Trump admin ADMITS wrongful deportation

[Anonymous]

Would the man be in this situation if he did not come into the country illegally? Yes or No?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most on this thread are skipping right over the difference between deportation and sending people to a prison constructed for hard core criminals.
Giant difference and a very convenient way to shift the Overton Window.

Yup. I would personally have zero interest in this if he were just deported to his home country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

Do you think it is OK if governments arrest people and deport them without a hearing straight to a prison in a foreign country where the US has no jurisdiction? How is that OK?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

Do you think it is OK if governments arrest people and deport them without a hearing straight to a prison in a foreign country where the US has no jurisdiction? How is that OK?

Yes, it's OK. No hearing. Military airlift out.

50 USC 21

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

Do you think it is OK if governments arrest people and deport them without a hearing straight to a prison in a foreign country where the US has no jurisdiction? How is that OK?

Yes, it's OK. No hearing. Military airlift out.

50 USC 21

On the hunch that someone is in that category?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

Do you think it is OK if governments arrest people and deport them without a hearing straight to a prison in a foreign country where the US has no jurisdiction? How is that OK?

Do you think it’s ok to sneak over the border? How is that ok?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

Do you think it is OK if governments arrest people and deport them without a hearing straight to a prison in a foreign country where the US has no jurisdiction? How is that OK?

Yes, it's OK. No hearing. Military airlift out.

50 USC 21

Straight to a foreign prison, don't pass go, don't collect $200.

The Federal Government empowered to just disappear people at will. Sick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

Do you think it is OK if governments arrest people and deport them without a hearing straight to a prison in a foreign country where the US has no jurisdiction? How is that OK?

Do you think it’s ok to sneak over the border? How is that ok?

No. I voted for Trump mostly on the border failures. But unlike some, I have the ability to judge policy independently. I don't blindly accept everything because Trump does it. Do you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

Do you think it is OK if governments arrest people and deport them without a hearing straight to a prison in a foreign country where the US has no jurisdiction? How is that OK?

Do you think it’s ok to sneak over the border? How is that ok?

No. I voted for Trump mostly on the border failures. But unlike some, I have the ability to judge policy independently. I don't blindly accept everything because Trump does it. Do you?

No, but I accept that this person put themselves in this situation by breaking the law in the first place. It’s like getting a DUI then complaining your insurance went up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The mistake they have admitted is sending him to El Salvador. Deporting him is not wrongful.

He’s a citizen of El Salvador. If there was a court order barring ICE from sending him to El Salvador, how could we deport him? What lawful means do we have to make any country other than El Salvador take him?

It is not clear that the court order barred ICE from sending him to El Salvador. The immigration judge's order says Guatemala three times, presumably in error.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

Do you think it is OK if governments arrest people and deport them without a hearing straight to a prison in a foreign country where the US has no jurisdiction? How is that OK?

Do you think it’s ok to sneak over the border? How is that ok?

No. I voted for Trump mostly on the border failures. But unlike some, I have the ability to judge policy independently. I don't blindly accept everything because Trump does it. Do you?

No, but I accept that this person put themselves in this situation by breaking the law in the first place. It’s like getting a DUI then complaining your insurance went up.

It's like getting a DUI and then getting sent to the gulag as punishment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

The law has not been followed. Deporting someone to a country you are specifically prohibited from deporting them to? Isn’t following the law. If this wasn’t such a clown show they could have legally deported him elsewhere, but they were either too lazy or too incompetent to do the work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Would the man be in this situation if he did not come into the country illegally? Yes or No?

Based on WaPo reporting about the number of U.S. CITIZENS ICE has deported, the answer is, maybe!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how people are pro regulation but against enforcement . Enforcement is so yucky.

Y’all make no sense

What if people just want— crazy idea, buckle up— enforcement to follow the law? The government did something illegal, admits it, and is resisting fixing it. This could have been a non-story if they fixed it last week and your fantasy would have been undisturbed for a bit longer.

The law HAS been followed. You didn't like the idea of deportations, so you're stalling for time. NO.

How about if you don't import 10 million strangers to "flood the zone" without figuring out who they are and why they are coming here?

How many people did it it take to execute 9/11 in the US? Maybe 30?

More than that. You turned your head and looked away while rampant crime was rising - carjackings, robberies under $1000, flash mobs, murder and other stupid crap....because... you wanted to "brown" the country.

Seriously, I don't care if you're offended. You dropped all common sense out the window in the name of group hugs and empathy. Just f'n NO.

The law has not been followed. Deporting someone to a country you are specifically prohibited from deporting them to? Isn’t following the law. If this wasn’t such a clown show they could have legally deported him elsewhere, but they were either too lazy or too incompetent to do the work.

Those troublemakers are being deported to a country with a no nonsense prison system, where they need to be. These are MS-13, TDA and "18th Street" gang members. Got it?