That would be HIPAA violation |
Not exactly. In my case I'm referring to talking about non-patients. Seems the environment there tends toward a more chatty work culture. |
Yes, vets are the ones who euthanize animals. I've seen vets euthanize them because it was the end of the day and they wanted to go home. I've also seen keepers/curators tell vets that certain animals were sicker than they actually were to get them euthanized. The big, personable animals (big cats, elephants, apes) get rock star medical treatment. Smaller animals often don't. The public will notice if a lion dies, they don't notice if a small monkey or a bird does. Euthanasia is also sometimes used to control population size, especially with hoofstock. A lot of vets are fantastic, but some aren't. Kind of like doctors- some got into the field because they actually care about people and want to help them. Others do it for money/prestige/etc. Ha, animals escape all the time. Sometimes it's due to human error- leaving a door open, not checking enclosures regularly for holes. Sometimes it's because animals have nothing to do all day but figure out ways to get out. |
She may not be smart but, not knowing how to spell even common words is not a sign to me. Some brains are better spellers is all. |
| I love this post but I'm pretty bored by the posts related to teaching. It's an old story and too often the subject of posts on all forums. |
You have busy bodies and chatty nurses and gossip in any office environment. Doctors and nurses are no exception. |
It's also not true. I did my PhD from Harvard. Only the best in my class (not me) had the chance to go on to faculty positions. One of them spent ten years as a postdoc. The ones who made it are some of the most brilliant people in the world and also the most dedicated. If they have an ego, it's because they have earned the right to. |
Yawn, secrets of the entertainment industry have been spilled all over the internet. |
|
Spent years in non-profit fundraising. Yep, that 18% overhead is BS. So much of our mailings were classified as "educational" or "communication." I'd represent the organization at things like CFC events and it would be coded as "public outreach."
I hated the acquisition mailings we did; often they would include language like "renew your membership now!" or "membership has expired!" And these were people who had never donated to the organization before. It preyed on them. Though these mailings were not my responsibility, it always made me feel dirty when I saw them. Most people in fundraising are ass-kissing idiots. That goes double for major gift officers. Just dumb. Not a single original thought in their heads and zero capacity for critical thinking. And because they spend so much time fawning over rich, self-important people and massaging those considerable egos, they think they too are incredibly important and expect everyone else to fawn over them. |
Between medical "professionals", HIPAA is a joke. |
In my field, the ones who made it (attained faculty positions) were just the ones who were willing to put up with the BS for the longest. They weren't actually the smartest. The smartest people I met in grad school and during my postdoc all left science. |
+1. The professors in my field were also (not so) closet racists. |
| Mental health worker - we all talk about all the interesting patients and their families all day long. |
O.k. you might check off the box that a kid CAN hold a 3" ball with his/her non-dominate hand (without really knowing if that is true or not). But obviously you can't give every kid the exact same assessment. Do you ever check off the NO the kid CAN NOT hold a 3"ball box on a kid (without knowing if that is really true or not)? |
I do! They tell us we're supposed to be more conservative and not estimate up if we don't see something, but then they also tell us that the kids' scores are supposed to be improving over time, and that kids should ideally be at the 3 mark (1-3 scale) before moving onto kindergarten. This leads to lots / most / all teachers giving 1s at the start of the year, 2s in the middle, and 3s at the end, no matter what the kids are doing. Why? Because our annual evaluations are impacted by the kids' scores (what could possibly be a bad idea in that?). Oh, and there's a chance our pay will also be tied to kids' scores soon. It's a horror show. Of course, there are lots of questions that most kids won't be anywhere close to because they aren't developmentally appropriate (e.g., questions on whether children explore topics in depth by conducting their own research on the Internet...in preschool). Meanwhile, I'm working on silly things like teaching kids to speak instead of just stare at me when other kids take their toys. |