GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole stupid situation is shameful.

It's obvious that Trump is the criminal here. How is this getting turned around. No one is focusing on the real issues. Just some kind of stupid kangaroo court.

Of course it is. None of this makes Trump's criminality go away. This is entirely "shoot the messenger" circus.

[Anonymous]

LOL.
Fierce is not the word I would use to describe her.
Incompetent, unethical, arrogant, not terribly smart..... I could go on.

I think you probably have a problem with Black women in general. I worked with racists who often referred to Black female coworkers as arrogant and incompetent when I did not find that to be true.

She testified he wasn't her first choice to hire. Their relationship started months after he was hired, and it was over in a few months. He was already separated. She was unmarried. She paid him back in cash for plane tickets. I just did this myself to a friend, $1200 for plane tickets. It's kind of aggravating that everyone has different cash apps, and no one writes checks anymore. I often have large amounts of cash and I have a safe. I'm not avoiding taxes.

Does anyone think it's odd that the guy who could not come up with bail ($10k), is suddenly able to hire this large team of lawyers?

If Republicans are outraged about this, I'm sure they will be infuriated to find out that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was sold a $1 million RV for $250k and his loan was wiped out within a year. Also enraging is that his elderly mother lives rent free in a home renovated and owned by Harlan Crow. And Crow has had business before the Supreme Court.

Fanni Willis is going to prevail and Trump donors will have wasted more money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching three white attorneys grill two African Americans about their sex life and relationship sure felt like a lynching.

+1 Plus everyone knows that Wade had (I assume prostate) cancer, which doesn’t seem like it was public knowledge, and there will be lines outside Willis’s house of burglars trying to get that cash.

Not long after she began her prosecution against Trump her home address and other personal details were doxxed and she immediately started receiving threatening messages and had suspicious characters at her front door and following her everywhere she went. She testified to that along with having to relocate from her home to live out of a suitcase elsewhere. Along with being terrified for her family, especially her elderly father who didn't want to be uprooted from her house, with fears of people of ill will showing up at all hours compounded by her father's fear of being exposed to covid given his own poor health.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I know several people who do and they have legitimate businesses. You are the nitwit.

Legitimate businesses and mistresses? Do they carry their thousands of dollars in cash in duffel bags or backpacks?

Where do you get this "duffel bags and backpacks full of cash" bullshit? There is absolutely ZERO in introduced evidence or testimony to support this. Did she have a few k in cash at her home? Sure. And it was probably less than $10k based on the testimony she gave. And so what? Since when is that some kind of crime? I could name a dozen or more people who probably have more than that in their till or wallet at any given time, whether contractors going to buy materials or restauranteurs et cetera and those numbers will easily scale out to the millions nationally. If it's some kind of big crime then why aren't we focusing on the commercials to buy gold bullion that come on conservative talk radio literally every 5 minutes? And if you don't know what I'm talking about here then maybe you need to step away from this conversation completely because you are definitely and unequivocably clueless on the subject.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole stupid situation is shameful.

It's obvious that Trump is the criminal here. How is this getting turned around. No one is focusing on the real issues. Just some kind of stupid kangaroo court.

Of course it is. None of this makes Trump's criminality go away. This is entirely "shoot the messenger" circus.

I think this needs to be reiterated every 5 posts or so.

[Anonymous]

Wow this whole case is going to be thrown out because of the corrupt da

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow this whole case is going to be thrown out because of the corrupt da

Wow totally wrong take for anyone who's actually been following any of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole stupid situation is shameful.

It's obvious that Trump is the criminal here. How is this getting turned around. No one is focusing on the real issues. Just some kind of stupid kangaroo court.

Of course it is. None of this makes Trump's criminality go away. This is entirely "shoot the messenger" circus.

I think this needs to be reiterated every 5 posts or so.

+1 It’s the “investigate the investigators!!!” BS they always pull.

[Anonymous]

Fani was very entertaining yesterday. Signing those forms that she didn’t receive any gifts from prohibited sources such as one of the DA’s office contract employees and not understanding what gifts are was quite the act. Judge is giving her plenty of rope that she is using very effectively.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fani was very entertaining yesterday. Signing those forms that she didn’t receive any gifts from prohibited sources such as one of the DA’s office contract employees and not understanding what gifts are was quite the act. Judge is giving her plenty of rope that she is using very effectively.

What gifts did she receive? Going Dutch on vacation? Taking turns buying lunch? Those aren’t gifts, that’s paying her own way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fani was very entertaining yesterday. Signing those forms that she didn’t receive any gifts from prohibited sources such as one of the DA’s office contract employees and not understanding what gifts are was quite the act. Judge is giving her plenty of rope that she is using very effectively.

Yep.
And she has another day on the stand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Watching three white attorneys grill two African Americans about their sex life and relationship sure felt like a lynching.

You have to be kidding.

She brought this on herself by making bad decisions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching three white attorneys grill two African Americans about their sex life and relationship sure felt like a lynching.

You have to be kidding.

She brought this on herself by making bad decisions.

That joke sure went over your head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I know several people who do and they have legitimate businesses. You are the nitwit.

Legitimate businesses and mistresses? Do they carry their thousands of dollars in cash in duffel bags or backpacks?

Evidently, Nathan Wade is a fan of cash too. He testified that he has clients who pay his law firm in cash all the time.
Really?
And, these two are in charge of one of the most high profile cases ever.
This would be hilarious if it weren't so serious.

Is using cash illegal?

Trumpers don’t like cash because Trump doesn’t have any. 😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I know several people who do and they have legitimate businesses. You are the nitwit.

Legitimate businesses and mistresses? Do they carry their thousands of dollars in cash in duffel bags or backpacks?

Where do you get this "duffel bags and backpacks full of cash" bullshit? There is absolutely ZERO in introduced evidence or testimony to support this. Did she have a few k in cash at her home? Sure. And it was probably less than $10k based on the testimony she gave. And so what? Since when is that some kind of crime? I could name a dozen or more people who probably have more than that in their till or wallet at any given time, whether contractors going to buy materials or restauranteurs et cetera and those numbers will easily scale out to the millions nationally. If it's some kind of big crime then why aren't we focusing on the commercials to buy gold bullion that come on conservative talk radio literally every 5 minutes? And if you don't know what I'm talking about here then maybe you need to step away from this conversation completely because you are definitely and unequivocably clueless on the subject.

PP here. You've gone off on a rant. I didn't mean I thought she actually did. It was sarcasm.