.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.


If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.

I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.

So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.


Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.




There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.

Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.

Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN


I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.


The homeowner's association? My god, the privilege on DCUM never stops. Do you have any idea of what a true rural location is like? There is no homeowner's association. You all really have no clue.


Have you taken a look at the pricing on some of the nearby homes? There may not be an HOA in that area, it may be secluded/rural but there are big homes worth millions nearby, too. That doesn't mean that the owners of this particular property where the remains were found are wealthy/privileged by any stretch. But I would imagine that there must be someone in the area that can be called on to keep an eye out on some of those $$$$ properties while the owners are away on vacation, etc. This is not to say that the owners of the property in question could have afforded to pay someone to walk the property or knew anyone that would be willing to do it, of course.


The woman is "wealthy" enough to own property, but too stupid to check her property? So she wants the privileges and benefits of being a citizen, without acting like one?

Anonymous
Maybe it's one of those places where people value privacy, take care of themselves and stay out of their neighbor's business (and yards).

Right now it seems obvious that the property should have been checked thoroughly because we know what was found there. But the day before the discovery, that property was just 1 of a million other places....nothing obvious about it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.


If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.

I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.

So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.


Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.




There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.

Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.

Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN


I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.


The homeowner's association? My god, the privilege on DCUM never stops. Do you have any idea of what a true rural location is like? There is no homeowner's association. You all really have no clue.


Have you taken a look at the pricing on some of the nearby homes? There may not be an HOA in that area, it may be secluded/rural but there are big homes worth millions nearby, too. That doesn't mean that the owners of this particular property where the remains were found are wealthy/privileged by any stretch. But I would imagine that there must be someone in the area that can be called on to keep an eye out on some of those $$$$ properties while the owners are away on vacation, etc. This is not to say that the owners of the property in question could have afforded to pay someone to walk the property or knew anyone that would be willing to do it, of course.


The woman is "wealthy" enough to own property, but too stupid to check her property? So she wants the privileges and benefits of being a citizen, without acting like one?



It's frustrating but please remember that this elderly owner did not hurt Hannah nor did she stand on her property shooing away trespassers. Maybe she just assumed that the search teams would search there, too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.


If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.

I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.

So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.


Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.




There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.

Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.

Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN


I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.


The homeowner's association? My god, the privilege on DCUM never stops. Do you have any idea of what a true rural location is like? There is no homeowner's association. You all really have no clue.


Have you taken a look at the pricing on some of the nearby homes? There may not be an HOA in that area, it may be secluded/rural but there are big homes worth millions nearby, too. That doesn't mean that the owners of this particular property where the remains were found are wealthy/privileged by any stretch. But I would imagine that there must be someone in the area that can be called on to keep an eye out on some of those $$$$ properties while the owners are away on vacation, etc. This is not to say that the owners of the property in question could have afforded to pay someone to walk the property or knew anyone that would be willing to do it, of course.


The woman is "wealthy" enough to own property, but too stupid to check her property? So she wants the privileges and benefits of being a citizen, without acting like one?



For the umpteenth time - Show us the PROOF that this homeowner/landowner did NOT check the property or have the property checked by someone else. If you cannot show us the proof, then just STFU.
Anonymous
Taking race out of the equation completely - I think we teach our kids so much to be inclusive and trusting and not skeptical based on appearances, all laudable things, but not always the most cautious approach. i.e., when I was in college I avoided all older townies like the plague. (They were all white). They were rednecky and sketchy. Now that would be considered snobby, classist and elitist. Sometimes you need to play the percentages and leave the PC stuff for someone else.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Taking race out of the equation completely - I think we teach our kids so much to be inclusive and trusting and not skeptical based on appearances, all laudable things, but not always the most cautious approach. i.e., when I was in college I avoided all older townies like the plague. (They were all white). They were rednecky and sketchy. Now that would be considered snobby, classist and elitist. Sometimes you need to play the percentages and leave the PC stuff for someone else.


+1

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.


If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.



20 years ago, I owned a six acre property in a rural area. I owned it for 4 years, and during that time I never once visited the far back end of the property. To this day I don't know what was there. I could see it -- wooded area, very pretty, with a pond, but I never walked back there. It was in a nice upper middle class area too. Just too much property to examine closely!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.


If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.



20 years ago, I owned a six acre property in a rural area. I owned it for 4 years, and during that time I never once visited the far back end of the property. To this day I don't know what was there. I could see it -- wooded area, very pretty, with a pond, but I never walked back there. It was in a nice upper middle class area too. Just too much property to examine closely!


Was there ever a murder of a young college student nearby, and a public plea by police to do so?
Anonymous
And did you ignore it?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And did you ignore it?


Again, how do you know the property owner did nothing? Some of you are oddly obsessed with this considering you have no clue what the owner did or did not do. You're sounding more and more unhinged.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And did you ignore it?


Again, how do you know the property owner did nothing? Some of you are oddly obsessed with this considering you have no clue what the owner did or did not do. You're sounding more and more unhinged.


Right. It's me, not the lazy woman who refused to follow a rather public police request. Got it.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: