There are many studies indicating that the main driver of the decline in the # of US manufacturing jobs has been increases in productivity. China's impact has been relatively small. |
Obama had all the tools he needed to fix it, index it to inflation for example. Republicans don't do minimum wage, but Trump is doing tariffs. That is something which is not insignificant. If your argument is Democrats give us Minimum wage vs Trump giving us tariffs, well did Democrats really give us a decent minimum wage? I don't think so. Then what about everyone else that aren't in a Union and make more than a minimum wage. (Hint: I lost my job and ACA was horrible.) |
Sigh….. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/senate-republicans-block-obama-bid-to-hike-minimum-wage-idUSBREA3T0PX/ |
I am not sure what your bolded statement even means, but I am very qualified on this, and I understand Walmart’s business model REALLY well. To the point that I would be certified by just about any court of law as an expert on the matter. Walmart is 100% about competition, and any good retailer is whether they say it that way or not. The Walmart model is low prices and high volume but at modest margins. In order to get the modest margins, they are aggressive with their vendors on costing, and they aim to have among the lowest selling prices in their respective markets compared to others. Said another way, they COMPETE with others on price. Some companies have attempted to promote value outside of price to differentiate from Walmart, and Target did that successfully for a while, but competition is 100% the name of the game. |
And Democrats tried again under Biden. https://www.npr.org/2021/02/25/970637190/senate-cant-vote-on-15-minimum-wage-parliamentarian-rules |
Truly amazing how the right wing propaganda machine has convinced people to blame democrats for things republicans did |
It should be higher. I assume that is why you think it is a joke. The left continues to want to raise it, the GOP continues to want to eliminate it. What is your point? |
Its called BRICS and it already exists. They are solidifying it and figuring out how to further screw the US and Trump. |
DP...they lowered prices forcing other companies out of business, the same way Amazon did with books when it first started. |
They dems have been trying to raise it for decades. What are you even arguing here? |
So, given that federal minimum wage is practically impossible politically (see below in the timeline when Obama had a filibuster proof majority), why do you present it as an alternative to tariffs? It really doesn't exist as an alternative. Timeline of Obama’s Senate majority January 2009: Obama takes office with 58 Democratic Senators (including independents Bernie Sanders & Joe Lieberman, who caucused with Democrats). April 2009: Senator Arlen Specter switches from Republican to Democrat, bringing the caucus to 59. July 2009: After a long recount, Al Franken (D-MN) is finally seated, giving Democrats 60 votes — the number needed to overcome a Republican filibuster. ➡️ This was the only period in Obama’s presidency with a filibuster-proof majority. How long did it last? The true 60-vote supermajority lasted from July 2009 to January 2010 (about six months). It ended when Scott Brown (R-MA) won Ted Kennedy’s former seat in January 2010. After that, Democrats were back to 59 votes and could no longer reliably beat filibusters. Why not use that window for the minimum wage? Priorities were elsewhere Obama and Democratic leadership used most of their political capital on the Affordable Care Act (ACA/Obamacare), economic stimulus, and financial reforms after the 2008 crash. These were massive fights that consumed nearly all of Congress’s bandwidth. Intraparty differences Even with 60 Democrats, the caucus was not perfectly unified. Conservative/centrist Democrats (like Ben Nelson, Blanche Lincoln, and Joe Lieberman) often opposed progressive measures, especially those seen as “anti-business” during the fragile recovery. This meant a nominal 60-vote majority didn’t always translate into 60 reliable votes. Political calculation Some Democratic strategists worried that pushing a federal minimum wage increase while the economy was still in deep recession (2009–2010) would open them up to criticism that it would hurt hiring. Instead, Obama focused on minimum wage increases later in his presidency (2013–2014), but by then Republicans controlled the House and filibustered in the Senate. ✅ So technically, yes — Obama had a short period with a filibuster-proof majority. ❌ But practically, the combination of limited time, competing legislative priorities, and a split Democratic caucus meant a minimum wage hike never made it onto the must-pass agenda. |
DP, this could warrant a whole separate thread but that IS a form of competition. Is is it not? |
Context is important...what was happening economically for the first two years when Obama was on office? Do you think THAT was the time to raise minimum wages? |
It's better to run on what Democrats will do than what Republicans won't do. There be no will for minimum wages in the Democrat camp. |
It’s expanding binding recall Turkey being a pet of BRICS. Why didn’t Xi invite Brazil and south Africa |