I was the "gaming it out" PP. And that is exactly my point. The OP did say that they were a dual Fed (possibly in the DMV) and expressed consternation that affording a private was difficult. I just wanted to say that even in the most ideal of scenarios and with diligent saving, $80k/year is a stretch. Especially if you mess up choice of funds in the 529 (e.g. target date funds, many of the state run ones etc). I was just responding to the PP that blithely assumed that 300K income would mean that they would have zero trouble paying for an expensive private college. |
I don't think UMC families are saying that they should be given aid. Just lamenting that they cannot afford it, even if some insist that they can. Many of us have 529 accounts, but those funds didn't grow that much, even putting in more than $2500 per year per account, and we have multiple kids. It's enough for in state, but not 80k per year. When we started saving college was a bit cheaper. Several years ago, when my DC was in MS, we looked at an expensive private. It was $60K/year. Now it's closer to $85k per year. Saving $240k is doable. Saving closer to $350K is much harder. If you still have 20 working years, I could see how you think you can afford to pull back on funding retirement, and save later, but if you are 55+, you don't have that luxury. |
We also probably won't get any aid and have financially planned for In-state College but will still be filing FASFA. Our HS Senior is hoping to go OOS so if it works out, we'll use Federal loans for that. |
But the goalposts got moved from one kid at any private to TWO kids at a T20 simultaneously. If you gross 300k and have one kid at a school that costs $50k a year net then something went wrong if you can’t cash flow it or use some savings. If it’s Amherst at $93k and you have zero savings and won’t take loans well no shit it’s out of reach. |
|
"300K in this area is middle class."
https://censusreporter.org/profiles/31000US47900-washington-arlington-alexandria-dc-va-md-wv-metro-area/ |
But if you have cash on hand to pay 100% of in-state costs then the problem is solved. You have saved enough, congrats! |
But, those if us at half your salary just don't get the lament. We saved $2500 a year per kid too. (Less when we were at a quarter of your salary). It sounds like we have similar savings, but with a lot less income. I hope people with younger kids read this and decide to set more aside. |
We were recommended by our student's private school not to submit the FAFSA. Wouldn't get any money anyway, and it could adversely affect their prospects for getting accepted (assumption: those who appear to be full pay might have an edge getting admitted). Worked for us. |
Though overstated, I think the point is that 25% of households earning $200k or more is a high percentage compared to most areas in the US. |
Even that might be barely enough. 2.5K/year/kid for 2 kids over a period of 16 years gets you to ~160K in 529s and that is in a decently performing all equity portfolio. That is not nearly enough for 4 years at an expensive school for multiple kids. Tripling that level of saving and paying out of cash flow during the actual college years might get you there, but barely. And with college costs far outpacing inflation, even this won't be enough in the future. |
In what universe is top 25 percent considered "middle"? |
So, when you include double the income, that should increase savings, making it enough. |
+1 Honestly, I read dcum because it really boggles my mind how out of touch so many here are, with the 95% of households that make less than them. Like.. it’s really mind blowing. COL differences between areas do make a difference, but not nearly to the extent dcum makes it out to be. |
Psst. You are not middle class. You are upper class. You are in the top 5% of wage earners, far away from middle class and outside of upper midfle class. |
If you are that far into the upper class and struggling to make ends meet, even here in DC, you are doing something very wrong. |