Whose Airstrike Bombed a Girls’ School in Iran? The U.S. Says It’s Still Investigating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israel is immoral

But not Iran. Nope, not the terrorist regime full of mullahs who execute thousands without even blinking.

Israel executes thousands without even blinking

They get a pass though because they are the chosen people

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t even need to kill 180 American schoolchildren as revenge, Americans will do it themselves.

Iran callously slaughtered hundreds of its own kids in the protests a few weeks ago. That deeply undermines their credibility and moral authority.

Exactly. It just boggles the mind that these posters seem to have no recollection of that. More likely, they have selective memory. Utter hypocrites.

The ones attacking the US with nothing to say about Iran's many evil acts are willfully dishonest, unserious posters. We should just flag them as trolls and move on.

The US strengthens the hardliners in Iran with these bombings. They aren't helping the protestors by destroying hospitals and slaughtering children.

Slaughtering kids is pretty bad but somehow I doubt the protesters will have all that much sympathy knowing the kids at Minab were the kids of IRGC officers who without a second thought ordered Basij thugs to slaughter the protesters and their kids in the streets, ordered hospitals to refuse them medical care, arrested shot kids arriving at hospitals and then beat them to death, and then held their bodies for ransom. That all happened.

That and brutal gang rape of any women and girls caught up by Basij and IRGC thugs.

Yes I’m sure you’re anti-rape. Very much into fidelity and consent, right.

None of this is about projecting vulnerable women for people like you.

[Anonymous]

Kudos to that journalist who called Trump out as being the only person who thought that Iran could have gotten their hands on a tomahawk and fired it at their own school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t even need to kill 180 American schoolchildren as revenge, Americans will do it themselves.

Iran callously slaughtered hundreds of its own kids in the protests a few weeks ago. That deeply undermines their credibility and moral authority.

Exactly. It just boggles the mind that these posters seem to have no recollection of that. More likely, they have selective memory. Utter hypocrites.

The ones attacking the US with nothing to say about Iran's many evil acts are willfully dishonest, unserious posters. We should just flag them as trolls and move on.

The US strengthens the hardliners in Iran with these bombings. They aren't helping the protestors by destroying hospitals and slaughtering children.

Slaughtering kids is pretty bad but somehow I doubt the protesters will have all that much sympathy knowing the kids at Minab were the kids of IRGC officers who without a second thought ordered Basij thugs to slaughter the protesters and their kids in the streets, ordered hospitals to refuse them medical care, arrested shot kids arriving at hospitals and then beat them to death, and then held their bodies for ransom. That all happened.

You're justifying the slaughter of children, just FYI. This is an attempt to excuse what we did, and it's wrong. They can be wrong and we can be wrong. Kids are out of bounds.

You’re either blindly wrapped in your own arguments or are willfully and deliberately distorting what others are saying. Describing why protesters might lack sympathy for IRGC‑connected families is not at all the same thing as justifying killing children. It’s an explanation of political and emotional context, not a moral endorsement of the strike. There is a clear difference between saying "people affected by years of state brutality may not feel compassion for regime elites" and saying "it was right to kill kids." The former is analysis. The latter is something no one here said.

Pointing out that the IRGC and Basij have committed atrocities against children does not mean anyone is arguing that children are legitimate targets. It means the regime’s own actions have created a climate of rage and trauma that shapes how protesters react. That is not justification. That is cause‑and‑effect. If you want to argue the strike was wrong, that’s a valid moral position. But accusing someone of defending the killing of children when they clearly did not is grossly inaccurate and shuts down any serious discussion.

We've seen you do this repeatedly throughout this thread. You are not debating in good faith.

I love how you throw around Basij like you had ever heard that word in your entire life before two weeks ago, though.

The regurgitation of propaganda is just on another level right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t even need to kill 180 American schoolchildren as revenge, Americans will do it themselves.

Iran callously slaughtered hundreds of its own kids in the protests a few weeks ago. That deeply undermines their credibility and moral authority.

Exactly. It just boggles the mind that these posters seem to have no recollection of that. More likely, they have selective memory. Utter hypocrites.

The ones attacking the US with nothing to say about Iran's many evil acts are willfully dishonest, unserious posters. We should just flag them as trolls and move on.

The US strengthens the hardliners in Iran with these bombings. They aren't helping the protestors by destroying hospitals and slaughtering children.

Slaughtering kids is pretty bad but somehow I doubt the protesters will have all that much sympathy knowing the kids at Minab were the kids of IRGC officers who without a second thought ordered Basij thugs to slaughter the protesters and their kids in the streets, ordered hospitals to refuse them medical care, arrested shot kids arriving at hospitals and then beat them to death, and then held their bodies for ransom. That all happened.

You're justifying the slaughter of children, just FYI. This is an attempt to excuse what we did, and it's wrong. They can be wrong and we can be wrong. Kids are out of bounds.

You’re either blindly wrapped in your own arguments or are willfully and deliberately distorting what others are saying. Describing why protesters might lack sympathy for IRGC‑connected families is not at all the same thing as justifying killing children. It’s an explanation of political and emotional context, not a moral endorsement of the strike. There is a clear difference between saying "people affected by years of state brutality may not feel compassion for regime elites" and saying "it was right to kill kids." The former is analysis. The latter is something no one here said.

Pointing out that the IRGC and Basij have committed atrocities against children does not mean anyone is arguing that children are legitimate targets. It means the regime’s own actions have created a climate of rage and trauma that shapes how protesters react. That is not justification. That is cause‑and‑effect. If you want to argue the strike was wrong, that’s a valid moral position. But accusing someone of defending the killing of children when they clearly did not is grossly inaccurate and shuts down any serious discussion.

We've seen you do this repeatedly throughout this thread. You are not debating in good faith.

I love how you throw around Basij like you had ever heard that word in your entire life before two weeks ago, though.

The regurgitation of propaganda is just on another level right now.

Your insulting of other posters' knowledge is on another level. You make unhinged rants, yet when others respond with well reasoned and fact based analysis you ignore the actual substance and attack with insults. We've heard of the Basij many times - Iran/Iraq war, where the regime used them for mine clearing and meat waves vs Iraq, decades of violent "moral policing," the brutal crackdown on the 1999 student protests, and again in 2009 for the Green Movement, where we saw videos of Basij gunmen on motorcycles firing at protesters. Do you think we're stupid? Uneducated? Unread? Seems you're the grossly underinformed one here. And the fact that the Basij have been the violent and brutal shock troops of this vicious regime for decades makes it all the more imperative that it end now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kudos to that journalist who called Trump out as being the only person who thought that Iran could have gotten their hands on a tomahawk and fired it at their own school.

Iran doesn't have Tomahawks. But they do have a number of KH-55 variants like the Soumar that looks even more like the missile in the video than a Tomahawk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kudos to that journalist who called Trump out as being the only person who thought that Iran could have gotten their hands on a tomahawk and fired it at their own school.

Iran doesn't have Tomahawks. But they do have a number of KH-55 variants like the Soumar that looks even more like the missile in the video than a Tomahawk.

Too bad they found the American parts of the Tomahawks.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/world/middleeast/iran-school-strike-us-missile.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kudos to that journalist who called Trump out as being the only person who thought that Iran could have gotten their hands on a tomahawk and fired it at their own school.

Iran doesn't have Tomahawks. But they do have a number of KH-55 variants like the Soumar that looks even more like the missile in the video than a Tomahawk.

Why are you the only person in the world openly disputing that it wasn't a Tomahawk? Don''t you think at least one of the psychopathic liars in the administration would have disputed it if it were up for debate? I mean these are the same people who will lie that they didn't just take a shit even with a toilet paper trail sticking out from between their ass cheeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t even need to kill 180 American schoolchildren as revenge, Americans will do it themselves.

Iran callously slaughtered hundreds of its own kids in the protests a few weeks ago. That deeply undermines their credibility and moral authority.

Exactly. It just boggles the mind that these posters seem to have no recollection of that. More likely, they have selective memory. Utter hypocrites.

The ones attacking the US with nothing to say about Iran's many evil acts are willfully dishonest, unserious posters. We should just flag them as trolls and move on.

The US strengthens the hardliners in Iran with these bombings. They aren't helping the protestors by destroying hospitals and slaughtering children.

Slaughtering kids is pretty bad but somehow I doubt the protesters will have all that much sympathy knowing the kids at Minab were the kids of IRGC officers who without a second thought ordered Basij thugs to slaughter the protesters and their kids in the streets, ordered hospitals to refuse them medical care, arrested shot kids arriving at hospitals and then beat them to death, and then held their bodies for ransom. That all happened.

You're justifying the slaughter of children, just FYI. This is an attempt to excuse what we did, and it's wrong. They can be wrong and we can be wrong. Kids are out of bounds.

You’re either blindly wrapped in your own arguments or are willfully and deliberately distorting what others are saying. Describing why protesters might lack sympathy for IRGC‑connected families is not at all the same thing as justifying killing children. It’s an explanation of political and emotional context, not a moral endorsement of the strike. There is a clear difference between saying "people affected by years of state brutality may not feel compassion for regime elites" and saying "it was right to kill kids." The former is analysis. The latter is something no one here said.

Pointing out that the IRGC and Basij have committed atrocities against children does not mean anyone is arguing that children are legitimate targets. It means the regime’s own actions have created a climate of rage and trauma that shapes how protesters react. That is not justification. That is cause‑and‑effect. If you want to argue the strike was wrong, that’s a valid moral position. But accusing someone of defending the killing of children when they clearly did not is grossly inaccurate and shuts down any serious discussion.

We've seen you do this repeatedly throughout this thread. You are not debating in good faith.

I love how you throw around Basij like you had ever heard that word in your entire life before two weeks ago, though.

The regurgitation of propaganda is just on another level right now.

Your insulting of other posters' knowledge is on another level. You make unhinged rants, yet when others respond with well reasoned and fact based analysis you ignore the actual substance and attack with insults. We've heard of the Basij many times - Iran/Iraq war, where the regime used them for mine clearing and meat waves vs Iraq, decades of violent "moral policing," the brutal crackdown on the 1999 student protests, and again in 2009 for the Green Movement, where we saw videos of Basij gunmen on motorcycles firing at protesters. Do you think we're stupid? Uneducated? Unread? Seems you're the grossly underinformed one here. And the fact that the Basij have been the violent and brutal shock troops of this vicious regime for decades makes it all the more imperative that it end now.

Oh, here we go again with the “there’s only one poster critical of xyz” nonsense.

Are you the same person in every thread who insists that there’s just one critic of U.S.. foreign policy posting over and over again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t even need to kill 180 American schoolchildren as revenge, Americans will do it themselves.

Iran callously slaughtered hundreds of its own kids in the protests a few weeks ago. That deeply undermines their credibility and moral authority.

Exactly. It just boggles the mind that these posters seem to have no recollection of that. More likely, they have selective memory. Utter hypocrites.

The ones attacking the US with nothing to say about Iran's many evil acts are willfully dishonest, unserious posters. We should just flag them as trolls and move on.

The US strengthens the hardliners in Iran with these bombings. They aren't helping the protestors by destroying hospitals and slaughtering children.

Slaughtering kids is pretty bad but somehow I doubt the protesters will have all that much sympathy knowing the kids at Minab were the kids of IRGC officers who without a second thought ordered Basij thugs to slaughter the protesters and their kids in the streets, ordered hospitals to refuse them medical care, arrested shot kids arriving at hospitals and then beat them to death, and then held their bodies for ransom. That all happened.

You're justifying the slaughter of children, just FYI. This is an attempt to excuse what we did, and it's wrong. They can be wrong and we can be wrong. Kids are out of bounds.

You’re either blindly wrapped in your own arguments or are willfully and deliberately distorting what others are saying. Describing why protesters might lack sympathy for IRGC‑connected families is not at all the same thing as justifying killing children. It’s an explanation of political and emotional context, not a moral endorsement of the strike. There is a clear difference between saying "people affected by years of state brutality may not feel compassion for regime elites" and saying "it was right to kill kids." The former is analysis. The latter is something no one here said.

Pointing out that the IRGC and Basij have committed atrocities against children does not mean anyone is arguing that children are legitimate targets. It means the regime’s own actions have created a climate of rage and trauma that shapes how protesters react. That is not justification. That is cause‑and‑effect. If you want to argue the strike was wrong, that’s a valid moral position. But accusing someone of defending the killing of children when they clearly did not is grossly inaccurate and shuts down any serious discussion.

We've seen you do this repeatedly throughout this thread. You are not debating in good faith.

I love how you throw around Basij like you had ever heard that word in your entire life before two weeks ago, though.

The regurgitation of propaganda is just on another level right now.

Your insulting of other posters' knowledge is on another level. You make unhinged rants, yet when others respond with well reasoned and fact based analysis you ignore the actual substance and attack with insults. We've heard of the Basij many times - Iran/Iraq war, where the regime used them for mine clearing and meat waves vs Iraq, decades of violent "moral policing," the brutal crackdown on the 1999 student protests, and again in 2009 for the Green Movement, where we saw videos of Basij gunmen on motorcycles firing at protesters. Do you think we're stupid? Uneducated? Unread? Seems you're the grossly underinformed one here. And the fact that the Basij have been the violent and brutal shock troops of this vicious regime for decades makes it all the more imperative that it end now.

Oh, here we go again with the “there’s only one poster critical of xyz” nonsense.

Are you the same person in every thread who insists that there’s just one critic of U.S.. foreign policy posting over and over again?

Are you the same person in every thread who keeps insisting that the US intentionally targeted the school with a "double tap" in order to deliberately murder children over and over again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kudos to that journalist who called Trump out as being the only person who thought that Iran could have gotten their hands on a tomahawk and fired it at their own school.

Iran doesn't have Tomahawks. But they do have a number of KH-55 variants like the Soumar that looks even more like the missile in the video than a Tomahawk.

Too bad they found the American parts of the Tomahawks.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/world/middleeast/iran-school-strike-us-missile.html

Oh, Iranian state media says so? That's who NYT cites, that's the only source. As though Iranian state media has any credibility...
I have no doubt they have Tomahawk parts pulled from other military targets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kudos to that journalist who called Trump out as being the only person who thought that Iran could have gotten their hands on a tomahawk and fired it at their own school.

Iran doesn't have Tomahawks. But they do have a number of KH-55 variants like the Soumar that looks even more like the missile in the video than a Tomahawk.

Too bad they found the American parts of the Tomahawks.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/world/middleeast/iran-school-strike-us-missile.html

Oh, Iranian state media says so? That's who NYT cites, that's the only source. As though Iranian state media has any credibility...
I have no doubt they have Tomahawk parts pulled from other military targets.

I'd rather trust Iran then any Hasbara zionganda coming out of Israel.

[Anonymous]

https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/09/world/video/ebof-cnn-investigation-isobel-yeong-iran-girls-school-tomahawk

CNN investigation finds new video appearing to confirm a US tomahawk missile hit a base near a school in Iran killing at least 168 children and 14 teachers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t even need to kill 180 American schoolchildren as revenge, Americans will do it themselves.

Iran callously slaughtered hundreds of its own kids in the protests a few weeks ago. That deeply undermines their credibility and moral authority.

Exactly. It just boggles the mind that these posters seem to have no recollection of that. More likely, they have selective memory. Utter hypocrites.

The ones attacking the US with nothing to say about Iran's many evil acts are willfully dishonest, unserious posters. We should just flag them as trolls and move on.

The US strengthens the hardliners in Iran with these bombings. They aren't helping the protestors by destroying hospitals and slaughtering children.

Slaughtering kids is pretty bad but somehow I doubt the protesters will have all that much sympathy knowing the kids at Minab were the kids of IRGC officers who without a second thought ordered Basij thugs to slaughter the protesters and their kids in the streets, ordered hospitals to refuse them medical care, arrested shot kids arriving at hospitals and then beat them to death, and then held their bodies for ransom. That all happened.

You're justifying the slaughter of children, just FYI. This is an attempt to excuse what we did, and it's wrong. They can be wrong and we can be wrong. Kids are out of bounds.

You’re either blindly wrapped in your own arguments or are willfully and deliberately distorting what others are saying. Describing why protesters might lack sympathy for IRGC‑connected families is not at all the same thing as justifying killing children. It’s an explanation of political and emotional context, not a moral endorsement of the strike. There is a clear difference between saying "people affected by years of state brutality may not feel compassion for regime elites" and saying "it was right to kill kids." The former is analysis. The latter is something no one here said.

Pointing out that the IRGC and Basij have committed atrocities against children does not mean anyone is arguing that children are legitimate targets. It means the regime’s own actions have created a climate of rage and trauma that shapes how protesters react. That is not justification. That is cause‑and‑effect. If you want to argue the strike was wrong, that’s a valid moral position. But accusing someone of defending the killing of children when they clearly did not is grossly inaccurate and shuts down any serious discussion.

We've seen you do this repeatedly throughout this thread. You are not debating in good faith.

I love how you throw around Basij like you had ever heard that word in your entire life before two weeks ago, though.

The regurgitation of propaganda is just on another level right now.

Your insulting of other posters' knowledge is on another level. You make unhinged rants, yet when others respond with well reasoned and fact based analysis you ignore the actual substance and attack with insults. We've heard of the Basij many times - Iran/Iraq war, where the regime used them for mine clearing and meat waves vs Iraq, decades of violent "moral policing," the brutal crackdown on the 1999 student protests, and again in 2009 for the Green Movement, where we saw videos of Basij gunmen on motorcycles firing at protesters. Do you think we're stupid? Uneducated? Unread? Seems you're the grossly underinformed one here. And the fact that the Basij have been the violent and brutal shock troops of this vicious regime for decades makes it all the more imperative that it end now.

Oh, here we go again with the “there’s only one poster critical of xyz” nonsense.

Are you the same person in every thread who insists that there’s just one critic of U.S.. foreign policy posting over and over again?

Are you the same person in every thread who keeps insisting that the US intentionally targeted the school with a "double tap" in order to deliberately murder children over and over again?

That's what they did. They could have hit that target in the early morning or late evening. They intentionally killed those children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t even need to kill 180 American schoolchildren as revenge, Americans will do it themselves.

Iran callously slaughtered hundreds of its own kids in the protests a few weeks ago. That deeply undermines their credibility and moral authority.

Exactly. It just boggles the mind that these posters seem to have no recollection of that. More likely, they have selective memory. Utter hypocrites.

The ones attacking the US with nothing to say about Iran's many evil acts are willfully dishonest, unserious posters. We should just flag them as trolls and move on.

The US strengthens the hardliners in Iran with these bombings. They aren't helping the protestors by destroying hospitals and slaughtering children.

Slaughtering kids is pretty bad but somehow I doubt the protesters will have all that much sympathy knowing the kids at Minab were the kids of IRGC officers who without a second thought ordered Basij thugs to slaughter the protesters and their kids in the streets, ordered hospitals to refuse them medical care, arrested shot kids arriving at hospitals and then beat them to death, and then held their bodies for ransom. That all happened.

You're justifying the slaughter of children, just FYI. This is an attempt to excuse what we did, and it's wrong. They can be wrong and we can be wrong. Kids are out of bounds.

You’re either blindly wrapped in your own arguments or are willfully and deliberately distorting what others are saying. Describing why protesters might lack sympathy for IRGC‑connected families is not at all the same thing as justifying killing children. It’s an explanation of political and emotional context, not a moral endorsement of the strike. There is a clear difference between saying "people affected by years of state brutality may not feel compassion for regime elites" and saying "it was right to kill kids." The former is analysis. The latter is something no one here said.

Pointing out that the IRGC and Basij have committed atrocities against children does not mean anyone is arguing that children are legitimate targets. It means the regime’s own actions have created a climate of rage and trauma that shapes how protesters react. That is not justification. That is cause‑and‑effect. If you want to argue the strike was wrong, that’s a valid moral position. But accusing someone of defending the killing of children when they clearly did not is grossly inaccurate and shuts down any serious discussion.

We've seen you do this repeatedly throughout this thread. You are not debating in good faith.

I love how you throw around Basij like you had ever heard that word in your entire life before two weeks ago, though.

The regurgitation of propaganda is just on another level right now.

Your insulting of other posters' knowledge is on another level. You make unhinged rants, yet when others respond with well reasoned and fact based analysis you ignore the actual substance and attack with insults. We've heard of the Basij many times - Iran/Iraq war, where the regime used them for mine clearing and meat waves vs Iraq, decades of violent "moral policing," the brutal crackdown on the 1999 student protests, and again in 2009 for the Green Movement, where we saw videos of Basij gunmen on motorcycles firing at protesters. Do you think we're stupid? Uneducated? Unread? Seems you're the grossly underinformed one here. And the fact that the Basij have been the violent and brutal shock troops of this vicious regime for decades makes it all the more imperative that it end now.

Oh, here we go again with the “there’s only one poster critical of xyz” nonsense.

Are you the same person in every thread who insists that there’s just one critic of U.S.. foreign policy posting over and over again?

Are you the same person in every thread who keeps insisting that the US intentionally targeted the school with a "double tap" in order to deliberately murder children over and over again?

This happened. Wrap your mind around it.