Tulsi Gabbard 2020

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tulsi Gabbard, 2004, arguing against the civil unions of gay people:
“As Democrats we should be representing the views of the people, not a small number of homosexual extremists.”

Only Democrat to vote against condemning the Assad regime violence against children.

No f*cking thank you.

She worked really hard in Hawaii to set back gay rights and now claims to be pro-gay but everyone know it is a lie. Big pass!

[Anonymous]

The next Jill Stein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The next Jill Stein.

She’s an accomplished Democratic Representative who serves in the military. Your comparison is false.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next Jill Stein.

She’s an accomplished Democratic Representative who serves in the military. Your comparison is false.

I thought the comparison was false because Stein actually worked as a physician and has been an environmental activist

Gabbard, like Kamala and many other women, took the pretty girl pass to life. Don’t expect much from any of them.

[Anonymous]

The gay rights stuff is concerning, but the complaints about her meeting Assad are totally ignorant and uniformed. Gabbard is the only Dem in the field who actually wants to place limits on US wars abroad. Vast majority of "progressive" democrats are just totally in the dark about foreign policy and war.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next Jill Stein.

She’s an accomplished Democratic Representative who serves in the military. Your comparison is false.

I thought the comparison was false because Stein actually worked as a physician and has been an environmental activist

Gabbard, like Kamala and many other women, took the pretty girl pass to life. Don’t expect much from any of them.

OMG. Gabbard served in the military and Harris was a DA. You're a rank sexist.

[Anonymous]

Tulsi Gabbard is not your friend.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tulsi-gabbard-president-sanders-democratic-party

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The gay rights stuff is concerning, but the complaints about her meeting Assad are totally ignorant and uniformed. Gabbard is the only Dem in the field who actually wants to place limits on US wars abroad. Vast majority of "progressive" democrats are just totally in the dark about foreign policy and war.

No. She did a totally unauthorized trip and refuses to condemn him. It is very concerning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The gay rights stuff is concerning, but the complaints about her meeting Assad are totally ignorant and uniformed. Gabbard is the only Dem in the field who actually wants to place limits on US wars abroad. Vast majority of "progressive" democrats are just totally in the dark about foreign policy and war.

No. She did a totally unauthorized trip and refuses to condemn him. It is very concerning.

Do you understand what her actual position on military intervention is? Or do you get all your foreign policy positions from Twitter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The gay rights stuff is concerning, but the complaints about her meeting Assad are totally ignorant and uniformed. Gabbard is the only Dem in the field who actually wants to place limits on US wars abroad. Vast majority of "progressive" democrats are just totally in the dark about foreign policy and war.

No. She did a totally unauthorized trip and refuses to condemn him. It is very concerning.

Do you understand what her actual position on military intervention is? Or do you get all your foreign policy positions from Twitter?

You need to simmer down. I think she is highly problematic and will not vote for her. Her position on gay rights is awful and her inability to condemn Assad is nuts. Her military position of not intervening is not the issue. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR HER. If it comes down to Trump v her, I would sit out. Both are terrible. The Democratic Party can and needs to do better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tulsi Gabbard is not your friend.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tulsi-gabbard-president-sanders-democratic-party

That's a hit piece in many ways, but let me ask you this: which Democratic candidate's foreign policy stance do you support, and why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The gay rights stuff is concerning, but the complaints about her meeting Assad are totally ignorant and uniformed. Gabbard is the only Dem in the field who actually wants to place limits on US wars abroad. Vast majority of "progressive" democrats are just totally in the dark about foreign policy and war.

No. She did a totally unauthorized trip and refuses to condemn him. It is very concerning.

Do you understand what her actual position on military intervention is? Or do you get all your foreign policy positions from Twitter?

You need to simmer down. I think she is highly problematic and will not vote for her. Her position on gay rights is awful and her inability to condemn Assad is nuts. Her military position of not intervening is not the issue. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR HER. If it comes down to Trump v her, I would sit out. Both are terrible. The Democratic Party can and needs to do better.

Ok, I see you are a other progressive with a shallow and totally uniformed understanding of foreign policy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The gay rights stuff is concerning, but the complaints about her meeting Assad are totally ignorant and uniformed. Gabbard is the only Dem in the field who actually wants to place limits on US wars abroad. Vast majority of "progressive" democrats are just totally in the dark about foreign policy and war.

No. She did a totally unauthorized trip and refuses to condemn him. It is very concerning.

Do you understand what her actual position on military intervention is? Or do you get all your foreign policy positions from Twitter?

You need to simmer down. I think she is highly problematic and will not vote for her. Her position on gay rights is awful and her inability to condemn Assad is nuts. Her military position of not intervening is not the issue. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR HER. If it comes down to Trump v her, I would sit out. Both are terrible. The Democratic Party can and needs to do better.

Ok, I see you are a other progressive with a shallow and totally uniformed understanding of foreign policy.

People like you are insufferable and why the Democrats have such a hard time winning elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next Jill Stein.

She’s an accomplished Democratic Representative who serves in the military. Your comparison is false.

I thought the comparison was false because Stein actually worked as a physician and has been an environmental activist

Gabbard, like Kamala and many other women, took the pretty girl pass to life. Don’t expect much from any of them.

Don’t be bitter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The gay rights stuff is concerning, but the complaints about her meeting Assad are totally ignorant and uniformed. Gabbard is the only Dem in the field who actually wants to place limits on US wars abroad. Vast majority of "progressive" democrats are just totally in the dark about foreign policy and war.

No. She did a totally unauthorized trip and refuses to condemn him. It is very concerning.

Do you understand what her actual position on military intervention is? Or do you get all your foreign policy positions from Twitter?

You need to simmer down. I think she is highly problematic and will not vote for her. Her position on gay rights is awful and her inability to condemn Assad is nuts. Her military position of not intervening is not the issue. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR HER. If it comes down to Trump v her, I would sit out. Both are terrible. The Democratic Party can and needs to do better.

Ok, I see you are a other progressive with a shallow and totally uniformed understanding of foreign policy.

People like you are insufferable and why the Democrats have such a hard time winning elections.

People like you are why 100s of thousands of innocent civilians are killed by US bombs and starvation in Yemen, while you are fixated by whatever images of dead children in Syria on your FB feed, all the while you feel smug and virtuous about the MLK sign in your yard.