Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is a sexual "train" automatically assumed to be rape?

I was a first-person witness to sex trains in college. The women were typically sober and thought it was thrilling, I guess.

Websites like Barstool sports and TFM have sorority girls posting college bucket lists and one of the items on the list is typically some form of group sex or having sex with a few athletes at once.

Excuse me while I vomit.

Nihilism, binge drinking, drugs, hippy dippy sexual freedom is what the left promotes. Why are you surprised so many co-eds go to "college" and eagerly pursue this crap? It's not like most of them are learning anything. It's just a drug and alcohol fueled place to hook up.

Kardashians are worth a billion dollars off a porno tape and having out of wedlock babies.

Sounds like Judge us on here defending O'Kavanaught...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who wants to be 2nd or 5th in line? That is nasty.

Ask literally any high school and college basketball, football, hockey and lacrosse team. Sexual trains are frighteningly commonplace. Most coeds are willing and eager. As John Mayer said, fathers be good to your daughters.

It's been a long time since I heard that term, "coed," to refer to a female college student.

How old are you, PP?

I seriously doubt "most" if any women are willing and eager. Likely not any.

So sick, these posts and posters. Trying to normalize behavior that is totally abnormal.

[Anonymous]

Sounds like Judge is on here defending O'Kavanaugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is a sexual "train" automatically assumed to be rape?

I was a first-person witness to sex trains in college. The women were typically sober and thought it was thrilling, I guess.

Websites like Barstool sports and TFM have sorority girls posting college bucket lists and one of the items on the list is typically some form of group sex or having sex with a few athletes at once.

Excuse me while I vomit.

For arguments sense, even if consensual - SCOTUS?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why is a sexual "train" automatically assumed to be rape?

I was a first-person witness to sex trains in college. The women were typically sober and thought it was thrilling, I guess.

Websites like Barstool sports and TFM have sorority girls posting college bucket lists and one of the items on the list is typically some form of group sex or having sex with a few athletes at once.[/quote]

Excuse me while I vomit. [/quote]

Nihilism, binge drinking, drugs, hippy dippy sexual freedom is what the left promotes. Why are you surprised so many co-eds go to "college" and eagerly pursue this crap? It's not like most of them are learning anything. It's just a drug and alcohol fueled place to hook up.

Kardashians are worth a billion dollars off a porno tape and having out of wedlock babies.[/quote]

You do not seem to have an accurate view of “the left,” grandpa. Hippies are no longer a thing and politics has little to do with lifestyle. Most of the liberals I know led a far more conservative life and college career than Judge “touch-my-p.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Full on smear campaign. Full speed ahead, folks!

When you get to three, it no longer sounds like a smear. It sounds like a pattern of behavior like Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought nihilism, drugs, sexual promiscuity and racking up as many partners as you can was the way to live. Now liberals are acting like pearl-clutching puritans. It's all so tiresome.

See, you think sex and rape are the same thing. It explains so very much.

You think Brett and his prep school douchebag buddies were raping girls every weekend and nobody reported them? Or do you think coeds were willing and thrilled for group sex with rich douchebag athletes?

Sorry, the latter is far more realistic.

Oh, yeah, his accusers sound super thrilled. He sounds like he was quite the catch back then.

Looks like Trump is posting here now too. Eager?? Good lord your wife must shudder when you approach your lair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought nihilism, drugs, sexual promiscuity and racking up as many partners as you can was the way to live. Now liberals are acting like pearl-clutching puritans. It's all so tiresome.

See, you think sex and rape are the same thing. It explains so very much.

You think Brett and his prep school douchebag buddies were raping girls every weekend and nobody reported them? Or do you think coeds were willing and thrilled for group sex with rich douchebag athletes?

Sorry, the latter is far more realistic.

Nobody is claiming either of those two things. Sheesh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought nihilism, drugs, sexual promiscuity and racking up as many partners as you can was the way to live. Now liberals are acting like pearl-clutching puritans. It's all so tiresome.

See, you think sex and rape are the same thing. It explains so very much.

You think Brett and his prep school douchebag buddies were raping girls every weekend and nobody reported them? Or do you think coeds were willing and thrilled for group sex with rich douchebag athletes?

Sorry, the latter is far more realistic.

I think you want to believe what you want to believe. I honestly have never met any coeds who were willing and thrilled for group sex. And I was a coed. I do know three girls in my dorm in my freshman year of college who were raped. Only one told her mother. None of the others told their parents.

This idea that there are coeds who are dying to have group sex is utterly false. Sorority girls with bucket lists??? GMAFB.
No.

This is like the middle eastern countries where a woman cannot be out unchaperoned because she will be attacked for wanting to be raped. It is all the same thought process. NO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find this latest accusation implausible. I went to plenty of posh parties with private school kids in tbe eighties, with lots of drugs and alcohol and sex, and I never saw or heard of anything like this. Just feels false to me.

So you find that implausible. Do you find all the other evidence so far implausible?
1) Judge's book with character "Bart O'Kavanaugh"
2) Ford's accusation plus
3) Ramirez's accusation plus
4) Stickney or whatever accusation plus
5) roommate who says Kavanaugh is a belligerent drunk plus
6) college friend who says Kavanaugh lied about virginity plus
7) Kavanaugh going on Fox to say he was a choir boy, not Animal House
8) Kavanaugh's yearbook which includes a reference to a girl (Renate) who a bunch of boys insinuated they all were "alums" of?

Not to mention that he bizarrely, apparently, kept a day planner from 1982, and admits drinking underage even as he apparently denies breaking the law to drink underage?



Taken alone, Ford's accusation would not be enough. Taken with all these other circumstances, the guy appears to be hiding his youthful behavior. Why would he prevaricate if he's done nothing wrong?

I find Ford’s story plausible but the one about gang rape to me seems implausible. That’s my gut reaction, as someone who lived through those years and spent time in similar environments.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Lol. You have no idea how much he did or didn’t drink. This whole thing is bullshit. He’s qualified and will be confirmed.

can't believe you're a real person

I am and a woman and a Democrat who voted for Hillary. Also a lawyer. This campaign is transparently political and the allegations are drafted to be vague guilt-by-association nonsense with timing that is ridiculously and transparently politically-motivated. It’s a campaign to discredit him based on him being at parties where bad things may have happened. You are a sheep and a part of the brainless mob for believing this stuff.

sorry, don't believe you

What the Hillary-voting poster says is essentially true and I don't why people are not believing her. Where I differ with the poster is that what she describes is a bad thing. She obviously favors a totally fact-based legalistic approach. I don't think the Republicans in the Senate care about facts and facts would be lost on them. So, while a legalistic approach might be honorable, it would also be a failure. The one way to defeat Kavanaugh it to do so politically. If that means "guilt-by-association" wherein the association is with gang-rape, I am perfectly comfortable with that. If Kavanaugh wants to admit to teenage indiscretions, so be it. But, lying about it makes him unfit for the court.

Well thanks for at least being honest that you support mob justice, Jeff!

Holy CRAP!! I do hope, Jeff, that your sons are never in a bad divorce or a bad relationship. The only thing saving them from such a fate is a woman with the honesty and integrity of the Democratic lawyer above!

Wow, quite a statement from Mr. Steele. This would be quite a precedent. So, it is guilty until proven innocent.

The Republicans have refused to allow a legitimate confirmation process. We are not talking about a court of law. There is no guilt or innocence. This is not a legal process, but a political process. If you insist on following legal standards when only political tactics matter, you will not be successful. You have to play by the rules of the game.

If the Republicans wanted to treat this like a legal process, then they would have to allow legal procedures. Proper discovery would allow for a lot more than a measly 5% of the relevant documents being released. But, the Republicans have decided to treat this as purely political. Don't be upset that Avenatti plays by their rules.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is almost too outrageous to even be believable. It’s like someone said “let’s come up with a shady sexual allegation to make him go away.” And that didn’t work so then they said “let’s try again just to bolster the first one.” Then when that didn’t work they said “screw it, let’s go for broke. Let’s say he’s actually a serial gang rapist.” I mean, this is like every liberal dystopian fantasy come to life

THIS x10000. It’s like out of some old school leftist propaganda playbook. It’s like it jumped from Jews-are-kinda-weird to Jews-are-sacrificing-children-and-drinking-their-blood.

Agreed. Women in this area are incredibly nasty and vindictive. I recently put an item up for sale on a crafting forum with well over 1,000,000 members. It's a rare, coveted item my cousin picked up for me and my price is very reasonable. I got ONE snide comment and that person turned out to be from the DC area. Out of over a million members. Color me not surprised.

I don’t know how compelling that anecdote is but you seem like a nice person who crafts and I’m glad you’re here.

LOL - it's just one more thing about the a lot of the women in this area. I don't know what's in the water. Just happened and pissed me off. My point is, is that nothing would surprise me if it comes from women here. They are as cut-throat as they come.

[Anonymous]

Julie Swetnick's resume is floating around.

She graduated HS in 1980.

The NIH summer internship listed below would've put her in contact with kids in Kavanaugh/Judge's social circle.

She also lists:

American Heart Association Competitive Fellowship Award Winner and NIH
Summer Intern / Cancer Researcher (Summers 1977, 1979, and 1980)
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Cellular Metabolism Lab
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD

Pre-Med (Biology, Chemistry, Microbiology, Genetics), Computer Science,
Applied Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Advanced Mathematics, and
Economics(1979-1985)
Montgomery County Community College, Germantown, MD

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:America 2018 where you are guilty based on words and not evidence.

If a women up for confirmation have her career derailed because at Mardi Gras she flashed her boobs in my face?

Or flip the bird at the president while riding her bike. This is a job interview, not a criminal trial.....why is this so difficult?

One of the dumbest talking points I've ever heard, designed to minimize the complete lack of morality on the left.

If the right has any claim to "morality" why are they refusing to investigate these three claims against Kavanaugh? Why? What are the morally right hiding? If this is a smear campaign, fabricated to derail the Kavanaugh nomination, won't the FBI root out the truth and prosecute these evil women? Why not let that happen? Oh, because maybe, just maybe, the FBI will find out the women are telling the truth. And the "moral" right doesn't want that to happen.

So much for your claim on morality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If true, these allegations mean that he's a disgusting POS.

It makes no difference that this behavior may be culturally tolerated or encouraged.

I think the Republicans will pay a huge price for pushing this through without listening to women.

The whole world is listening to this circus, you fool. And laughing at the nonsense that only one gender must be believed.