Eh, it's not straightforward. Mandy Moore posted a link to her brother's Go Fund Me after the fires (he also lost his house) which was ALSO tone deaf because why the hell is Mandy Moore asking her fans to donate money so that her [rich] brother can rebuild his Palisades house, when she is also rich? I feel bad for anyone who loses their house in a fire, of course that is going to be very hard to deal with and move on from, but also have some self awareness as a wealthy celebrity -- these people have resources most people do not have. So accusing Tisdale of being "tone deaf" is odd to me because being tone deaf is kind of a broad Hollywood quality. The way this reads to me is that Hillary and Mandy were the Queen Bees of their friend group, and that the expectation when Mandy's house burned down is that all the other women in the group would fall all over themselves trying to help her (even though Mandy has enough resources to largely just help herself). It was a competition to prove how devoted you were to the Queen. And Ashley didn't play that game for whatever reason (maybe she was oblivious, maybe she knew what was going on and found it lame, maybe she was already sick of this group, maybe she specifically dislikes Mandy, who knows) and her punishment was that everyone closed ranks against her. In a toxic group like this, it's always "rules for thee but not for me" from the people at the top of the hierarchy. It *is* toxic, and trying to get the public on the side of the Queen Bees is just an extension of that toxic behavior. You really want to convince me that Mandy Moore and Hillary Duff are victims here? Please. There are no victims. It's just a bunch of petty people trying to one up each other (and yeah, Tisdale was trying to one up when she wrote the essay -- that doesn't mean she's wrong about the underlying dynamics though). |
Okay. My husband wouldn’t tolerate this either, but I do think it would be fun to be married to someone who loved drama and wanted to chat about it. It probably wouldn’t be good for me or make me a better person, but it would be fun. |
This sounds so right. My husband’s boss lost her house in a flood a few years ago. She’s an orthopedic surgeon and could afford to replace things. I thought it was crazy to give her money when so many other poor people needed it, but DH spent $700 replacing his boss kid’s legos. Honestly, he was right to do it. I don’t think she explicitly said anything, but it clearly changed her perspective of him. |
Oh, you can be with someone who loves drama. Not married, but my boyfriend and I love sharing gossip with each other. I'll share my messiest friend's sordid details and he'll share his dumb ass coworker's dating debacles. But the difference between him and Hillary's husband is that my boyfriend would never get involved publicly. |
+1 DH and I watch some Real Housewives franchises together and he has plenty of opinions on the drama! But he also cringes even harder than I do when a husband tries to get involved in a fight between the women or one-up a shady comment at the reunion or something. Enjoying drama generally is one thing, men being cattier than women in a girl fight is another. |
I think it could be fun to have a DH who wanted to gossip with me, at home, on our own. I do not think it would be fun to have a DH who publicly called out other women in the pettiest way possible. It's a man being publicly nasty and critical/condescending to a woman because his wife's feelings were hurt, and in doing so he had valley confirms that his wife was the agressor here. Also FYI, Duff's husband also publicly abused with Johnny Depp in the whole Depp/Heard situation. He's an ahole. |
| Sorry, that should say "publicly sided" with Depp. Weird Freudian auto-correct. |
Yep. |
I think this whole thing is ridiculous and I forgot Hilary Duff existed but her name has been mentioned dozens of times in this thread and the pictures I saw on People.com all had her in them, so I think it was pretty much a foregone conclusion that she was part of the group that was being talked about. It's not like whatever her husband's name is posting about it is what connected Hilary to the group. Who knows why he did it. He could be a fame whore. He could be just as petty and mean as Ashley portrays the women in the group. Or he could have a legitimate point if Ashley's take is wrong. Who knows. |
True. But please don't mention their names in the same sentence as that movie again. That movie was great. These women are c-list at best. |
Well we do know he looks like a total loser beefing with one of his wife's friends/former friends in such an embarrassing way. What kind of self respecting man acts like that? |
Insecurity? That's my main guess. I'm with you, I haven't seen drama like this before and it all sounds really silly. Some people have posted that maybe one person hasn't experienced this before, but I imagine if I polled 20 of my girlfriends they would all say they've never been part of a group like this. Given that we've been friends for decades I imagine I would have heard of it before if they had. And many of us were in sororities and still didn't witness nonsense like this. |
I mean, yeah, it was pretty much assumed that Hilary was one of the moms in the group. It's a lot of late 30s/early 40s former Disney stars. But she was never explicitly mentioned by Ashley. I just don't get why he felt the need to respond to it. The fact that he did makes him and Hilary look like the aholes. |
WTAF?? |
|
Well Hillary's sister Hailey Duff liked both Tisdale's post about her essay and the Cut's post of the essay.
Interesting. |