ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

If the rosters end up being primarily Union with a splash of Brave then yes, besides the 08 age group of course. Time will tell.

What makes the 08 group exempt from all of this?

Assuming PP means 08G Brave. They are the better team head to head with Union - stronger players. I think #4 or #3 in MA. But their roster is small and from what I hear everyone plays most if not all minutes. Might be a shock when they roll up on a 24 person roster.

They had a good season, but let’s not get carried away. At BRAVE, 3rd/4th in MA makes a team (internally) look like Brazil ‘70, but that doesn’t mean FVU keeps just about the entire BRAVE squad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is probably the same Arlington dad who hid in the trees last year to scout a Union ID session that his kid wasn't even at.

When my kids were younger, there was an Arlington coach that did this. Ratted kids out and a few got blackballed.

It was sick. Parents are paying $3-5k—they should routinely check for fit and see what’s out there.

If you are doing your job, you’d welcome competition and be confident your players will stay.

This is not unique to Arlington. All the coaches rat out any players to their current coaches.

It's usually other parents on your team that tell the coach if your kid is trying out or guesting at other clubs.

Of course, rats. They even lie about it. All to position their kid in a better place.

As a coach, if a parent were coming up to me to rat out other players---they'd be on 'my list'. Not in a good way.

The true irony is the rat parent think this helps them---but they are just as susceptible to being knifed in the back by the same Coach/Club.

There is zero loyalty in youth soccer. None. Don't for a second trust anyone. Play your cards close to your chest and always have back-up option.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clyde said the same thing. All Mclean girls will stay. Of course, he is always lying, but who knows....

Lindsey has been making promises too.

Who's Lindsey? C'mon man!? You can't put CW in the same sentence as this Lindsey person

[Anonymous]

LO is MV's puppet. Has been for years. She's spewing whatever she's being told.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is probably the same Arlington dad who hid in the trees last year to scout a Union ID session that his kid wasn't even at.

When my kids were younger, there was an Arlington coach that did this. Ratted kids out and a few got blackballed.

It was sick. Parents are paying $3-5k—they should routinely check for fit and see what’s out there.

If you are doing your job, you’d welcome competition and be confident your players will stay.

This is not unique to Arlington. All the coaches rat out any players to their current coaches.

It's usually other parents on your team that tell the coach if your kid is trying out or guesting at other clubs.

Of course, rats. They even lie about it. All to position their kid in a better place.

As a coach, if a parent were coming up to me to rat out other players---they'd be on 'my list'. Not in a good way.

The true irony is the rat parent think this helps them---but they are just as susceptible to being knifed in the back by the same Coach/Club.

There is zero loyalty in youth soccer. None. Don't for a second trust anyone. Play your cards close to your chest and always have back-up option.

You know someone will rat, so its stay in your car or corner of the field during games and B-line for the car at the end. The rats are out and they are hungry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

Nice try! McLean is 1/3 present in the equal partnership.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

Nice try! McLean is 1/3 present in the equal partnership.

This what I keep telling myself. I belong, 1/3 of this is mine, I sure hope they pick me.

-BRAVE players/parents and maybe even some coaches

We would have already picked you Fairfax County is not that big.

-NM (or any Union 3.0 coach)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clyde said the same thing. All Mclean girls will stay. Of course, he is always lying, but who knows....

Lindsey has been making promises too.

Clyde is a pathological liar. Please don't compare. L is a great coach and person.

[Anonymous]

139 pages! Anyone know what the record is for # of pages for a soccer forum post?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

If the rosters end up being primarily Union with a splash of Brave then yes, besides the 08 age group of course. Time will tell.

What makes the 08 group exempt from all of this?

Assuming PP means 08G Brave. They are the better team head to head with Union - stronger players. I think #4 or #3 in MA. But their roster is small and from what I hear everyone plays most if not all minutes. Might be a shock when they roll up on a 24 person roster.

They had a good season, but let’s not get carried away. At BRAVE, 3rd/4th in MA makes a team (internally) look like Brazil ‘70, but that doesn’t mean FVU keeps just about the entire BRAVE squad.

Do you think they will keep more of the Mclean/union squad? That makes no sense

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clyde said the same thing. All Mclean girls will stay. Of course, he is always lying, but who knows....

Lindsey has been making promises too.

Clyde is a pathological liar. Please don't compare. L is a great coach and person.

What did CW lie about before? I thought he was respected? He has two teams so if it is true please proviude detales.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clyde said the same thing. All Mclean girls will stay. Of course, he is always lying, but who knows....

Lindsey has been making promises too.

Who's Lindsey? C'mon man!? You can't put CW in the same sentence as this Lindsey person

1000000000000000000000000000%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:139 pages! Anyone know what the record is for # of pages for a soccer forum post?

I recall a NOVA thread years ago that got so big it had to be split in parts. Might have been 500+ pages. Admins weren't thrilled about it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is probably the same Arlington dad who hid in the trees last year to scout a Union ID session that his kid wasn't even at.

When my kids were younger, there was an Arlington coach that did this. Ratted kids out and a few got blackballed.

It was sick. Parents are paying $3-5k—they should routinely check for fit and see what’s out there.

If you are doing your job, you’d welcome competition and be confident your players will stay.

This is not unique to Arlington. All the coaches rat out any players to their current coaches.

It's usually other parents on your team that tell the coach if your kid is trying out or guesting at other clubs.

Of course, rats. They even lie about it. All to position their kid in a better place.

As a coach, if a parent were coming up to me to rat out other players---they'd be on 'my list'. Not in a good way.

The true irony is the rat parent think this helps them---but they are just as susceptible to being knifed in the back by the same Coach/Club.

There is zero loyalty in youth soccer. None. Don't for a second trust anyone. Play your cards close to your chest and always have back-up option.

You have been warned

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:139 pages! Anyone know what the record is for # of pages for a soccer forum post?

139
3 of value