Tulsi Gabbard 2020

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

She's the only Democratic candidate that always saw the Russia BS for what it was. That alone makes her worthy of serious consideration.

What has she said about the “Russia BS”?

+1. It’s early primary season and she’s the only candidate Russian media is promoting. That’s not good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

She's the only Democratic candidate that always saw the Russia BS for what it was. That alone makes her worthy of serious consideration.

What has she said about the “Russia BS”?

her views - https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/tulsi-gabbard-if-mueller-found-trump-colluded-with-russia-it-could-have-led-to-a-civil-war

“Now that Mueller has reported that his investigation revealed no such collusion, we all need to put aside our partisan interests and recognize that finding that the president of the United States did not conspire with Russia to interfere with our elections is a good thing for our country,” said Gabbard, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate.

She continued, “Because if the president had been indicted for conspiring with Russia to interfere with and affect the outcome of our elections, it would have precipitated a terrible crisis that could have led to civil war. So we should all be relieved that President Trump was not found to have colluded with the Russians.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

She's the only Democratic candidate that always saw the Russia BS for what it was. That alone makes her worthy of serious consideration.

What has she said about the “Russia BS”?

+1. It’s early primary season and she’s the only candidate Russian media is promoting. That’s not good.

If you were some Russian master spy and wanted to promote tulsi (or Biden of Bernie or trump), would you do with with favorable coverage on Russia today?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

She's the only Democratic candidate that always saw the Russia BS for what it was. That alone makes her worthy of serious consideration.

What has she said about the “Russia BS”?

+1. It’s early primary season and she’s the only candidate Russian media is promoting. That’s not good.

ridiculous

If Trump didn't work with Russia, then let's move on. Let's work toward real leadership in 2020 instead of focusing on what was.

She is for the people within our borders. The money we spend on "wars" is money best spent on our own people who are suffering. That's what she's saying. She mentioned homelessness and a living wage.

But b/c she has some views which mirror "right thinking," she's turning off some of the wacked out liberals. fine, I say . . . Go find a hippy commune and bake your own bread. We need moderates from both sides.

[Anonymous]

The real question is when will this thread be used as evidence of her Russian collusion in a FISA application by the FBI?

Y'all have lost your minds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The real question is when will this thread be used as evidence of her Russian collusion in a FISA application by the FBI?

Y'all have lost your minds.

Nope, we just know how to read.

Russia's propaganda machine discovers 2020 Democratic candidate Tulsi Gabbard
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/russia-s-propaganda-machine-discovers-2020-democratic-candidate-tulsi-gabbard-n964261
Experts who track websites and social media linked to Russia have seen stirrings of a possible campaign of support for Hawaii Democrat Tulsi Gabbard.

The Russian propaganda machine that tried to influence the 2016 U.S. election is now promoting the presidential aspirations of a controversial Hawaii Democrat who earlier this month declared her intention to run for president in 2020.

An NBC News analysis of the main English-language news sites employed by Russia in its 2016 election meddling shows Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, who is set to make her formal announcement Saturday, has become a favorite of the sites Moscow used when it interfered in 2016.

Several experts who track websites and social media linked to the Kremlin have also seen what they believe may be the first stirrings of an upcoming Russian campaign of support for Gabbard.

Since Gabbard announced her intention to run on Jan. 11, there have been at least 20 Gabbard stories on three major Moscow-based English-language websites affiliated with or supportive of the Russian government: RT, the Russian-owned TV outlet; Sputnik News, a radio outlet; and Russia Insider, a blog that experts say closely follows the Kremlin line. The CIA has called RT and Sputnik part of "Russia's state-run propaganda machine."

[Anonymous]

I knew next to nothing about her but I just listened to her interview with Rogan and she came across as a thoughtful, well-reasoned candidate with real ideas for change. I'm a fan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I knew next to nothing about her but I just listened to her interview with Rogan and she came across as a thoughtful, well-reasoned candidate with real ideas for change. I'm a fan.

I agree 100%, and she's young and not idealistic.

[Anonymous]

She's a non-contender.

Move along and please get on board with someone who can beat the A$$ in chief.

Tulsi cannot.

Be realistic and let's vote this mother effer out of the people's house.

[Anonymous]

Hey, here’s Tulsi’s whole homophobic family!
https://twitter.com/urbroyo/status/1084349561324355585?s=21

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

Nothing unimpressive about a kick ass woman of color who was a major in the reserves, surfs, and wants to keep us out of wars.

What’s your real agenda, friend?

I’m a Tulsi fan but I wouldn’t say being a woman of color is inherently impressive. I only care about qualifications, ideas, values and vision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey, here’s Tulsi’s whole homophobic family!
https://twitter.com/urbroyo/status/1084349561324355585?s=21

People change their views. Plus, she was a kid.

Hillary had an interesting exchange with T. Gross on Fresh Air b/c she waffled. While she supported the union on paper, she still felt that marriage was a sacred bond between a man and a woman.

I'm not holding this against Gabbard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey, here’s Tulsi’s whole homophobic family!
https://twitter.com/urbroyo/status/1084349561324355585?s=21

People change their views. Plus, she was a kid.

Hillary had an interesting exchange with T. Gross on Fresh Air b/c she waffled. While she supported the union on paper, she still felt that marriage was a sacred bond between a man and a woman.

I'm not holding this against Gabbard.

They’re comparing gay marriage to marrying your dog. It’s disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The real question is when will this thread be used as evidence of her Russian collusion in a FISA application by the FBI?

Y'all have lost your minds.

+1

That after the Mueller report DCUM's idiots are still paranoid about Russia says so much about these posters. Russia was a minor factor (if one at all) in the 2016 election. If you think Tulsi's appearances on RT are indicative of her being suspect, you belong in an insane asylum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey, here’s Tulsi’s whole homophobic family!
https://twitter.com/urbroyo/status/1084349561324355585?s=21

People change their views. Plus, she was a kid.

Hillary had an interesting exchange with T. Gross on Fresh Air b/c she waffled. While she supported the union on paper, she still felt that marriage was a sacred bond between a man and a woman.

I'm not holding this against Gabbard.

They’re comparing gay marriage to marrying your dog. It’s disgusting.

'Woke' morons on DCUM will grasp at anything to discredit a WOC who doesn't parrot their shibboleths. That's why this forum is my favorite for seeing what's stupid about professional Democrats.

I agree, and I'll say again that she was a child being used to push an adult's agenda.

I guess you'd hate your child for forever for making a dumb mistake at 15, eh?