Shen Yun warning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

You must see some if the irony I. Your post, no!’b you’re a scientist who didn’t do any research and a atheist who is offended by the devil? YOU should write a play.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh, our kids would beg to go see the show every time one of those postcards came in the mail or we saw an add.

Let me tell you something: you are lucky that your kids are asking to go see a show. It takes a lot of negotiation with mine before we agree to see a show. With hindsight, I wish my DD managed to persuade me to skip this show.

TKC has a lot of great (non-cult) programming - keep throwing out ideas to them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

You must see some if the irony I. Your post, no!’b you’re a scientist who didn’t do any research and a atheist who is offended by the devil? YOU should write a play.

Is this speaking in tongues?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean the Shen Yun DC web site clearly describes itself as “China before communism” and as a “Heavenly gift” and that ancient China was “divinely inspired” and has a “rich spiritual heritage.”

“Cult” is OP’s characterization. But OP is pretty clearly a racist and hate-filled anti-theist.

BTW, religion and culture go hand-in-glove.

Not sure why you think it’s necessary for the KC to label it a “cult” when its religious themes are transparently emphasized on the organization’s web site.

Why do you think the Kennedy Center needs to hide the religious background to get people to watch this show? You don't think they'd go if they had all of the facts?

Why do you think think the KC is “hiding” anything? I found the description to be accurate. You sound like a right wing conservative complaining that some media outlet isn’t covering some story they think is important.

They are hiding the religious aspects of the performance:
"Shen Yun’s unique artistic vision expands theatrical experience into a multi-dimensional, inspiring journey through one of humanity’s greatest treasures—the five millennia of traditional Chinese culture.

This epic production immerses you in stories reaching back to the most distant past. You’ll explore realms even beyond our visible world. Featuring one of the world’s oldest art forms— classical Chinese dance—along with patented scenographic effects and all-original orchestral works, Shen Yun opens a portal to a civilization of enchanting beauty and enlightening wisdom.

Traditional Chinese culture—with its profoundly optimistic worldview and deep spiritual roots— was displaced by communism in China. Today, only the New York–based Shen Yun is keeping this precious heritage alive on stage. And it’s an experience that will take your breath away."

Why are you afraid of the KC being transparent?

That sounds like an accurate description to me.

The Kennedy Center hosts cultural performances by American Indian tribes too. Many are spiritual in nature. Will you also demand trigger warnings?

Why are atheists such fragile little snowflakes who lack conviction in their value systems?

I would not say that I lack conviction in my value system. My concern is that you religious people learned that it is ok to believe in something with no evidence whatsoever. That affects not only me, but the whole country (see how many Republicans believe that the election was stolen). So why would I support a fundamentalist religious group?

You keep using that phrase. Which is really rather ethnocentric -- "fundamentalist" in an anglicized context is quite the loaded term that paints quite the negative caricature of intolerant, judgmental Bible thumpers who speak in tongues, handle snakes, hate gays, and so on and so forth.

So perhaps you can explain in a little more detail how you are getting "fundamentalist religious group" from a few slogans that atheism is bad? Because I'm not seeing it.

They may not be your cup of tea, but they don't exactly hide their spiritual leanings and so far as I know don't behave in any insidious ways other than, evidently, making comments in performances that make you uncomfortable because you don't share their beliefs.

In other words, your overreaction here kind of disgusting.

exactly

I gather that you are another poster who does not know the definition of a fundamentalist religious organization, so here is the definition again:

Christian fundamentalism: movement in American Protestantism that arose in the late 19th century in reaction to theological modernism, which aimed to revise traditional Christian beliefs to accommodate new developments in the natural and social sciences, especially the theory of biological evolution (https://www.britannica.com/topic/Christian-fundamentalism). Do you see any resemblance?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

You must see some if the irony I. Your post, no!’b you’re a scientist who didn’t do any research and a atheist who is offended by the devil? YOU should write a play.

Is this speaking in tongues?

Just autocorrect

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

You must see some if the irony I. Your post, no!’b you’re a scientist who didn’t do any research and a atheist who is offended by the devil? YOU should write a play.

Is this speaking in tongues?

It may look like speaking in tongues, but it might be just not hitting the correct keys on the keyboard and not spell checking. I think they are trying to be funny because I am a scientist (and I didn't do research about the play I bought tickets to) and am atheist (who is offended by being associated by the devil). I don't do a lot of research when I go to Kennedy Center because I trust them to screen the shows on their stages.

The claim that you should not be offended when religious people associate you with the devil (because you don't believe in devil anyway) is a jewel of religious "critical thinking." A few centuries ago they used to torture "heretics" and burn them alive. Now they think you should be fine with their trash talk because they don't kill you anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

Maybe you need to put more critical thinking into why that bothers you. If you’re an atheist the devil doesn’t exist and neither does God. Why are you bothered to be called something that doesn’t exist to you?

When religious people associate you with the Devil, they don't really mean something good. This association is clearly meant as an insult rather than a friendly association. Should the atheists feel warm inside just because they don't believe in Devil? This line of argument is absolutely ridiculous. Just as ridiculous as a religious person preaching about critical thinking.

It's within their First Amendment rights to insult you. You don't need to listen. Second, it's ludicrous to suggest that religion requires the complete abdication of critical thinking.

I like how you carefully qualified the abdication of critical thinking. Which means that we agree on the fact that there is some abdication of critical thinking involved.

There is something else that I find surprising about your post. You defend the limited capability for critical thinking of the religious people, but you don't judge the critical thinking involved in the post claiming that atheists should not be offended by being associated with the Devil. Would you consider this claim as a fine attempt at critical thinking or just another abdication of critical thinking?

I don't believe being religious prevents one from thinking critically. Newton was a noted theologian and you must admit a fairly impressive critical thinker. I would hardly call his ability limited. His belief in God doesn't diminish his work. Should you be offended by someone else's opinion of you? I don't know. Are they someone whose opinion you should care about? Was their opinion specifically targeted at you or just atheists in general? I am not personally offended by slights at my profession. People need my profession whether they realize it or not.

In short, be a duck, not a sponge.

There are always exceptions to rules. Not every typical religious person is Newton.
And if you think that you cannot be affected by the lack of critical thinking of religious people, just wait until Trump is back into the White House.

What does Trump have to do with this? Are you suggesting Trump worships something other than money?

I find it difficult to believe you are a scientist. The exception explicitly disproves your hypothesis that no religious person can apply critical thinking. As far as "exceptions," the list of notable physicists, mathematicians, and engineers that hold religious beliefs is hardly short. So, do some religious people reject critical thinking? Sure. That doesn't mean they don't have First Amendment rights. Do they have a right to offend you? Yes, that's freedom of speech.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

Maybe you need to put more critical thinking into why that bothers you. If you’re an atheist the devil doesn’t exist and neither does God. Why are you bothered to be called something that doesn’t exist to you?

When religious people associate you with the Devil, they don't really mean something good. This association is clearly meant as an insult rather than a friendly association. Should the atheists feel warm inside just because they don't believe in Devil? This line of argument is absolutely ridiculous. Just as ridiculous as a religious person preaching about critical thinking.

It's within their First Amendment rights to insult you. You don't need to listen. Second, it's ludicrous to suggest that religion requires the complete abdication of critical thinking.

I like how you carefully qualified the abdication of critical thinking. Which means that we agree on the fact that there is some abdication of critical thinking involved.

There is something else that I find surprising about your post. You defend the limited capability for critical thinking of the religious people, but you don't judge the critical thinking involved in the post claiming that atheists should not be offended by being associated with the Devil. Would you consider this claim as a fine attempt at critical thinking or just another abdication of critical thinking?

I don't believe being religious prevents one from thinking critically. Newton was a noted theologian and you must admit a fairly impressive critical thinker. I would hardly call his ability limited. His belief in God doesn't diminish his work. Should you be offended by someone else's opinion of you? I don't know. Are they someone whose opinion you should care about? Was their opinion specifically targeted at you or just atheists in general? I am not personally offended by slights at my profession. People need my profession whether they realize it or not.

In short, be a duck, not a sponge.

There are always exceptions to rules. Not every typical religious person is Newton.
And if you think that you cannot be affected by the lack of critical thinking of religious people, just wait until Trump is back into the White House.

What does Trump have to do with this? Are you suggesting Trump worships something other than money?

I find it difficult to believe you are a scientist. The exception explicitly disproves your hypothesis that no religious person can apply critical thinking. As far as "exceptions," the list of notable physicists, mathematicians, and engineers that hold religious beliefs is hardly short. So, do some religious people reject critical thinking? Sure. That doesn't mean they don't have First Amendment rights. Do they have a right to offend you? Yes, that's freedom of speech.

Maybe your love of First Amendment will eventually convince you that I also have the right to free speech. I choose to use my right to raise awareness about their deceitful practices. Would you allow that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

Maybe you need to put more critical thinking into why that bothers you. If you’re an atheist the devil doesn’t exist and neither does God. Why are you bothered to be called something that doesn’t exist to you?

When religious people associate you with the Devil, they don't really mean something good. This association is clearly meant as an insult rather than a friendly association. Should the atheists feel warm inside just because they don't believe in Devil? This line of argument is absolutely ridiculous. Just as ridiculous as a religious person preaching about critical thinking.

It's within their First Amendment rights to insult you. You don't need to listen. Second, it's ludicrous to suggest that religion requires the complete abdication of critical thinking.

I like how you carefully qualified the abdication of critical thinking. Which means that we agree on the fact that there is some abdication of critical thinking involved.

There is something else that I find surprising about your post. You defend the limited capability for critical thinking of the religious people, but you don't judge the critical thinking involved in the post claiming that atheists should not be offended by being associated with the Devil. Would you consider this claim as a fine attempt at critical thinking or just another abdication of critical thinking?

I don't believe being religious prevents one from thinking critically. Newton was a noted theologian and you must admit a fairly impressive critical thinker. I would hardly call his ability limited. His belief in God doesn't diminish his work. Should you be offended by someone else's opinion of you? I don't know. Are they someone whose opinion you should care about? Was their opinion specifically targeted at you or just atheists in general? I am not personally offended by slights at my profession. People need my profession whether they realize it or not.

In short, be a duck, not a sponge.

There are always exceptions to rules. Not every typical religious person is Newton.
And if you think that you cannot be affected by the lack of critical thinking of religious people, just wait until Trump is back into the White House.

What does Trump have to do with this? Are you suggesting Trump worships something other than money?

I find it difficult to believe you are a scientist. The exception explicitly disproves your hypothesis that no religious person can apply critical thinking. As far as "exceptions," the list of notable physicists, mathematicians, and engineers that hold religious beliefs is hardly short. So, do some religious people reject critical thinking? Sure. That doesn't mean they don't have First Amendment rights. Do they have a right to offend you? Yes, that's freedom of speech.

If you like to nitpick words, where did I say that no religious person can apply critical thinking? A lot of early science was done by clergymen. It's a known fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

Maybe you need to put more critical thinking into why that bothers you. If you’re an atheist the devil doesn’t exist and neither does God. Why are you bothered to be called something that doesn’t exist to you?

When religious people associate you with the Devil, they don't really mean something good. This association is clearly meant as an insult rather than a friendly association. Should the atheists feel warm inside just because they don't believe in Devil? This line of argument is absolutely ridiculous. Just as ridiculous as a religious person preaching about critical thinking.

It's within their First Amendment rights to insult you. You don't need to listen. Second, it's ludicrous to suggest that religion requires the complete abdication of critical thinking.

I like how you carefully qualified the abdication of critical thinking. Which means that we agree on the fact that there is some abdication of critical thinking involved.

There is something else that I find surprising about your post. You defend the limited capability for critical thinking of the religious people, but you don't judge the critical thinking involved in the post claiming that atheists should not be offended by being associated with the Devil. Would you consider this claim as a fine attempt at critical thinking or just another abdication of critical thinking?

I don't believe being religious prevents one from thinking critically. Newton was a noted theologian and you must admit a fairly impressive critical thinker. I would hardly call his ability limited. His belief in God doesn't diminish his work. Should you be offended by someone else's opinion of you? I don't know. Are they someone whose opinion you should care about? Was their opinion specifically targeted at you or just atheists in general? I am not personally offended by slights at my profession. People need my profession whether they realize it or not.

In short, be a duck, not a sponge.

There are always exceptions to rules. Not every typical religious person is Newton.
And if you think that you cannot be affected by the lack of critical thinking of religious people, just wait until Trump is back into the White House.

What does Trump have to do with this? Are you suggesting Trump worships something other than money?

I find it difficult to believe you are a scientist. The exception explicitly disproves your hypothesis that no religious person can apply critical thinking. As far as "exceptions," the list of notable physicists, mathematicians, and engineers that hold religious beliefs is hardly short. So, do some religious people reject critical thinking? Sure. That doesn't mean they don't have First Amendment rights. Do they have a right to offend you? Yes, that's freedom of speech.

If you like to nitpick words, where did I say that no religious person can apply critical thinking? A lot of early science was done by clergymen. It's a known fact.

ridiculous as a religious person preaching about critical thinking

You seem to believe that they can't meaningfully speak about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

Maybe you need to put more critical thinking into why that bothers you. If you’re an atheist the devil doesn’t exist and neither does God. Why are you bothered to be called something that doesn’t exist to you?

When religious people associate you with the Devil, they don't really mean something good. This association is clearly meant as an insult rather than a friendly association. Should the atheists feel warm inside just because they don't believe in Devil? This line of argument is absolutely ridiculous. Just as ridiculous as a religious person preaching about critical thinking.

It's within their First Amendment rights to insult you. You don't need to listen. Second, it's ludicrous to suggest that religion requires the complete abdication of critical thinking.

I like how you carefully qualified the abdication of critical thinking. Which means that we agree on the fact that there is some abdication of critical thinking involved.

There is something else that I find surprising about your post. You defend the limited capability for critical thinking of the religious people, but you don't judge the critical thinking involved in the post claiming that atheists should not be offended by being associated with the Devil. Would you consider this claim as a fine attempt at critical thinking or just another abdication of critical thinking?

I don't believe being religious prevents one from thinking critically. Newton was a noted theologian and you must admit a fairly impressive critical thinker. I would hardly call his ability limited. His belief in God doesn't diminish his work. Should you be offended by someone else's opinion of you? I don't know. Are they someone whose opinion you should care about? Was their opinion specifically targeted at you or just atheists in general? I am not personally offended by slights at my profession. People need my profession whether they realize it or not.

In short, be a duck, not a sponge.

There are always exceptions to rules. Not every typical religious person is Newton.
And if you think that you cannot be affected by the lack of critical thinking of religious people, just wait until Trump is back into the White House.

What does Trump have to do with this? Are you suggesting Trump worships something other than money?

I find it difficult to believe you are a scientist. The exception explicitly disproves your hypothesis that no religious person can apply critical thinking. As far as "exceptions," the list of notable physicists, mathematicians, and engineers that hold religious beliefs is hardly short. So, do some religious people reject critical thinking? Sure. That doesn't mean they don't have First Amendment rights. Do they have a right to offend you? Yes, that's freedom of speech.

If you like to nitpick words, where did I say that no religious person can apply critical thinking? A lot of early science was done by clergymen. It's a known fact.

ridiculous as a religious person preaching about critical thinking

You seem to believe that they can't meaningfully speak about it.

DP. None on this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you don’t think the Kennedy Center should allow performances with a religious theme or you think that all shows that have a religious element should have a warning like - Atheists beware. Religious discussion contained in performance.

I never thought that I will ever hear on a Kennedy Center stage that atheism and evolution are devil's deceit. I have nothing against religious shows as long as they are advertised as such. I don't want to pay them to sit in the audience as they tell me that I am the tool of the devil.

Maybe you need to put more critical thinking into why that bothers you. If you’re an atheist the devil doesn’t exist and neither does God. Why are you bothered to be called something that doesn’t exist to you?

When religious people associate you with the Devil, they don't really mean something good. This association is clearly meant as an insult rather than a friendly association. Should the atheists feel warm inside just because they don't believe in Devil? This line of argument is absolutely ridiculous. Just as ridiculous as a religious person preaching about critical thinking.

It's within their First Amendment rights to insult you. You don't need to listen. Second, it's ludicrous to suggest that religion requires the complete abdication of critical thinking.

I like how you carefully qualified the abdication of critical thinking. Which means that we agree on the fact that there is some abdication of critical thinking involved.

There is something else that I find surprising about your post. You defend the limited capability for critical thinking of the religious people, but you don't judge the critical thinking involved in the post claiming that atheists should not be offended by being associated with the Devil. Would you consider this claim as a fine attempt at critical thinking or just another abdication of critical thinking?

I don't believe being religious prevents one from thinking critically. Newton was a noted theologian and you must admit a fairly impressive critical thinker. I would hardly call his ability limited. His belief in God doesn't diminish his work. Should you be offended by someone else's opinion of you? I don't know. Are they someone whose opinion you should care about? Was their opinion specifically targeted at you or just atheists in general? I am not personally offended by slights at my profession. People need my profession whether they realize it or not.

In short, be a duck, not a sponge.

There are always exceptions to rules. Not every typical religious person is Newton.
And if you think that you cannot be affected by the lack of critical thinking of religious people, just wait until Trump is back into the White House.

What does Trump have to do with this? Are you suggesting Trump worships something other than money?

I find it difficult to believe you are a scientist. The exception explicitly disproves your hypothesis that no religious person can apply critical thinking. As far as "exceptions," the list of notable physicists, mathematicians, and engineers that hold religious beliefs is hardly short. So, do some religious people reject critical thinking? Sure. That doesn't mean they don't have First Amendment rights. Do they have a right to offend you? Yes, that's freedom of speech.

If you like to nitpick words, where did I say that no religious person can apply critical thinking? A lot of early science was done by clergymen. It's a known fact.

ridiculous as a religious person preaching about critical thinking

You seem to believe that they can't meaningfully speak about it.

That comment was directed to the particular poster that I was talking to. I assumed I was talking to a religious person who wanted to convince me that critical thinking implies not to be offended when you are associated with imaginary beings. I later realized that some atheists use the same logic (so the poster might have been an atheist after all).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does the KC let these crazies use their theater?

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/stepping-into-the-uncanny-unsettling-world-of-shen-yun/amp

They paid to rent the space? Is there a problem with religious organizations renting performance venues?

There is a problem with a fundamentalist religious organization misrepresenting religious propaganda as a cultural experience. KC should properly advertise the show as a cult spewing science denialism.

I believe that's your view of the organization. Why don't you apply to work at the Kennedy Center?

Isn’t one of the pelosi daughters on the board? Maybe they like the diversity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you look at the “about” page on their website the depict religious paintings and then mention Falun Dafa which is a religious movement.

https://www.shenyunperformingarts.org/spirituality

I’m sorry you were disappointed but I’m not sure what you think you can do. They don’t hide the religious side of their performer from the audience.

Once you are in the audience, they don't hide the religious side. But they advertise the show as a Chinese cultural experience, not as a fundamental religious experience.

It’s not hidden on their website either.

“It’s the show the CCP doesn’t want you to see.”
That means we’ll be seeing it.

[Anonymous]

The Shen Yun website specifically references spirituality, specific Eastern religions, and the oppression of Falun Dafa due to their beliefs. Why would you assume this production should be completely secular? It's not the role of the Kennedy Center to censor or provide warnings about religious content, or any content with which you may not agree.