Tulsi Gabbard 2020

[Anonymous]

16 of the 20 something Democratic candidates have qualified for the debate based on polling and donations. You know who hasn't qualified yet? Tulsi.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/16-candidates-now-qualify-for-the-first-democratic-primary-debates/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:16 of the 20 something Democratic candidates have qualified for the debate based on polling and donations. You know who hasn't qualified yet? Tulsi.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/16-candidates-now-qualify-for-the-first-democratic-primary-debates/

She's qualified and then some. She'll be in the debates, don't fret your pretty head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16 of the 20 something Democratic candidates have qualified for the debate based on polling and donations. You know who hasn't qualified yet? Tulsi.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/16-candidates-now-qualify-for-the-first-democratic-primary-debates/

She's qualified and then some. She'll be in the debates, don't fret your pretty head.

She hasn’t qualified for the debates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16 of the 20 something Democratic candidates have qualified for the debate based on polling and donations. You know who hasn't qualified yet? Tulsi.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/16-candidates-now-qualify-for-the-first-democratic-primary-debates/

She's qualified and then some. She'll be in the debates, don't fret your pretty head.

lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16 of the 20 something Democratic candidates have qualified for the debate based on polling and donations. You know who hasn't qualified yet? Tulsi.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/16-candidates-now-qualify-for-the-first-democratic-primary-debates/

She's qualified and then some. She'll be in the debates, don't fret your pretty head.

lol

Actually I take back my LOL - she did qualify based on donors

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/29/us/politics/democratic-primary-debates-2020.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16 of the 20 something Democratic candidates have qualified for the debate based on polling and donations. You know who hasn't qualified yet? Tulsi.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/16-candidates-now-qualify-for-the-first-democratic-primary-debates/

She's qualified and then some. She'll be in the debates, don't fret your pretty head.

lol

Actually I take back my LOL - she did qualify based on donors

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/29/us/politics/democratic-primary-debates-2020.html

Would be interesting to see who her donors are, since she's not registering at all in the polls and Russia has taken such an interest in her candidacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16 of the 20 something Democratic candidates have qualified for the debate based on polling and donations. You know who hasn't qualified yet? Tulsi.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/16-candidates-now-qualify-for-the-first-democratic-primary-debates/

She's qualified and then some. She'll be in the debates, don't fret your pretty head.

lol

Actually I take back my LOL - she did qualify based on donors

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/29/us/politics/democratic-primary-debates-2020.html

Would be interesting to see who her donors are, since she's not registering at all in the polls and Russia has taken such an interest in her candidacy.

This is the LOL taker backer - and yeah, I would be curious, too. I think she has some appeal with the Bernie/Yang crowd. To me that seems like a super fringey part of the party (to the extent you even believe Bernie/Yang are part of the party). But yeah - I don't know

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election/tulsi-gabbard-russia-david-duke-policies-2020-campaign-white-nationalist-hawaii-propaganda-a8768056.html

[Anonymous]

Tulsi is a major, a surfer, and a kick ass woman. Wait for the debates!

[Anonymous]

She is one of the least impressive candidates on the Democratic side. In terms of qualifications for President, she has none. Yes, she has accomplished a few things, but not much when you are talking about Presidential candidates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is one of the least impressive candidates on the Democratic side. In terms of qualifications for President, she has none. Yes, she has accomplished a few things, but not much when you are talking about Presidential candidates.

She's much more qualified to be President than Trump (any non-senile adult is), but the interest the Russians have taken in promoting her candidacy worries me.

[Anonymous]

She ought to try to maintain some dignity and bow out now.

Awful, just awful.

[Anonymous]

Tulsi is the best qualified candidate.

[Anonymous]

You’re wasting your time with Tulsi. I don’t want to offend but you don’t understand the very basic principles of power if you still advocate running to the ballot box to fix a problem.

The President of the USA has no power. One phone call from the CEO of Goldman-Sachs or Lockheed-Martin would put President Gabbard in her place as servant to the masters of the universe.

[Anonymous]

She'd be the democratic version of the DB in office.

NO WAY.

Hang it up Tulsi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You’re wasting your time with Tulsi. I don’t want to offend but you don’t understand the very basic principles of power if you still advocate running to the ballot box to fix a problem.

The President of the USA has no power. One phone call from the CEO of Goldman-Sachs or Lockheed-Martin would put President Gabbard in her place as servant to the masters of the universe.

By this logic what does it matter who you vote for?

You may as well have Tulsi! Surfer president and #aloha