Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

[Anonymous]

In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scott also told officers the day Laci went missing that he was at the Sf bay. About 27 searches of the SF bay went on in January and no dead body was found. Scott was the suspect since day 1 and It was public information to anyone around that Scott went fishing at the SF Bay on Christmas Eve.

Laci and Connor were found in April.

It’s obvious they were placed there later after the heavy police searches of the SF Bay died down

It’s a needle in a haystack. Her body was badly decomposed not fresh. It had been weighted down with concrete anchors and eventually broke free.

It’s not a needle in a haystack. This wasn’t the Pacific Ocean we are talking about. It’s a shallow marina about as deep or less than your standard swimming pool. The anchors werent real anchors. He made anchors out of concrete to save money, and other men at the marina were making fun of how ridiculous Scott’s boat and his skills were. Naturally, that was his first time using the boat in the water.

Don’t you think he would used real anchors? The cops didn’t believe Scott could throw Laci overboard on such a a boat in the middle of the marina without falling in himself and they tried very hard to see if it’s possible he tied/buoyed his boat to a pier and then threw her overboard but that wouldn’t make sense because she’d be on the shore in plain view of everyone

Too bad Geragos couldn’t convince a jury. So your hero rots.

I don’t think he’s a hero but typical response. The real crime is that people with this kind of thinking can serve on juries and decide the fate of one’s life.

If you think Scott Peterson is the first man to lie and the first man to not cry or the first man to cheat on his wife and tell his mistress he wants to stay with her forever and this is the first Christmas without his wife (when he was in fact trying to buy a goodie bag for his wife’s dad in fact per his own volunteering and spend Christmas with his wife’s family).

If you think Scott was a loving husband who would never do this, that’s on you. Scott’s demands for a new trial have been denied for years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scott also told officers the day Laci went missing that he was at the Sf bay. About 27 searches of the SF bay went on in January and no dead body was found. Scott was the suspect since day 1 and It was public information to anyone around that Scott went fishing at the SF Bay on Christmas Eve.

Laci and Connor were found in April.

It’s obvious they were placed there later after the heavy police searches of the SF Bay died down

It’s a needle in a haystack. Her body was badly decomposed not fresh. It had been weighted down with concrete anchors and eventually broke free.

It’s not a needle in a haystack. This wasn’t the Pacific Ocean we are talking about. It’s a shallow marina about as deep or less than your standard swimming pool. The anchors werent real anchors. He made anchors out of concrete to save money, and other men at the marina were making fun of how ridiculous Scott’s boat and his skills were. Naturally, that was his first time using the boat in the water.

Don’t you think he would used real anchors? The cops didn’t believe Scott could throw Laci overboard on such a a boat in the middle of the marina without falling in himself and they tried very hard to see if it’s possible he tied/buoyed his boat to a pier and then threw her overboard but that wouldn’t make sense because she’d be on the shore in plain view of everyone

Too bad Geragos couldn’t convince a jury. So your hero rots.

I don’t think he’s a hero but typical response. The real crime is that people with this kind of thinking can serve on juries and decide the fate of one’s life.

If you think Scott Peterson is the first man to lie and the first man to not cry or the first man to cheat on his wife and tell his mistress he wants to stay with her forever and this is the first Christmas without his wife (when he was in fact trying to buy a goodie bag for his wife’s dad in fact per his own volunteering and spend Christmas with his wife’s family).

If you think Scott was a loving husband who would never do this, that’s on you. Scott’s demands for a new trial have been denied for years.

He’s no longer on death row. Baby steps.

Maybe he will face a new trial and be free one day. You never know

[Anonymous]

Why are so many claiming his innocence due to circumstantial evidence, when your reasoning he is innocent is based on conspiracy theories and circumstantial evidence?

Chris Watts was a "good husband" on paper until he murdered his family. This scenario is nothing new.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

Its called wishful thinking

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scott also told officers the day Laci went missing that he was at the Sf bay. About 27 searches of the SF bay went on in January and no dead body was found. Scott was the suspect since day 1 and It was public information to anyone around that Scott went fishing at the SF Bay on Christmas Eve.

Laci and Connor were found in April.

It’s obvious they were placed there later after the heavy police searches of the SF Bay died down

It’s a needle in a haystack. Her body was badly decomposed not fresh. It had been weighted down with concrete anchors and eventually broke free.

It’s not a needle in a haystack. This wasn’t the Pacific Ocean we are talking about. It’s a shallow marina about as deep or less than your standard swimming pool. The anchors werent real anchors. He made anchors out of concrete to save money, and other men at the marina were making fun of how ridiculous Scott’s boat and his skills were. Naturally, that was his first time using the boat in the water.

Don’t you think he would used real anchors? The cops didn’t believe Scott could throw Laci overboard on such a a boat in the middle of the marina without falling in himself and they tried very hard to see if it’s possible he tied/buoyed his boat to a pier and then threw her overboard but that wouldn’t make sense because she’d be on the shore in plain view of everyone

Too bad Geragos couldn’t convince a jury. So your hero rots.

I don’t think he’s a hero but typical response. The real crime is that people with this kind of thinking can serve on juries and decide the fate of one’s life.

If you think Scott Peterson is the first man to lie and the first man to not cry or the first man to cheat on his wife and tell his mistress he wants to stay with her forever and this is the first Christmas without his wife (when he was in fact trying to buy a goodie bag for his wife’s dad in fact per his own volunteering and spend Christmas with his wife’s family).

If you think Scott was a loving husband who would never do this, that’s on you. Scott’s demands for a new trial have been denied for years.

He’s no longer on death row. Baby steps.

Maybe he will face a new trial and be free one day. You never know

No. That's not happening. Unless there was substantial new evidence (including DNA mostly) that pointed to another possible suspect, its not happening ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

Its called wishful thinking

Murderers are unlikable. The spouse is the most dangerous person to a pregnant woman. Not stranger danger. Scott put a target on himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I truly believe Laci would still be alive and found alive before New Years Eve if the cops actually listened to the thousand tips they received. They were convinced Laci was killed by Scott that first night and searched through the bay so many times they gave up. That entire time, they ignored tips from locals that said they saw a pregnant woman arguing with a group of men and shoved into a van. The dog did not go missing which means Laci was right by her house but the dogs collar was very muddy according to the neighbor who placed the dog back in the yard. That implies Laci did go for a walk. She was not killed on the night of Dec 23rd or early morning of the 24th. She walked the dog.

Did the people who saw her arguing with these men testify at the trial?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I truly believe Laci would still be alive and found alive before New Years Eve if the cops actually listened to the thousand tips they received. They were convinced Laci was killed by Scott that first night and searched through the bay so many times they gave up. That entire time, they ignored tips from locals that said they saw a pregnant woman arguing with a group of men and shoved into a van. The dog did not go missing which means Laci was right by her house but the dogs collar was very muddy according to the neighbor who placed the dog back in the yard. That implies Laci did go for a walk. She was not killed on the night of Dec 23rd or early morning of the 24th. She walked the dog.

Did the people who saw her arguing with these men testify at the trial?

Those neighbors couldn’t even agree on the color of the van. White van, orange van, brown van, and these so called sightings went on for weeks even after she was reported missing. They were not very credible. It sucks for Scott that the bodies turned up right where he had been that same day she went missing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

I think he's guilty, but if for some reason he didn't get a fair trial then he should get one. However, I agree with you that there are dozens of nonsensical tidbits that people cling to as a reason for his guilt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

I think he's guilty, but if for some reason he didn't get a fair trial then he should get one. However, I agree with you that there are dozens of nonsensical tidbits that people cling to as a reason for his guilt.

He had one of the best legal defense teams. He got a fair trial, he just didn’t like the outcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scott also told officers the day Laci went missing that he was at the Sf bay. About 27 searches of the SF bay went on in January and no dead body was found. Scott was the suspect since day 1 and It was public information to anyone around that Scott went fishing at the SF Bay on Christmas Eve.

Laci and Connor were found in April.

It’s obvious they were placed there later after the heavy police searches of the SF Bay died down

It’s a needle in a haystack. Her body was badly decomposed not fresh. It had been weighted down with concrete anchors and eventually broke free.

It’s not a needle in a haystack. This wasn’t the Pacific Ocean we are talking about. It’s a shallow marina about as deep or less than your standard swimming pool. The anchors werent real anchors. He made anchors out of concrete to save money, and other men at the marina were making fun of how ridiculous Scott’s boat and his skills were. Naturally, that was his first time using the boat in the water.

Don’t you think he would used real anchors? The cops didn’t believe Scott could throw Laci overboard on such a a boat in the middle of the marina without falling in himself and they tried very hard to see if it’s possible he tied/buoyed his boat to a pier and then threw her overboard but that wouldn’t make sense because she’d be on the shore in plain view of everyone

Too bad Geragos couldn’t convince a jury. So your hero rots.

I don’t think he’s a hero but typical response. The real crime is that people with this kind of thinking can serve on juries and decide the fate of one’s life.

If you think Scott Peterson is the first man to lie and the first man to not cry or the first man to cheat on his wife and tell his mistress he wants to stay with her forever and this is the first Christmas without his wife (when he was in fact trying to buy a goodie bag for his wife’s dad in fact per his own volunteering and spend Christmas with his wife’s family).

If you think Scott was a loving husband who would never do this, that’s on you. Scott’s demands for a new trial have been denied for years.

There are some gross, trollish, people in here attacking Amber Frey, Sharon Rocha, and even Laci. Totally appalling. But you’re lumping everyone with concerns about this conviction together.

Some of us are saying Scott was a despicable person, a bad husband, and probably a sociopath BUT we think there’s a chance he’s not guilty of murder and we would like to see complete DNA testing. Innocent people go to prison all the time. The system is a wreck. If he’s innocent of the crime, he shouldn’t be in prison, and there are plenty of things that are questionable with the conviction. When law enforcement resists DNA testing that’s a huge red flag to me.

It’s a bad faith argument to accuse all people who have concerns about the process of thinking Scott is a good person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

Its called wishful thinking

Murderers are unlikable. The spouse is the most dangerous person to a pregnant woman. Not stranger danger. Scott put a target on himself.

It’s also dangerous if a woman confronts strange men committing a crime.

The spouse is the most dangerous when there is a history of previous DV. There was no history of DV with the Petersons. Laci loved Scott and would hate that everyone thought he killed her thanks to some loose tramp like Amber who didn’t even know who her kids father even was. That was the woman Scott wanted to leave Laci for? I don’t think so. Nancy Grace and the state had it all wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

Its called wishful thinking

Murderers are unlikable. The spouse is the most dangerous person to a pregnant woman. Not stranger danger. Scott put a target on himself.

It’s also dangerous if a woman confronts strange men committing a crime.

The spouse is the most dangerous when there is a history of previous DV. There was no history of DV with the Petersons. Laci loved Scott and would hate that everyone thought he killed her thanks to some loose tramp like Amber who didn’t even know who her kids father even was. That was the woman Scott wanted to leave Laci for? I don’t think so. Nancy Grace and the state had it all wrong.

The defense didn’t prove it’s case. They never called the so called witnesses to testify about seeing Laci confront buglars, the medical expert did not confirm the baby was born alive, and the DV issue is not a fact. Scott was in debt, his business was failing, he had told some relatives he was hoping for infertility, he was having affairs, lying to the police and suddenly bought a secret boat and a few weeks later his wife and baby washed up right where he had been. The case is completely obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the A&E doc, one of the things that pissed off the detectives is Scott giving one of the cops a coaster for his cup of water. He thought that was suspicious for a man who just lost his wife to do.

It’s ridiculous the stuff they came up with. They just didn’t like Scott. The entire family originally thought she was alive and maybe went into labor and was at a local hospital. Even Sharon Rocha, Lacis mom, criticized the cops and the reporters who implied foul play. The family thought Laci went into labor prematurely.

Its called wishful thinking

Murderers are unlikable. The spouse is the most dangerous person to a pregnant woman. Not stranger danger. Scott put a target on himself.

It’s also dangerous if a woman confronts strange men committing a crime.

The spouse is the most dangerous when there is a history of previous DV. There was no history of DV with the Petersons. Laci loved Scott and would hate that everyone thought he killed her thanks to some loose tramp like Amber who didn’t even know who her kids father even was. That was the woman Scott wanted to leave Laci for? I don’t think so. Nancy Grace and the state had it all wrong.

Omg. I’m sure Laci would be grateful her husband got what he deserved.