Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact:

Very true. Not sure how anyone can argue with that.

Answer one very simple question:

Why was trump trying to flush documents down a toilet?

He was not there during the raid. Story said he was in NY I think.

He was in NJ. Not there. Story about him flushing documents is false.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schiff, Garland, Pelosi and Wray - Committee to Re-Elect Trump. Well done.

I take it he now has your vote? Taking nat sec docs is a sign of presidential gravitas, to you?

You do you.

I don’t know what he did. And I can’t stand him. But these jerkoffs have tried every stunt to scuttle him that it has become hard to tell what is legit versus political. I had a sliver of hope Trump would not run but now it seems certain he will and send the country into more turmoil. But you do you rooting for your heros to one up dipshit Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact:

Very true. Not sure how anyone can argue with that.

Answer one very simple question:

Why was trump trying to flush documents down a toilet?

He was not there during the raid. Story said he was in NY I think.

This was when he was president you f**king idiot. God why do I even bother talking to you idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems just guaranteed that Trump will run and likely win in ‘24. What a shit-show these morons have unleashed.

Seems they’re trying to get him on a technicality that would forbid him from seeking office again. And truthfully, I could see Trump secretly wanting this. He doesn’t have to risk losing, he can just be a lazy glorified martyr for the GOP. Win win.

Wasn’t is Sandy Berger who stuffed a bunch of classified documents down his pants and tried to smuggle them out of the archives? Was he prosecuted? No. Look, I am no Trump supporter but these asshats just made it a certainty that we will be stuck with him for another four years. Well done.

Yeah - he plead guilty to a misdemeanor. What a penalty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schiff, Garland, Pelosi and Wray - Committee to Re-Elect Trump. Well done.

I take it he now has your vote? Taking nat sec docs is a sign of presidential gravitas, to you?

You do you.

I don’t know what he did. And I can’t stand him. But these jerkoffs have tried every stunt to scuttle him that it has become hard to tell what is legit versus political. I had a sliver of hope Trump would not run but now it seems certain he will and send the country into more turmoil. But you do you rooting for your heros to one up dipshit Trump.

You're babbling. No one has tried to scuttle him. At all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact:

Very true. Not sure how anyone can argue with that.

Answer one very simple question:

Why was trump trying to flush documents down a toilet?

He was not there during the raid. Story said he was in NY I think.

He was in NJ. Not there. Story about him flushing documents is false.

No, dumba$$, it did happen. Not today. No one is talking about today.

We are talking about when he did it AS PRESIDENT:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/08/politics/trump-white-house-notes-toilet-photos-cnntv/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schiff, Garland, Pelosi and Wray - Committee to Re-Elect Trump. Well done.

I take it he now has your vote? Taking nat sec docs is a sign of presidential gravitas, to you?

You do you.

I don’t know what he did. And I can’t stand him. But these jerkoffs have tried every stunt to scuttle him that it has become hard to tell what is legit versus political. I had a sliver of hope Trump would not run but now it seems certain he will and send the country into more turmoil. But you do you rooting for your heros to one up dipshit Trump.

You're babbling. No one has tried to scuttle him. At all.

Steele Dossier, Mueller Report, calling for his impeachment the day he was inaugurated, Russian Collusion? Yes, those were all such worthy expenditures of government time and money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact:

Very true. Not sure how anyone can argue with that.

Answer one very simple question:

Why was trump trying to flush documents down a toilet?

He was not there during the raid. Story said he was in NY I think.

He was in NJ. Not there. Story about him flushing documents is false.

The flushing didn’t happen during the raid like Dylan and David with the drugs at the beach apartment. The flushing occurred in the White House during Trump’s presidency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Great, when Trump or DeSantis become president, they can raid Biden’s home for evidence of Hunter and Joe’s conflicts of interest with Russia. This sets a horrible precedent that a current president and DOJ can go after a former president for whatever reason. Should have been done through the courts, not a raid.

Trump tried to have Democrats and their families prosecuted. He begged DOJ to go after them. He tried to coerce Ukraine. There was nothing to investigate or prosecute.

Trump is and was a corrupt criminal who should have been removed by impeachment. This is not Biden prosecuting Trump. This is Trump’s corrupt criminal network finally collapsing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schiff, Garland, Pelosi and Wray - Committee to Re-Elect Trump. Well done.

I take it he now has your vote? Taking nat sec docs is a sign of presidential gravitas, to you?

You do you.

I don’t know what he did. And I can’t stand him. But these jerkoffs have tried every stunt to scuttle him that it has become hard to tell what is legit versus political. I had a sliver of hope Trump would not run but now it seems certain he will and send the country into more turmoil. But you do you rooting for your heros to one up dipshit Trump.

Who exactly are you blaming for a decision that will ultimately be up to Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great, when Trump or DeSantis become president, they can raid Biden’s home for evidence of Hunter and Joe’s conflicts of interest with Russia. This sets a horrible precedent that a current president and DOJ can go after a former president for whatever reason. Should have been done through the courts, not a raid.

Trump tried to have Democrats and their families prosecuted. He begged DOJ to go after them. He tried to coerce Ukraine. There was nothing to investigate or prosecute.

Trump is and was a corrupt criminal who should have been removed by impeachment. This is not Biden prosecuting Trump. This is Trump’s corrupt criminal network finally collapsing.

Eh, if Democrats have done something wrong, then raid them. I'm tired of Republicans getting away with all this illegal crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems just guaranteed that Trump will run and likely win in ‘24. What a shit-show these morons have unleashed.

Seems they’re trying to get him on a technicality that would forbid him from seeking office again. And truthfully, I could see Trump secretly wanting this. He doesn’t have to risk losing, he can just be a lazy glorified martyr for the GOP. Win win.

Wasn’t is Sandy Berger who stuffed a bunch of classified documents down his pants and tried to smuggle them out of the archives? Was he prosecuted? No. Look, I am no Trump supporter but these asshats just made it a certainty that we will be stuck with him for another four years. Well done.

Yeah - he plead guilty to a misdemeanor. What a penalty.

Pro tip: when you plead guilty it’s often to reduced charges. When you appeal everything up to the Supreme Court it won’t be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great, when Trump or DeSantis become president, they can raid Biden’s home for evidence of Hunter and Joe’s conflicts of interest with Russia. This sets a horrible precedent that a current president and DOJ can go after a former president for whatever reason. Should have been done through the courts, not a raid.

Trump tried to have Democrats and their families prosecuted. He begged DOJ to go after them. He tried to coerce Ukraine. There was nothing to investigate or prosecute.

Trump is and was a corrupt criminal who should have been removed by impeachment. This is not Biden prosecuting Trump. This is Trump’s corrupt criminal network finally collapsing.

Part of his election platform was promising his supporters he would send Hillary Clinton to jail

The Trump-controlled IRS started obviously politically-motivated audits of McCabe and Comey

The Trump-initiated Durham probe resulted in the politically-motivated prosecution of Michael Sussman, that ended up with Sussman being acquitted on all charges.

[Anonymous]

You know the saying, “it’s not the crime, it’s the cover-up” that will get you? The “how” and the “why” behind highly classified documents ending up at Mar-a-Lago and then not being handed over to the National Archives upon notification that the Presidential Records Act was being violated may be part of an effort to cover up other crimes.

There’s a reason why Trump did highly unusual things like tearing up documents and then throwing them on the floor or burning them or flushing them down the toilet. There’s a reason why he met privately with Putin and there’s no official account of what was said. There was a reason for Jared trying to set up back channels for off-the-record communication with foreign leaders during the transition.

There’s a poster here who thinks the failure to retain records — including highly sensitive classified documents — in accordance with the law is not a real crime, just a “crime,” and that it’s setting a horrible precedent to enforce the law. I’d like to hear that poster’s innocent explanation for why the documents could not be recovered without an FBI raid.

[Anonymous]

🍿🍿🍿
If you are found guilty of willfully violating the statute regarding removal or destruction of government documents you are no longer eligible to hold federal office.