This is a major factor in people's choices. When there is free parking, people are more likely to choose to drive by themselves than when they have to pay for parking. |
|
OP, the obesity rate in this country is almost 42%:https://www.tfah.org/report-details/state-of-obesity-2022/#:~:text=Nationally%2C%2041.9%20percent%20of%20adults,obesity%20rate%20of%2041.4%20percent.
Walking and biking require a degree of fitness that most folks simply don't possess. Good luck. |
|
More policing. I would like only people with only bus-pass to board the buses and it should be expensive to buy.
Bus-pass should be issued by employers or school. For occasional commuter it should be expensive. Also, passes should be revoked for bad behavior and should be issued if the person has no discipline problems in school or place of employment. |
Other things I have done on a bike: biked to/from Metro (because it's more reliable/predictable than bus to/from Metro) biked after dropping my car off/biked to pick my car up gone places on the bus or on Metro, with the bike to solve the last-mile problem driven most of the way and parked, then biked the rest of the way (if I'm going somewhere where it's hard to park or parking is expensive) biked one way (downhill), then taken the bus back the other way (uphill) multi-tasked and increased my time/efficiency by getting my exercise while also getting errands done (instead of separate time for exercise and errands) |
The argument you are trying to make is really weak. I mean rrreeealllyyy weak. It's difficult to tell if you're simply trolling but I'll bite on this. See, the thing is, you could make multiple e-bikes with the quantity of materials you are referencing above to produce a single SUV. Efficiency. How's about them facts? |
First we build an environment for people to drive everywhere instead of walk or bike. Then people are physically unable to walk or bike. Then we justify the environment built for people to drive everywhere, on grounds that people are physically unable to walk or bike. |
You want travel by bus to cost more? And bus travel should be only for work or school?
|
| Honestly? Protected or separated bike lanes like they have in many northern/western european cities. |
+1 to the bolded. I just looked up my bike commute from my suburban house to my office- shortest route was over an hour. I also SWEAT (I very much envy those who don't!) so that would mean more time when I get there to shower/dry hair/change. Frankly, I'm not a confident cyclist anyway- I learned to ride on wide, traffic-free suburban streets in the midwest. There isn't a route where I could take only separate bike paths. I do park at the closest metro and metro in because my employer subsidizes metro fare so it is cheaper, but also more efficient, than driving/parking. In the past (when I lived/worked elsewhere) I commuted by bus. |
| I am planning to start taking metro to work in the fall. The biggest barrier for me has been that I have to get my son to daycare on my way to work and the metro is not stroller or toddler friendly. However, I am moving him to a different daycare close to my house so I will drop him off before getting on/off metro. |
|
I'm someone who has always lived in walkable neighborhoods and have always commuted to work by metro or bus. I do a lot of my errands on foot and use my cheap, compact car very little. But, there are simply circumstances in which public transportation will never be as easy or convenient for weekend errands, leisure activities, shopping, etc. The buses or trains don't run often enough, or the stops are not close enough to my destination, or it takes much longer than driving due to connections, transfers, wait times. I'll be carrying big or heavy things. The departure or destination or transfer points don't feel safe or it's too late at night. There will ALWAYS be occasions when I will choose the car.
As for biking, NOTHING will make me move by bike instead. I'm not a strong or skilled cyclist. I would not feel safe even in protected lanes due to faster, more aggressive cyclists. I'm old enough to worry about injuries, even if I'm healthy and fit. I don't want to have to adapt my clothes, accessories, hair just so that I can bike, wear a helmet. I don't want that much exposure to sun, car pollution, cold or hot weather. I don't want to have to purchase a good bike, a collection of safety gear, lights, reflectors, trailers, etc. in order to try to safely do the things by bike that I can easily and more quickly do by car. And, there will always be plenty of people for whom biking is just not feasible due to the distances they have to cover, health, physical limitations, age, weight and fitness levels. It will never be a solution for everyone. |
It's funny how Americans will do all kinds of crash diets and pharmaceuticals and other extreme measures to lose weight, but will never give up the car commute. When I moved from LA (car commute) to DC (metro commute with a ten-ish minute walk on either side) I lost 15lbs without any other changes. |
But neither are cars. |
But OP's question is what would it take for people to use public transportation or bikes instead of cars, assuming there will be a solution that will eliminate motoring. The question posed is not why doesn't everyone use cars nor what will it take for everyone to use cars. |
No, the OP is just asking what it would take for individual people to consider biking or taking the bus instead of driving. The OP is not asking what it would take to eliminate driving for everyone everywhere always. Also, many of the answers are "Bikes bad, bus bad, Metro bad, cars 4 ever". I think that the people posting such answers cannot imagine a life where people, who are otherwise like them, can't or don't use cars every time they go anywhere for any purpose. |