If Biden doesn’t ace the first debate, will he be replaced at the convention?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4723563-if-biden-doesnt-ace-the-first-debate-will-he-be-replaced-at-the-convention/mlite/?nxs-test=mlite


“That being the case, the scheduled presidential debate on June 27 will be the most crucial test yet to determine Biden’s mental acuity. Those who mean harm to our nation will be watching that first debate with calculated interest.
The pressure on Biden to “ace” the debate will be enormous. His latest major gaffe is not creating confidence among his supporters, while potentially creating increased hope among our adversaries.
While at a Juneteenth celebration at the White House on Monday, Biden not only appeared to freeze solid for a minute, but then, when later delivering remarks, not only slurred his speech, but appeared to say something the New York Post reported as: “She know long! She knew suhlongasuhijeruhhnied, our freedom can never be secured.”“

UK daily mail has a big article about Obama, the Clintons, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer joining forces to force Joe to resign and Kamala as well. It says the DNC is arranging an online poll to select a new President and VP.


Secret Democrat plot to replace Biden revealed: How Clinton, Obama, Pelosi and Schumer will topple the aging President… and when they'll do it

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13481849/amp/democrat-plot-biden-replacement-clinton-obama-pelosi-schumer.html


“According to Democratic bigwig, Obama campaign guru David Axelrod, the Biden team scheduled one of the earliest presidential debates in history (June 27 on CNN) to prove to naysayers that Joe's not going anywhere.

But the gambit carries tremendous risk.

While an efficient debate performance by Biden could help rally Democrats behind him - a significant misstep would only stoke more replacement chatter.

Former Clinton advisor and polling expert Mark Penn suggested the CNN debate will be Biden's last chance to reassure voters he's fit for the job.”

I have to admit I think the early debate might be to see if Biden is competent enough to keep running.

Please, please, please. I hope Jamie Harrison picks Gretchen Whitmer.

She is polling at 20% against Trump. Why would you do that when Biden is hovering at 48%?

Because they can't do an accurate poll with a maybe candidate. She'd win MI, which Biden won't. He's one point ahead of Trump. Sorry, that's not a gamble I'm willing to take. Look at how wrong the polls were in 2016. Put any < 55 on the ballot either side and they win. I'd bet everything I own on it.

Willing to bet you that Biden wins Michigan again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Counterpoint

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Counterpoint

Too bad for Malone, his boy is going to stand up there and whine and cry and spew for minutes at a time. Unless he can literally shove his money into Trump's mouth to shut him up, not much he can do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Counterpoint


Where is the lie?

[Anonymous]

If the GOP is upset about CNN being in control like that, then maybe they shouldn't have pulled out of the non-partisan commission on presidential debates?

[Anonymous]

Someone mentioned polling above

The 2016 polling was actually within margin of error

Since then, polling has skewed more heavily R and D’s keep beating polls by multiple points

That is the current trend. We shall see where we land in November

[Anonymous]

Doesn't matter. You can't trust any of them.

Get an audience of citizens in there and let them ask questions on the fly.

F the MSM.

[Anonymous]

Bets on Trump pulling out? He’s realize he’s put himself in a corner by saying Trump is a senile old man. He’s lowered the bar so much that all Joe has to do is walk in and I’m Joe Biden and I’m alive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't matter. You can't trust any of them.

Get an audience of citizens in there and let them ask questions on the fly.

F the MSM.

+1 that is how the debate should work.

The media and political parties would never allow tax paying citizens to interfere or intrude on their fake debates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bets on Trump pulling out? He’s realize he’s put himself in a corner by saying Trump is a senile old man. He’s lowered the bar so much that all Joe has to do is walk in and I’m Joe Biden and I’m alive.

You are confused in your zeal to pretend Biden is a functioning human.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone mentioned polling above

The 2016 polling was actually within margin of error

Since then, polling has skewed more heavily R and D’s keep beating polls by multiple points

That is the current trend. We shall see where we land in November

The truth is that Trump is as far behind Biden as he was in 2020. He's at least 4 points behind. But the media and polls want to make this seem like a close race, so they use biased polling models that lean right and show a closer race, maybe even one leaning right for Trump. But both candidates have about the same percentage of their respective party base, so they are neck and neck there. But the reality is that the independent vote leaned slightly left before the Trump judgement in NY and is now leaning even more left after the judgement in NY. And after the debate, when Trump's dementia devolves into more shark, battery and boat stories, the independent vote will lean more left. Trump needs some major media swing by September to stop the slow and steady attrition of his non-base support. Because right now, he's in a slow and steady nickel and diming of the middle 40% of the electorate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't matter. You can't trust any of them.

Get an audience of citizens in there and let them ask questions on the fly.

F the MSM.

+1 that is how the debate should work.

The media and political parties would never allow tax paying citizens to interfere or intrude on their fake debates.

And here we have it. Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't matter. You can't trust any of them.

Get an audience of citizens in there and let them ask questions on the fly.

F the MSM.

+1 that is how the debate should work.

The media and political parties would never allow tax paying citizens to interfere or intrude on their fake debates.

This is nonsense. When the commission ran debates there was always one that was a town hall format.

[Anonymous]

the teams agreed to these parameters

I expect to hear nothing of substance from one candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the teams agreed to these parameters

I expect to hear nothing of substance from one candidate

…in spite of his 16 props and mock studio at camp david.