My gut feeling on 3/26 BOE vote

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wootton PTSA has publicly committed to planning for the transition to the new building if the BOE votes for this option. I hope the few rogue parents will listen to the wise Wootton leadership and stand down for the benefit of the community.


How is that going to work with an active legal situation? Are they inextricably linked?


There isn't an active legal situation. They don't have a case.


Compare these Taylor scenarios for 2 school sites he wanted decommissioned. Taylor/MCPS decided to call Wootton a relocation, SSIMS a closure. No difference in what would happen to public school students currently in boundary. Politicians care about 1 site and not the other. Jawando quiet on 1 closure and not the other https://www.willjawando.com/news/ None of them care about the no Wootton overload for Churchill.

Process should have been the same for both sites. MCPS Taylor does not want to fund operating a 27th HS. 12/11/26 meeting had SSIMS closure as an action item that failed. Same meeting should have had a vote on closure of Wootton.
https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DP6QG868D2AD/$file/Apprv%20Process%20Closure%20Procedures%20Silver%20Spring%20Intl%20MS.pdf

https://saveoursilverspringschools.com/


Sorry, no, this analysis is dumb. SSIMS would have actually been shut down and its students and staff split to other existing schools. Wootton, its staff, and almost all of its students are moving from an old building to a vacant brand new building. Not sure how anyone can think these two things are the same?


SSIMS was also going to be used as a holding school. Exactly the same as the Wootton plan. Exactly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wootton PTSA has publicly committed to planning for the transition to the new building if the BOE votes for this option. I hope the few rogue parents will listen to the wise Wootton leadership and stand down for the benefit of the community.


How is that going to work with an active legal situation? Are they inextricably linked?


There isn't an active legal situation. They don't have a case.


Compare these Taylor scenarios for 2 school sites he wanted decommissioned. Taylor/MCPS decided to call Wootton a relocation, SSIMS a closure. No difference in what would happen to public school students currently in boundary. Politicians care about 1 site and not the other. Jawando quiet on 1 closure and not the other https://www.willjawando.com/news/ None of them care about the no Wootton overload for Churchill.

Process should have been the same for both sites. MCPS Taylor does not want to fund operating a 27th HS. 12/11/26 meeting had SSIMS closure as an action item that failed. Same meeting should have had a vote on closure of Wootton.
https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DP6QG868D2AD/$file/Apprv%20Process%20Closure%20Procedures%20Silver%20Spring%20Intl%20MS.pdf

https://saveoursilverspringschools.com/


Sorry, no, this analysis is dumb. SSIMS would have actually been shut down and its students and staff split to other existing schools. Wootton, its staff, and almost all of its students are moving from an old building to a vacant brand new building. Not sure how anyone can think these two things are the same?


A closure is a closure whether students are moved to an existing school currently receiving students or a new building. Thise scenarios are different from students assigned to other sites temporarily during renovation whether the sites are dedicated buildings school or undercapacity sites.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-A5foyoqS7rlZI0vCncHtHChCIRdZMNC/view
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wootton PTSA has publicly committed to planning for the transition to the new building if the BOE votes for this option. I hope the few rogue parents will listen to the wise Wootton leadership and stand down for the benefit of the community.


How is that going to work with an active legal situation? Are they inextricably linked?


There isn't an active legal situation. They don't have a case.


Compare these Taylor scenarios for 2 school sites he wanted decommissioned. Taylor/MCPS decided to call Wootton a relocation, SSIMS a closure. No difference in what would happen to public school students currently in boundary. Politicians care about 1 site and not the other. Jawando quiet on 1 closure and not the other https://www.willjawando.com/news/ None of them care about the no Wootton overload for Churchill.

Process should have been the same for both sites. MCPS Taylor does not want to fund operating a 27th HS. 12/11/26 meeting had SSIMS closure as an action item that failed. Same meeting should have had a vote on closure of Wootton.
https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DP6QG868D2AD/$file/Apprv%20Process%20Closure%20Procedures%20Silver%20Spring%20Intl%20MS.pdf

https://saveoursilverspringschools.com/


Sorry, no, this analysis is dumb. SSIMS would have actually been shut down and its students and staff split to other existing schools. Wootton, its staff, and almost all of its students are moving from an old building to a vacant brand new building. Not sure how anyone can think these two things are the same?


SSIMS was also going to be used as a holding school. Exactly the same as the Wootton plan. Exactly.


What are you talking about? You are nuts. Do you really not understand the difference between closing a school and moving a school?

The fact that the empty building would be used as a holding school doesn't somehow mean that the school itself therefore closes. That makes zero sense. You are off your rocker.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:SIAP but can someone please post the latest proposal for redistricting (impacted ESs/MSs/HSs)? My head is dizzy keeping up with these options.


There are currently 2 boundary studies going on. We're at the very last step, the Superintendent has submitted his recommendations, the BOE / Superintendent have held multiple public meetings, and the BOE will be voting this Thursday on whether to approve or not.

Additionally, the Regional Programs was also recommended by the Superintendent, which would dissolve the high school consortiums and set up regional programs.

The easiest way to see how you're affected is to click on the interactive map and punch in your address and it should show you what your current MS / HS is and what it will be under the superintendent's recommendation

Woodward opening:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentrecwoodwardnorth?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Bethesda Chevy-Chase
Montgomery Blair
Albert Einstein
Walter Johnson
John F. Kennedy
Northwood
Wheaton
Walt Whitman

Crown / Wootton + Damascus expansion:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentreccrowndamascus?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Winston Churchill
Clarksburg
Damascus
Gaithersburg
Richard Montgomery
Northwest
Poolesville
Quince Orchard
Seneca Valley
Watkins Mill
Thomas S. Wootton

Full presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DQZPAX63BCF7/$file/Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260205%20PPT.pdf
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wootton PTSA has publicly committed to planning for the transition to the new building if the BOE votes for this option. I hope the few rogue parents will listen to the wise Wootton leadership and stand down for the benefit of the community.


How is that going to work with an active legal situation? Are they inextricably linked?


There isn't an active legal situation. They don't have a case.


Compare these Taylor scenarios for 2 school sites he wanted decommissioned. Taylor/MCPS decided to call Wootton a relocation, SSIMS a closure. No difference in what would happen to public school students currently in boundary. Politicians care about 1 site and not the other. Jawando quiet on 1 closure and not the other https://www.willjawando.com/news/ None of them care about the no Wootton overload for Churchill.

Process should have been the same for both sites. MCPS Taylor does not want to fund operating a 27th HS. 12/11/26 meeting had SSIMS closure as an action item that failed. Same meeting should have had a vote on closure of Wootton.
https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DP6QG868D2AD/$file/Apprv%20Process%20Closure%20Procedures%20Silver%20Spring%20Intl%20MS.pdf

https://saveoursilverspringschools.com/


Sorry, no, this analysis is dumb. SSIMS would have actually been shut down and its students and staff split to other existing schools. Wootton, its staff, and almost all of its students are moving from an old building to a vacant brand new building. Not sure how anyone can think these two things are the same?


SSIMS was also going to be used as a holding school. Exactly the same as the Wootton plan. Exactly.


DP. It is not at all the same. In Wootton's case, there is already a new school nearby that they can be relocated to, almost in full. For SSIMS, there is no school to relocate to, and there was a proposal to add new additions to nearby schools, to split the SSIMS students between them, and who knows what would happen to the staff. That proposal has since been at least delayed,a nd now funding for those projects has been removed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wootton PTSA has publicly committed to planning for the transition to the new building if the BOE votes for this option. I hope the few rogue parents will listen to the wise Wootton leadership and stand down for the benefit of the community.


How is that going to work with an active legal situation? Are they inextricably linked?


There isn't an active legal situation. They don't have a case.


Compare these Taylor scenarios for 2 school sites he wanted decommissioned. Taylor/MCPS decided to call Wootton a relocation, SSIMS a closure. No difference in what would happen to public school students currently in boundary. Politicians care about 1 site and not the other. Jawando quiet on 1 closure and not the other https://www.willjawando.com/news/ None of them care about the no Wootton overload for Churchill.

Process should have been the same for both sites. MCPS Taylor does not want to fund operating a 27th HS. 12/11/26 meeting had SSIMS closure as an action item that failed. Same meeting should have had a vote on closure of Wootton.
https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DP6QG868D2AD/$file/Apprv%20Process%20Closure%20Procedures%20Silver%20Spring%20Intl%20MS.pdf

https://saveoursilverspringschools.com/


Denial is the first stage of acceptance. Its ok. You might need to hurry through the other ones and get to acceptance more quickly though for your own sanity.

Sorry, no, this analysis is dumb. SSIMS would have actually been shut down and its students and staff split to other existing schools. Wootton, its staff, and almost all of its students are moving from an old building to a vacant brand new building. Not sure how anyone can think these two things are the same?


SSIMS was also going to be used as a holding school. Exactly the same as the Wootton plan. Exactly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SIAP but can someone please post the latest proposal for redistricting (impacted ESs/MSs/HSs)? My head is dizzy keeping up with these options.


There are currently 2 boundary studies going on. We're at the very last step, the Superintendent has submitted his recommendations, the BOE / Superintendent have held multiple public meetings, and the BOE will be voting this Thursday on whether to approve or not.

Additionally, the Regional Programs was also recommended by the Superintendent, which would dissolve the high school consortiums and set up regional programs.

The easiest way to see how you're affected is to click on the interactive map and punch in your address and it should show you what your current MS / HS is and what it will be under the superintendent's recommendation

Woodward opening:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentrecwoodwardnorth?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Bethesda Chevy-Chase
Montgomery Blair
Albert Einstein
Walter Johnson
John F. Kennedy
Northwood
Wheaton
Walt Whitman

Crown / Wootton + Damascus expansion:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentreccrowndamascus?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Winston Churchill
Clarksburg
Damascus
Gaithersburg
Richard Montgomery
Northwest
Poolesville
Quince Orchard
Seneca Valley
Watkins Mill
Thomas S. Wootton

Full presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DQZPAX63BCF7/$file/Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260205%20PPT.pdf


There is no vote on the regional programs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SIAP but can someone please post the latest proposal for redistricting (impacted ESs/MSs/HSs)? My head is dizzy keeping up with these options.


There are currently 2 boundary studies going on. We're at the very last step, the Superintendent has submitted his recommendations, the BOE / Superintendent have held multiple public meetings, and the BOE will be voting this Thursday on whether to approve or not.

Additionally, the Regional Programs was also recommended by the Superintendent, which would dissolve the high school consortiums and set up regional programs.

The easiest way to see how you're affected is to click on the interactive map and punch in your address and it should show you what your current MS / HS is and what it will be under the superintendent's recommendation

Woodward opening:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentrecwoodwardnorth?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Bethesda Chevy-Chase
Montgomery Blair
Albert Einstein
Walter Johnson
John F. Kennedy
Northwood
Wheaton
Walt Whitman

Crown / Wootton + Damascus expansion:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentreccrowndamascus?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Winston Churchill
Clarksburg
Damascus
Gaithersburg
Richard Montgomery
Northwest
Poolesville
Quince Orchard
Seneca Valley
Watkins Mill
Thomas S. Wootton

Full presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DQZPAX63BCF7/$file/Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260205%20PPT.pdf


There is no vote on the regional programs.


There is, in a very general sense.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DSFTQE7875F4/$file/Apprv%20Rec%20Establish%20Secondary%20Regional%20Programs%20260326.pdf
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SIAP but can someone please post the latest proposal for redistricting (impacted ESs/MSs/HSs)? My head is dizzy keeping up with these options.


There are currently 2 boundary studies going on. We're at the very last step, the Superintendent has submitted his recommendations, the BOE / Superintendent have held multiple public meetings, and the BOE will be voting this Thursday on whether to approve or not.

Additionally, the Regional Programs was also recommended by the Superintendent, which would dissolve the high school consortiums and set up regional programs.

The easiest way to see how you're affected is to click on the interactive map and punch in your address and it should show you what your current MS / HS is and what it will be under the superintendent's recommendation

Woodward opening:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentrecwoodwardnorth?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Bethesda Chevy-Chase
Montgomery Blair
Albert Einstein
Walter Johnson
John F. Kennedy
Northwood
Wheaton
Walt Whitman

Crown / Wootton + Damascus expansion:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentreccrowndamascus?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Winston Churchill
Clarksburg
Damascus
Gaithersburg
Richard Montgomery
Northwest
Poolesville
Quince Orchard
Seneca Valley
Watkins Mill
Thomas S. Wootton

Full presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DQZPAX63BCF7/$file/Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260205%20PPT.pdf


There is no vote on the regional programs.


There is, in a very general sense.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DSFTQE7875F4/$file/Apprv%20Rec%20Establish%20Secondary%20Regional%20Programs%20260326.pdf


All power is turned over to the superintendent. The BOE will never discuss or vote on the regions or programs again. The superintendent doesn't even have to set up regions. He can do something completely different. He can set up 20 regions or none.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SIAP but can someone please post the latest proposal for redistricting (impacted ESs/MSs/HSs)? My head is dizzy keeping up with these options.


There are currently 2 boundary studies going on. We're at the very last step, the Superintendent has submitted his recommendations, the BOE / Superintendent have held multiple public meetings, and the BOE will be voting this Thursday on whether to approve or not.

Additionally, the Regional Programs was also recommended by the Superintendent, which would dissolve the high school consortiums and set up regional programs.

The easiest way to see how you're affected is to click on the interactive map and punch in your address and it should show you what your current MS / HS is and what it will be under the superintendent's recommendation

Woodward opening:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentrecwoodwardnorth?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Bethesda Chevy-Chase
Montgomery Blair
Albert Einstein
Walter Johnson
John F. Kennedy
Northwood
Wheaton
Walt Whitman

Crown / Wootton + Damascus expansion:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentreccrowndamascus?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Winston Churchill
Clarksburg
Damascus
Gaithersburg
Richard Montgomery
Northwest
Poolesville
Quince Orchard
Seneca Valley
Watkins Mill
Thomas S. Wootton

Full presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DQZPAX63BCF7/$file/Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260205%20PPT.pdf


Thrilled that my neighborhood is now connected with Poolesville (instead of NWHS).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SIAP but can someone please post the latest proposal for redistricting (impacted ESs/MSs/HSs)? My head is dizzy keeping up with these options.


There are currently 2 boundary studies going on. We're at the very last step, the Superintendent has submitted his recommendations, the BOE / Superintendent have held multiple public meetings, and the BOE will be voting this Thursday on whether to approve or not.

Additionally, the Regional Programs was also recommended by the Superintendent, which would dissolve the high school consortiums and set up regional programs.

The easiest way to see how you're affected is to click on the interactive map and punch in your address and it should show you what your current MS / HS is and what it will be under the superintendent's recommendation

Woodward opening:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentrecwoodwardnorth?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Bethesda Chevy-Chase
Montgomery Blair
Albert Einstein
Walter Johnson
John F. Kennedy
Northwood
Wheaton
Walt Whitman

Crown / Wootton + Damascus expansion:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentreccrowndamascus?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Winston Churchill
Clarksburg
Damascus
Gaithersburg
Richard Montgomery
Northwest
Poolesville
Quince Orchard
Seneca Valley
Watkins Mill
Thomas S. Wootton

Full presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DQZPAX63BCF7/$file/Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260205%20PPT.pdf


There is no vote on the regional programs.


There is, in a very general sense.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DSFTQE7875F4/$file/Apprv%20Rec%20Establish%20Secondary%20Regional%20Programs%20260326.pdf


All power is turned over to the superintendent. The BOE will never discuss or vote on the regions or programs again. The superintendent doesn't even have to set up regions. He can do something completely different. He can set up 20 regions or none.


It’s ok, when it comes election time, we’ll be voting. Time for a turnover with the BOE and County Council.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SIAP but can someone please post the latest proposal for redistricting (impacted ESs/MSs/HSs)? My head is dizzy keeping up with these options.


There are currently 2 boundary studies going on. We're at the very last step, the Superintendent has submitted his recommendations, the BOE / Superintendent have held multiple public meetings, and the BOE will be voting this Thursday on whether to approve or not.

Additionally, the Regional Programs was also recommended by the Superintendent, which would dissolve the high school consortiums and set up regional programs.

The easiest way to see how you're affected is to click on the interactive map and punch in your address and it should show you what your current MS / HS is and what it will be under the superintendent's recommendation

Woodward opening:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentrecwoodwardnorth?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Bethesda Chevy-Chase
Montgomery Blair
Albert Einstein
Walter Johnson
John F. Kennedy
Northwood
Wheaton
Walt Whitman

Crown / Wootton + Damascus expansion:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentreccrowndamascus?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Winston Churchill
Clarksburg
Damascus
Gaithersburg
Richard Montgomery
Northwest
Poolesville
Quince Orchard
Seneca Valley
Watkins Mill
Thomas S. Wootton

Full presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DQZPAX63BCF7/$file/Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260205%20PPT.pdf


Thrilled that my neighborhood is now connected with Poolesville (instead of NWHS).


But what about the recommended middle school??
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So they have spent months creating endless power points about the regional model and when it comes to vote they have....nothing? Just dissolve the DCC and NEC and let Taylor create unspecified "regional programs"? WTAF is Taylor thinking?


More like what is the board thinking approving this? They think they can ask for guardrails, but once they approve, Taylor can do whatever he wants.


I hope the next board is ready to fire Taylor.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SIAP but can someone please post the latest proposal for redistricting (impacted ESs/MSs/HSs)? My head is dizzy keeping up with these options.


There are currently 2 boundary studies going on. We're at the very last step, the Superintendent has submitted his recommendations, the BOE / Superintendent have held multiple public meetings, and the BOE will be voting this Thursday on whether to approve or not.

Additionally, the Regional Programs was also recommended by the Superintendent, which would dissolve the high school consortiums and set up regional programs.

The easiest way to see how you're affected is to click on the interactive map and punch in your address and it should show you what your current MS / HS is and what it will be under the superintendent's recommendation

Woodward opening:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentrecwoodwardnorth?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Bethesda Chevy-Chase
Montgomery Blair
Albert Einstein
Walter Johnson
John F. Kennedy
Northwood
Wheaton
Walt Whitman

Crown / Wootton + Damascus expansion:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentreccrowndamascus?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Winston Churchill
Clarksburg
Damascus
Gaithersburg
Richard Montgomery
Northwest
Poolesville
Quince Orchard
Seneca Valley
Watkins Mill
Thomas S. Wootton

Full presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DQZPAX63BCF7/$file/Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260205%20PPT.pdf


Thrilled that my neighborhood is now connected with Poolesville (instead of NWHS).


But what about the recommended middle school??


Kingsview? Fine with me. Just glad it's not Ridgeview.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:SIAP but can someone please post the latest proposal for redistricting (impacted ESs/MSs/HSs)? My head is dizzy keeping up with these options.


There are currently 2 boundary studies going on. We're at the very last step, the Superintendent has submitted his recommendations, the BOE / Superintendent have held multiple public meetings, and the BOE will be voting this Thursday on whether to approve or not.

Additionally, the Regional Programs was also recommended by the Superintendent, which would dissolve the high school consortiums and set up regional programs.

The easiest way to see how you're affected is to click on the interactive map and punch in your address and it should show you what your current MS / HS is and what it will be under the superintendent's recommendation

Woodward opening:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentrecwoodwardnorth?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Bethesda Chevy-Chase
Montgomery Blair
Albert Einstein
Walter Johnson
John F. Kennedy
Northwood
Wheaton
Walt Whitman

Crown / Wootton + Damascus expansion:
https://sites.google.com/mcpsmd.net/superintendentreccrowndamascus?usp=sharing

High schools affected:
Winston Churchill
Clarksburg
Damascus
Gaithersburg
Richard Montgomery
Northwest
Poolesville
Quince Orchard
Seneca Valley
Watkins Mill
Thomas S. Wootton

Full presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DQZPAX63BCF7/$file/Rec%20Secondary%20Prog%20Analysis%20Boundary%20Studies%20260205%20PPT.pdf


Thrilled that my neighborhood is now connected with Poolesville (instead of NWHS).


But what about the recommended middle school??


Kingsview? Fine with me. Just glad it's not Ridgeview.


what's up with ridgeview? up the ramp down the stairs #iykyk old school bobcats
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: