Arlington ECNL ID’s

[Anonymous]

I see a few insecure trolls have some idle time today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What people have always said about Arlington is coming to light, 1-0 against Hammerheads and then now lose to VDA 1-3. Coming back down to earth it looks like.

What goes up must come down. Arlington is known for sluggish high school teams. The way they see soccer is weird. Big and fast and then by puberty big can back fire on you and the agility takes a dive. Then problems start for these teams. Keep it up Arlington! Way to go.

No. It is more what wins at the ulittles does not win at older ages. The older the players get the less and less goals are scored by long balls with an offensive players running it down. Also as the kids age the physical advantage of early development disappear.

At older ages the winning teams are the one who can score by breaking down a low block defense once the defense has set and the offense players are not moving forward. Watch these teams. As soon as the offensive players can not move forward they do not know what to do. There are very few one on one opportunities or long balls that generate scoring opportunities because of the designs of the defense and experience of the defenders.

Arlington(and other clubs) does not develop the players who can break down defenses. These players have to have a great first touch, vision, be comfortable in tight spaces, have a high speed of play and be able to create after being stopped from going forwards. This actually requires the players to be in a practice environment that stresses those abilities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What people have always said about Arlington is coming to light, 1-0 against Hammerheads and then now lose to VDA 1-3. Coming back down to earth it looks like.

What goes up must come down. Arlington is known for sluggish high school teams. The way they see soccer is weird. Big and fast and then by puberty big can back fire on you and the agility takes a dive. Then problems start for these teams. Keep it up Arlington! Way to go.

No. It is more what wins at the ulittles does not win at older ages. The older the players get the less and less goals are scored by long balls with an offensive players running it down. Also as the kids age the physical advantage of early development disappear.

At older ages the winning teams are the one who can score by breaking down a low block defense once the defense has set and the offense players are not moving forward. Watch these teams. As soon as the offensive players can not move forward they do not know what to do. There are very few one on one opportunities or long balls that generate scoring opportunities because of the designs of the defense and experience of the defenders.

Arlington(and other clubs) does not develop the players who can break down defenses. These players have to have a great first touch, vision, be comfortable in tight spaces, have a high speed of play and be able to create after being stopped from going forwards. This actually requires the players to be in a practice environment that stresses those abilities.

TLR

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What people have always said about Arlington is coming to light, 1-0 against Hammerheads and then now lose to VDA 1-3. Coming back down to earth it looks like.

What goes up must come down. Arlington is known for sluggish high school teams. The way they see soccer is weird. Big and fast and then by puberty big can back fire on you and the agility takes a dive. Then problems start for these teams. Keep it up Arlington! Way to go.

Yep. They now follow the SYC way. Irrelevant after U16

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see a few insecure trolls have some idle time today.

Better not be from the club formerly known as NVA…. some players had a loooooong week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA won with two ringers. We know the result if they play each other straight up. VDA probably doesn’t even make it out of the division this year. Not worried.

What about Arlington trapped players?

One of the vda “ringers” is a 2011.

When are the best players at Arlington leaving for Vda?

Rumor at least one is on the way.

Right.

[Anonymous]

Seems like all this website is is a Arlington hate group. Do all you ADULTS really find joy in berating a group of 13-14 year olds?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA won with two ringers. We know the result if they play each other straight up. VDA probably doesn’t even make it out of the division this year. Not worried.

What about Arlington trapped players?

One of the vda “ringers” is a 2011.

When are the best players at Arlington leaving for Vda?

Rumor at least one is on the way.

Right.

someone saw the writing on the wall?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems like all this website is is a Arlington hate group. Do all you ADULTS really find joy in berating a group of 13-14 year olds?

Nah, just these kids' awful parents who likely will teach the kids to be just like them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like all this website is is a Arlington hate group. Do all you ADULTS really find joy in berating a group of 13-14 year olds?

Nah, just these kids' awful parents who likely will teach the kids to be just like them.

It's really wonderful to read all the Arlington cope about "ringers" and other excuse-making. They trash the refs constantly, too. They'll grab at any excuse. This team's parents are the poster children for Horrible Delusional Sports Parents. They deserve every bit of the comeuppance headed their way.

[Anonymous]

Rough weekend for A-town

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah demographics are obvious too why choosing big can backfire in a place like Arlington. History of sport shows us a team that better reflects the world like VDA’s demo wins over Arlington every time. Housing segregation rears its head in everything.

Why are the Vda teams so dirty? Is this coached and worked on in practice or is it just because their parents are trashy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah demographics are obvious too why choosing big can backfire in a place like Arlington. History of sport shows us a team that better reflects the world like VDA’s demo wins over Arlington every time. Housing segregation rears its head in everything.

Why are the Vda teams so dirty? Is this coached and worked on in practice or is it just because their parents are trashy?

Quite the socio-economic and racial overtones from Arlington Dad. Just cause all your Arlington kids go to private schools… This is why everyone hates on Arlington - you are snobs through and through.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah demographics are obvious too why choosing big can backfire in a place like Arlington. History of sport shows us a team that better reflects the world like VDA’s demo wins over Arlington every time. Housing segregation rears its head in everything.

Why are the Vda teams so dirty? Is this coached and worked on in practice or is it just because their parents are trashy?

Quite the socio-economic and racial overtones from Arlington Dad. Just cause all your Arlington kids go to private schools… This is why everyone hates on Arlington - you are snobs through and through.

Don’t be such a Karen!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What people have always said about Arlington is coming to light, 1-0 against Hammerheads and then now lose to VDA 1-3. Coming back down to earth it looks like.

What goes up must come down. Arlington is known for sluggish high school teams. The way they see soccer is weird. Big and fast and then by puberty big can back fire on you and the agility takes a dive. Then problems start for these teams. Keep it up Arlington! Way to go.

No. It is more what wins at the ulittles does not win at older ages. The older the players get the less and less goals are scored by long balls with an offensive players running it down. Also as the kids age the physical advantage of early development disappear.

At older ages the winning teams are the one who can score by breaking down a low block defense once the defense has set and the offense players are not moving forward. Watch these teams. As soon as the offensive players can not move forward they do not know what to do. There are very few one on one opportunities or long balls that generate scoring opportunities because of the designs of the defense and experience of the defenders.

Arlington(and other clubs) does not develop the players who can break down defenses. These players have to have a great first touch, vision, be comfortable in tight spaces, have a high speed of play and be able to create after being stopped from going forwards. This actually requires the players to be in a practice environment that stresses those abilities.

How would you know any of this? You would have to have watched every game of every age group over the last year. I doubt that. You are just saying general nonsense which may or may not have been true at some point in time for certain specific age groups.