Look at the context of Cawthorn’s politics (and Crow’s) and tell me that. That’s what you’re missing. |
Says you. And because the great you says so, it must be true for all! |
So, if two politicians both like gin over bourban, that makes them the same? Have you any idea how many Americans have visited the Eagle's Nest? I don't think you know much about it. |
Well clearly there are people like you who salivate over Nazi memorabilia and would love to be able to have some hanging in their house to look at every day. You do you. Jawohl! |
I've visited Ausschwitz. Did not buy souvenirs, did not frame any photos taken on that day. Visiting a evil site isn’t the same as collecting things belonging to perpetrators of evil and displaying them in your home. |
And everyone must do exactly as you do and react exactly as you do to be right and good thinking. All makes sense now. |
Hit a nerve eh? |
are you sure |
![]() He was not being persecuted. He had a grueling reprehensible history of harassment. He should not have been put on the bunch. |
Holy moly. That you liken the politics of hate that Cawthorn, Crow and Thomas have in common to sharing a love of particular booze does not recommend your argument to be taken seriously. I don’t think you know much about anything. Seriously, I don’t think you know anything. Here’s beloved travel writer Rick Steves on the Eagle’s Nest: https://www.ricksteves.com/watch-read-listen/read/articles/hitlers-eagles-nest-at-berchtesgaden There are many, many places to take in the awesome views of the Alps. To visit this one specific place? You’re going for WWII history. Add in fascist politics? You’re going to see Hitler’s mountaintop aerie. |
+1 We lived in Germany for a couple of years when my parents were stationed there (we're Americans). We took a family trip to see Eagle's Nest. It's part of history, not to mention in an astoundingly beautiful area. Honestly, the hysterics on this thread are really something to behold. |
DP. You're making a fool of yourself. Visiting a *concentration camp* is not the same thing as visiting Eagle's Nest. Both are sobering experiences, but they are in no way comparable. You can climb on down off your high horse of virtue now. |
DP. You're not making whatever point you think you are. I read Steves' review of the area, and nowhere does he say it's a terrible place to visit, don't go, if you go you are a Nazi, etc. In fact, this is what he says about it: "While for many modern visitors "Berchtesgaden" is synonymous with "Hitler's Eagle's Nest," "the Eagle's Nest" actually refers just to this small lodge itself, perched alone amid spectacular scenery like a Bond villain's lair. Built in 1939 with precision stonework evoking fascist obedience, it was Hitler's 50th birthday gift from his inner circle. The lodge and the road up to it cost a fortune — but Hitler, who was afraid of heights, visited only 14 times. (It wasn't even much of a lodge: While Nazi officials met and hosted visiting diplomats here — and Eva Braun was fond of sunbathing on the terrace — it never had any beds.) Today, the chalet that Hitler ignored is basically a three-room, reasonably priced restaurant with little in the way of artifacts, and views that are often obscured by fog. On nice days, however, the terrace offers a magnificent panorama, and the tunnel, elevator, and mountain road — Germany's highest — that lead to the Eagle's Nest are dramatic in any weather. For many, however, Obersalzberg's vast bunker system is the more fascinating part of a visit. This professionally engineered underground town held meeting rooms, offices, government archives, and lavish living quarters for Hitler — all connected by four miles of tunnels cut, by slave labor, through solid rock. You can't visit all of it, and what you can see was stripped and looted bare by Allied soldiers. But enough is left that you can wander among the concrete and marvel at megalomania gone mad." I've visited it and it was, indeed, fascinating. |
I’m sorry, I have to laugh at your inability to form an argument. I’d didn’t say he said any of those things. I said that if you go there, you’re going for the WWII history. And then you reinforced what I wrote. Clarence Thomas is a slow witted and corrupt person who shouldn’t have been nominated. Like some slimy influencer, he’s taken loads of gifts in exchange for no one quite knows. And it just so happens that the person from whom he takes all these gifts is equally crap. I haven’t seen a single Republican say this is bad. |
It is JUSTICE Thomas, to you, friend. Your opinion of him couldn't matter in the least. His command of the law and our Constitution are impressive. As is his sense of humor and his ability to treat people kindly... unlike you.
https://thehill.com/regulation/3526826-sotomayor-praises-clarence-thomas-he-is-a-man-who-cares-deeply-about-the-court-as-an-institution/ |