GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

.
These 'dutch dates' are trips to other countries, cruises.
Even the prosecution has given up and didn't call Willis again. but people on here are still defending her ludicrous claims that she put up to prevent going to jail.
She does not have to be proven guilty here. The judge is free to give weight to the use of attorney client privilege.

This was not an office romance. It was her hiring her boyfriend.

You seem to be under the impression that Fani Willis is being prosecuted and potentially faces jail time. That is not the case. This hearing was part of the prosecution of Trump and the remaining co-conspirators who have not plead guilty for attempted election interference. This hearing was to determine whether Willis can continue on the prosecution team.

She will be facing State and Federal criminal charges and her law license will be suspended or worse after she is removed from the Trump case

Really? Cool.

So now tell me what charges Clarence Thomas will be facing, when he will be removed from office and when he will have his law license suspended or worse, given his ethics violations and illegal gifts were much larger than Willis's and went on for much much longer than Willis's?

Whataboutism....

This thread is about Fani Willis and Nathan Wade and whether they are going to remain in place to prosecute the cases that Fani brought in GA.
Take your rant to another thread.

NO.

NO, NO and NO. Absolutely NOT.

If you want to sit here and rant on and on and on about how Fani Willis is corrupt and criminal and needs to be removed from the case, impeached and removed from office, prosecuted and stripped of her law license (despite your lack of evidence) then Clarence Thomas also needs to be addressed given the gifts he took and the glaring conflicts of interest on his end and his refusals to recuse are FAR worse, FAR more egregious, and FAR more obvious and at this point FAR more well documented than anything Fani Willis did.

I'm really sick of the bogus, disingenuous, hypocritical double standard you are putting in place here.

I WILL NOT take it to another thread. If you don't like it, then maybe YOU are the one who should leave. Shame on you.

Hit a nerve, I see.
You are off topic, pp.
Stay on topic or get reported.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

.
These 'dutch dates' are trips to other countries, cruises.
Even the prosecution has given up and didn't call Willis again. but people on here are still defending her ludicrous claims that she put up to prevent going to jail.
She does not have to be proven guilty here. The judge is free to give weight to the use of attorney client privilege.

This was not an office romance. It was her hiring her boyfriend.

You seem to be under the impression that Fani Willis is being prosecuted and potentially faces jail time. That is not the case. This hearing was part of the prosecution of Trump and the remaining co-conspirators who have not plead guilty for attempted election interference. This hearing was to determine whether Willis can continue on the prosecution team.

She will be facing State and Federal criminal charges and her law license will be suspended or worse after she is removed from the Trump case

Really? Cool.

So now tell me what charges Clarence Thomas will be facing, when he will be removed from office and when he will have his law license suspended or worse, given his ethics violations and illegal gifts were much larger than Willis's and went on for much much longer than Willis's?

Whataboutism....

This thread is about Fani Willis and Nathan Wade and whether they are going to remain in place to prosecute the cases that Fani brought in GA.
Take your rant to another thread.

NO.

NO, NO and NO. Absolutely NOT.

If you want to sit here and rant on and on and on about how Fani Willis is corrupt and criminal and needs to be removed from the case, impeached and removed from office, prosecuted and stripped of her law license (despite your lack of evidence) then Clarence Thomas also needs to be addressed given the gifts he took and the glaring conflicts of interest on his end and his refusals to recuse are FAR worse, FAR more egregious, and FAR more obvious and at this point FAR more well documented than anything Fani Willis did.

I'm really sick of the bogus, disingenuous, hypocritical double standard you are putting in place here.

I WILL NOT take it to another thread. If you don't like it, then maybe YOU are the one who should leave. Shame on you.

Hit a nerve, I see.
You are off topic, pp.
Stay on topic or get reported.

DP but why is getting reported such a big threat? It probably would affect your income if you were banned though. You are preventing healthy discussion by repeatedly gas lighting and posting the same argument over and over. It's disruptive and I wish this forum were as well moderated as in the past.

For your own good I'll say don't be too disappointed when the judge finds Willis is still qualified to prosecute Trump. Trump's codefendant's attorneys have promised evidence they have not been able to produce. Their only two witnesses have ulterior motives: the estranged wife and the former friend who was told to resign or be fired from the D.A.'s office. The financial records of those two should be investigated to see if they received bribe money from Trump World, as long as we are snooping into people's private lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

Did you listen to her testimony? It’s not odd at all. I would never plan a trip with a boyfriend when that boyfriend was a world traveler who had a travel agent and a separate cruise travel agent. My dad is similarly well-traveled - six continents plus a boat trip off of Cape Horn to try to get Antarctica in there too - and I would never dream of planning a trip for the two of us because my stuff wouldn’t measure up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

She explained this. Did you listen to the testimony?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

Yes. She said it was bcause he was a "world traveler," but her allowing him to plan all the trips is a bit in conflict with his testimony about her.... that she is an "independent" woman. He also said that she would limit her transactions "for safety reasons" which makes no sense. Safety? How?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The judge formerly worked for her so she still has a chance.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

She explained this. Did you listen to the testimony?

She's hilarious claiming that her own testimony is proof, no you need evidence and corroborating witness, hopefully her evidence against Trump is stronger and not made up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

She explained this. Did you listen to the testimony?

She's hilarious claiming that her own testimony is proof, no you need evidence and corroborating witness, hopefully her evidence against Trump is stronger and not made up

Sworn testimony is evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

She explained this. Did you listen to the testimony?

She's hilarious claiming that her own testimony is proof, no you need evidence and corroborating witness, hopefully her evidence against Trump is stronger and not made up

Is the concept of evidence new to you? Witness testimony is direct evidence, which most of the country seems to believe is better than circumstantial evidence. I disagree with the latter, but it’s what people say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

No it isn't. Their testimony was that he had a travel agent who had a credit card on file and she reimbursed him. There is nothing odd about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

She explained this. Did you listen to the testimony?

She's hilarious claiming that her own testimony is proof, no you need evidence and corroborating witness, hopefully her evidence against Trump is stronger and not made up

Actually the burden is on the other side to provide evidence of their claims. To date, there is no such evidence.

As it pertains to the actual case, she has Trump's phone call to the Secretary of State asking to find the exact number of votes needed to be declared the winner. She has a wide variety of texts and emails and she has the testimony of the people who have taken plea offers, including Trump's own "kraken" attorneys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The judge formerly worked for her so she still has a chance.

Yes but only for 3 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a typical Trump strategy -- he's used it many, many times over the years. Obfuscate and distract, and drag things out as long as possible. They are good at digging up dirt on people -- Fanni should have done a little more research into Trump's tactics. This is a tried and true strategy. He repeats it because it works, and Fanni is his latest victim.

[/b]She shouldn't have had a relationship at work, period. But it wasn't a crime, no nepotism, no one's screaming sexual abuse here. [b]It has nothing to do with the prosecution of Trump and his allies -- NOTHING.

Read it for what it is, and don't fall into the trap they set for you.

Let the trial begin!!!

It actually is a crime. She violated Fulton County ethics laws. She had a legal duty to disclose the relationship and any gifts over $100. She did not. Additionally, she has opened up Fulton County to potential hostile workplace and discrimination claims. You do not date people you have supervisory responsibility over period. Any company in the US with HR policies in place would fire you for this.

Two things can be true at once. She can be guilty and so can Trump/the other defendents.

She didn't get any gifts.

She and her boyfriend went dutch on meals and trips.

It's so convenient to deal with cash only in these types of situations, isn't it? Becomes a he said/she said situation. It's how a lot of criminals get away with their crimes.

I thought only drug dealers used wads of cash to take care of their business. I guess the top prosecutor in Fulton County, Georgia conducts her business with wads of cash as well. Maybe IRS should look into this since IRS has hundreds of more investigators now to investigate these potential tax fraud cases.

Using cash to reimburse people for things is not illegal and the IRS or anyone else doesn’t need to investigate it.

It's still a great way to give your secret lover cash. No Venmo or Zelle. No way to trace. Street savvy attorneys!

Or, it could be a bunch of dutch dates. There is absolutely no proof of impropriety, which the defendents in this case have to prove. They haven't but are happy to have people like you slinging mud and false assertions.

+1000. All they have is an assortment of half-baked and unfounded accusations with nowhere near enough solid evidence to prove any of it. And, Willis was pretty clear on her philosophy with regard to dating. Having been through some bad relationships she wanted to pay her own way and to not to be beholden to any man financially. She testified to that.

It is odd that she never paid for the two of them when planning any trips and had him reimburse her for his portion.

She explained this. Did you listen to the testimony?

She's hilarious claiming that her own testimony is proof, no you need evidence and corroborating witness, hopefully her evidence against Trump is stronger and not made up

Is the concept of evidence new to you? Witness testimony is direct evidence, which most of the country seems to believe is better than circumstantial evidence. I disagree with the latter, but it’s what people say.

The problem is that Fani said her testimony is a "proof". Her testimony is just one piece of "evidence" in addition to other evidence properly introduced at the trial.

Her testimony shows she does not even understand the very basics of the legal system let alone the trial practice and Rules of Evidence.

[Anonymous]

The way that judge (who worked for Fani for several years before assuming the bench) bent over backwards to accommodate Fani.

Based on my decades of legal experience, any judge other than this Judge in this Hearing would not have tolerated Fani's outbursts and disrespect she displayed for everybody including the Court.

This judge can have some backbone if he wants to: He immediately warned someone that he will have to step out if it happened again after someone was heard laughing when Wade said he received cash.

Basically, this judge let Fani come in unannounced, neither party had called Fani as a witness yet since they were still arguing the attorney-client privilege issue, the judge had NOT yet ruled on the issue and Fani just sat at the witness seat not even giving the Court an opportunity to rule which is highly disrespectful to the Court.

Any other judge would have given Fani 1 stern warning that she would be found in contempt of the Court if it (accusatory tone, hostility, outbursts, speeches etc.) happened again and then the 2nd time Fani disrupts or have another outbursts, she will be sitting in County lockup.