Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if Leland has to testify?

Testify where?

She will likely be interviewed by the FBI and tell them what she knows

Did you know she doesn't want to speak under oath?

Serious question: does the FBI conduct interviews under oath?

Red herring. Lying to the senate carries the same legal penalty as lying to the FBI. Leland already provided her statements under penalty that she does not know Kavanaugh.

This. Obviously. Moreover, she may shed some light on Ford's zeel to kill the nomination of any conservative.

She has shown strong partisan motive. She hired two democratic activists lawyers. She sings identical tunes as senate democrats do. Senate democrats called for FBI investigation long before she said anything. She just went along with the democrats on this joy ride.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Never seen such a liar giving testimony. Ever.

Drinking games involving quarters are called QUARTERS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bottom line - even if the FBI FINDS NOTHING (but I believe they will) based on that frat bro, sophomoric, ugly teared, bombastic performance yesterday, he is not fit to be a supreme court judge let alone a traffic cop.

Or a teacher, or a basketball coach, or a reader at Blessed Sacrament.

This guy is a fraud and should be ashamed of himself.

Email from Blessed Sacrament today (Kav the choir boy's full-time church) announced a virtual town hall about the abuse and culture of secrecy that is shaking the Catholic Church. Kind of amazing timing, don't you think? BTW I am Catholic.

If you truly are Catholic then I suggest you go to reconciliation because no decent person, let alone a decent Catholic, would talk about anyone the way you just did. You need to examine your conscience.

So true. And the worst thing is that certain elements of the Blessed Sacrament community have started referring to "Coach K" as "Coach Rapey." How cruel!

Are they "Coach K" alumni?

A mix of the community. They must know that referring to Coach K as Coach Rapey is heartbreaking, right?

Some students, parents, and staff (not faculty.) Not all but some. From Coach K to "Coach Rapey." It really is unkind.

Meh. He can rant and yell and scream his innocence to them just like he did on Thursday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if Leland has to testify?

Testify where?

She will likely be interviewed by the FBI and tell them what she knows

Did you know she doesn't want to speak under oath?

Serious question: does the FBI conduct interviews under oath?

Not exactly. The FBI always interviews in pairs. One agent writes up the 302 form while the other one does the questioning. Lying to a federal agent is a crime under 18 USC 1001.

[Anonymous]

I'm sorry, I guess you think she should seen who Ann Coulter would recommend to be her lawyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Yeah, you're missing him lying under oath

Also about his sneering, dismissive orneriness at being asked questions under oath. It's clear he doesn't think these juvenile escapades are anything other than boys being boys. So we all had an inside sexual joke about a girl named Renate we liked to characterize as loose, wink wink, nudge nudge, wouldn't any red blooded boy act the same? Who cares that she was a living, feeling human being.

[Anonymous]

Serious question: does the FBI conduct interviews under oath?

I think I remember that they did not put HRC under oath--but, I also think that lying to the FBI is a felony--under oath or not.

No expert, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Okay I read the statement. The Judge says that she wasn't the one who was pushed and she was dating him then.

She uses the typical lawyer language to leave open the possibility that it was another woman who was pushed, because of course she can't know that he wasn't seeing other women with certainty.

So it wasn't her and we still don't know.

So did I. She's now a Federal Judge appointed by Trump. Unless the person she was with has a different take on the event, this lead seems dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a good article that explains why Swetnick could have gone to those parties again and again

https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/9/27/17906644/sixteen-candles-rape-culture-1980s-brett-kavanaugh

FBI is not permitted to investigate Julie Swetnick claims. I'm not a big Avenatti fan but Swetnick did file a sworn declaration under oath to Congress.

The White House is limiting the scope of the FBI’s investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, multiple people briefed on the matter told NBC News.

While the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau has not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s, those people familiar with the investigation told NBC News. A White House official confirmed that Swetnick's claims will not be pursued as part of the reopened background investigation into Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/white-house-limits-scope-fbi-s-investigation-allegations-against-brett-n915061?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma

link to above post

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if Leland has to testify?

Testify where?

She will likely be interviewed by the FBI and tell them what she knows

Did you know she doesn't want to speak under oath?

Serious question: does the FBI conduct interviews under oath?

Red herring. Lying to the senate carries the same legal penalty as lying to the FBI. Leland already provided her statements under penalty that she does not know Kavanaugh.

This. Obviously. Moreover, she may shed some light on Ford's zeel to kill the nomination of any conservative.

She has shown strong partisan motive. She hired two democratic activists lawyers. She sings identical tunes as senate democrats do. Senate democrats called for FBI investigation long before she said anything. She just went along with the democrats on this joy ride.

Looking at that photo, the difference I spot is that she seems vulnerable but is surrounded by people who seem to care about her and are worried about her, whereas BK is totally alone with a nasty look on his face while his wife looks on with some sort of forlorn look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the FBI investigation:

FBI; please describe the night Judge Kavanaugh was with Dr. Ford.

Mark Judge: I have no recollection of such a night, and I’ve never seen Judge Kavanaugh behave as described.

PJ Smith: I was never at such a gathering described.

Leland Keyser: I have never met Judge Kavanaugh.

FBI: Can you describe any time Dr. Ford and Brett Kavanaugh were together at a small gathering at a private house?

Collective: No

FBI: would you like to add anything else?

collective: No

FBI: thank you we will put this in our report.

FBI report:

Brett Kavanaugh statement, Christine Blasey Ford statement, three witnesses’ account.

Joe Manchin: FBI conducted a thorough investigation and found no credible corroborating evidence, therefore I will vote yes

Jeff Flake: This one week pause reaffirmed ... blah blah ... therefore I will vote yes

Liberal tears raining down

I'm sure they will vote yes, no matter what the investigation days. But, at least, there will be an investigation.

There will be something liberal coming down, but it won't be tears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good article that explains why Swetnick could have gone to those parties again and again

https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/9/27/17906644/sixteen-candles-rape-culture-1980s-brett-kavanaugh

FBI is not permitted to investigate Julie Swetnick claims. I'm not a big Avenatti fan but Swetnick did file a sworn declaration under oath to Congress.

The White House is limiting the scope of the FBI’s investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, multiple people briefed on the matter told NBC News.

While the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau has not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s, those people familiar with the investigation told NBC News. A White House official confirmed that Swetnick's claims will not be pursued as part of the reopened background investigation into Kavanaugh.

This doesn’t ring true to me. The FBI is not investigating these women as separate cases. It is investigating Kavanaugh’s background. To do an investigation agents have to go down many rabbit holes that they can’t anticipate at the outset. If another name comes up (even another one we haven’t heard about) the agents will have more doors to knock on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if Leland has to testify?

Testify where?

She will likely be interviewed by the FBI and tell them what she knows

Did you know she doesn't want to speak under oath?

Serious question: does the FBI conduct interviews under oath?

Red herring. Lying to the senate carries the same legal penalty as lying to the FBI. Leland already provided her statements under penalty that she does not know Kavanaugh.

This. Obviously. Moreover, she may shed some light on Ford's zeel to kill the nomination of any conservative.

She has shown strong partisan motive. She hired two democratic activists lawyers. She sings identical tunes as senate democrats do. Senate democrats called for FBI investigation long before she said anything. She just went along with the democrats on this joy ride.

Looking at that photo, the difference I spot is that she seems vulnerable but is surrounded by people who seem to care about her and are worried about her, whereas BK is totally alone with a nasty look on his face while his wife looks on with some sort of forlorn look.

Yeah, our dear Kavanaugh supporter, that photo isn't helping your case.

[Anonymous]

If the white house says that the FBI is limited in who they can interview to the list of witnesses Trump gave them, then why is the FBI asking for people with information to come forward?

This doesn't make sense.

If they limit it in this way, then no one will believe the results.