EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Repeated nonsense. That's not even an interesting tidbit since it's exactly what her lawyer said.

But if Pitt wants it, doesn't that suggest there will be plenty of info about her alienation efforts?

In April, Pitt filed a motion requesting Jolie produce years worth of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), according to a legal filing obtained by CNN. The court granted Pitt’s motion in May and set a deadline for Jolie to submit the NDAs by mid-July, according to the order, obtained by CNN.

These NDAs have become the center of the Miraval case, which in itself has felt like “an extension of their divorce,” according to Jacobi-Parisi, who clarified that the Miraval case and the divorce are technically separate court actions.

Jacobi-Parisi added: “Under the Miraval court action, [the NDAs] can then bring up and dredge up all of the information that was probably sealed in their divorce.”

Her lawyer said it would open doors for them to call NDA's about the plane and abuse. He was right as many people have said it was going to backfire.

She’s already put this out there in excruciating detail. What’s left?

It's still heavily retracted and the other information about it will came out now. Including what the now adult kids said. Brad doesn't want things from the divorce to be unsealed. That's why his lawyers have said it's only a business dispute and family stuff/abuse shouldn't spill over. Expect this was never just a business dispute. It was always going to happen and the case, while different, is still an extension of the divorce as the lawyer also said in this article.

Will be interesting since her story has evolved quite a bit. First story he lunged at a kid, new story he choked one and hit another in the face. If he’s telling the truth, which I suspect, this will help him overall. Even if the kids’ testimony about his drunkenness and anger is out there.

First, she leaked the information about him having a physical altercation with Maddox. Her story has evolved over the years. Now he choked another kid and abused her and abused her before the plane incident. She is probably making up the details in relation to whatever legal wins he has.

Not having all the details doesn't mean it's evolved.

Wasn't it the unsealed FBI report that used the language "lunged at a child" with no mention of hitting? Yes, her story does seem to have evolved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Repeated nonsense. That's not even an interesting tidbit since it's exactly what her lawyer said.

But if Pitt wants it, doesn't that suggest there will be plenty of info about her alienation efforts?

In April, Pitt filed a motion requesting Jolie produce years worth of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), according to a legal filing obtained by CNN. The court granted Pitt’s motion in May and set a deadline for Jolie to submit the NDAs by mid-July, according to the order, obtained by CNN.

These NDAs have become the center of the Miraval case, which in itself has felt like “an extension of their divorce,” according to Jacobi-Parisi, who clarified that the Miraval case and the divorce are technically separate court actions.

Jacobi-Parisi added: “Under the Miraval court action, [the NDAs] can then bring up and dredge up all of the information that was probably sealed in their divorce.”

Her lawyer said it would open doors for them to call NDA's about the plane and abuse. He was right as many people have said it was going to backfire.

She’s already put this out there in excruciating detail. What’s left?

It's still heavily retracted and the other information about it will came out now. Including what the now adult kids said. Brad doesn't want things from the divorce to be unsealed. That's why his lawyers have said it's only a business dispute and family stuff/abuse shouldn't spill over. Expect this was never just a business dispute. It was always going to happen and the case, while different, is still an extension of the divorce as the lawyer also said in this article.

Will be interesting since her story has evolved quite a bit. First story he lunged at a kid, new story he choked one and hit another in the face. If he’s telling the truth, which I suspect, this will help him overall. Even if the kids’ testimony about his drunkenness and anger is out there.

First, she leaked the information about him having a physical altercation with Maddox. Her story has evolved over the years. Now he choked another kid and abused her and abused her before the plane incident. She is probably making up the details in relation to whatever legal wins he has.

Not having all the details doesn't mean it's evolved.

Wasn't it the unsealed FBI report that used the language "lunged at a child" with no mention of hitting? Yes, her story does seem to have evolved.

The FBI report has never been posted. Just bits and pieces have been revealed from outlets that have seen it. They purposefully didnt post everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Repeated nonsense. That's not even an interesting tidbit since it's exactly what her lawyer said.

But if Pitt wants it, doesn't that suggest there will be plenty of info about her alienation efforts?

In April, Pitt filed a motion requesting Jolie produce years worth of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), according to a legal filing obtained by CNN. The court granted Pitt’s motion in May and set a deadline for Jolie to submit the NDAs by mid-July, according to the order, obtained by CNN.

These NDAs have become the center of the Miraval case, which in itself has felt like “an extension of their divorce,” according to Jacobi-Parisi, who clarified that the Miraval case and the divorce are technically separate court actions.

Jacobi-Parisi added: “Under the Miraval court action, [the NDAs] can then bring up and dredge up all of the information that was probably sealed in their divorce.”

Her lawyer said it would open doors for them to call NDA's about the plane and abuse. He was right as many people have said it was going to backfire.

She’s already put this out there in excruciating detail. What’s left?

It's still heavily retracted and the other information about it will came out now. Including what the now adult kids said. Brad doesn't want things from the divorce to be unsealed. That's why his lawyers have said it's only a business dispute and family stuff/abuse shouldn't spill over. Expect this was never just a business dispute. It was always going to happen and the case, while different, is still an extension of the divorce as the lawyer also said in this article.

Will be interesting since her story has evolved quite a bit. First story he lunged at a kid, new story he choked one and hit another in the face. If he’s telling the truth, which I suspect, this will help him overall. Even if the kids’ testimony about his drunkenness and anger is out there.

First, she leaked the information about him having a physical altercation with Maddox. Her story has evolved over the years. Now he choked another kid and abused her and abused her before the plane incident. She is probably making up the details in relation to whatever legal wins he has.

Not having all the details doesn't mean it's evolved.

Wasn't it the unsealed FBI report that used the language "lunged at a child" with no mention of hitting? Yes, her story does seem to have evolved.

Correct. I believe the only redacted parts were the kids’ accounts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

Most of the public has decided she's a nut bag and he's the normal one. She's not changing any hearts or minds on this. It's been 8 years and no smoking gun or bombshells. Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

It doesn't matter. Both cases were interconnected and what is sealed will be unsealed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

It doesn't matter. Both cases were interconnected and what is sealed will be unsealed

There is zero interconnection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

It doesn't matter. Both cases were interconnected and what is sealed will be unsealed

There is zero interconnection.

If she didn't in fact pull out because of the NDA, that is correct. That's what the judge needs to determine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

It doesn't matter. Both cases were interconnected and what is sealed will be unsealed

There is zero interconnection.

If she didn't in fact pull out because of the NDA, that is correct. That's what the judge needs to determine.

She felt entitled to sell behind his back because she was outraged about the adverse custody ruling. My question has always been can she sell regardless of motivation, even if it is patently unfair to her business partner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

It doesn't matter. Both cases were interconnected and what is sealed will be unsealed

There is zero interconnection.

Not true. There is an interconnection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-ready-propose-girlfriend-113833386.html

I know this is from a trashy tabloid, but I hope this news is true. Marriage and a baby would be so good for Brad. He deserves happiness after the hell his crazy ex-wife has put him through for the past eight years.

He's 60, lol.

Plenty of celebs who are older are having children.

And that makes it right how exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Yeah, some of the outlets said the kids had journals collected too by the fbi. All of that is going to come out. It was always going to end this way.

The legal case is about the winery. It’s not about her abuse allegations. She is trying to distract and misdirect from her wrongful sale of the chateau.

She’s already released so much information about her allegations and she hasn’t managed to destroy his reputation or career. She can keep trying, but I don’t think most of the public cares about the details of their messy divorce. She’s like a broken record. At some point, you tune out.

It doesn't matter. Both cases were interconnected and what is sealed will be unsealed

There is zero interconnection.

Not true. There is an interconnection.

That's what she wants you to think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he’s smart he’ll never marry again

+1

Yeah, he’s now seen what a divorce is like with kids involved plus unequal wealth. With Jen A it was easy peasy, no kids and equal wealth so everything split neatly down the middle. He’ll never have that again, should just enjoy coupling up until it gets stale.

It will be interesting to see if he ever marries again. Probably only after being with a partner a good long time is my guess. He's a pretty romantic guy though. He gave Jolie incredible gifts when they were together, the Winston Churchill painting, custom-made desk, Chateau shares (ill-advised of course) and was very gushy with his previous partners. I could see him marrying again, down the road. Not any time soon though, given the trauma of the years-long raking over the coals by Jolie.

In most respects he seems to have treated Jolie like a queen. I find it puzzling that she could never muster any forgiveness toward him, especially once he got sober.

Jolie filed for divorce, not Pitt. He initially did not want the divorce. Jolie filed for and asked for full physical custody with visitation for Brad. He wanted joint physical custody and that's when the real battle began. As for the winery, Jolie submitted an email to the court that she wrote to Brad telling him she wanted to sell the winery because she did not want to be involved in an alcohol business because alcohol ruined the family. Brad was given first deebs but passed. He wanted to control her and force her to stay in business with him. His problem, not hers. He is the one prolonging this, not her.