Which among WASP would you choose to ED and why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Thanks for presenting your empty credentials but go on the Princeton grad student page and see how difficult it is to find a person with a BA from WASP

You really have no idea what you are talking about.

Here are outcomes of recent Swarthmore Alumni. You'll find them at graduate school at MIT, Stanford, Yale, Princeton amongst others.

https://digital.swarthmore.edu/outcomes/

not a single grad at Princeton for a PhD in math, just an operations research PhD at MIT. Lord you people don’t even read your own sources.

Ph.D feeders for math, per capita:
1)CIT
2) Harvey Mudd
3) MIT
4) Pomona
5) Swarthmore
6) Princeton
7) Reed
8) Chicago
9) Carleton
10) St. Olaf

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-phd-programs#math

Majority are SLACs. Now go away.

The type of grad schools Harvey Mudd and Caltech students are getting into is not the same as Pomona or Reed.

Do you have something to back that up except your poorly thought out little stew of bias and ignorance?

Omg stop being any and look at their major outcome reports if you’re so worried

Please enlighten us. Otherwise you are just spouting unsupported nonsense.

You can find institutional research reports. You’re not a child and know how to find sources.

Please do, it's your assertion that requires detail. The govt data which you choose to interpret in a manner not consistent with reality indicates that your assertion is without merit. So it's time to put up or shut up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Thanks for presenting your empty credentials but go on the Princeton grad student page and see how difficult it is to find a person with a BA from WASP

You really have no idea what you are talking about.

Here are outcomes of recent Swarthmore Alumni. You'll find them at graduate school at MIT, Stanford, Yale, Princeton amongst others.

https://digital.swarthmore.edu/outcomes/

not a single grad at Princeton for a PhD in math, just an operations research PhD at MIT. Lord you people don’t even read your own sources.

Ph.D feeders for math, per capita:
1)CIT
2) Harvey Mudd
3) MIT
4) Pomona
5) Swarthmore
6) Princeton
7) Reed
8) Chicago
9) Carleton
10) St. Olaf

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-phd-programs#math

Majority are SLACs. Now go away.

The type of grad schools Harvey Mudd and Caltech students are getting into is not the same as Pomona or Reed.

Do you have something to back that up except your poorly thought out little stew of bias and ignorance?

Omg stop being any and look at their major outcome reports if you’re so worried

Please enlighten us. Otherwise you are just spouting unsupported nonsense.

You can find institutional research reports. You’re not a child and know how to find sources.

Please do, it's your assertion that requires detail. The govt data which you choose to interpret in a manner not consistent with reality indicates that your assertion is without merit. So it's time to put up or shut up.

So you have no intention at looking at any source but shouting? Great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Thanks for presenting your empty credentials but go on the Princeton grad student page and see how difficult it is to find a person with a BA from WASP

You really have no idea what you are talking about.

Here are outcomes of recent Swarthmore Alumni. You'll find them at graduate school at MIT, Stanford, Yale, Princeton amongst others.

https://digital.swarthmore.edu/outcomes/

not a single grad at Princeton for a PhD in math, just an operations research PhD at MIT. Lord you people don’t even read your own sources.

Ph.D feeders for math, per capita:
1)CIT
2) Harvey Mudd
3) MIT
4) Pomona
5) Swarthmore
6) Princeton
7) Reed
8) Chicago
9) Carleton
10) St. Olaf

https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-phd-programs#math

Majority are SLACs. Now go away.

The type of grad schools Harvey Mudd and Caltech students are getting into is not the same as Pomona or Reed.

Do you have something to back that up except your poorly thought out little stew of bias and ignorance?

Omg stop being any and look at their major outcome reports if you’re so worried

Please enlighten us. Otherwise you are just spouting unsupported nonsense.

You can find institutional research reports. You’re not a child and know how to find sources.

Please do, it's your assertion that requires detail. The govt data which you choose to interpret in a manner not consistent with reality indicates that your assertion is without merit. So it's time to put up or shut up.

So you have no intention at looking at any source but shouting? Great.

Actually you were the one who started with the assertion that SLAC Math majors don't place as well as students from Berkeley, Princeton, and MIT without anything at all to back that up.....and still crickets from your sorry little ass.

But, let's use Berkeley since you asked.......Current Math Phd students with undergrad degrees from Amherst, Wellesley, and Williams. So why don't you just STFU and crawl back into your little hole.

[Anonymous]

I would choose Williams or Amherst.

(Then Bowdoin, but it's not one of the W.A.S.P. colleges)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would choose Williams or Amherst.

(Then Bowdoin, but it's not one of the W.A.S.P. colleges)

It should be though. WASPB.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would choose Williams or Amherst.

(Then Bowdoin, but it's not one of the W.A.S.P. colleges)

It should be though. WASPB.

Agree.

[Anonymous]

Williams Amherst Swarthmore, but trying to figure out P. Pomona, really? One of these things is not like the others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would choose Williams or Amherst.

(Then Bowdoin, but it's not one of the W.A.S.P. colleges)

Okay Bowdoin alum.

[Anonymous]

it’s amherst and williams

then the rest of nescac is indistinguishable- save the dregs ct college and trinity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:it’s amherst and williams

then the rest of nescac is indistinguishable- save the dregs ct college and trinity

pomona fits in that middle bucket - more a peer to Bowdoin than A or W

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:it’s amherst and williams

then the rest of nescac is indistinguishable- save the dregs ct college and trinity

pomona fits in that middle bucket - more a peer to Bowdoin than A or W

These posts are absurd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Williams Amherst Swarthmore, but trying to figure out P. Pomona, really? One of these things is not like the others.

You are correct that Pomona is not like the others. But I don't think anyone at Pomona would rather be at Williams, Amherst, or Swarthmore.

[Anonymous]

My personal preference would be

1) Amherst
2) Pomona
3) Williams
4) Swarthmore
5) Bowdoin

But that’s just it, one personal preference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:it’s amherst and williams

then the rest of nescac is indistinguishable- save the dregs ct college and trinity

pomona fits in that middle bucket - more a peer to Bowdoin than A or W

These posts are absurd.

Some Bowdoin parents or alumni have found this thread. Bowdoin isn’t AWS. It’s a good NESCAC, but it’s second-tier with Wesleyan and Middlebury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:it’s amherst and williams

then the rest of nescac is indistinguishable- save the dregs ct college and trinity

pomona fits in that middle bucket - more a peer to Bowdoin than A or W

No it’s not, people turn down a and w for p but turning b down for them is much rarer