2016 LAMB lottery results

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hi friends. I just asked the LAMB admin. They only initially accepted 12 pk-3 (or 10 but I think they said 12). And no pk-4.
For comparison, last year they initially accepted 27 pk-3 and 4 or so pk-4. So unless they open up a new class, chances are unlikely the wait list will reach the depths of last year. But it will still move!! Good luck!


Any explanation for the smaller, at this point, class for pk3?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hi friends. I just asked the LAMB admin. They only initially accepted 12 pk-3 (or 10 but I think they said 12). And no pk-4.
For comparison, last year they initially accepted 27 pk-3 and 4 or so pk-4. So unless they open up a new class, chances are unlikely the wait list will reach the depths of last year. But it will still move!! Good luck!


Any explanation for the smaller, at this point, class for pk3?


Is the class actually smaller? They may have had a bumper crop of siblings.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hi friends. I just asked the LAMB admin. They only initially accepted 12 pk-3 (or 10 but I think they said 12). And no pk-4.
For comparison, last year they initially accepted 27 pk-3 and 4 or so pk-4. So unless they open up a new class, chances are unlikely the wait list will reach the depths of last year. But it will still move!! Good luck!


Any explanation for the smaller, at this point, class for pk3?


Is the class actually smaller? They may have had a bumper crop of siblings.


I assume siblings.
Anonymous
I overlooked the siblings aspect; explains the smaller non siblings cohort.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hi friends. I just asked the LAMB admin. They only initially accepted 12 pk-3 (or 10 but I think they said 12). And no pk-4.
For comparison, last year they initially accepted 27 pk-3 and 4 or so pk-4. So unless they open up a new class, chances are unlikely the wait list will reach the depths of last year. But it will still move!! Good luck!


This contradicts what a PP said about her PK4 child being admitted...


Well they said that is where they were on the lists. So I bet the pk-4er got in from pk-3 sibling getting in?


I'm the poster with the 3 children admitted ... My guess would also be that my PK-4er was pulled in my her siblings. We've already sent in our response and all ... also, the posted lottery list may be different than the actual list after siblings, because my PK-4er is actually another PH (not EH) and she was in the 200's originally.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hi friends. I just asked the LAMB admin. They only initially accepted 12 pk-3 (or 10 but I think they said 12). And no pk-4.
For comparison, last year they initially accepted 27 pk-3 and 4 or so pk-4. So unless they open up a new class, chances are unlikely the wait list will reach the depths of last year. But it will still move!! Good luck!


This contradicts what a PP said about her PK4 child being admitted...


Well they said that is where they were on the lists. So I bet the pk-4er got in from pk-3 sibling getting in?


I'm the poster with the 3 children admitted ... My guess would also be that my PK-4er was pulled in my her siblings. We've already sent in our response and all ... also, the posted lottery list may be different than the actual list after siblings, because my PK-4er is actually another PH (not EH) and she was in the 200's originally.


Welcome to LAMB! And Congrats!!!
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: