ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

I think the coaching slates will tell you which teams will have a majority or close to on, from one club or the other at least on the girls side. No idea about the boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

I think the coaching slates will tell you which teams will have a majority or close to on, from one club or the other at least on the girls side. No idea about the boys.

It does? They list coaches from both clubs.

[Anonymous]

Hmm. check out those Union 08 boys...

[Anonymous]

Lots of lies being spread by boys side just because they know the boys are not ECNL level and are going to be RL or NCSL soon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

If the rosters end up being primarily Union with a splash of Brave then yes, besides the 08 age group of course. Time will tell.

What makes the 08 group exempt from all of this?

They’re better than the current Union team.

There are plenty of Brave 10s and 11s who could start on FVU, the question will be what they do.

Not sure on 12s, but without SYC, I believe Vienna’s squad is stronger than McLean’s.

Other than the 07/06 & 09 squads (current Union) and the 08 squad (current Brave), it should be a pretty equal mix. If SYC players head back to Springfield, that changes everything.

[Anonymous]

So does this mean that there are a couple of ecnl coaches relieved of their duties next year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mclean ECNL families got an email from Nadir basically saying that the girls program is separate from the poorly performing boys program and that Mclean girls families should stay with FXU.

Did he email BRYC and VYS families too?

Why is the Technical Director at GFR sending out emails like that to Mclean ECNL families...that seems wierd..I guess GFR does care about girls youth soccer just not at their own club

Getting real desperate. Parents seeing through the BS that is NM. How is he not in violation of conflict of interest. No other club would allow you to be TD of another club and coach in another. McLean is a joke. LW and CW gettting paid by NM to allow him to do whatever he wants. Someone nont should look into this.

[Anonymous]

Brave parents don't realize the mess they are getting into at McLean. NM is an abusive coach (just ask his players).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brave parents don't realize the mess they are getting into at McLean. NM is an abusive coach (just ask his players).

No room for that on this board. Tell him to his face instead of cowering behind your screen

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brave parents don't realize the mess they are getting into at McLean. NM is an abusive coach (just ask his players).

Either play ECNL or go to NCSL/ECNL RL....BRAVE parents lose every game by 10 goals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

If the rosters end up being primarily Union with a splash of Brave then yes, besides the 08 age group of course. Time will tell.

What makes the 08 group exempt from all of this?

They’re better than the current Union team.

There are plenty of Brave 10s and 11s who could start on FVU, the question will be what they do.

Not sure on 12s, but without SYC, I believe Vienna’s squad is stronger than McLean’s.

Plan for no SYC at 12's or 11's. The 10's were 3/4 SYC and they have had some defectors but this team is competitive so not all SYC is going back for GA. Mainly a ECNL vs GA decision for those '10 girls. So hopefully they make the best indiviual decision exclusive of leagues as that would be a silly way to make this call.

Other than the 07/06 & 09 squads (current Union) and the 08 squad (current Brave), it should be a pretty equal mix. If SYC players head back to Springfield, that changes everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

If the rosters end up being primarily Union with a splash of Brave then yes, besides the 08 age group of course. Time will tell.

What makes the 08 group exempt from all of this?

Assuming PP means 08G Brave. They are the better team head to head with Union - stronger players. I think #4 or #3 in MA. But their roster is small and from what I hear everyone plays most if not all minutes. Might be a shock when they roll up on a 24 person roster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

If the rosters end up being primarily Union with a splash of Brave then yes, besides the 08 age group of course. Time will tell.

What makes the 08 group exempt from all of this?

They’re better than the current Union team.

There are plenty of Brave 10s and 11s who could start on FVU, the question will be what they do.

Not sure on 12s, but without SYC, I believe Vienna’s squad is stronger than McLean’s.

Other than the 07/06 & 09 squads (current Union) and the 08 squad (current Brave), it should be a pretty equal mix. If SYC players head back to Springfield, that changes everything.

Forgetting that soccer isn't merit based.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically this is Mclean ECNL 2.0

All of this was a 'friendly' way of removing Brave from ECNL.

If the rosters end up being primarily Union with a splash of Brave then yes, besides the 08 age group of course. Time will tell.

What makes the 08 group exempt from all of this?

Assuming PP means 08G Brave. They are the better team head to head with Union - stronger players. I think #4 or #3 in MA. But their roster is small and from what I hear everyone plays most if not all minutes. Might be a shock when they roll up on a 24 person roster.

24... ha ha, more like 30.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clyde said the same thing. All Mclean girls will stay. Of course, he is always lying, but who knows....

Lindsey has been making promises too.