Travis and Taylor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Your continued use of "legit real family" is starting to gross me out. All families are "real" and "legit." Being a white family from the midwest whose adult sons play pro football does not make you more real and legit, but it really feels like that's what you're trying to say.

You just injected race into the discussion and put words in people’s mouths that they didn’t put there.

Watch the documentary on Jason Kelce and you’ll see that both his parents are incredibly loving and sacrificed financially for their kids. There is a strong and loving family presence there that helped shape their growth. They seem well adjusted thanks to that type of family environment.

I’m sorry you think it’s “racist” to talk about supporting, loving families. Most scientists, or even sociologists, would agree that a stable, loving environment with two parents is a great place to grow up, but you go ahead and write flippant, irreverent and spiteful, snarky, race-baiting internet comments and we’ll all just go on with our lives. Ugh, and I’m liberal. Sorry we’re all not woke enough to comment here.

No, I'm responding to your repeated use of the phrase "legit real family" to describe the Kelces. It's a weird phrasing, especially the word "legit." Why not just say "they seem like a loving, supportive family." That would have been normal. You chose to go with "legit real family." Why? It's weird and absolutely begs the question of what an illegitimate, fake family looks like.

And I’m responding to your patronizing and boring obsession with semantics and policing of words. Who fking cares that that poster wrote “legit” family? They do come from a “legit” family. One that isn’t broken and allowed for an upbringing much less likely to cause personality. I’m sorry you feel the need to give us all a social justice tongue lashing because we didn’t use the correct clinal terminology and it was offensive to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Your continued use of "legit real family" is starting to gross me out. All families are "real" and "legit." Being a white family from the midwest whose adult sons play pro football does not make you more real and legit, but it really feels like that's what you're trying to say.

You just injected race into the discussion and put words in people’s mouths that they didn’t put there.

Watch the documentary on Jason Kelce and you’ll see that both his parents are incredibly loving and sacrificed financially for their kids. There is a strong and loving family presence there that helped shape their growth. They seem well adjusted thanks to that type of family environment.

I’m sorry you think it’s “racist” to talk about supporting, loving families. Most scientists, or even sociologists, would agree that a stable, loving environment with two parents is a great place to grow up, but you go ahead and write flippant, irreverent and spiteful, snarky, race-baiting internet comments and we’ll all just go on with our lives. Ugh, and I’m liberal. Sorry we’re all not woke enough to comment here.

No, I'm responding to your repeated use of the phrase "legit real family" to describe the Kelces. It's a weird phrasing, especially the word "legit." Why not just say "they seem like a loving, supportive family." That would have been normal. You chose to go with "legit real family." Why? It's weird and absolutely begs the question of what an illegitimate, fake family looks like.

And I’m responding to your patronizing and boring obsession with semantics and policing of words. Who fking cares that that poster wrote “legit” family? They do come from a “legit” family. One that isn’t broken and allowed for an upbringing much less likely to cause personality. I’m sorry you feel the need to give us all a social justice tongue lashing because we didn’t use the correct clinal terminology and it was offensive to you.

*personality disorders or mental health problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Your continued use of "legit real family" is starting to gross me out. All families are "real" and "legit." Being a white family from the midwest whose adult sons play pro football does not make you more real and legit, but it really feels like that's what you're trying to say.

You just injected race into the discussion and put words in people’s mouths that they didn’t put there.

Watch the documentary on Jason Kelce and you’ll see that both his parents are incredibly loving and sacrificed financially for their kids. There is a strong and loving family presence there that helped shape their growth. They seem well adjusted thanks to that type of family environment.

I’m sorry you think it’s “racist” to talk about supporting, loving families. Most scientists, or even sociologists, would agree that a stable, loving environment with two parents is a great place to grow up, but you go ahead and write flippant, irreverent and spiteful, snarky, race-baiting internet comments and we’ll all just go on with our lives. Ugh, and I’m liberal. Sorry we’re all not woke enough to comment here.

No, I'm responding to your repeated use of the phrase "legit real family" to describe the Kelces. It's a weird phrasing, especially the word "legit." Why not just say "they seem like a loving, supportive family." That would have been normal. You chose to go with "legit real family." Why? It's weird and absolutely begs the question of what an illegitimate, fake family looks like.

And I’m responding to your patronizing and boring obsession with semantics and policing of words. Who fking cares that that poster wrote “legit” family? They do come from a “legit” family. One that isn’t broken and allowed for an upbringing much less likely to cause personality. I’m sorry you feel the need to give us all a social justice tongue lashing because we didn’t use the correct clinal terminology and it was offensive to you.

*personality disorders or mental health problems.

LOL I think you got it right the first time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Your continued use of "legit real family" is starting to gross me out. All families are "real" and "legit." Being a white family from the midwest whose adult sons play pro football does not make you more real and legit, but it really feels like that's what you're trying to say.

You just injected race into the discussion and put words in people’s mouths that they didn’t put there.

Watch the documentary on Jason Kelce and you’ll see that both his parents are incredibly loving and sacrificed financially for their kids. There is a strong and loving family presence there that helped shape their growth. They seem well adjusted thanks to that type of family environment.

I’m sorry you think it’s “racist” to talk about supporting, loving families. Most scientists, or even sociologists, would agree that a stable, loving environment with two parents is a great place to grow up, but you go ahead and write flippant, irreverent and spiteful, snarky, race-baiting internet comments and we’ll all just go on with our lives. Ugh, and I’m liberal. Sorry we’re all not woke enough to comment here.

No, I'm responding to your repeated use of the phrase "legit real family" to describe the Kelces. It's a weird phrasing, especially the word "legit." Why not just say "they seem like a loving, supportive family." That would have been normal. You chose to go with "legit real family." Why? It's weird and absolutely begs the question of what an illegitimate, fake family looks like.

And I’m responding to your patronizing and boring obsession with semantics and policing of words. Who fking cares that that poster wrote “legit” family? They do come from a “legit” family. One that isn’t broken and allowed for an upbringing much less likely to cause personality. I’m sorry you feel the need to give us all a social justice tongue lashing because we didn’t use the correct clinal terminology and it was offensive to you.

*personality disorders or mental health problems.

LOL I think you got it right the first time.

And WE get it. You are just a morally superior person and now everyone knows it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Your continued use of "legit real family" is starting to gross me out. All families are "real" and "legit." Being a white family from the midwest whose adult sons play pro football does not make you more real and legit, but it really feels like that's what you're trying to say.

You just injected race into the discussion and put words in people’s mouths that they didn’t put there.

Watch the documentary on Jason Kelce and you’ll see that both his parents are incredibly loving and sacrificed financially for their kids. There is a strong and loving family presence there that helped shape their growth. They seem well adjusted thanks to that type of family environment.

I’m sorry you think it’s “racist” to talk about supporting, loving families. Most scientists, or even sociologists, would agree that a stable, loving environment with two parents is a great place to grow up, but you go ahead and write flippant, irreverent and spiteful, snarky, race-baiting internet comments and we’ll all just go on with our lives. Ugh, and I’m liberal. Sorry we’re all not woke enough to comment here.

No, I'm responding to your repeated use of the phrase "legit real family" to describe the Kelces. It's a weird phrasing, especially the word "legit." Why not just say "they seem like a loving, supportive family." That would have been normal. You chose to go with "legit real family." Why? It's weird and absolutely begs the question of what an illegitimate, fake family looks like.

And I’m responding to your patronizing and boring obsession with semantics and policing of words. Who fking cares that that poster wrote “legit” family? They do come from a “legit” family. One that isn’t broken and allowed for an upbringing much less likely to cause personality. I’m sorry you feel the need to give us all a social justice tongue lashing because we didn’t use the correct clinal terminology and it was offensive to you.

*personality disorders or mental health problems.

LOL I think you got it right the first time.

And WE get it. You are just a morally superior person and now everyone knows it.

Relax. I'm not the poster you have been sparring with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Stop romanticizing TK’s life.

Travis was raised in a two parent household where his mother despised their father. TK’s mom was the main breadwinner because TK’s dad was frequently unemployed. It was by no means an ideal upbringing.

[Anonymous]

The NFL got what it wanted for the Super Bowl. Doesn’t matter if the Chiefs win or lose now. Millions more people will be tuning in and the NFL will milk it for all it’s worth…

…because Travis and Taylor will inevitably split by the summer — certainly by the beginning of next season. She’s certainly not going to play the googly-eyed cheerleading girlfriend schtick indefinitely.

After this month she will have plenty of fodder with which to write another song (probably an entire album) and profit off it for years to come. He’ll fade into obscurity like most NFL players.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Stop romanticizing TK’s life.

Travis was raised in a two parent household where his mother despised their father. TK’s mom was the main breadwinner because TK’s dad was frequently unemployed. It was by no means an ideal upbringing.

But but midwestern! Wholesome! All American! The Kelce brothers are both so tall and strong!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The NFL got what it wanted for the Super Bowl. Doesn’t matter if the Chiefs win or lose now. Millions more people will be tuning in and the NFL will milk it for all it’s worth…

…because Travis and Taylor will inevitably split by the summer — certainly by the beginning of next season. She’s certainly not going to play the googly-eyed cheerleading girlfriend schtick indefinitely.

After this month she will have plenty of fodder with which to write another song (probably an entire album) and profit off it for years to come. He’ll fade into obscurity like most NFL players.

We should bookmark this post. I think it's spot on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Stop romanticizing TK’s life.

Travis was raised in a two parent household where his mother despised their father. TK’s mom was the main breadwinner because TK’s dad was frequently unemployed. It was by no means an ideal upbringing.

But but midwestern! Wholesome! All American! The Kelce brothers are both so tall and strong!

I think the MAGAs have done a good job of dispelling the wholesome midwestern trope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Stop romanticizing TK’s life.

Travis was raised in a two parent household where his mother despised their father. TK’s mom was the main breadwinner because TK’s dad was frequently unemployed. It was by no means an ideal upbringing.

And TK was an alleged drug addict who got kicked off his college team, then slept with NFL groupies for the last 10 years. What a dreamboat!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travis and Jason come from a supportive legit real family. There doesn't seem to be any major conflicts in their family with big and bigger egos.

Stop romanticizing TK’s life.

Travis was raised in a two parent household where his mother despised their father. TK’s mom was the main breadwinner because TK’s dad was frequently unemployed. It was by no means an ideal upbringing.

They definitely got their looks from their mother. Yikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:she doesn't really seem like her age if that makes sense

https://twitter.com/tayvisnation/status/1751779290591453281

It does make sense and I totally agree. She seems young for her age. Maybe it’s her hair and makeup? Her giddy behavior? How attached she seems to female friends? She seems like she’s 22 not 34.

I think she acts younger around Travis and yes the giddy behavior is part of it. She comes off as a very young woman without a lot of life experience who adores/looks up to her super successful boyfriend. It feels cringe to me.

It makes me think of when certain friends of mine who were previously very with it and successful started fawning all over a new boyfriend like he invented fire, when they were as if not more accomplished. It feels retrograde and you wonder if they are acting less intelligent or mature in purpose because the guy likes feeling in charge.

This feels mean. When you fall in love, those first several months you are not yourself, and it really happens at every age. Most people falling in love don’t have these big moments captured by a million cameras - but anyone who’s been in a new relationship feels dopey. It’s just usually more private.

Also, you’re not really ever seeing them in a normal situation. He just found out he was going to the Super Bowl, you’re not going to act your chill self.

I agree it feels mean. Look at the Golden Bachelor contestants - many seem like they bonded and are now good friends after spending a few months together. I think this happens when you are in a completely new environment (for you) - you look to people to latch onto as you navigate the situation.

For Taylor, Brittany is the perfect person to help her navigate through the WAG world.

This take is a perfect example of why her behavior feels immature to me. If you were describing a 24 year old, I'd see how this makes sense. You are describing someone a decade older, who has a billion dollars and was just named Time's Person of the Year. Why are you comparing her to contestants on the Golden Bachelor??? Why does she need someone to "latch onto" and navigate being a football girlfriend? Why does she even have to do "football girlfriend" correctly -- she's Taylor Swift, who cares.

Also, to the prior poster, it is not actually necessary for so many of the Travis and Taylor's "key moments" in their relationship to be public. Like sure, her giving him a hug after yesterday's game -- that was going to happen on the field. But most of the personal interactions between them that have been "caught" by the cameras could have happened in private. They are not required to do a pap walk after going to dinner. Travis is not required to greet her in full view of fans and press when she comes off the stage at her show. She is not required to walk through the stadium with him after games. And so on. Many, many famous people manage to date in ways that don't involve being photographed on dates or in private, intimate moments. These people are insanely wealthy -- they just have those moments behind closed doors.

We see this stuff because they want us to see it.

The only "pap walk" after dinner was in NYC in Sept, where the paps follow Taylor 24/7. Find one "pap walk" from Kansas City, where apparently they've been regularly going out to dinner the last few months. Yes, like other famous people they've managed to go on private dates.

Yes, they do have to walk out of the stadium together, since, believe it or not, they are going home together. Because, yes, they really are having a relationship, they really are sleeping together, IT IS ALL REAL.

I'm curious, what other things do you refuse to believe are real?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:she doesn't really seem like her age if that makes sense

https://twitter.com/tayvisnation/status/1751779290591453281

It does make sense and I totally agree. She seems young for her age. Maybe it’s her hair and makeup? Her giddy behavior? How attached she seems to female friends? She seems like she’s 22 not 34.

I think she acts younger around Travis and yes the giddy behavior is part of it. She comes off as a very young woman without a lot of life experience who adores/looks up to her super successful boyfriend. It feels cringe to me.

It makes me think of when certain friends of mine who were previously very with it and successful started fawning all over a new boyfriend like he invented fire, when they were as if not more accomplished. It feels retrograde and you wonder if they are acting less intelligent or mature in purpose because the guy likes feeling in charge.

This feels mean. When you fall in love, those first several months you are not yourself, and it really happens at every age. Most people falling in love don’t have these big moments captured by a million cameras - but anyone who’s been in a new relationship feels dopey. It’s just usually more private.

Also, you’re not really ever seeing them in a normal situation. He just found out he was going to the Super Bowl, you’re not going to act your chill self.

I agree it feels mean. Look at the Golden Bachelor contestants - many seem like they bonded and are now good friends after spending a few months together. I think this happens when you are in a completely new environment (for you) - you look to people to latch onto as you navigate the situation.

For Taylor, Brittany is the perfect person to help her navigate through the WAG world.

This take is a perfect example of why her behavior feels immature to me. If you were describing a 24 year old, I'd see how this makes sense. You are describing someone a decade older, who has a billion dollars and was just named Time's Person of the Year. Why are you comparing her to contestants on the Golden Bachelor??? Why does she need someone to "latch onto" and navigate being a football girlfriend? Why does she even have to do "football girlfriend" correctly -- she's Taylor Swift, who cares.

Also, to the prior poster, it is not actually necessary for so many of the Travis and Taylor's "key moments" in their relationship to be public. Like sure, her giving him a hug after yesterday's game -- that was going to happen on the field. But most of the personal interactions between them that have been "caught" by the cameras could have happened in private. They are not required to do a pap walk after going to dinner. Travis is not required to greet her in full view of fans and press when she comes off the stage at her show. She is not required to walk through the stadium with him after games. And so on. Many, many famous people manage to date in ways that don't involve being photographed on dates or in private, intimate moments. These people are insanely wealthy -- they just have those moments behind closed doors.

We see this stuff because they want us to see it.

The only "pap walk" after dinner was in NYC in Sept, where the paps follow Taylor 24/7. Find one "pap walk" from Kansas City, where apparently they've been regularly going out to dinner the last few months. Yes, like other famous people they've managed to go on private dates.

Yes, they do have to walk out of the stadium together, since, believe it or not, they are going home together. Because, yes, they really are having a relationship, they really are sleeping together, IT IS ALL REAL.

I'm curious, what other things do you refuse to believe are real?

Santa.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The NFL got what it wanted for the Super Bowl. Doesn’t matter if the Chiefs win or lose now. Millions more people will be tuning in and the NFL will milk it for all it’s worth…

…because Travis and Taylor will inevitably split by the summer — certainly by the beginning of next season. She’s certainly not going to play the googly-eyed cheerleading girlfriend schtick indefinitely.

After this month she will have plenty of fodder with which to write another song (probably an entire album) and profit off it for years to come. He’ll fade into obscurity like most NFL players.

Taylor, in 5 months, tooling around on the piano:

I hitched a ride on your shooting star
Not knowing where it would take me
A box in the sky isn't as high as you think
But when I fell, well, it was gonna break me
I wanted to be your girl, your heart
Bleeding red whether you won or lost
The planes, the games, the after party
The money didn't matter; I didn't know what it'd cost

Maybe she's playing the young, adoring girlfriend because she knows this will make it more believable to her fans when she inevitably writes a breakup song that casts her as the victim. It only makes sense if you forget that she's incredibly powerful and in control of her life, so she has to convince everyone she's just a girl, standing in front of a boy, hoping he'll invite her to sit in his family's box at the big game.