ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh Boy. Bodycam video was just released. The Left is NOT gonna like this.

Beyotch tried to run him over. Clear as day.

Just saw it. Clear as day. 100% legit shooting. Glad it's out there. IDGAF if they accept it or not. It's indisputable. Will be interesting to see how long they try and say black is white and water is dry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This appears to be the body cam from Ross. Note I said "appears".

I am 61 years old and not the heroic type. I can say that had I been in his shoes I would NOT have been in fear of my life or the lives of others.

In the BBC’s slow-motion analysis from a different angle, the journalist states from the first discharge to the last spanned a time period of:

“naught point seven seconds.”

It’s posted right on BBC for anyone to see.

The critical moment here spanned:

0.7 seconds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh Boy. Bodycam video was just released. The Left is NOT gonna like this.

Beyotch tried to run him over. Clear as day.

Just saw it. Clear as day. 100% legit shooting. Glad it's out there. IDGAF if they accept it or not. It's indisputable. Will be interesting to see how long they try and say black is white and water is dry.

Can you explain? At what point does the justified shooting happen exactly?

[Anonymous]

He was a hardcore Trump supporter a Gadsden flag bootlicking hypocrite, how surprising.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15447739/ICE-shooter-Filipina-wife-father-Minneapolis.html?media_id=3806378314257485077_63267679733&media_author_id=63267679733&ranking_info_token=GCA2YWI5MjI4YzEyYTU0Mjg5OGUxYTg5YWUyZDA0ZTgzNCX2tbwFFZADFsauipYNGBMzODA2Mzc4MzE0MjU3NDg1MDc3KAN2bGwA&utm_source=ig_text_feed_timeline

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

The onus is ALWAYS on the driver in the U.S. in general and the law is on the books in Minnesota. He, on foot, can walk anywhere he wants, even stand in the middle of the street and motorists must yield. You cannot use a vehicle as a weapon to harm a human body, even if you’re upset/overwhelmed or feel righteously justified. If there is a physical confrontation or contact, the driver has very little, if any, defense. And, this is inconvenient for those who want to ignore it, as a federal agent, he has the right to move about the scene and order/make interlopers leave. Even if he says so “rudely”, as someone earlier whined. Even if “legal observers” don’t like his job or the agency he serves.

They told her to move, she moved.

The opportunity for her to safely move her car had passed. She failed to move it when she could safely do so. Once officers got out, approached her car, at were literally touching her car telling her to get out- multiple officers right next to her car- she could no longer safely maneuver her car and should have gotten out. I don’t even back out of parking spot if someone is within several feet of my car- for fear of accidentally hitting someone

You can hear them on the video telling her to move when they were next to the car.

They are very clearly telling her to get out of the car.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a nice video that gives a view of the front of the car. Sorry if this is old news.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/video/minnesota-shooting-ice-video-before-shooting-digvid

Why does he step in front of the car?? And why not get out of the way when she backs up, clearly intending to drive off?

The onus is ALWAYS on the driver in the U.S. in general and the law is on the books in Minnesota. He, on foot, can walk anywhere he wants, even stand in the middle of the street and motorists must yield. You cannot use a vehicle as a weapon to harm a human body, even if you’re upset/overwhelmed or feel righteously justified. If there is a physical confrontation or contact, the driver has very little, if any, defense. And, this is inconvenient for those who want to ignore it, as a federal agent, he has the right to move about the scene and order/make interlopers leave. Even if he says so “rudely”, as someone earlier whined. Even if “legal observers” don’t like his job or the agency he serves.

They told her to move, she moved.

The opportunity for her to safely move her car had passed. She failed to move it when she could safely do so. Once officers got out, approached her car, at were literally touching her car telling her to get out- multiple officers right next to her car- she could no longer safely maneuver her car and should have gotten out. I don’t even back out of parking spot if someone is within several feet of my car- for fear of accidentally hitting someone

You can hear them on the video telling her to move when they were next to the car.

They are very clearly telling her to get out of the car.

The wife seems like the crazy one here. You can hear Renee say “I’m not mad at you” to the ICE officer near her window and seems calmer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This appears to be the body cam from Ross. Note I said "appears".

I am 61 years old and not the heroic type. I can say that had I been in his shoes I would NOT have been in fear of my life or the lives of others.

If you compare the eyewitness video above, to the excellent analysis here by the BBC, it’s clear this was a lawful and legitimate use of deadly force by the police:

https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/ceqzj9932wjo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This appears to be the body cam from Ross. Note I said "appears".

I am 61 years old and not the heroic type. I can say that had I been in his shoes I would NOT have been in fear of my life or the lives of others.

This does appear to be from Officer Ross’s cellular phone-camera.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This appears to be the body cam from Ross. Note I said "appears".

I am 61 years old and not the heroic type. I can say that had I been in his shoes I would NOT have been in fear of my life or the lives of others.

This will be the video which exonerates Ross.

That’s certainly what he thinks since he sent it exclusively to a RWNJ “news” outlet.

[Anonymous]

Neighbors watching out for their neighborhood are now "radical" and "agitators."


Trumper nonsense

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo had an article with quotes from RG’s father. He said she ‘had a good life, but a hard life”. The article does not explain what was meant by this cryptic statement. Any ideas?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2026/01/08/renee-good-ice-who-is/

Maybe because her husband died. What do YOU think it means? Sounds like you’re dying to insinuate it’s something bad.

There is a subset of of criminolgy called victimology. It is not victim blaming. Per google response:

“Victimology is the scientific study of crime victims, exploring the causes, consequences, and patterns of victimization, including the victim's role, their relationship with offenders, interactions with the justice system, and societal responses like media portrayal and support services. It's an interdisciplinary field, drawing from criminology, psychology, sociology, and law, aiming to understand victims better, reduce victimization, and improve support through theories like victim precipitation and by analyzing factors like class, race, and gender. “



It’s relevant in this case, actually in all cases. It can be used as an educational tool to prevent similar victims.

It’s abundantly clear here Renee sought to make herself a victim in this instance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“ The officer did not have any choice here.”

He could’ve stepped out of the way.

So man things that he could have done. I look forward to hearing what his lawyer will say in court.

They also could’ve allowed the doctor to try to help her. Instead they said “I don’t care”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh Boy. Bodycam video was just released. The Left is NOT gonna like this.

Beyotch tried to run him over. Clear as day.

Just saw it. Clear as day. 100% legit shooting. Glad it's out there. IDGAF if they accept it or not. It's indisputable. Will be interesting to see how long they try and say black is white and water is dry.

Not clear as day. At no point in the video do you see the car making contact with the agent. And the wheels are clearly turned away from him.

And she is CLEARLY spinning the steering wheel right hand-over-hand to pull away. If he's watching her, that's painfully obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This appears to be the body cam from Ross. Note I said "appears".

I am 61 years old and not the heroic type. I can say that had I been in his shoes I would NOT have been in fear of my life or the lives of others.

I do not see how anyone could watch that and not clearly conclude she drove right at him and actually hit him. He was justified in deploying deadly force here.

Case closed.

WTF? Yes, case closed...he murdered her.

she was turning right. He was at the corner of her vehicle. He could've stepped out of the way, but he was VERY ready with his gun, fired multiple shots, and then called her a bit ch.

He also testified under oath in an earlier case that he knows ICE agents should step out of the way of moving vehicles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo had an article with quotes from RG’s father. He said she ‘had a good life, but a hard life”. The article does not explain what was meant by this cryptic statement. Any ideas?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2026/01/08/renee-good-ice-who-is/

Maybe because her husband died. What do YOU think it means? Sounds like you’re dying to insinuate it’s something bad.

There is a subset of of criminolgy called victimology. It is not victim blaming. Per google response:

“Victimology is the scientific study of crime victims, exploring the causes, consequences, and patterns of victimization, including the victim's role, their relationship with offenders, interactions with the justice system, and societal responses like media portrayal and support services. It's an interdisciplinary field, drawing from criminology, psychology, sociology, and law, aiming to understand victims better, reduce victimization, and improve support through theories like victim precipitation and by analyzing factors like class, race, and gender. “



It’s relevant in this case, actually in all cases. It can be used as an educational tool to prevent similar victims.

It’s abundantly clear here Renee sought to make herself a victim in this instance.

She was a victim of murder.