Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:she should go back under conservatership shes mentally ill
You can't even spell conservatorship. And no, most mentally ill people do not require one, especially one run by grifting relatives who think she's too ill to make her own decisions about her choice of birth control, but not ill enough to perform publicly for millions of dollars per night.
Further, the fact that she voluntarily is seeking help is a good sign and negates the need for a conservatorship.
Oh, great! She's 44 now and has continued to act irresponsibly. Glad someone (her sons?) got through to her before she killed someone with her reckless driving.
Look reckless driving sucks. I would like a few more details about the incident because repots show her blood alcohol level was technically below the legal limit, but it’s likely she had prescription drugs in her system and is/was abusing them.
But unfortunately, millions and millions of people do this every year and some repeatedly and we don’t put them in a conservatorship. It might be that she needs a conservatorship again, but at this stage, she’s voluntarily getting help which is a good sign. That’s all I’m saying.