Omnibus Corrupt SCOTUS Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
With all of the corruption and ethics issues being surfaced as it relates to the Supreme Court, it seems like a consolidated threat might be in order.

Kavanaugh:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1107259.page

Thomas:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1124230.page

Alito
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128398.page


and then...

Ah that’s why the potted plant won’t answer any questions. He’ll expose himself.

[Anonymous]

Great thread on the omnibus here:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.

Point out the ethics lapses and corruption of "left" justices and we can talk.

DP. OK.

It turns out Justice Sotomayor left six free or reimbursed excursions off her 2016 financial disclosure report, which she amendment last year but was only released to the public (i.e., us) today.

In 2020, via public records request, we discovered that Sotomayor’s trip to Rhode Island to give the URI commencement address included a free flight and hotel, which under federal law must be reported in an annual disclosure report. It wasn’t. Today we learned that her 2016 trips to universities in Illinois, New Jersey, Alaska, Wisconsin and Minnesota were also omitted.

Even with all these trips being to public schools and for educational talks, the omissions show the the court must take its disclosure responsibilities more seriously.

https://fixthecourt.com/2022/06/justice-sotomayor-amends-financial-disclosure-include-six-free-trips-previously-omitted/

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nominee financial disclosure from March 2022 reveals she “inadvertently omitted” consulting income her spouse “periodically receives from consulting on medical malpractice cases” on previous reports.

“Jackson only told us her husband made money in ‘legal malpractice consulting,’ which is about as opaque as you can get,” he said. “Where did this money come from? Who are his clients? Did these clients have any matter before Jackson while she served as a federal judge for the prior decade? Jackson left out this required information in her disclosures for nearly 10 years, and she stated in her 2022 confirmation disclosures that she’d amend them later. Where are the amendments?”

Jackson not only omitted details about her husband’s work, she also excluded details about her own positions.

“My 2014 and 2016 annual reports inadvertently omitted reimbursements from: (i) the University of California, Berkeley School of Law for expenses to attend a panel discussion in October 2014, and (ii) the Aspen Institute for expenses to attend a Justice and Society seminar in July 2016,” the disclosure states. “In addition, my 2014 annual report inadvertently omitted my salary of $1,765 from George Washington University for teaching a Federal Sentencing Seminar.”

https://dailycaller.com/2023/04/20/double-standard-ketanji-brown-jackson-financial-disclosure-supreme-court-clarence-thomas-ethics/

So you are comparing the corruption potential of a free hotel room while speaking to students at a university in Minnesota with a series of multi million dollar private yacht luxury excursions taken as vacations and 10 million dollars in private $$?

Be serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.

Point out the ethics lapses and corruption of "left" justices and we can talk.

DP. OK.

It turns out Justice Sotomayor left six free or reimbursed excursions off her 2016 financial disclosure report, which she amendment last year but was only released to the public (i.e., us) today.

In 2020, via public records request, we discovered that Sotomayor’s trip to Rhode Island to give the URI commencement address included a free flight and hotel, which under federal law must be reported in an annual disclosure report. It wasn’t. Today we learned that her 2016 trips to universities in Illinois, New Jersey, Alaska, Wisconsin and Minnesota were also omitted.

Even with all these trips being to public schools and for educational talks, the omissions show the the court must take its disclosure responsibilities more seriously.

https://fixthecourt.com/2022/06/justice-sotomayor-amends-financial-disclosure-include-six-free-trips-previously-omitted/

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nominee financial disclosure from March 2022 reveals she “inadvertently omitted” consulting income her spouse “periodically receives from consulting on medical malpractice cases” on previous reports.

“Jackson only told us her husband made money in ‘legal malpractice consulting,’ which is about as opaque as you can get,” he said. “Where did this money come from? Who are his clients? Did these clients have any matter before Jackson while she served as a federal judge for the prior decade? Jackson left out this required information in her disclosures for nearly 10 years, and she stated in her 2022 confirmation disclosures that she’d amend them later. Where are the amendments?”

Jackson not only omitted details about her husband’s work, she also excluded details about her own positions.

“My 2014 and 2016 annual reports inadvertently omitted reimbursements from: (i) the University of California, Berkeley School of Law for expenses to attend a panel discussion in October 2014, and (ii) the Aspen Institute for expenses to attend a Justice and Society seminar in July 2016,” the disclosure states. “In addition, my 2014 annual report inadvertently omitted my salary of $1,765 from George Washington University for teaching a Federal Sentencing Seminar.”

https://dailycaller.com/2023/04/20/double-standard-ketanji-brown-jackson-financial-disclosure-supreme-court-clarence-thomas-ethics/

So you are comparing the corruption potential of a free hotel room while speaking to students at a university in Minnesota with a series of multi million dollar private yacht luxury excursions taken as vacations and 10 million dollars in private $$?

Be serious.

Hey.... if you are going to start teetotaling, it's only fair.
I'm sure there is far more when it comes to the progressive Justices.
And, shall we go back and check out the expenses of RBG?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.

+1
Thank you for cutting to the chase. That's the only thing that would make these dopes happy - full control of the SC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.

Point out the ethics lapses and corruption of "left" justices and we can talk.

Please. I can actually predict the next ‘scandal’. Same sources, same BS.

The charges against thomas aren’t BS. Because you’re a wing nut, you get to essentially wish them away, but they’re real.

DP. I would argue it is YOU who is the wing nut, and as such, you get to keep obsessing over what has already been proven to NOT be ethics violations. The rules have now changed, and Thomas will change the way he reports personal hospitality from friends. Grow up and move on.

The Supreme Court justice, who is currently the longest serving justice on the high court, went on to explain in the statement that he sought guidance early in his tenure about the gifts and “was advised that this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the Court, was not reportable,” adding that he has “always sought to comply with the disclosure guidelines.”

Justices file financial disclosure forms annually, which include requirements for the disclosure of certain gifts received. But rules about disclosing travel under the category of “personal hospitality” were reportedly not clearly outlined.

In his statement, Thomas noted that the disclosure guidelines are being changed, with new guidance adopted last month by the Judicial Conference of the United States, which includes a requirement to disclose some free trips and air travel. He added that he intends to follow that guidance in the future.
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2023-04-07/justice-thomas-says-he-was-advised-that-personal-hospitality-from-friends-was-not-reportable

[Anonymous]

We see you for what you are, Democrats.

https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1652051928040308737
Among the SCOTUS-related stories that major outlets have broken in the last few weeks:

- Washington Post discovered that Clarence Thomas has been declaring income from "Ginger Holdings LLC" instead of "Ginger Limited Partnership" since 2006.

- CNN discovered that a company Harlan Crow's family had a minority interest in was involved in a case that SCOTUS declined to consider. Crow & his company had no involvement in the case.

- Politico discovered that Justice Gorsuch correctly declared the sale of his portion of an LLC that sold property to a partner at a law firm. That partner never met Gorsuch and is a big Dem donor.

- Business Insider discovered that Justice Roberts' wife is a successful recruiter for major law firms. None of her recruits have ever argued before SCOTUS.

If you don't realize this is an intentional and coordinated campaign aimed directly at delegitimizing the SCOTUS majority, I don't know what to tell you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know!! Let’s impeach all but the democrats and fill the entire SC with democrats because that’s the goal here. I don’t think y’all know how transparent and gullible you all are.

Point out the ethics lapses and corruption of "left" justices and we can talk.

Please. I can actually predict the next ‘scandal’. Same sources, same BS.

The charges against thomas aren’t BS. Because you’re a wing nut, you get to essentially wish them away, but they’re real.

DP. I would argue it is YOU who is the wing nut, and as such, you get to keep obsessing over what has already been proven to NOT be ethics violations. The rules have now changed, and Thomas will change the way he reports personal hospitality from friends. Grow up and move on.

The Supreme Court justice, who is currently the longest serving justice on the high court, went on to explain in the statement that he sought guidance early in his tenure about the gifts and “was advised that this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the Court, was not reportable,” adding that he has “always sought to comply with the disclosure guidelines.”

Justices file financial disclosure forms annually, which include requirements for the disclosure of certain gifts received. But rules about disclosing travel under the category of “personal hospitality” were reportedly not clearly outlined.

In his statement, Thomas noted that the disclosure guidelines are being changed, with new guidance adopted last month by the Judicial Conference of the United States, which includes a requirement to disclose some free trips and air travel. He added that he intends to follow that guidance in the future.
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2023-04-07/justice-thomas-says-he-was-advised-that-personal-hospitality-from-friends-was-not-reportable

You’re way behind. Thomas is way past free trips and air travel now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We see you for what you are, Democrats.

https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1652051928040308737
Among the SCOTUS-related stories that major outlets have broken in the last few weeks:

- Washington Post discovered that Clarence Thomas has been declaring income from "Ginger Holdings LLC" instead of "Ginger Limited Partnership" since 2006.

- CNN discovered that a company Harlan Crow's family had a minority interest in was involved in a case that SCOTUS declined to consider. Crow & his company had no involvement in the case.

- Politico discovered that Justice Gorsuch correctly declared the sale of his portion of an LLC that sold property to a partner at a law firm. That partner never met Gorsuch and is a big Dem donor.

- Business Insider discovered that Justice Roberts' wife is a successful recruiter for major law firms. None of her recruits have ever argued before SCOTUS.

If you don't realize this is an intentional and coordinated campaign aimed directly at delegitimizing the SCOTUS majority, I don't know what to tell you.

The firms are over paying for her services and then the firms have business before the court. That is incredibly problematic.

[Anonymous]

Oh and that doesn't even mention Mitch McConnells withholding the Garland pick from Obama to make way for Gorsuch and then slamming Barrett through in record time.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

The justices who were nominated by Dems don’t have immediate family who work?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We see you for what you are, Democrats.

https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1652051928040308737
Among the SCOTUS-related stories that major outlets have broken in the last few weeks:

- Washington Post discovered that Clarence Thomas has been declaring income from "Ginger Holdings LLC" instead of "Ginger Limited Partnership" since 2006.

- CNN discovered that a company Harlan Crow's family had a minority interest in was involved in a case that SCOTUS declined to consider. Crow & his company had no involvement in the case.

- Politico discovered that Justice Gorsuch correctly declared the sale of his portion of an LLC that sold property to a partner at a law firm. That partner never met Gorsuch and is a big Dem donor.

- Business Insider discovered that Justice Roberts' wife is a successful recruiter for major law firms. None of her recruits have ever argued before SCOTUS.

If you don't realize this is an intentional and coordinated campaign aimed directly at delegitimizing the SCOTUS majority, I don't know what to tell you.

Bingo. So sick of these constant, pathetic lies from the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The justices who were nominated by Dems don’t have immediate family who work?

Oh you want to bring up Ginni helping to plan the insurrection?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The justices who were nominated by Dems don’t have immediate family who work?

Kagan and Sotomayor are both single. Brown Jackson’s husband is a surgeon.