School Board Meeting 9/23

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK prudes...let's hear:

What is an acceptable age for kids to start masturbating?

What is an acceptable age for kids to start experimenting with sex with peers?

That is not the issue. The issue is the graphic nature of those words and that book. You do know there is a graphic novel she was addressing, as well?

It's exactly the issue.

PP said 9-10 is too young.

How old is not "too young"?

Still waiting on the answer to this.

What age is not “too young”?

If two fourth graders exploring their bodies together is “too young”, what is old enough?

13?
15?
17?
Any age?

Fourth grade is 9 and 10.

At least be a teenager first, if you need a number. Preferably old enough to drive, if not to vote.

So kids need to wait until 13-18 to “play doctor”?

So, schools should have books promoting sex with peers and pedophilia?

Liar.

There is no pedophilia.

When a grown man is performing oral sex on a pre-teen, that is pedophilia.
Read the excerpts from the book...... https://dailycaller.com/2021/09/24/fairfax-county-public-school-mother-child-porn-pedophilia-books-library/

Get a better source. Daily Caller is full of sh1t.

There is not a grown man performing oral sex on a kid. The excerpts are clearly misinterpreted. It’s an adult reflecting on his as experiences as a 4th grader with another 4th grader. This has been explained multiple times. Go read it all for yourself. “Do your research”.

You are either intentionally pushing these lies or you’re dumb AF.

DP. Why should we even be encouraging middle school students who are not adults to be reading about gay sex acts performed upon 4th graders from the perspective of an adult reflecting back? You are smutty AF. What exactly is your agenda in wanting this filth in school libraries?

I actually don't care if this particular book is in the high school library or not. It's up to the review board to decide if it's OK.

But I will call out LIES and MISINFORMATION spread by MAGA losers every chance I get.

Because you think only Trump supporters object to this kind of graphic filth in school libraries?

That says it all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK prudes...let's hear:

What is an acceptable age for kids to start masturbating?

What is an acceptable age for kids to start experimenting with sex with peers?

That is not the issue. The issue is the graphic nature of those words and that book. You do know there is a graphic novel she was addressing, as well?

It's exactly the issue.

PP said 9-10 is too young.

How old is not "too young"?

Still waiting on the answer to this.

What age is not “too young”?

If two fourth graders exploring their bodies together is “too young”, what is old enough?

13?
15?
17?
Any age?

Fourth grade is 9 and 10.

At least be a teenager first, if you need a number. Preferably old enough to drive, if not to vote.

So kids need to wait until 13-18 to “play doctor”?

So, schools should have books promoting sex with peers and pedophilia?

Liar.

There is no pedophilia.

When a grown man is performing oral sex on a pre-teen, that is pedophilia.
Read the excerpts from the book...... https://dailycaller.com/2021/09/24/fairfax-county-public-school-mother-child-porn-pedophilia-books-library/

Get a better source. Daily Caller is full of sh1t.

There is not a grown man performing oral sex on a kid. The excerpts are clearly misinterpreted. It’s an adult reflecting on his as experiences as a 4th grader with another 4th grader. This has been explained multiple times. Go read it all for yourself. “Do your research”.

You are either intentionally pushing these lies or you’re dumb AF.

DP. Why should we even be encouraging middle school students who are not adults to be reading about gay sex acts performed upon 4th graders from the perspective of an adult reflecting back? You are smutty AF. What exactly is your agenda in wanting this filth in school libraries?

I actually don't care if this particular book is in the high school library or not. It's up to the review board to decide if it's OK.

But I will call out LIES and MISINFORMATION spread by MAGA losers every chance I get.

Because you think only Trump supporters object to this kind of graphic filth in school libraries?

That says it all.

I think that the vast majority of people who:
(1) link to daily caller
(2) push blatant lies
(3) try to ban books

are Trump supporters.

[Anonymous]

I think that the vast majority of people who:
(1) link to daily caller
(2) push blatant lies
(3) try to ban books

are Trump supporters.

So, because you hate Trump supporters and think they are behind this, you will fight to keep extremely disturbing and harmful books in our schools.

Got it. Talk about "group think."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I think that the vast majority of people who:
(1) link to daily caller
(2) push blatant lies
(3) try to ban books

are Trump supporters.

So, because you hate Trump supporters and think they are behind this, you will fight to keep extremely disturbing and harmful books in our schools.

Got it. Talk about "group think."

Liar. These books aren't "harmful".

Let's put it this way. I hate people who fck around with school systems to advance their political agenda. And, yes, I also hate Trump supporters because they are lying POSs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think that the vast majority of people who:
(1) link to daily caller
(2) push blatant lies
(3) try to ban books

are Trump supporters.

So, because you hate Trump supporters and think they are behind this, you will fight to keep extremely disturbing and harmful books in our schools.

Got it. Talk about "group think."

Liar. These books aren't "harmful".

Let's put it this way. I hate people who fck around with school systems to advance their political agenda. And, yes, I also hate Trump supporters because they are lying POSs.

You know.. I don't really give a damn what you think of the Daily Caller. Or, what you think of Trump supporters. You come across as a bigot.

At the risk of having this post deleted, here is the passage in question that was in the link:

“What if I told you I touched another guy’s d*ck? What if I told you I sucked it? I was 10 years old but it’s true. I sucked [Doug]’s d*ck, the real estate guy, and he sucked mine too.”

And, if this IS deleted, it proves my point. This is not appropriate for MS. I would say it is not appropriate for HS either.
This is promotion of pedophilia since Doug is an adult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think that the vast majority of people who:
(1) link to daily caller
(2) push blatant lies
(3) try to ban books

are Trump supporters.

So, because you hate Trump supporters and think they are behind this, you will fight to keep extremely disturbing and harmful books in our schools.

Got it. Talk about "group think."

Liar. These books aren't "harmful".

Let's put it this way. I hate people who fck around with school systems to advance their political agenda. And, yes, I also hate Trump supporters because they are lying POSs.

You know.. I don't really give a damn what you think of the Daily Caller. Or, what you think of Trump supporters. You come across as a bigot.

At the risk of having this post deleted, here is the passage in question that was in the link:

“What if I told you I touched another guy’s d*ck? What if I told you I sucked it? I was 10 years old but it’s true. I sucked [Doug]’s d*ck, the real estate guy, and he sucked mine too.”

And, if this IS deleted, it proves my point. This is not appropriate for MS. I would say it is not appropriate for HS either.
This is promotion of pedophilia since Doug is an adult.

You are a fcking moron. They were both in 4th grade when it happened. He was reflecting on his youth when he had his sexual awakening.

These are all things you'd understand if you had actually read it and/or had a fcking clue.

[Anonymous]

Weren’t people trying to ban all sorts of classics recently? Huck Finn etc. Were they all trump supporters too? Since only trump supporters want to ban books? This is such a bizarre thread. I’d love to see who it is that has a problem with removing these books from school libraries. Such an odd thing to argue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think that the vast majority of people who:
(1) link to daily caller
(2) push blatant lies
(3) try to ban books

are Trump supporters.

So, because you hate Trump supporters and think they are behind this, you will fight to keep extremely disturbing and harmful books in our schools.

Got it. Talk about "group think."

Liar. These books aren't "harmful".

Let's put it this way. I hate people who fck around with school systems to advance their political agenda. And, yes, I also hate Trump supporters because they are lying POSs.

You know.. I don't really give a damn what you think of the Daily Caller. Or, what you think of Trump supporters. You come across as a bigot.

At the risk of having this post deleted, here is the passage in question that was in the link:

“What if I told you I touched another guy’s d*ck? What if I told you I sucked it? I was 10 years old but it’s true. I sucked [Doug]’s d*ck, the real estate guy, and he sucked mine too.”

And, if this IS deleted, it proves my point. This is not appropriate for MS. I would say it is not appropriate for HS either.
This is promotion of pedophilia since Doug is an adult.

DP. Doug is also 10 at the time the sex happens. It's not pedophilia or promotion of pedophilia for an adult to remember a time he had sex underage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think that the vast majority of people who:
(1) link to daily caller
(2) push blatant lies
(3) try to ban books

are Trump supporters.

So, because you hate Trump supporters and think they are behind this, you will fight to keep extremely disturbing and harmful books in our schools.

Got it. Talk about "group think."

Liar. These books aren't "harmful".

Let's put it this way. I hate people who fck around with school systems to advance their political agenda. And, yes, I also hate Trump supporters because they are lying POSs.

The irony of this statement given the current state of the FCPS school board.

Whoosh

[Anonymous]

Poor kids. Whatever happened to just reading Judy Blume?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Weren’t people trying to ban all sorts of classics recently? Huck Finn etc. Were they all trump supporters too? Since only trump supporters want to ban books? This is such a bizarre thread. I’d love to see who it is that has a problem with removing these books from school libraries. Such an odd thing to argue.

This was already discussed - the GOP has been astroturfing across the nation to infiltrate local school organizations and to manufacture and magnify "issues" to drive division and try to fearmonger up votes.

One of these GOP astroturfing organizations is based right here in the area. These are the people pushing these "issues".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Poor kids. Whatever happened to just reading Judy Blume?

Wasnt Judy Blume controversial back in the day for all of the talk about menstruation and sec and breast size?

[Anonymous]

This was already discussed - the GOP has been astroturfing across the nation to infiltrate local school organizations and to manufacture and magnify "issues" to drive division and try to fearmonger up votes.

One of these GOP astroturfing organizations is based right here in the area. These are the people pushing these "issues".

So, because GOP doesn't want porn in the school, then it must be a good thing to have porn in the school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This was already discussed - the GOP has been astroturfing across the nation to infiltrate local school organizations and to manufacture and magnify "issues" to drive division and try to fearmonger up votes.

One of these GOP astroturfing organizations is based right here in the area. These are the people pushing these "issues".

So, because GOP doesn't want porn in the school, then it must be a good thing to have porn in the school?

This isn’t porn.

Sorry CRT didn’t work out for you either.

[Anonymous]

This isn’t porn.

Have you looked at the pictures from the graphic novel?