EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-ready-propose-girlfriend-113833386.html

I know this is from a trashy tabloid, but I hope this news is true. Marriage and a baby would be so good for Brad. He deserves happiness after the hell his crazy ex-wife has put him through for the past eight years.

He's 60, lol.

Plenty of celebs who are older are having children.

And that makes it right how exactly?

There are no rules about what is right or wrong. Your judgment not withstanding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he’s smart he’ll never marry again

+1

Yeah, he’s now seen what a divorce is like with kids involved plus unequal wealth. With Jen A it was easy peasy, no kids and equal wealth so everything split neatly down the middle. He’ll never have that again, should just enjoy coupling up until it gets stale.

It will be interesting to see if he ever marries again. Probably only after being with a partner a good long time is my guess. He's a pretty romantic guy though. He gave Jolie incredible gifts when they were together, the Winston Churchill painting, custom-made desk, Chateau shares (ill-advised of course) and was very gushy with his previous partners. I could see him marrying again, down the road. Not any time soon though, given the trauma of the years-long raking over the coals by Jolie.

In most respects he seems to have treated Jolie like a queen. I find it puzzling that she could never muster any forgiveness toward him, especially once he got sober.

Jolie filed for divorce, not Pitt. He initially did not want the divorce. Jolie filed for and asked for full physical custody with visitation for Brad. He wanted joint physical custody and that's when the real battle began. As for the winery, Jolie submitted an email to the court that she wrote to Brad telling him she wanted to sell the winery because she did not want to be involved in an alcohol business because alcohol ruined the family. Brad was given first deebs but passed. He wanted to control her and force her to stay in business with him. His problem, not hers. He is the one prolonging this, not her.

This this. Not saying she's without fault at all but he's being weird about her. I thought it ever since james grey indirectly spilled Brad took over ad astra and added things he didnt approve because of what what happening in Brad's life. Then he's out here telling people they look like her at his permiere. He's weird. The pr stories with his gf? Also freaking weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he’s smart he’ll never marry again

+1

Yeah, he’s now seen what a divorce is like with kids involved plus unequal wealth. With Jen A it was easy peasy, no kids and equal wealth so everything split neatly down the middle. He’ll never have that again, should just enjoy coupling up until it gets stale.

It will be interesting to see if he ever marries again. Probably only after being with a partner a good long time is my guess. He's a pretty romantic guy though. He gave Jolie incredible gifts when they were together, the Winston Churchill painting, custom-made desk, Chateau shares (ill-advised of course) and was very gushy with his previous partners. I could see him marrying again, down the road. Not any time soon though, given the trauma of the years-long raking over the coals by Jolie.

In most respects he seems to have treated Jolie like a queen. I find it puzzling that she could never muster any forgiveness toward him, especially once he got sober.

Jolie filed for divorce, not Pitt. He initially did not want the divorce. Jolie filed for and asked for full physical custody with visitation for Brad. He wanted joint physical custody and that's when the real battle began. As for the winery, Jolie submitted an email to the court that she wrote to Brad telling him she wanted to sell the winery because she did not want to be involved in an alcohol business because alcohol ruined the family. Brad was given first deebs but passed. He wanted to control her and force her to stay in business with him. His problem, not hers. He is the one prolonging this, not her.

This this. Not saying she's without fault at all but he's being weird about her. I thought it ever since james grey indirectly spilled Brad took over ad astra and added things he didnt approve because of what what happening in Brad's life. Then he's out here telling people they look like her at his permiere. He's weird. The pr stories with his gf? Also freaking weird.

Fixed it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

This too! Brad could have asked for a new custody modification after the judge was removed. If a majority of the therapists thought joint custody would be beneficial for all the kids then he wouldn't have had a problem. Unless it truly wouldn't have been beneficial for all of them. Zahara for example would have been 16 in 2021. I said it before and will say it again. Battling over 17 year Pax was wrong and controlling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

C'mon now. Joint custody is the norm. He didn't want anything crazy, he wanted a modern divorce, not a 1970s style divorce. Asking for joint custody isn't shady or weird. It's what a parent who loves their children does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

... She didn't allow visitation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he’s smart he’ll never marry again

+1

Yeah, he’s now seen what a divorce is like with kids involved plus unequal wealth. With Jen A it was easy peasy, no kids and equal wealth so everything split neatly down the middle. He’ll never have that again, should just enjoy coupling up until it gets stale.

It will be interesting to see if he ever marries again. Probably only after being with a partner a good long time is my guess. He's a pretty romantic guy though. He gave Jolie incredible gifts when they were together, the Winston Churchill painting, custom-made desk, Chateau shares (ill-advised of course) and was very gushy with his previous partners. I could see him marrying again, down the road. Not any time soon though, given the trauma of the years-long raking over the coals by Jolie.

In most respects he seems to have treated Jolie like a queen. I find it puzzling that she could never muster any forgiveness toward him, especially once he got sober.

Jolie filed for divorce, not Pitt. He initially did not want the divorce. Jolie filed for and asked for full physical custody with visitation for Brad. He wanted joint physical custody and that's when the real battle began. As for the winery, Jolie submitted an email to the court that she wrote to Brad telling him she wanted to sell the winery because she did not want to be involved in an alcohol business because alcohol ruined the family. Brad was given first deebs but passed. He wanted to control her and force her to stay in business with him. His problem, not hers. He is the one prolonging this, not her.

Brad did not pass on buying Miraval. He wanted to buy her share, but Angelina cut off negotiations because she was already negotiating with Stoli (and signing an exclusivity agreement with them) behind Brad’s back. Brad found out by press release that he had a new business partner. He never wanted to be in business with the company Angelina sold to (he had turned them down as a buyer already), but that’s exactly the reason Angelina sold to them - to hurt Brad. I don’t know why she’s surprised that she’s being sued and everyone involved in the transaction is essentially suing everyone else. She should have thought that might be a possibility when she decided to make a secret sale.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

C'mon now. Joint custody is the norm. He didn't want anything crazy, he wanted a modern divorce, not a 1970s style divorce. Asking for joint custody isn't shady or weird. It's what a parent who loves their children does.

Pax at 17 years old should have had every right to decide not to voice that he didn't want to be around that abused him. That other Anon is right. Instead of agreeing to focus on the younger kids he wanted it his way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

Sure. Basically she liked the private judge just fine until the private judge gave Brad a normal custody agreement instead of the vindictive agreement she wanted. Which is what PP said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

The private judge officiated their wedding. Angelina never had a problem with him until she realized he was going to rule against her and in favor of Brad.

Not true. She asked for him to be removed before the trial ever started. He was notifying her of the cases he had taken with Brad but
suddenly stopped. He was wrong. And the timing of Brad asking for a new modification even made the appellate judges uncomfortable

Sure. Basically she liked the private judge just fine until the private judge gave Brad a normal custody agreement instead of the vindictive agreement she wanted. Which is what PP said.

She asked for the judge to be removed BEFORE the trial ever happened and before the judge gave any verdict so no that's completely wrong.