Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele]Has anyone noticed physical similarities between the Kirk shooter and the DNC pipe bomber?
[/quote]

[img]
[/img][/quote]
I thought this picture was a trans man??? This looks like your average white cis-man[/quote]

Trans women, when they wear men’s clothing and cut their hair short tend to look just like cis men.[/quote]
Nope. This person has a serious Adam’s Apple. [/quote]


This is an AI manipulated photo.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]No, that only happens if they start taking hormones or steroids.

Elliot Page nee Ellen Page looked very feminine before her transition. If you look at her now, she looks much more masculine, including her body. She's clearly taking hormones to make her look that way.

[quote=Anonymous]Trans women, when they wear men’s clothing and cut their hair short tend to look just like cis men.[/quote][/quote]
Ellen Page always looked like a tween boy to me, so Elliot Page wasn’t too much of a stretch.

[Anonymous]

Who on the left is the equivalent to Charlie Kirk? I honestly cannot think of any one individual who is not a politician that is the cultural leader of progressives.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Harry Sisson?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Inside job

by who?

He was recently pushing to release the Epstein files. Given the precision of his hit and the fact that he wasn’t caught, my guess is Israel or Russia.

We should know more about the private plane that took off and off radar to Mexico right after he was shot.

He backed off on that on Trump's direct orders a while back. Trump doesn't want the Epstein materials released for obvious reasons so he got his zealots, including CK, in line.

CK stopped doing that on Monday, renewed his call for the files to be released and said he thought Epstein was a Mossad agent.

Charlie Kirk had called for the full release of the Epstein files several days ago as well linking Epstein to Israeli intelligence, and then suddenly ends up dead by a single shot made from 200 yards away. The fact that the shooter hasn't been caught yet, and already the left is getting blamed is more suspicious. This seems like he was putting too much pressure on the Epstein issue and was silenced because of it.

Here's the video of him calling for the files to be released. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOda98IEjzx/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any and all democrats celebrating is excusing his death are the biggest POS. Be better. Do better. No death should be celebrated. No political assassination should be celebrated. Evil.

Stop equating apathy with celebration.

I don’t support what happened to Charlie. Charlie supported what happened to Charlie. And me saying that it doesn’t mean I’m “celebrating”.

+1 stealing from a friend
Things I disagree with:
1. Charlie Kirk
2. shooting Charlie Kirk

I might hate what you say but I will fight for your right to say it without the threat of violence (or arrest.)

I almost teared up at the statement by W. of all people. Whoever is running his post presidential comms nailed this.

"Today, a young man was murdered in cold blood while expressing his political views. It happened on a college campus, where the open exchange of opposing ideas should be sacrosanct. Violence and vitriol must be purged from the public square. Members of other political parties are not our enemies; they are our fellow citizens. May God bless Charlie Kirk and his family, and may God guide America toward civility."

I have no problem with the open exchange of political ideas. I'm happy to debate legitimate policy issues like trade policy, tariffs, environmental regulations, arming Ukraine, etc. In that sense I certainly concur with the sentiments above.

But my problem with the populist right-wing is that their "political" issues go beyond policy, and focus on who counts as an American and as a human being. My sexual orientation, gender, race, and religion are not up for debate or discussion, and I'm not interested in the "free exchange" of ideas on these topics. There has to be a set of ground rules for politics that acknowledges America as a pluralistic and diverse society. If MAGA isn't willing to acknowledge that fact, then there's no basis for common dialog.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who on the left is the equivalent to Charlie Kirk? I honestly cannot think of any one individual who is not a politician that is the cultural leader of progressives.

Progressives got on the podcast game late, there really isn’t one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope Republicans come out in droves in the midterms and gain a supermajority in both houses based on this violence. Then it’s Amendment time.

What if it was a Republican who shot him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Is he walking that way because he has a gun down on leg of his pants?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Are they limping before they even get there? How did they even get away?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who on the left is the equivalent to Charlie Kirk? I honestly cannot think of any one individual who is not a politician that is the cultural leader of progressives.

Krassenstein brothers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who on the left is the equivalent to Charlie Kirk? I honestly cannot think of any one individual who is not a politician that is the cultural leader of progressives.

Hassan Abi for the young guys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question: Anyone kind of ready to move on from Charlie Kirk? I am, and I'm a bit surprised by how I feel.

I was shocked by it yesterday, but I'm already sort of losing interest in it (even though I realize the irony of still posting about it).

I've gotten pretty desensitized to violence, thanks to the country's lack of gun control laws.

So you want to move on from his murder before law enforcement catches his killer?

DP- Yes, in Melania’s words , I don’t care. Now release the Epstein files. Enough with this distraction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who on the left is the equivalent to Charlie Kirk? I honestly cannot think of any one individual who is not a politician that is the cultural leader of progressives.

Progressives got on the podcast game late, there really isn’t one.

Progressives didn’t need podcasts because they had the legacy media, FB, and Twitter.