well no wonder Amy Chua defended Brett Kavanugh so emphatically

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

Do we know what else was promised as part of this deal?

[Anonymous]

Will she go throughout basic training?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Interesting. You should drop an email to abovethelaw and get them working on this story.

Isn't he the law school alum writer who shamelessly boasted (in jest?) about how his sketchy dad's political connections and affirmative action are the only reason he got into Harvard and Harvard Law? Then he proceeded to flunk the BAR and defaulted on his loans and wrote endlessly about law school being a scam, while he mooched off his lawyer wife? Real piece of work, if that's the guy I'm thinking of.

Lol

So you're too good to read Above The Law?

Apparently so, even though PP doesn't know what Above the Law is. It's blog with multiple writers. A woman writing for Above the Law was actually one of the first blogs to point out, nearly a year ago, the hypocrisy of Amy Chua defending Kavanaugh as a patron of women, when in fact, Kavanaugh was hiring her daughter (i.e. patronizing one particular woman in her family.)
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/07/yale-prof-promotes-brett-kavanaughs-extraordinary-ability-to-hire-her-daughter/

[Anonymous]

Speaking of grooming...

Chua defended Kavanaugh before the nation learned that Christine Blasey Ford had credibly accused him of sexual assault, and there’s no evidence she knew about Blasey Ford before everyone else did. But she may have known that Kavanaugh wasn’t the woman-respecting paragon she’d made him out to be in public. A Guardian report, published in September 2018, alleged that Chua urged female students to dress a certain way, all the better to appeal to Kavanaugh. Chua told students that it was “no accident” that Kavanaugh’s female clerks “looked like models,” sources told the news outlet. Students “reacted with surprise, and quickly pointed out that Chua’s own daughter was due to clerk for Kavanaugh,” the Guardian continued. “A source said that Chua quickly responded, saying that her own daughter would not put up with any inappropriate behaviour.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

You are not Kavanaugh. You don’t know what he’s done in his life. Your blind defense of a man with admitted drinking problems and accusations of sexual assault from credible females just makes you sound dimwitted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

You are not Kavanaugh. You don’t know what he’s done in his life. Your blind defense of a man with admitted drinking problems and accusations of sexual assault from credible females just makes you sound dimwitted.

DP.

1. You are not Kavanaugh either.
2. PP is not Kavanaugh, but believes it is her duty and responsibility to make unfounded accusations about chasing people around a desk. Disgusting.
3. Admitted drinking problems? No. There are no drinking problems. Seven FBI background checks prove that.
4. Accusations of sexual assault? You mean from Blasey Ford whose own witnesses could not corroborate her story? Or, maybe Julie Swetnik? The accuser referred for a criminal probe for false accusations?
5. Finally - we DO know what he has done in his life. And, his accomplishments are far greater than what you have accomplished, of that I am sure.

You are desperate, pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

You are not Kavanaugh. You don’t know what he’s done in his life. Your blind defense of a man with admitted drinking problems and accusations of sexual assault from credible females just makes you sound dimwitted.

DP.

1. You are not Kavanaugh either.
2. PP is not Kavanaugh, but believes it is her duty and responsibility to make unfounded accusations about chasing people around a desk. Disgusting.
3. Admitted drinking problems? No. There are no drinking problems. Seven FBI background checks prove that.
4. Accusations of sexual assault? You mean from Blasey Ford whose own witnesses could not corroborate her story? Or, maybe Julie Swetnik? The accuser referred for a criminal probe for false accusations?
5. Finally - we DO know what he has done in his life. And, his accomplishments are far greater than what you have accomplished, of that I am sure.

You are desperate, pp.

Look in the mirror if you want to see desperation. You are the one defending a mediocre man who was put on the Supreme Court despite not being assessed as well-qualified by the ABA, who likes to hire women "who look like models" according to Amy Chua. Oh and btw, just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur. Most sexual assault doesn't have witnesses. I pray you don't have a daughter, because with your attitude it would be devastating if she were ever to be raped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

You are not Kavanaugh. You don’t know what he’s done in his life. Your blind defense of a man with admitted drinking problems and accusations of sexual assault from credible females just makes you sound dimwitted.

DP.

1. You are not Kavanaugh either.
2. PP is not Kavanaugh, but believes it is her duty and responsibility to make unfounded accusations about chasing people around a desk. Disgusting.
3. Admitted drinking problems? No. There are no drinking problems. Seven FBI background checks prove that.
4. Accusations of sexual assault? You mean from Blasey Ford whose own witnesses could not corroborate her story? Or, maybe Julie Swetnik? The accuser referred for a criminal probe for false accusations?
5. Finally - we DO know what he has done in his life. And, his accomplishments are far greater than what you have accomplished, of that I am sure.

You are desperate, pp.

Look in the mirror if you want to see desperation. You are the one defending a mediocre man who was put on the Supreme Court despite not being assessed as well-qualified by the ABA, who likes to hire women "who look like models" according to Amy Chua. Oh and btw, just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur. Most sexual assault doesn't have witnesses. I pray you don't have a daughter, because with your attitude it would be devastating if she were ever to be raped.

The bolded is a flat out lie. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/american-bar-association-backs-kavanaugh-despite-previous-letter-to-the-contrary/
As for the rest of your post..........You have problems.
I chuckle at this comment........"just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur."
That is a statement of pure desperation. It is like me saying, "Just because there were no witnesses to you abusing your child, it doesn't mean it didn't occur."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

You are not Kavanaugh. You don’t know what he’s done in his life. Your blind defense of a man with admitted drinking problems and accusations of sexual assault from credible females just makes you sound dimwitted.

DP.

1. You are not Kavanaugh either.
2. PP is not Kavanaugh, but believes it is her duty and responsibility to make unfounded accusations about chasing people around a desk. Disgusting.
3. Admitted drinking problems? No. There are no drinking problems. Seven FBI background checks prove that.
4. Accusations of sexual assault? You mean from Blasey Ford whose own witnesses could not corroborate her story? Or, maybe Julie Swetnik? The accuser referred for a criminal probe for false accusations?
5. Finally - we DO know what he has done in his life. And, his accomplishments are far greater than what you have accomplished, of that I am sure.

You are desperate, pp.

+ 100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of grooming...

Chua defended Kavanaugh before the nation learned that Christine Blasey Ford had credibly accused him of sexual assault, and there’s no evidence she knew about Blasey Ford before everyone else did. But she may have known that Kavanaugh wasn’t the woman-respecting paragon she’d made him out to be in public. A Guardian report, published in September 2018, alleged that Chua urged female students to dress a certain way, all the better to appeal to Kavanaugh. Chua told students that it was “no accident” that Kavanaugh’s female clerks “looked like models,” sources told the news outlet. Students “reacted with surprise, and quickly pointed out that Chua’s own daughter was due to clerk for Kavanaugh,” the Guardian continued. “A source said that Chua quickly responded, saying that her own daughter would not put up with any inappropriate behaviour.”

Gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

You are not Kavanaugh. You don’t know what he’s done in his life. Your blind defense of a man with admitted drinking problems and accusations of sexual assault from credible females just makes you sound dimwitted.

DP.

1. You are not Kavanaugh either.
2. PP is not Kavanaugh, but believes it is her duty and responsibility to make unfounded accusations about chasing people around a desk. Disgusting.
3. Admitted drinking problems? No. There are no drinking problems. Seven FBI background checks prove that.
4. Accusations of sexual assault? You mean from Blasey Ford whose own witnesses could not corroborate her story? Or, maybe Julie Swetnik? The accuser referred for a criminal probe for false accusations?
5. Finally - we DO know what he has done in his life. And, his accomplishments are far greater than what you have accomplished, of that I am sure.

You are desperate, pp.

Look in the mirror if you want to see desperation. You are the one defending a mediocre man who was put on the Supreme Court despite not being assessed as well-qualified by the ABA, who likes to hire women "who look like models" according to Amy Chua. Oh and btw, just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur. Most sexual assault doesn't have witnesses. I pray you don't have a daughter, because with your attitude it would be devastating if she were ever to be raped.

The bolded is a flat out lie. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/american-bar-association-backs-kavanaugh-despite-previous-letter-to-the-contrary/
As for the rest of your post..........You have problems.
I chuckle at this comment........"just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur."
That is a statement of pure desperation. It is like me saying, "Just because there were no witnesses to you abusing your child, it doesn't mean it didn't occur."

Did you forget? Or do you just not know?

https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/almID/900005453238&ABA_downgrades_Kavanaugh_from_WellQualified_to_Qualified/?slreturn=20190514105139

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

You are not Kavanaugh. You don’t know what he’s done in his life. Your blind defense of a man with admitted drinking problems and accusations of sexual assault from credible females just makes you sound dimwitted.

DP.

1. You are not Kavanaugh either.
2. PP is not Kavanaugh, but believes it is her duty and responsibility to make unfounded accusations about chasing people around a desk. Disgusting.
3. Admitted drinking problems? No. There are no drinking problems. Seven FBI background checks prove that.
4. Accusations of sexual assault? You mean from Blasey Ford whose own witnesses could not corroborate her story? Or, maybe Julie Swetnik? The accuser referred for a criminal probe for false accusations?
5. Finally - we DO know what he has done in his life. And, his accomplishments are far greater than what you have accomplished, of that I am sure.

You are desperate, pp.

Look in the mirror if you want to see desperation. You are the one defending a mediocre man who was put on the Supreme Court despite not being assessed as well-qualified by the ABA, who likes to hire women "who look like models" according to Amy Chua. Oh and btw, just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur. Most sexual assault doesn't have witnesses. I pray you don't have a daughter, because with your attitude it would be devastating if she were ever to be raped.

The bolded is a flat out lie. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/american-bar-association-backs-kavanaugh-despite-previous-letter-to-the-contrary/
As for the rest of your post..........You have problems.
I chuckle at this comment........"just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur."
That is a statement of pure desperation. It is like me saying, "Just because there were no witnesses to you abusing your child, it doesn't mean it didn't occur."

Did you forget? Or do you just not know?

https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/almID/900005453238&ABA_downgrades_Kavanaugh_from_WellQualified_to_Qualified/?slreturn=20190514105139

Kavanaugh got confirmed by the senate. What don’t you get?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

You are not Kavanaugh. You don’t know what he’s done in his life. Your blind defense of a man with admitted drinking problems and accusations of sexual assault from credible females just makes you sound dimwitted.

DP.

1. You are not Kavanaugh either.
2. PP is not Kavanaugh, but believes it is her duty and responsibility to make unfounded accusations about chasing people around a desk. Disgusting.
3. Admitted drinking problems? No. There are no drinking problems. Seven FBI background checks prove that.
4. Accusations of sexual assault? You mean from Blasey Ford whose own witnesses could not corroborate her story? Or, maybe Julie Swetnik? The accuser referred for a criminal probe for false accusations?
5. Finally - we DO know what he has done in his life. And, his accomplishments are far greater than what you have accomplished, of that I am sure.

You are desperate, pp.

Look in the mirror if you want to see desperation. You are the one defending a mediocre man who was put on the Supreme Court despite not being assessed as well-qualified by the ABA, who likes to hire women "who look like models" according to Amy Chua. Oh and btw, just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur. Most sexual assault doesn't have witnesses. I pray you don't have a daughter, because with your attitude it would be devastating if she were ever to be raped.

The bolded is a flat out lie. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/american-bar-association-backs-kavanaugh-despite-previous-letter-to-the-contrary/
As for the rest of your post..........You have problems.
I chuckle at this comment........"just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur."
That is a statement of pure desperation. It is like me saying, "Just because there were no witnesses to you abusing your child, it doesn't mean it didn't occur."

Did you forget? Or do you just not know?

https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/almID/900005453238&ABA_downgrades_Kavanaugh_from_WellQualified_to_Qualified/?slreturn=20190514105139

Kavanaugh got confirmed by the senate. What don’t you get?

So you didn't know? Were you asleep last year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She was ROTC at Harvard. The Army has invested 4 years of Harvard education/ROTC training into her - you better believe they had a spot ready for her when she graduated.

So she got an educational deferment for law school - not highly unusual. But an additional deferment for a clerkship is unusual. And then ANOTHER deferment for a Supreme Court clerkship - I'm pretty confident that has never happened before. What use does the Army JAG Corps have for a former Supreme Court clerk?

Bet she has a good time processing insurance claims and filling out wills and POAs for deployments.

Do you know anything about military JAG? Who do you think prosecutes and defends soldiers when they are tried? Who do you think sits on the military bench? Oh, sure, someone high profile like Bergdahl or Hassan may hire a private attorney, but most are handled in house.
Sure, there are JAG officers involved in wills and POAs which are pretty much forms prepared by paralegals, but that is minimal compared to most of the other duties. Who do you think handles sexual assault cases? Regular assault cases? AWOL? Desertion? Theft? etc. Oh, and there are also housing discrimination cases, and all types of legal issues.

There will be plenty of time for her to serve. She may have already, in fact.

I love it when people who know nothing try educate those who do know what they're talking about. DH was an ROTC JAG and I was a civilian attorney working on post, but I'll defer to your superior knowledge.

DH thinks Tiger Mommy might have or will pay off Tiger Baby's commitment, but I think she'll eventually serve because she probably has political ambitions and military service seems to be a good addition to the political resume. And just think what kind of book Amy could write about that!

Sounds like the PP knew what they were talking about. Perhaps you’re just insecure?

You are about as qualified as a Supreme Court clerk to try a sexual assault case. You think they throw a brand-new JAG into a major felony trial? New JAGs will start in legal assistance, etc. You want someone who's spent 2 years being chased around the desk by Brett Kavanaugh defending your court-martial?

The ultimate point is that Tiger Mom's kid is getting special treatment. The question is why.

Seriously? What a grossly inappropriate remark. Why am I not surprised. Kavanaugh has never done any such thing, so keep your fevered imagination to yourself.

+1.

PP is sick

You are not Kavanaugh. You don’t know what he’s done in his life. Your blind defense of a man with admitted drinking problems and accusations of sexual assault from credible females just makes you sound dimwitted.

DP.

1. You are not Kavanaugh either.
2. PP is not Kavanaugh, but believes it is her duty and responsibility to make unfounded accusations about chasing people around a desk. Disgusting.
3. Admitted drinking problems? No. There are no drinking problems. Seven FBI background checks prove that.
4. Accusations of sexual assault? You mean from Blasey Ford whose own witnesses could not corroborate her story? Or, maybe Julie Swetnik? The accuser referred for a criminal probe for false accusations?
5. Finally - we DO know what he has done in his life. And, his accomplishments are far greater than what you have accomplished, of that I am sure.

You are desperate, pp.

Look in the mirror if you want to see desperation. You are the one defending a mediocre man who was put on the Supreme Court despite not being assessed as well-qualified by the ABA, who likes to hire women "who look like models" according to Amy Chua. Oh and btw, just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur. Most sexual assault doesn't have witnesses. I pray you don't have a daughter, because with your attitude it would be devastating if she were ever to be raped.

The bolded is a flat out lie. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/american-bar-association-backs-kavanaugh-despite-previous-letter-to-the-contrary/
As for the rest of your post..........You have problems.
I chuckle at this comment........"just because there are no witnesses to sexual assault, doesn't mean it didn't occur."
That is a statement of pure desperation. It is like me saying, "Just because there were no witnesses to you abusing your child, it doesn't mean it didn't occur."

Did you forget? Or do you just not know?

https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/almID/900005453238&ABA_downgrades_Kavanaugh_from_WellQualified_to_Qualified/?slreturn=20190514105139

Not sure what this source is you have.......

The American Bar Association will no longer review its "well qualified" rating of Justice Brett Kavanaugh now that the Senate confirmed him, an ABA official told CNN Monday. The official, who declined to speak on the record, cited an ABA policy of ending its rating process once a nominee is confirmed.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/15/politics/kavanaugh-aba-review/index.html