Quake reveals day of Jesus' crucifixion, researchers believe

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

They are your opinions. Scholarship and academia and research aren’t based on the opinions of a stay at home troll, hostile to religion, and happy to take away the religious freedom American was founded on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

They are your opinions. Scholarship and academia and research aren’t based on the opinions of a stay at home troll, hostile to religion, and happy to take away the religious freedom American was founded on.

Dp here. Why don’t you address them one by one?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

They are your opinions. Scholarship and academia and research aren’t based on the opinions of a stay at home troll, hostile to religion, and happy to take away the religious freedom American was founded on.

Sounds like pp is talking about themselves. Even the "hostile to religion" part, because truly religious people don't speak cruelly to others because they have different views about religion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

They are your opinions. Scholarship and academia and research aren’t based on the opinions of a stay at home troll, hostile to religion, and happy to take away the religious freedom American was founded on.

Dp here. Why don’t you address them one by one?

Why would I? There have been pages and pages of posts with sourced information that is true and factual. Someone posts one post of opinions/unsourced claims, big deal. If you all can disregard many, many factual and sourced posts, I am not worried about pp’s single opinion post. It does nothing to refute any of the facts posted, an pp is too lazy to attempt anything substantial.

Most of the hostile to religion posters here lie, anyway. The poster with “multiple STEM degrees.” The poster who was raised as a “Two by Two.” The poster who said she was a grandmother who was going to baptize her grandchild secretly.

We know you are lying. It’s embarrassing but you are all either very young or very ignorant, to continue to troll so miserably. Probably both.

We have a real up and comer in the adultery thread that claimed several wild and ridiculous things about religious people and child porn, without any links or sources.

Very disturbed people posting here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

They are your opinions. Scholarship and academia and research aren’t based on the opinions of a stay at home troll, hostile to religion, and happy to take away the religious freedom American was founded on.

Sounds like pp is talking about themselves. Even the "hostile to religion" part, because truly religious people don't speak cruelly to others because they have different views about religion.

lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

They are your opinions. Scholarship and academia and research aren’t based on the opinions of a stay at home troll, hostile to religion, and happy to take away the religious freedom American was founded on.

Sounds like pp is talking about themselves. Even the "hostile to religion" part, because truly religious people don't speak cruelly to others because they have different views about religion.

lol

Yeah truly religious people let people tell them they are less intelligent, brainwashed, uneducated, myth-believing child porn loving morons and smile simply back at the spewing atheist rhetoric like an absolute numpties- in your dreams. I don’t care if you don’t like religion, if you don’t believe in God. I hope you have a great life. But you’ve no reason to disparage the beliefs of religious people. A bunch of anti- theist bullies obsessed with hatred of God, hatred of Christianity and Christians inhabit this forum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

They are your opinions. Scholarship and academia and research aren’t based on the opinions of a stay at home troll, hostile to religion, and happy to take away the religious freedom American was founded on.

Sounds like pp is talking about themselves. Even the "hostile to religion" part, because truly religious people don't speak cruelly to others because they have different views about religion.

lol

Yeah truly religious people let people tell them they are less intelligent, brainwashed, uneducated, myth-believing child porn loving morons and smile simply back at the spewing atheist rhetoric like an absolute numpties- in your dreams. I don’t care if you don’t like religion, if you don’t believe in God. I hope you have a great life. But you’ve no reason to disparage the beliefs of religious people. A bunch of anti- theist bullies obsessed with hatred of God, hatred of Christianity and Christians inhabit this forum.

Disagreement and disparagement are not the same thing. The spewer strikes again. Goodbye

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

They are your opinions. Scholarship and academia and research aren’t based on the opinions of a stay at home troll, hostile to religion, and happy to take away the religious freedom American was founded on.

Dp here. Why don’t you address them one by one?

Why would I? There have been pages and pages of posts with sourced information that is true and factual. Someone posts one post of opinions/unsourced claims, big deal. If you all can disregard many, many factual and sourced posts, I am not worried about pp’s single opinion post. It does nothing to refute any of the facts posted, an pp is too lazy to attempt anything substantial.

Most of the hostile to religion posters here lie, anyway. The poster with “multiple STEM degrees.” The poster who was raised as a “Two by Two.” The poster who said she was a grandmother who was going to baptize her grandchild secretly.

We know you are lying. It’s embarrassing but you are all either very young or very ignorant, to continue to troll so miserably. Probably both.

We have a real up and comer in the adultery thread that claimed several wild and ridiculous things about religious people and child porn, without any links or sources.

Very disturbed people posting here.

I’ll take that as a “because I can’t “.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

Actually, these are facts.

They are your opinions. Scholarship and academia and research aren’t based on the opinions of a stay at home troll, hostile to religion, and happy to take away the religious freedom American was founded on.

Dp here. Why don’t you address them one by one?

Why would I? There have been pages and pages of posts with sourced information that is true and factual. Someone posts one post of opinions/unsourced claims, big deal. If you all can disregard many, many factual and sourced posts, I am not worried about pp’s single opinion post. It does nothing to refute any of the facts posted, an pp is too lazy to attempt anything substantial.

Most of the hostile to religion posters here lie, anyway. The poster with “multiple STEM degrees.” The poster who was raised as a “Two by Two.” The poster who said she was a grandmother who was going to baptize her grandchild secretly.

We know you are lying. It’s embarrassing but you are all either very young or very ignorant, to continue to troll so miserably. Probably both.

We have a real up and comer in the adultery thread that claimed several wild and ridiculous things about religious people and child porn, without any links or sources.

Very disturbed people posting here.

The PP asked: "Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?"

Clearly that PP wants to have some kind of discussion. Information has been addressed multiple times in multiple locations.

Let's discuss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Copy & pasting things over and over again doesn’t make them any more relevant.

But it's time consuming and hopefully impresses some people.

Notice no one addresses the information in the posts?

Recap of "addressing information" in the posts:
1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

etc.

These are all your opinions. Opinions are great, but not fact.

They are at least as factual as any of the "information" posted.

The information has been addressed. Which point do you want to discuss?

[Anonymous]

Which one isn't true?

1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Which one isn't true?

1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

Good idea to repeat this list, but don't expect a cogent answer anytime soon. Spewer is spewed out, but shall return -- spewing on another thread, supposedly defending religion, while helping atheists look reasonable and smart -- as we often are. Religious people can be too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Which one isn't true?

1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

DP

I am not in this argument so won’t respond to all your points but many excellent scientists have rich lives of faith,

Western science grew out of religious and scientific reasoning.

It is absurd to create conflict where it does not exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which one isn't true?

1. PP misinterpreted the comment: “No archeological discovery has ever contradicted”. That doesn’t mean any discovery actually supported the Bible stories.

2. Even if archaeologists could positively identify the exact spot of a "miracle", that doesn’t prove that supernatural events actually happened.

3. If a book includes some factual, historical events, people, and/or locations that doesn't mean that the entire book is factual.

4. Random "biblical archaeologists" are not "top 3 archaeologists in history".

5. Unanswered question: If you learned that the Bible was not completely historically accurate, would you lose your faith?

6. If an archaeologists says that something "parallels" something in the bible that isn't actually "proving" it.

7. You need actual science to draw scientific conclusions.

8. Most scientists don't believe in God. Very few scientists are evangelical.

9. Most respected scientists who are religious do keep religion and science separate.
”the scientific method and the scientific worldview can't be allowed to get distorted by religious perspectives” -Collins

DP

I am not in this argument so won’t respond to all your points but many excellent scientists have rich lives of faith,

Western science grew out of religious and scientific reasoning.

It is absurd to create conflict where it does not exist.

I do agree that very few scientists are evangelical Christians though. However many mainstream Christian traditions are the spiritual homes of rigorous scientists.