Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The universal standard for conflict of interests is to avoid EVEN THE APPEARANCE of a conflict. This is so over any rational line -- but we're not dealing with rational people. So, here we are. The lunatics are running the asylum (apologies to those with actual mental health issues that are not fully self-inflicted).

at the very least, he should have recused himself from hearing cases relating to the insurrection (and going forward any trump presidency/insurrection cases). Failure to do this, as he should have, should have futher consequences.

Further consequences, beyond future recusal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's the lesson of the Trump presidency.
As long as you don't admit any wrongdoing and don't resign, a republican can ride out anything no matter how corrupt, unethical or illegal.
The right wing propaganda machine will protect you from any republican backlash and so long as republicans protect their own,
there will be no actual consequences.

Please spell out exactly what He did wrong? Not what his wife did, but what he did.

He tried to hide his wife's involvement. Got it?

Please show me where he did this, not what you assume he did

I’m glad that you also welcome an investigation into Clarence and Ginni Thomas’s activities and how that has impacted his decisions, as well as any support they may have given to the GOP’s attempts to overthrow the government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Correct me if I’m wrong, but Justice Thomas didn’t know what docs were in the national archives? And in the released texts between Meadows and GT there are no emails dated in December and January?

I don't know if any of us can confirm the first. As to the second, I believe there was one communication from around 1/10 when Ginni expressed disappointment with Pence.

He didn’t know where the texts his wife sent to Meadows were archived Bc they were sent to Meadows private phone. We don’t know if there are other messages out there- all we know is what has been released to us by the J6C. Further it seems curious that there are no texts from Ginny in December or January in the run up to the insurrection.

You can easily hypothesize that there’s worse texts out there that haven’t been released and that’s what they are getting ahead of and why CT hid in the hospital. Should be fun when they subpoena the wife of a SCT justice.

Wow, the people who wanted to lock up the email lady should be hopping mad about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's the lesson of the Trump presidency.
As long as you don't admit any wrongdoing and don't resign, a republican can ride out anything no matter how corrupt, unethical or illegal.
The right wing propaganda machine will protect you from any republican backlash and so long as republicans protect their own,
there will be no actual consequences.

Please spell out exactly what He did wrong? Not what his wife did, but what he did.

He tried to hide his wife's involvement. Got it?

Please show me where he did this, not what you assume he did

I’m glad that you also welcome an investigation into Clarence and Ginni Thomas’s activities and how that has impacted his decisions, as well as any support they may have given to the GOP’s attempts to overthrow the government.

Correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's the lesson of the Trump presidency.
As long as you don't admit any wrongdoing and don't resign, a republican can ride out anything no matter how corrupt, unethical or illegal.
The right wing propaganda machine will protect you from any republican backlash and so long as republicans protect their own,
there will be no actual consequences.

Please spell out exactly what He did wrong? Not what his wife did, but what he did.

I don't know if he tried to hide anyything, but I wish the people frothing at the mouth about the laptop would see things the same way they see CT's involvement with his wife's actions.
He tried to hide his wife's involvement. Got it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Correct me if I’m wrong, but Justice Thomas didn’t know what docs were in the national archives? And in the released texts between Meadows and GT there are no emails dated in December and January?

I don't know if any of us can confirm the first. As to the second, I believe there was one communication from around 1/10 when Ginni expressed disappointment with Pence.

He didn’t know where the texts his wife sent to Meadows were archived Bc they were sent to Meadows private phone. We don’t know if there are other messages out there- all we know is what has been released to us by the J6C. Further it seems curious that there are no texts from Ginny in December or January in the run up to the insurrection.

You can easily hypothesize that there’s worse texts out there that haven’t been released and that’s what they are getting ahead of and why CT hid in the hospital. Should be fun when they subpoena the wife of a SCT justice.

Wow, the people who wanted to lock up the email lady should be hopping mad about this.

Should be. But you and I both know that those people who wanted to lock up the email lady are, to put it charitably, crazy.

And it’s pretty much been projection about Mrs. Clinton since forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's the lesson of the Trump presidency.
As long as you don't admit any wrongdoing and don't resign, a republican can ride out anything no matter how corrupt, unethical or illegal.
The right wing propaganda machine will protect you from any republican backlash and so long as republicans protect their own,
there will be no actual consequences.

Please spell out exactly what He did wrong? Not what his wife did, but what he did.

He tried to hide his wife's involvement. Got it?

Please show me where he did this, not what you assume he did

NP. He did not vote to release Trump’s/WH’s records on the insurrection.

Technically, he did not concur with an assessment that a mandate to release those records (which did not include the emails in question) should not be stayed.
And either way, it isn't proof of his intent.

DGAF. He is tainted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And yes, I know he wouldn't ultimately be convicted. But it would keep the conflicts of interest and January 6th continually in the public eye. January 6th was the lowest point in American democracy since the Civil War and Trump wanted to turn the US into an autocratic dictatorship and a substantial number of members of Congress wanted to help him do it.
And the loonies have spent the last 18 months trying to purge the Republican party of those remaining members who DID do the right thing.

So here's the thing. You're basically suggesting using constitutional processes and the power of the government to further a political party's agenda. That is exactly what was happening in the prior administration. Let's just stop doing that. All of us, regardless of party.

So the Ds should just look the other way? Disregard corruption because it might benefit them?

Ridiculous given how the Rs have actually abused their powers for their own benefit and to support illegal behavior.

I'm not suggesting that nothing be done. I'm supportive of the 1/6 commission, and any prosecutions that result. I'm also supportive of everybody talking about it publicly, etc. What I am not in favor of doing is impeaching a justice "for show" and to create spectacle.

I agree. No Supreme Court justice has ever been successfully impeached. Another lost impeachment hearing will cost Democrats in the long run. Shame him into retirement or charge his wife criminally or both. Keep her conspiracy to overthrow our government in the news.

Maybe Mrs. Thomas runs into some issues, though I don’t know how you sanction her for using her right to speak freely. But the notion that Justice Thomas must resign underscores the Democrat plot against America. You can’t hand Biden an illegitimate chance to fill another SCOTUS seat. People forget that Justice Thomas did nothing wrong.

If somehow Justice Thomas is forced out or driven to death, his seat needs to be held open until his party takes the Presidency. It’s only fair.

There are no republican or democrat seats on the Supreme Court. You need a civics lesson.

Plotting to overthrow a free and fair election is not free speech. It remains to be proven that Clarence did something wrong but I'm of the opinion that he probably did. Guilty people act guilty and he certainly is. My mind keeps going back to Ginni's partner and co founder of Turning Point that day after the insurrection. He proudly tweeted that they paid for 80 bus loads. It was deleted but someone somewhere must have a screen shot. If true she funded the insurection. Clarence retiring does not give Biden an "illegitimate" pick for the Supreme Court. If there's an opening during President Biden's term it must be filled.

It remains to be proven that your husband is a child molester, but he probably is.
See how that works?

He just walked out of a hotel room with a kid. Still don’t know what happened in that room but it doesn’t look good.

They will NEVER get it, PPs. Never.

GOP trolls working extra hard at defending traitors today. You just don't get it. Thomas feined an illness at a covenient time.

[Anonymous]

The 1/6 Committee will seek to interview Ginni. Over/under on whether she'll voluntarily appear?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The 1/6 Committee will seek to interview Ginni. Over/under on whether she'll voluntarily appear?

Zero chance

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Correct me if I’m wrong, but Justice Thomas didn’t know what docs were in the national archives? And in the released texts between Meadows and GT there are no emails dated in December and January?

I don't know if any of us can confirm the first. As to the second, I believe there was one communication from around 1/10 when Ginni expressed disappointment with Pence.

He didn’t know where the texts his wife sent to Meadows were archived Bc they were sent to Meadows private phone. We don’t know if there are other messages out there- all we know is what has been released to us by the J6C. Further it seems curious that there are no texts from Ginny in December or January in the run up to the insurrection.

You can easily hypothesize that there’s worse texts out there that haven’t been released and that’s what they are getting ahead of and why CT hid in the hospital. Should be fun when they subpoena the wife of a SCT justice.

Wow, the people who wanted to lock up the email lady should be hopping mad about this.

Should be. But you and I both know that those people who wanted to lock up the email lady are, to put it charitably, crazy.

And it’s pretty much been projection about Mrs. Clinton since forever.

Not really because HRC is actually accomplished.

[Anonymous]

The 1/6 committee will be neutered in time due to upcoming indictments. Mark my words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The 1/6 Committee will seek to interview Ginni. Over/under on whether she'll voluntarily appear?

over/under on whether the committee will actually accomplish a single thing before the next congress dissolves it?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's the lesson of the Trump presidency.
As long as you don't admit any wrongdoing and don't resign, a republican can ride out anything no matter how corrupt, unethical or illegal.
The right wing propaganda machine will protect you from any republican backlash and so long as republicans protect their own,
there will be no actual consequences.

Please spell out exactly what He did wrong? Not what his wife did, but what he did.

He tried to hide his wife's involvement. Got it?

Please show me where he did this, not what you assume he did

NP. He did not vote to release Trump’s/WH’s records on the insurrection.

Technically, he did not concur with an assessment that a mandate to release those records (which did not include the emails in question) should not be stayed.
And either way, it isn't proof of his intent.

Thomas had a conflict of interest and there is no Constitutional basis for his dissent. Even Alito wouldn’t go there.