Omnibus Corrupt SCOTUS Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Contrary to statements at the time, the FBI never ran any background investigations and none of the allegations were investigated either. Kavanaugh is unfit for the position and had everything come to light, even the GOP Senators - not the most craven ones - would not have supported him. Certainly not Collins or Murkowski.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Contrary to statements at the time, the FBI never ran any background investigations and none of the allegations were investigated either. Kavanaugh is unfit for the position and had everything come to light, even the GOP Senators - not the most craven ones - would not have supported him. Certainly not Collins or Murkowski.

It’s a shame, isn’t it? All of this could have been cleared up and known. Now he gets to walk around under a cloud of his own questionable ethics.

Of course the GOP could support getting money out of politics and Leonard Leo and the rest of the dark money losers could have the same day as the rest of us get, but nah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

The GOP shouldn’t have nominated an attempted rapist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

The proof keeps coming. But you all are convinced by “faith” that Jesus walks among us and wants you to condone child rape and people like Kavanaugh because abortion, so maybe you’re not really fit to talk about burdens of proof?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

Antics by the left? It was the right that leaked the sec story to distract from the horrid finances story - that STILL hasn't been covered. Sorry no, you don't get to blame the left here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

Antics by the left? It was the right that leaked the sec story to distract from the horrid finances story - that STILL hasn't been covered. Sorry no, you don't get to blame the left here.

Good Lord you people are insane.

Look back on the hearings. The left was bat$hit crazy..... starting with the Hail Mary by Feinstein and continuing with the endless march of activists attempting to disrupt the hearings.
Yes, antics by the left. Thankfully, they didn't work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

Antics by the left? It was the right that leaked the sec story to distract from the horrid finances story - that STILL hasn't been covered. Sorry no, you don't get to blame the left here.

The finances are intriguing. I hope it comes out some day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

Antics by the left? It was the right that leaked the sec story to distract from the horrid finances story - that STILL hasn't been covered. Sorry no, you don't get to blame the left here.

The finances are intriguing. I hope it comes out some day.

Not with the corrupt John Roberts supporting right wing corruption.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

Antics by the left? It was the right that leaked the sec story to distract from the horrid finances story - that STILL hasn't been covered. Sorry no, you don't get to blame the left here.

Good Lord you people are insane.

Look back on the hearings. The left was bat$hit crazy..... starting with the Hail Mary by Feinstein and continuing with the endless march of activists attempting to disrupt the hearings.
Yes, antics by the left. Thankfully, they didn't work.

It wasn't a hail mary by Feinstein. Someone else on the right leaked it and at that point the maelstron started. The left HAD been planning to focus on how he was financially compromised and how he had lied during his service to the W administration. They wanted no part of the sex stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

Antics by the left? It was the right that leaked the sec story to distract from the horrid finances story - that STILL hasn't been covered. Sorry no, you don't get to blame the left here.

Good Lord you people are insane.

Look back on the hearings. The left was bat$hit crazy..... starting with the Hail Mary by Feinstein and continuing with the endless march of activists attempting to disrupt the hearings.
Yes, antics by the left. Thankfully, they didn't work.

It wasn't a hail mary by Feinstein. Someone else on the right leaked it and at that point the maelstron started. The left HAD been planning to focus on how he was financially compromised and how he had lied during his service to the W administration. They wanted no part of the sex stuff.

It’s a typical GOP tactic to do this kind of thing specifically so they can whine about the Democrats being nasty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Would be perfectly on brand for him.

A story like this is unsurprising coming from a publication that has pushed totally false, yet "bombshell" stories in the past.
The Rolling Stone thrives on provocative fictional stories that fuel their left-wing readers.
And, it is unsurprising that Hollywood would produce a fictional account of a story and call it a "documentary."

This is so on-brand for these groups.
There is no truth to the story. But, that will not prevent the left-wing from pushing it.

Unless you were there, you have no idea if there was truth to it or not. I have friend who were at Prep and other friends who were ate undergrad with him and they both told tales of his exploits. I tend to believe them. They are republicans and would have no reason to make it up.

Given the antics pulled by the Democrats during his confirmation - no way I believe this story or any others pushed by the left.
They are really good at throwing out allegations with zero proof. And, as we have seen - all it takes is an allegation for the left to latch onto.
Far too many loons on the left.

Antics by the left? It was the right that leaked the sec story to distract from the horrid finances story - that STILL hasn't been covered. Sorry no, you don't get to blame the left here.

Good Lord you people are insane.

Look back on the hearings. The left was bat$hit crazy..... starting with the Hail Mary by Feinstein and continuing with the endless march of activists attempting to disrupt the hearings.
Yes, antics by the left. Thankfully, they didn't work.

It wasn't a hail mary by Feinstein. Someone else on the right leaked it and at that point the maelstron started. The left HAD been planning to focus on how he was financially compromised and how he had lied during his service to the W administration. They wanted no part of the sex stuff.

Bull$hit.

You just want to sweep the scummy antics of your party under the carpet. Pathetic.