Why does everyone think Kamala was such a bad candidate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t put HRC and Harris in the same league, not happening…

True, they aren't in that league of awfulness where you'll find Trump and Biden,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The popular vote difference is final: 1.47%

She wasn’t “awful”. The GOP was just better at flooding the airwaves with utter BS. GD one issue voters on the environment and Gaza plus all the fools who were convinced to stay home or only vote down ballot are the problem.

+1

RWNJ propaganda skewed the vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this a serious question? WTAF.

I mean how bad does a candidate have to be until everyone recognizes their innate loser qualities? I say this with sincerity.

She lost to Trump a convicted disgusting felon with $1B in donations from all walks of life. She's a female diversity candidate who could not rally females and diversity voters. Some people truly do not know when to stop, sigh.

There are lots of reasons for this other than Kamala being a bad candidate, but I doubt Democrats will give a woman the nomination again for a very long time.

Why would you say that? Democratic men have lost before and we never said that we won't run a man again

America will never elect a woman as POTUS. The position is too tied up in concepts of military power, masculinity, and toughness. We'll never elect a gay man either. Just the way it is.

We'll elect a woman soon enough. But the first woman president will be a Republican. Nikki Haley would have easily defeated Biden or Harris. The problem for Democrats isn't gender. It's their disdain for most Americans. It's their policies - from crime to immigration. It's their capture by the billionaire class, which hates real primaries. It's the local progressive loons closing schools and defunding police. There are lots of reasons aren't winning now, but gender isn't one of them.

A paragraph of beauty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this a serious question? WTAF.

I mean how bad does a candidate have to be until everyone recognizes their innate loser qualities? I say this with sincerity.

She lost to Trump a convicted disgusting felon with $1B in donations from all walks of life. She's a female diversity candidate who could not rally females and diversity voters. Some people truly do not know when to stop, sigh.

There are lots of reasons for this other than Kamala being a bad candidate, but I doubt Democrats will give a woman the nomination again for a very long time.

Why would you say that? Democratic men have lost before and we never said that we won't run a man again

America will never elect a woman as POTUS. The position is too tied up in concepts of military power, masculinity, and toughness. We'll never elect a gay man either. Just the way it is.

Statistically, at least one of the presidents had to be gay. My money is on Wilson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t put HRC and Harris in the same league, not happening…

They are in the same league. They used men to make their careers and both lost to Trump.

[Anonymous]

She’s LITERALLY never accomplished anything in her life. And no, merely holding a particular job is not an achievement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

Yup! 54% of Americans have less than a sixth grade literacy rate. Our country is stupid.

I doubled checked your claim as I found it shocking but it checked out with National Literacy Institute's statistics for 2024-2025. (Although the average literacy rate in the US in 2024 is around 79%, meaning roughly 21% of adults are considered illiterate, 54% of adults having literacy levels below a 6th-grade level). This means one quarter are barely literate between 4th-6th grade levels)

Nearly 40% have college degrees so there appear to be great extremes - Either college educated or barely Literate.

I don’t think that it means Americans are stupid but that the societal odds are stacked against many people acquiring literacy skills.
Whose parents did not attend college

The fact that American voters have a low IQ is well proven by the fact that Trump, Biden, Trump were elected in the three most recent elections. We don't need additional stats to support this fact.

Do you believe that voting rights don’t belong to people with lower IQs or those that are illiterate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this a serious question? WTAF.

I mean how bad does a candidate have to be until everyone recognizes their innate loser qualities? I say this with sincerity.

She lost to Trump a convicted disgusting felon with $1B in donations from all walks of life. She's a female diversity candidate who could not rally females and diversity voters. Some people truly do not know when to stop, sigh.

There are lots of reasons for this other than Kamala being a bad candidate, but I doubt Democrats will give a woman the nomination again for a very long time.

Why would you say that? Democratic men have lost before and we never said that we won't run a man again

America will never elect a woman as POTUS. The position is too tied up in concepts of military power, masculinity, and toughness. We'll never elect a gay man either. Just the way it is.

Statistically, at least one of the presidents had to be gay. My money is on Wilson.

Think much more recent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s LITERALLY never accomplished anything in her life. And no, merely holding a particular job is not an achievement.

Going to law school, being a prosecutor, a state AG, a senator, and VP are “literal” non-accomplishments to you? lol Have you never voted for someone who WAS accomplished by your criteria then??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s LITERALLY never accomplished anything in her life. And no, merely holding a particular job is not an achievement.

Going to law school, being a prosecutor, a state AG, a senator, and VP are “literal” non-accomplishments to you? lol Have you never voted for someone who WAS accomplished by your criteria then??

But what did she ACCOMPLISH with these opportunities? NOTHING!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t put HRC and Harris in the same league, not happening…

They are in the same league. They used men to make their careers and both lost to Trump.

Agree. Hillary has a better brain than Kamala but a worse personality. Same league.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.

Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.

Yup! 54% of Americans have less than a sixth grade literacy rate. Our country is stupid.

I doubled checked your claim as I found it shocking but it checked out with National Literacy Institute's statistics for 2024-2025. (Although the average literacy rate in the US in 2024 is around 79%, meaning roughly 21% of adults are considered illiterate, 54% of adults having literacy levels below a 6th-grade level). This means one quarter are barely literate between 4th-6th grade levels)

Nearly 40% have college degrees so there appear to be great extremes - Either college educated or barely Literate.

I don’t think that it means Americans are stupid but that the societal odds are stacked against many people acquiring literacy skills.
Whose parents did not attend college

The fact that American voters have a low IQ is well proven by the fact that Trump, Biden, Trump were elected in the three most recent elections. We don't need additional stats to support this fact.

Do you believe that voting rights don’t belong to people with lower IQs or those that are illiterate?

No, everyone who meets the American voter eligibility requirements should be able to vote. We're just not good at it as a country.

[Anonymous]

I can't stand her word salads and drunk platitudes saying a bunch of nothing. She set back black women in the Democratic Party for a long time. If only we had people like Michelle Obama running....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t put HRC and Harris in the same league, not happening…

They are in the same league. They used men to make their careers and both lost to Trump.

Agree. Hillary has a better brain than Kamala but a worse personality. Same league.

Trump has both a worse personalty and worse brain, but since he has a penis, its all good.

[Anonymous]

Bottom line, the dems take the house with 7600 votes over 3 congressional districts, or if the NC GOP didn't extreme gerrymander the state.

The dems take the white house with .0000014% of the vote flipped in 3 states.

The 'dems in disarray" and "GOP mandate" headlines are way overblown.